Citations

Financial toxicity is a significant but often overlooked consequence of cancer for adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15–39 years old), who face limited savings, unstable employment, and insurance gaps that heighten financial stress. As part of a larger initiative to determine whether our cancer center can use an existing social drivers of health (SDOH) screening process to identify patients who may benefit from targeted supportive interventions, we sought to characterize financial strain, toxicity, and SDOH needs in AYAs treated in our cancer center and compare them to both younger and older cancer patients. This is a cross-sectional observational study at Mayo Clinic of patients with an oncology-related department visit between 8 September 2023–4 June 2024 (N = 81,731) who completed routine institutional electronic screenings for financial strain and SDOH. Survey items assessed financial strain, transportation barriers, and food insecurity; institutional billing data captured financial toxicity (unresolved balances, collection referrals, write-offs). AYAs (n = 5655) were more likely than non-AYAs to report medium/high financial strain, have unpaid debt, or have an unresolved balance, referral to a collection agency, or bad debt write-off, with nearly double the odds of medium/high financial strain compared to patients over 40 (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.84–2.23, p < 0.001). Within AYAs, ages 26–32 bore the greatest burden: 24.2% in the medium/high-risk category, 9.4% with unresolved billing issues or collections, and 11.6% reporting food insecurity. These findings identify AYAs—particularly those 26–32—as a distinct high-risk group for financial toxicity and health-related social needs, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, tailored financial navigation, and policy efforts to reduce economic barriers to care. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in mitigating financial toxicity, addressing health-related social needs, and improving patient outcomes in this population.

Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the most common cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYAs), a population with distinct biological, clinical, and developmental characteristics. Yet care remains fragmented between pediatric and adult systems contributing to variability in treatment exposure and survivorship outcomes. We synthesized current evidence on AYA HL epidemiology, biology, treatment strategies, supportive care needs, long-term toxicity risk, and survivorship. AYAs have access to multiple efficacious treatment options with high cure rates, but long-term survivors face significant medical, psychosocial, and financial effects with notable risks for cardiopulmonary disease, secondary malignancies, fertility impairment, and unmet psychosocial needs. Harmonized pediatric-adult treatment frameworks, AYA-focused support, and developmentally tailored survivorship care are essential to improving outcomes for AYA HL survivors.

Abstract Introduction Management of acute leukemia (AL) during pregnancy remains challenging. In the first trimester, chemotherapy is toxic to the fetus, while delaying treatment may endanger maternal health, often prompting recommendations for pregnancy termination. In later trimesters, although the risk of congenital malformations decreases, complications such as preterm labor remain prevalent. Delivery prior to chemotherapy may be considered in advanced gestation. This study aimed to describe maternal and fetal outcomes of patients diagnosed with AL during pregnancy. Methods Following institutional review board approval, we retrospectively identified pregnant patients diagnosed with AL between 1995 and 2025 across Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida). We recorded leukemia subtype, treatment course, maternal and fetal outcomes. Results We identified 18 patients diagnosed with AL during pregnancy, including 11 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 7 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Ten were diagnosed in the first trimester, 3 in the second, and 5 in the third. In the AML group (n=11; median age 30 years, range 18-42), one patient had acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). ELN 2022 risk stratification was favorable in 5 (45%), intermediate in 4 (36%), and adverse in 2 (18%). In the ALL group (n=7; median age 23 years, range 19-34), 5 had B-ALL (one Philadelphia chromosome-positive) and 2 had T-ALL. All ALL cases were diagnosed in the first trimester. Among first-trimester AMLs, 2 of 3 had core-binding factor (CBF) AML. All eight patients diagnosed in the second and third trimesters had AML (1 APL, 2 CBF AML, 1 KMT2A-rearranged, 1 with DEK::NUP214 fusion, 1 complex karyotype including t(8;21), 2 with normal karyotype). Overall, 15 (83%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after initial induction. One patient had refractory disease and achieved partial remission after salvage, another had refractory disease and achieved CR after multiple lines of therapy, and a third achieved CR after FLAG-idarubicin and revumenib. Five patients received chemotherapy during pregnancy (3 in the first trimester, 1 in the second, 1 in the third); two of these resulted in live births. Among the 10 patients diagnosed in the first trimester, all underwent therapeutic or spontaneous abortion. Of the 3 second-trimester diagnoses, 2 underwent spontaneous or therapeutic abortion at 15 weeks. The third received 7+3 induction at 24 weeks for KMT2A-rearranged AML, followed by preterm delivery at 26 weeks and re-induction with FLAG-idarubicin plus revumenib, achieving CR. Among the 5 third trimester diagnoses, 4 delivered preterm infants (median gestational age 33 weeks) prior to chemotherapy. One patient received 7+3 at 29 weeks and delivered a viable preterm infant at 36 weeks. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 5 of 11 patients with AML (45%) and 3 of 7 patients with ALL (43%) died, mostly due to disease progression. Median overall survival was not reached in either group. Causes of death were as follows: 1 of AML, 1 of ALL, 3 of acute stem cell transplant (SCT) complications, 1 of chronic SCT complications, 1 of Hodgkin lymphoma, and 1 of pneumonia. Among patients diagnosed in the second and third trimesters (n=8, all with AML), 6 (75%) resulted in live births: 5 of 5 (100%) third-trimester diagnoses and 1 of 3 (33%) second-trimester diagnoses. All received intensive induction: 7+3 (n=5), 7+3 + ATRA (n=1), 7+3 + gilteritinib (n=1), and 7+3 + nilotinib (n=1). Of the second-trimester group, only one received induction prior to delivery; she later achieved CR with FLAG-ida and revumenib. Among the third-trimester group, one patient received chemotherapy prior to delivery and achieved CR followed by SCT. All but one of the 8 AML patients achieved CR after initial therapy. Conclusions Successful pregnancy outcomes were achieved in 75% of patients diagnosed with AML during the late second or third trimester. Notably, 5 (28%) of patients received chemotherapy during pregnancy. Larger, multi-institutional cohorts are warranted to further characterize the incidence and outcomes of AL in pregnancy.

Abstract Introduction: Sexual health is an important part of overall well-being for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). AYAs have unique sexual health needs as they navigate development, relationships, and identity formation. AYA patients may experience sexual dysfunction due to conditioning chemotherapy/radiation therapy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), changes in body image, mental health effects, relationship shifts, and the challenges of dating with a serious illness. We surveyed both pediatric and adult HCT providers at our institution to assess current practices of discussing sexual health needs with AYAs as well as barriers to these discussions in order to guide interventions to improve communication. Methods: Adult and pediatric HCT physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurse coordinators in the Mayo Clinic Rochester HCT program completed an online survey to understand their perspectives about addressing sexual health needs in AYA HCT survivors. This survey covered current practice patterns in discussing sexual health and managing sexual health needs, barriers to providing sexual health care, and recommendations for provider education. Results: This survey included responses from 25 HCT providers (35% response rate): 22 adult providers and 3 pediatric providers. The respondents comprised of 10 physicians (40%), 8 advanced practice providers (32%), and 7 nurses (28%). Most of the providers saw 6-10 AYA patients per month (48%), while others reported: 1-5 AYAs (36%), 11-15 AYAs (12%), and 16-20 AYAs (4%); no provider saw 21 or more. While all respondents felt sexual health was an important topic for AYA HCT patients, most (80%) also reported rarely (44%) or only sometimes (36%) discussing sexual health with AYA patients. Primary barriers included inadequate knowledge of resources for referrals (72%), insufficient training on this topic (60%), limited time for discussion (56%), discomfort discussing sexual health with AYAs (32%), and concern about patient discomfort (28%). When it came to screening for GVHD, 28% of respondents reported not regularly screening for genitourinary GVHD and 40% indicated feeling uncomfortable or very uncomfortable managing it. Frequently discussed topics included fertility (64%) and contraception (52%). Almost all respondents (96%) expressed interest in further education. Topics of interest included an overview of common sexual health issues in AYA HCT survivors (88%), medical management of sexual health concerns such as erectile dysfunction, low libido, and vaginal dryness (72%), management of psychosocial concerns impacting body image and relationships (64%), cultural considerations for addressing sexual health (56%), providing inclusive care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer or questioning (LGBTQ) AYAs (56%), genitourinary GVHD (56%), and safer sex practices during and after transplant (52%). Discussion: Although regular sexual health assessment in HCT survivors is recommended, most providers at our institution did not routinely discuss sexual health with AYAs. While genitourinary GVHD is an important HCT-specific sexual health topic, screening for this condition is not consistently performed. Providers were eager for further education and identified several topic areas for future educational interventions. Our data will aid in the development of an educational intervention for providers covering key sexual health issues in AYA HCT survivors, including medical and psychosocial management of sexual health concerns, as well as inclusive care for intercultural and LGBTQ AYAs, with the aim of improving frequency of sexual health discussions and provider confidence. Time constraints were identified as a key barrier, so patient-focused educational interventions that can occur outside of the clinical appointment may be an opportunity to deliver information and empower patients to raise specific concerns during their visits. In combination with healthcare provider-focused education, this may promote critical sexual health-related discussions during appointments.

Background: Financial toxicity (FT), or the negative impact of medical expenses experienced by patients, is a known adverse effect of cancer treatment that result in worse health outcomes for patients. However, there is limited literature investigating FT in lymphoma with even less data on predictors such as age, gender, and socioeconomic factors. As lymphoma treatment options expand, it is vital to understand the impact of these treatments on patients' financial well-being. We investigate FT through patient reported outcomes from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO), a large multi-institution prospective cohort study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed NHL were enrolled into the LEO cohort from 2015-2020. Clinical, pathology and treatment data were abstracted from medical records, and participants were offered self-administered surveys at enrollment and selected follow-up time points. Participants were included if they completed at least four of six survey questions on FT adapted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) within the first year after diagnosis. Questions focused on either material hardship (unable to cover costs; file for bankruptcy; borrow money; work extra job or hours) or psychological stress (worried about paying large medical bills). We evaluated FT as answering positively to any question (any vs none). Associations with FT were evaluated using chi-squared tests. All analyses were performed using R (v4.2.2). Results: 3202 patients completed at least four survey questions relating to FT. Mean age at diagnosis was 62 years (18-94), 56% were male, and majority identified as white (90%). Characteristics associated with FT are reported (p&lt;0.001). FT was more likely in younger patients: 18-25 years (64%, 30/47), 26-44 years (73%, 299/313), and 45-64 years (58%, 799/1375) as compared to those 65-79 years (36%, 459/1272) and ≥80 years (35%, 69/195). FT was highest in patients without a high school diploma (54%, 45/84), followed by patients with a high school diploma (52%, 209/402), and an associate's degree (57%, 358/627). It was lowest in patients with a bachelor's (45%, 224/296) or post-graduate degree (39.6%, 216/545). Higher FT was seen in those receiving disability income (65%, 47/72); whereas less FT was seen in retired patients (36%, 299/828). FT rates inversely correlated with income: 65% for income &lt; $21,000 (184/283), 61% for $21,000- $39,999 (224/370) and 60% for $40,000-$65,999 (293/491). Lower FT noted for income range of $66,000-$106,000 (47%, 323/681) or &gt; $106,000 (37%, 324/872). Patients separated from a partner (82.9%, 19/23) had the highest FT, followed by patients living with a partner (64%, 48/75), divorced (56%, 103/184), and never married (53.4%, 79/148). Patients who were married (47%, 793/1672) or widowed (41%, 60/146) reported the lowest FT. Higher FT was reported in DLBCL (55%, 631/1146), MCL (55%, 172/315), and TCL (53%, 119/226) when compared to FL (44%, 327/746), MZL (44%, 137/316), and other NHL (44%, 200/453). This is likely related to treatment as more FT was seen in patients who received an anthracycline and/or alkylator containing therapy (54%, 1066/1963) versus non-systemic (43%, 120/278) and observation (35%, 168/483). In multivariable analyses, FT strongly correlated with age at diagnosis, household income, and treatment type. The odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the most significant category within each variable are as follows: age per 1 year (0.96, [0.95-0.97]), income &gt; $106,000 vs &lt; $21,000 (0.28, [0.21-0.38]), and observation vs anthracycline and/or alkylator (0.56, [0.44-0.71]). Conclusion: Nearly 50% of patients with lymphoma experience FT, seen as material hardship and psychological stress, within the first year of diagnosis. Patients with a younger age (18-44), less education, and lower household income reported higher levels of FT; whereas those who were retired or married/widowed reported lower FT. Lymphoma subtypes that require more anthracycline and/or alkylator containing therapy imposed higher FT. Understanding these risk factors can help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from additional resources during lymphoma management.

e23554 Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a low-grade neoplasm arising from follicular dendritic cells. Its diagnosis is challenging due to its extreme rarity, and the optimal management remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of FDCS patients (pts) seen at Mayo Clinic, MN since 2018. Time to event analyses were done from the time of diagnosis. Results: Ten pts with FDCS were identified (Table). The median age was 60 years (range, 38-76) and 5 were males. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (30%) followed by constitutional symptoms, shortness of breath, and vision change. In 3 pts, the diagnosis was incidental. The 2 most common primary locations were abdomen/pelvis (50%) and mediastinum (30%). Six pts (60%) presented with advanced disease and 3 (30%) had Castleman’s disease. Most (60%) had advanced disease. Six pts had Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization and all tested negative. Seven pts had next generation sequencing and 5 (83%) had genetic alterations detected with CDKN2A/B alterations being most frequent (3 pts, all with advanced disease). The median follow up was 4.3 years (range, 0.2-13.3). In the 4 patients with localized disease, 3 underwent complete surgical excision resulting in complete remissions (CRs). The one who received radiation had a partial remission (PR). The median time to progression after 1st line treatment was 4 months (all with advanced disease). All 3 pts who died had advanced disease and 2 had CDKN2A/B alterations. Conclusions: In FDCS, localized diseases managed by surgical excision with or without radiation can achieve long term remissions. Advanced diseases generally do not respond to multimodality therapy including immunotherapy but can have disease stabilization with variable survival. CDKN2A/B mutations were common and potentially associated with a worse outcome. Better understanding of the impact of the FDCS mutational landscape on prognosis may provide novel approaches to therapy. [Table: see text]

Healthcare inequities are often attributed to large-scale structural barriers for access to medical care or patient-medical staff interactions. However, the role of the electronic medical record (EMR) in perpetuating hidden biases has been poorly characterized. This passive form of sharing implicit biases with unknown readers may have profound ripple effects asynchronous in place and time from the note writer. This study aims to illustrate racial imbalances in ad hominem patient characterizations as documented by medical staff, regardless of role, in a large metro healthcare system. The use of certain potentially stigmatizing language in emergency department (ED) and inpatient notes for hematology/oncology patients was investigated. Retrospective chart review of four hospitals within a university network in a major metro area between 1/1/2019 - 6/30/2021 was undertaken. Patients ≥22 years old were included with two primary hypotheses in mind: 1) Negative terms are used more frequently for underrepresented minorities, and 2) words with shock value (i.e. curse words) are used more often than more general descriptors of these terms (e.g. “cursing” or “profanity”). Nine positive and twelve negative terms were evaluated, based on the authors' observations of their use in the EMR in past encounters (Table 1). Some were personal descriptors in which the ED or inpatient note writer would be less likely than outpatient providers to have a full sense of outpatient care or social determinants of health (e.g. compliant). Others were behavioral descriptions (e.g. hostile) or words with minimal medical relevance (e.g. curse words). If multiple notes in an encounter included the same word(s), the encounter was only analyzed once for each word to avoid word count inflation, though re-occurrences for the same patient in subsequent encounters were counted. Authors' manual data review using natural language processing software confirmed appropriate use of terms. Generalized estimating equations were used for race-based comparisons to account for same-patient clustered encounters. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for self-reported demographic comparisons with White as the reference category. P≤0.05 was considered significant. A total of 1,059 encounters for 889 hematology/oncology patients were analyzed. Mean age was 61 years (standard deviation 16.7) and 49.4% were female. White race was reported for 80.2% of patients (72% system-wide prevalence during same timeframe) and Black for 11.4% (15.2% system-wide); all others were ≤4% so only White/Black comparisons were included. Positive terms were more prevalent than negative ones (n=535 vs 459). However, negative terms were found more often for Black individuals (OR 2.24, CI 1.41 - 3.56, P&lt;0.001), while the positive terms were less frequently documented in Black patients relative to White patients (OR 0.51, CI 0.33 - 0.77, P=0.001), and neither category was concordant with the overall patient racial demographics. Other significant racial differences existed for the terms “Argumentative”, “Disrespectful”, “Noncompliant”, and “Polite”, all discrepancies which favored White patients (Table 2). Specific curse words were documented nearly as often as “cursing”, “swearing”, or “profanity”, but no racial differences were observed. Some words in the initial search (“Brave”, “Courageous”, “Empathetic”, and “Ambitious”) were not found in hematology/oncology notes in this timeframe. EMR documentation in hospital-based hematology/oncology care demonstrated evidence of racial discrepancies in language that may carry stigma, positively or negatively. Importantly, many of these terms have questionable, if any, medical relevance. The use of stigmatizing terminology in the EMR may reflect implicit biases that extend past the direct patient encounter, passively and subconsciously prejudicing future care from other staff members. Time-saving heuristics and documentation shortcuts like copy-forwarding may further ossify healthcare inequities. This phenomenon is undoubtedly not limited to this hospital system or the hematology/oncology field, but quantitative real-world evidence has been scant. Improved awareness of stigmatizing language in documentation may be one step towards mitigating this contributor to unequal care for hematology/oncology providers and their patients.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency, content, dynamics, and patterns of cost conversations in academic medical oncology across tumor types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 529 audio recordings between May 3, 2012, to September 23, 2014, from a prospective three-site communication study in which patients at any stage of management for any solid tumor malignancy were seen in routine oncology appointments. Recordings were deidentified, transcribed, and flagged for any mention of cost. We coded encounters and used qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Financial issues were discussed in 151 (28%) of 529 recordings. Conversations lasted shorter than 2 minutes on average. Patients/caregivers raised a majority of discussions (106 of 151), and 40% of cost concerns raised by patients/caregivers were not verbally acknowledged by clinicians. Social service referrals were made only six times. Themes from content analysis were related to insurance eligibility/process, work insecurity, cost of drugs, cost used as tool to influence medical decision making, health care–specific costs, and basic needs. Financial concerns influenced oncology work processes via test or medication coverage denials, creating paperwork for clinicians, potentially influencing patient involvement in trials, and leading to medication self-rationing or similar behaviors. Typically, financial concerns were associated with negative emotions. CONCLUSION: Financial issues were raised in approximately one in four academic oncology visits. These brief conversations were usually initiated by patients/caregivers, went frequently unaddressed by clinicians, and seemed to influence medical decision making and work processes and contribute to distress. Themes identified shed light on the kinds of gaps that must be addressed to help patients with cancer cope with the rising cost of care.

Abstract Background Little is known about how complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is discussed in cancer care across varied settings in the U.S. Methods In two practices affiliated with one academic medical center in southern California (SoCal), and one in the upper Midwest (UM), we audio-recorded patient-clinician interactions in medical oncology outpatient practices. We counted the frequency and duration of CAM-related conversations. We coded recordings using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. We used chi-square tests for bivariate analysis of categorical variables and generalized linear models for continuous variables to examine associations between dialogue characteristics, practice setting, and population characteristics with the occurrence of CAM discussion in each setting followed by multivariate models adjusting for clinician clustering. Results Sixty-one clinicians and 529 patients participated. Sixty-two of 529 (12%) interactions included CAM discussions, with significantly more observed in the SoCal university practice than in the other settings. Visits that included CAM were on average 6 minutes longer, with CAM content lasting an average of 78 seconds. In bivariate tests of association, conversations containing CAM included more psychosocial statements from both clinicians and patients, higher patient-centeredness, more positive patient and clinician affect, and greater patient engagement. In a multivariable model including significant bivariate terms, conversations containing CAM were independently associated with higher patient-centeredness, slightly longer visits, and being at the SoCal university site. Conclusion The frequency of CAM-related discussion in oncology varied substantially across sites. Visits that included CAM discussion were longer and more patient centered. Implications for Practice The Institute of Medicine and the American Society of Clinical Oncology have called for more open discussions of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). But little is known about the role population characteristics and care contexts may play in the frequency and nature of those discussions. The present data characterizing actual conversations in practice complements a much larger literature based on patient and clinician self-report about CAM disclosure and use. It was found that CAM discussions in academic oncology visits varied significantly by practice context, that the majority were initiated by the patient, and that they may occur more when visit time exists for lifestyle, self-care, and psychosocial concerns.