Citations

Abstract Background Despite advances in diagnosis and management, the interstitial lung disease (ILD) lexicon is plagued by ambiguous and inconsistent terminology that complicates communication and impedes knowledge generation. The objective of this Fleischner Society Consensus Statement was to produce standardized terminology for ILD multidisciplinary diagnoses and major phenotypes. Methods Interviews with 10 experts were used to identify ILD clinical diagnoses and major phenotypes. The preferred terms for each entity and potential alternatives were identified, alongside the rationale for the preferred term. Entities with more than one potential term were the subject of an online modified Delphi survey posed to the 29 committee members, aiming to achieve consensus. Committee members rated their agreement with the initially preferred term—5 (strongly agree), 4 (agree), 3 (neutral/unsure), 2 (disagree), and 1 (strongly disagree)—with the option to provide additional comments. Median score ≥4 and interquartile range ≤1 were considered consensus agreement. Terms not reaching agreement were discussed by video conference, followed by an additional survey that incorporated feedback. Results From the 60 initial terms, there were two root terms that required upfront consensus before survey initiation (ILD and interstitial pneumonia) and another eight terms that had no alternative suggested by the committee or in the literature. Agreement was met by 47/50 terms (94%) in Round 1 of the survey. The three terms (6%) that did not reach agreement met agreement in Round 2. Conclusions This document provides standardized recommended terms for ILD multidisciplinary diagnoses and major phenotypes that will facilitate communication among clinicians, researchers, patients, and other stakeholders.

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectiveThe diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) often relies on the integration of various clinical, radiological, and histopathological data. Achieving high diagnostic accuracy in ILDs, particularly for distinguishing usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that combines computed tomography (CT) and histopathological images to improve the accuracy and consistency of UIP diagnosis.MethodsA dataset of CT and pathological images from 324 patients with ILD between 2009 and 2021 was collected. The CT component of the model was trained to identify 28 different radiological features. The pathological counterpart was developed in our previous study. A total of 114 samples were selected and used for testing the multimodal AI model. The performance of the multimodal AI was assessed through comparisons with expert pathologists and general pathologists.ResultsThe developed multimodal AI demonstrated a substantial improvement in distinguishing UIP from non‐UIP, achieving an AUC of 0.92. When applied by general pathologists, the diagnostic agreement rate improved significantly, with a post‐model κ score of 0.737 compared to 0.273 pre‐model integration. Additionally, the diagnostic consensus rate with expert pulmonary pathologists increased from κ scores of 0.278–0.53 to 0.474–0.602 post‐model integration. The model also increased diagnostic confidence among general pathologists.ConclusionCombining CT and histopathological images, the multimodal AI algorithm enhances pathologists' diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and confidence in identifying UIP, even in cases where specialised expertise is limited. image

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a distinctive interstitial pneumonia with upper lobe predominance that shows unique morphological features among idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). Affected patients have a variety of clinical presentations with heterogeneous clinical courses. Cluster analysis is a valuable tool for identifying distinct clinical phenotypes under heterogeneous conditions. This study aimed to identify the phenotypes of patients with idiopathic PPFE. Using cluster analysis, novel PPFE phenotypes were identified among subjects from our multicenter cohort, and outcomes were stratified according to phenotypic clusters. Among the subjects with baseline data (N = 84), four clusters were identified. Cluster 1 included younger male subjects with coexisting non-UIP-like patterns. Cluster 2 included elderly female nonsmokers with low body mass index (BMI). Cluster 3 included elderly male smokers with a coexisting IP-like pattern. Cluster 4 included younger male smokers without lower lobe lesions. Patients in cluster 3 had significantly worse survival outcomes than those in clusters 1, 2, and 4 (p < 0.001, p = 0.0041, and p = 0.0155, respectively). Among idiopathic PPFE patients, cluster analysis using baseline characteristics identified four distinct clinical phenotypes that might predict survival outcomes.

ABSTRACTBackground and objectivePneumothorax is a co‐morbidity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its incidence, risk factors and prognostic significance in IPF remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the incidence and prognostic significance of pneumothorax in patients with IPF, and to further investigate the risk factors for its onset.MethodsEighty‐four consecutive patients with IPF based on the consensus guideline were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records, pulmonary function tests and chest high‐resolution computed tomography images, and determined the incidence of pneumothorax. The prognostic significance of pneumothorax was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model analysis with time‐dependent covariates. We also assessed the cumulative incidence and the risk factors for pneumothorax.ResultsOf the 84 patients, 17 (20.2%) developed pneumothorax. The cumulative incidence of pneumothorax was 8.5%, 12.5% and 17.7% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that pneumothorax was significantly related to poor prognosis (hazards ratio, 2.99; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for sex, age and forced vital capacity (% predicted), revealed that pneumothorax was an independent predictor of poor outcome in IPF (hazards ratio, 2.85; P = 0.006). Lower BMI and the presence of extensive reticular abnormalities were significantly associated with developing pneumothorax.ConclusionThese results confirm that patients with IPF often develop pneumothorax during their clinical course and that the onset of pneumothorax predicts a poor outcome.

AbstractBackground and objectiveDespite significant recent progress in the understanding of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the early phase of the disease is still poorly understood. We studied patients with IPF without pulmonary function impairment in order to determine the clinical features, natural history and key findings for physiological progression.MethodsTwenty‐five patients without pulmonary function impairment were identified from among patients with previously diagnosed IPF who underwent surgical lung biopsies between January 1997 and December 2006 at our institutions. ‘Without pulmonary function impairment’ was defined as both forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) >80% predicted. Patients diagnosed with IPF through multidisciplinary discussion based on the new IPF guidelines were the subjects of this study.ResultsSixteen patients had a confirmed diagnosis of IPF. Eleven patients presented with chest X‐ray abnormality found during an annual health examination. Seven patients were asymptomatic. Eleven patients showed physiological disease progression (median time; 19.9 ± 12.3 months) defined by a decline of at least 10% in FVC or at least 15% in DLco. Univariate analysis revealed that both usual interstitial pneumonia pattern and extent of honeycombing on high‐resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were factors associated with disease progression (odds ratio 5.634, 95% confidence interval 1.364–23.278; odds ratio 2.371/5%, 95% confidence interval 1.042–5.395).ConclusionsIPF patients without pulmonary function impairment have a progressive but slow clinical course. The existence and extent of honeycombing on HRCT are predictive of disease progression.

Abstract Rationale Patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may have typical findings of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on computed tomography (CT) or nonspecific or atypical findings, including those often seen in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Objectives The aims of this study were to revisit the high-resolution CT findings of IPF and to clarify the correlation between the CT findings and mortality. Methods The study included 98 patients with a histologic diagnosis of UIP and a clinical diagnosis of IPF. Two observers evaluated the CT findings independently and classified each case into one of the following three categories: (1) definite UIP, (2) consistent with UIP, or (3) suggestive of alternative diagnosis. The correlation between the CT categories and mortality was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards regression models. Measurements and Main Results Thirty-three of the 98 CT scans were classified as definite UIP, 36 as consistent with UIP, 29 as suggestive of an alternative diagnosis. The mean survival was 45.7, 57.9, and 76.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival among the three categories (all P &gt; 0.05). Traction bronchiectasis and fibrosis scores were significant predictors of outcome (hazard ratios: 1.30 and 1.10, respectively; 95% confidence intervals: 1.18–14.2 and 1.03–1.19, respectively). Conclusions In patients with IPF and UIP pattern on the biopsy, the pattern of abnormality on thin-section CT, whether characteristic of UIP or suggestive of alternative diagnosis, does not influence prognosis. Prognosis is influenced by traction bronchiectasis and fibrosis scores.

Abstract The natural history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been characterized as a steady, predictable decline in lung function over time. Recent evidence suggests that some patients may experience a more precipitous course, with periods of relative stability followed by acute deteriorations in respiratory status. Many of these acute deteriorations are of unknown etiology and have been termed acute exacerbations of IPF. This perspective is the result of an international effort to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding acute exacerbations of IPF. Acute exacerbations of IPF are defined as acute, clinically significant deteriorations of unidentifiable cause in patients with underlying IPF. Proposed diagnostic criteria include subjective worsening over 30 days or less, new bilateral radiographic opacities, and the absence of infection or another identifiable etiology. The potential pathobiological roles of infection, disordered cell biology, coagulation, and genetics are discussed, and future research directions are proposed.