Citations

ABSTRACT Aim The supply of donor kidneys (living and deceased) has fallen far behind the need, while the number of patients with end stage kidney disease continues to rise, increasing their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Kidney transplant candidates frequently exhibit large artery calcification, a major contributor to cardiovascular death. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) and survival in patients awaiting kidney transplant. Methods We modified the coronary calcium scoring method (Modified Agatston Method) and applied it to quantify AAC. This retrospective study included all adult patients ( N = 4184) listed for kidney transplant from 2005 to 2023 who had undergone abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients were categorised into two groups: those who died while on the waiting list (DWL) and those who survived (SWL). Results Among 4184 candidates, 446 (10.7%) died while on the waiting list, and 3738 (89.3%) survived to transplant or study end. Patients in the DWL group had significantly higher AAC scores across all vascular sites. The median total AAC score was 3605.8 (IQR 780.1–9017.3) in the DWL group versus 940.1 (IQR 49.2–4915.0) in the SWL group. Each 1000‐point increase in total AAC was associated with a 5.1% increase in mortality risk (HR 1.051; p < 0.001). An AAC cutoff of > 1769 correlated with reduced 5‐year survival (45.4% vs. 77.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusion AAC scoring on non‐contrast abdominal CT represents a noninvasive biomarker of mortality in kidney transplant waitlist patients and may enhance risk stratification and personalised care.

Abstract Background Abdominal arterial calcification is a well-established predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in kidney failure. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), a common genetic cause of kidney failure, presents with a distinct vascular profile. However, the burden of abdominal arterial calcification in ADPKD remains inadequately characterized. Clarifying these differences may improve cardiovascular risk stratification and transplant timing. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 4088 adult patients listed for kidney transplant at three Mayo Clinic sites (2005–2024). Patients were categorized by kidney failure cause: ADPKD vs. non-ADPKD. Abdominal arterial calcification was quantified on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans using a modified Agatston scoring method. Propensity score matching (1:1) adjusted for age, sex, race, lipid levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, dialysis exposure, coronary artery disease, neurovascular disease, and smoking history, was performed. Abdominal arterial calcification scores were compared between matched groups, and subgroup analyses evaluated abdominal arterial calcification severity across dialysis durations in ADPKD patients. Results After matching, 309 patients with ADPKD were compared with 309 non-ADPKD chronic kidney disease (CKD) controls. Abdominal arterial calcification scores were significantly lower in the ADPKD group (median: 425.3; IQR: 0.0–2033.5) than in the non-ADPKD group (median: 1256.8; IQR: 96.5–5033.8). Among ADPKD patients, abdominal arterial calcification scores increased with dialysis duration (P &lt; .001). Conclusion ADPKD patients exhibit lower abdominal arterial calcification scores than their non-ADPKD counterparts after adjusting for clinical variables. Abdominal arterial calcification progression with dialysis highlights the importance of early transplant evaluation. This study introduces a novel adaptation of coronary calcium scoring software for quantifying abdominal calcification, offering a standardized approach to vascular risk assessment in kidney transplant candidates.

ABSTRACT Background Abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) is a common comorbidity in patients with end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) and a predictor of cardiovascular events post‐kidney transplant. However, prior studies lacked a standardized approach to evaluate AAC and its impact on post‐transplant outcomes. This study aimed to correlate AAC score values with post‐kidney transplant outcomes using a modified scoring system traditionally applied to coronary artery calcification. Methods This retrospective study included 14 339 adult patients listed for kidney transplant between 2002 and 2023 at three transplant centers. Among them, 3683 patients met the criteria of undergoing a kidney transplant and an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan pre‐transplant. We modified the coronary calcium score software by adjusting intake data points to quantify calcification in the abdominal aorta, common iliac, external iliac, and internal iliac arteries. Outcomes focused on post‐transplant mortality. Results In 3683 kidney transplant recipients, higher AAC scores were significantly associated with increased mortality. Each 1000‐unit increase in AAC score elevated hazard ratios (HRs) across arterial regions, including 1.116 for the aorta and 1.389 for the internal iliac (all p < 0.001). Adjusted analyses confirmed AAC as an independent risk factor for mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated lower survival with increasing AAC quartiles. Conclusions AAC, measured by a standardized score, is a significant mortality risk factor in kidney transplant recipients. Integrating AAC scores into pre‐transplant evaluations could enhance risk stratification and improve outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore interventions to reduce AAC and improve survival.

Objective: To address whether kidney transplant (KTx) candidates, ages 60+, should accept a high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidney and differences when considering a high (>85%) versus low (<85%) KDPI KTx. Background: To date, there is limited survival data to guide decision-making for patients aged ≥60 years who are faced with the choice of accepting a high KDPI kidney or remaining on the waitlist. Methods: Propensity-matched cohort study using data from United Network on Organ Sharing (2014–2021). Cox proportional hazard models and competing risk models allowed comparison of (1) patient survival on the waitlist or after KTx and (2) patient and graft survival after KTx for the second comparison between matched groups, stratified by age groups: 60 to 65, 66 to 70, and 71+. Results: Receiving a >85% KDPI kidney versus remaining on the waitlist was associated with reduced mortality [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80, P < 0.001] overall and across the 2 oldest age groups: 66 to 70 (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.73, P < 0.001) and 71+ (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44–0.83, P < 0.001). Those aged 60 to 65 did not experience a survival benefit (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.67–1.11, P = 0.259). Patients ages 60+ receiving a >85% or ≤85% KDPI kidney experience comparable survival rates. Conclusions: Our study revealed a survival advantage linked to receiving a lower-quality KTx than remaining on the waitlist in the overall sample and for those 66+. Graft failure and survival were independent of the organ quality.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsOne strategy to minimize the risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is to avoid an Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) mismatch through kidney paired donation. We aimed to estimate the incidence of PTLD in EBV‐negative kidney transplant recipients with EBV‐positive donors (D+/R−) and evaluate the excess risk of death following the occurrence of PTLD.MethodsWe included adult patients in OPTN database who underwent kidney transplants between 2012 and 2022. Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of EBV serostatus on the development of PTLD, and to assess mortality following PTLD diagnosis in D+/R− individuals.ResultsA total of 179 068 patients were included, with 92.8% in the R+, 6.4% in the D+/R−, and 0.8% in the D−/R− group. D+/R− exhibited a significantly higher risk of PTLD compared to R+ and D−/R− groups. D+/R− had a greater risk of PTLD when compared to D−/R− recipients (aHR: 3.82; p < 0.001). Among D+/R− recipients, those who developed PTLD had a significantly higher risk of mortality (aHR: 2.28; p < 0.001 in deceased donor kidney transplant [DDKT] and aHR: 5.22; p < 0.001 in living donor kidney transplant [LDKT]).ConclusionsD+/R− recipients have nearly a fourfold higher risk of PTLD compared to D−/R− recipients, suggesting that choosing an EBV D−/R− transplant could reduce the PTLD risk by about 73%. This data is crucial for counseling EBV‐negative patients considering kidney paired donation to avoid an EBV serostatus mismatch.

ABSTRACTUreteral stenosis is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation, causing significant morbidity and potential graft function impairment. Treatment options include conservative management, endourological procedures, surgical interventions and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN). While PCN effectively relieves obstruction, it comes with its own complications. This study evaluates the risk factors, incidence, complications and outcomes of PCN in this population.We conducted a retrospective case series analysis of 98 kidney transplant recipients who underwent PCN. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were collected and analysed to assess the incidence of complications and identify associated risk factors.Among the 98 recipients, the median age at transplant was 56 years, with 52% being male. The most common comorbidities included hypertension (75.5%) and diabetes mellitus (35.7%). Complications occurred in 38.8% of patients, with infections being the most frequent (74.4%), including urinary tract infections (28.9%) and pyelonephritis (22.4%). The primary organisms identified were gram‐negative bacteria (55.1%). Reconstructive surgery was required in 35.7% of cases and patient survival was 83.7% at follow‐up.In conclusion, PCN in kidney transplant recipients is associated with a high rate of complications, particularly infections. Effective management necessitates the identification and addressing of associated risk factors such as diabetes, elevated BMI and specific induction therapies. While PCN is vital for preserving graft function, further research should focus on refining clinical protocols and developing targeted preventive strategies for high‐risk patients.

ABSTRACTBackgroundAdenovirus (ADV) infection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplants. The incidence of ADV infection in kidney transplant (KT) is not well‐defined as ADV is often asymptomatic and not routinely checked.MethodsThis retrospective case‐series study included KT and simultaneous pancreas‐KT (SPKT) recipients from January 1, 2008, to January 31, 2024, across three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) with symptomatic adenovirus polymerase chain reaction cases. The primary outcomes were allograft function at various intervals post‐ADV infection, allograft, and patient survival.ResultsWe report one of the largest multi‐site case series regarding outcomes of ADV in KT with 17 patients. The median time to ADV infection was 30 weeks (5–74). Five patients (29%) developed disseminated infection. Nine patients (53%) of the entire cohort experienced graft loss within a median of 35 (4–168) weeks, with four (44%) of graft loss attributed to ADV. Nine patients (53%) developed rejections post‐ADV infection with a median of 4 (2–8) weeks after resolution. One patient died from acute hypoxic respiratory failure from ADV infection.ConclusionADV should be considered in KT/SPKT patients with renal dysfunction, hematuria, and with or without fever. Despite the low mortality rate, there is a significant risk of graft loss and rejection after ADV infection. It is crucial to screen for ADV and develop intervention strategies for treatment. Further multicenter studies are needed to better define, stage, and manage ADV infection. image