Citations

Clear

33 citation(s) found for "Hoog, J".

Shared and distinct molecular signatures of resistance to different endocrine therapies (Alliance A011106).
Holloway, Kimberly, Williams, Laterrica, Kim, Beom Jun, Sanati, Souzan , Fernandez-Martinez, Aranzazu, Fan, C C, Korchina, Viktoriya , Gibbs, Richard, Watson, Mark A., Partridge, Ann H., Zhang, B, Ellis, Matthew James, Carey, L, Perou, Charles, Ma, C X, Anurag, Meenakshi , Dou, Yongchao , Hoog, Jeremy , Holloway, Kimberly R. , Williams, Laterrica C. , Vij, Kiran R , Fernández-Martínez, Aranzazu , Suman, Vera J. , Partridge, Ann H. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Carey, Lisa A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 566-566

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.566 Get It

566 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) resistance (ETR) remains a primary challenge in ER+ breast cancer. Analyzing pretreatment tumor transcriptomes across trials with early response endpoints can reveal shared and specific ETR signatures. This study utilizes baseline RNA data from the Phase III ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106, NCT01953588; Anastrozole [A], Fulvestrant [F], or AF) and the ACOSOG Z1031B trial (NCT00824941) to identify predictors of early Ki67 response in postmenopausal ER+/HER2– patients. Methods: ETR was defined as week-4 on-treatment Ki67 >10%. Baseline gene expression from ALTERNATE was analyzed to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes (Wilcoxon test, P<0.05) and Hallmark pathways associated with ETR, both across and within individual treatment arms. Feature selection was performed using mixOmics. A Pan-Endocrine Therapy Signature (PETS) was developed by uniting DE genes identified across all three ALTERNATE arms and Z1031B. All statistical analyses were conducted in R (P<0.05). Results: Overall ETR rate in the ALTERNATE RNA-seq cohort (n=733) was 26%. ETR was associated with high Risk of Recurrence (ROR), Oncotype RS, and Mammaprint scores (calculated from RNA-seq data in research setting). In luminal tumors (n=649), ETR was linked to chr 3q13.33, 8q24.13, and 20q13.12 cytoband upregulation and 17q21, 18q23, 3p21.1, and 10q24.32 cytoband downregulation. ETR tumors showed T-cell, E2F target, and interferon-γ enrichment; sensitive tumors favored early estrogen response and muscle differentiation. At individual gene level, high MYBL2 , PIF1 , TROAP and with low HJURP predicted ETR across all samples (AUC>0.70). A deep learning model using all protein-coding genes achieved AUC 0.82 (training) and 0.79 (test) in predicting ETR. Cross-trial integration identified ETR-associated PETS, enriched for genomic instability. PETS performed comparably to established signatures and strongly correlated with MYBL2 signature (r=0.93). Top ETR predictors were MYBL2 , AURKB , and EME1 for Arm A and IL4I1 , TNFAIP6 , and ANLN for Arm AF. AF-resistant tumors were enriched for systemic lupus and RIG-I–like receptor signaling; sensitive tumors favored PI3K–AKT, EGFR TKI resistance, AMPK, and insulin signaling. Conclusions: Baseline transcriptomics identify shared and therapy-specific ETR markers. The 15-gene PETS defines a convergent resistance signature, performing similar to established signatures in predicting ETR and correlating with MYBL2. Enrichment of cell-cycle and immune pathways in resistant tumors may suggest patient stratification approach for alternative or combinatorial strategies to overcome early ETR in ER+ breast cancer. Acknowledgement: https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA1. Clinical trial information: NCT01953588 .
Abstract RF1-02: Surgical outcomes in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) -a randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) trial in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breas
Leitch, A. M., Dockter, Travis , Suman, VJ, Weiss, Anna, Unzeitig, G. W., Guenther, J., Sanati, S., Vij, K., Hoog, J., Caudle, A., Tiersten, Amy , Mita, M., Razaq, WA, Hieken, T. J., Rimawi, M. F., Ellis, M. J., Winer, E., Hunt, K. K., Partridge, A. H., Carey, L. A., Leitch, A. Marilyn , Unzeitig, Gary, Guenther, J. Michael, Sanati, Souzan , Hoog, J, Caudle, Abigail S. , Mita, M, Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Ellis, M. J., Winer, E. P., Partridge, Ann H.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: RF1-02-RF1-02

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf1-02 Get It

Abstract Background: While there are abundant data on the surgical management of BC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is less guidance regarding surgical management of BC after NET, particularly with respect to lymph node (LN) surgery. While pathologic complete response (pCR) is common with NAC, it is a rare event with NET. In this analysis we assess the surgeons’ approach in the context of NET. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F), or both for 6 mos. before surgery. The primary objective was to determine if neoadjuvant F or A+F increases the rate of pCR or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 &lt;2.7% residual disease over A alone. Breast surgery was per standard of care. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required to determine preoperative endocrine prognostic index PEPI score and residual cancer burden (RCB). Surgeons were required to indicate if the patient would be eligible for breast- conserving surgery (BCS) prior to NET. Patient accrual occurred from 2014-2018. The surgical outcomes are reported for the entire group. Results: Among the 3 treatment arms, 933 patients completed 6 cycles of NET. The clinical T stage at diagnosis was 73.6% T2, 22.6% T3and 3.8% T4. Initial tumor size was assessed by mammogram and ultrasound. Primary tumor histology was ductal in 64.8% and lobular in 25.4%.568 pts (60.9%) were clinically node negative (cN0), 36.2% cN1, 2.6% cN2 with 0.3% cN3. LNs were palpable in 25.2%. 383 had LN needle biopsy pre NET, of which 80.9% were positive. The surgeons’ initial impression of the patient’s eligibility for BCS was 74% while 0.6% were considered inoperable.75.5% of pts had post-NET imaging performed. Of those with tumor size recorded, 52.9% were T1 or not visible. Overall, 69.9% of the 933 patients had BCS. Of those 330 pts without post-NET imaging or who had post-NET imaging without a size noted, 64.8% underwent BCS. For pts undergoing BCS, 80.2% required only one surgery for margin clearance. Of the 690 pts deemed eligible for BCS pre NET, 79% had BCS. Of the 240 pts deemed ineligible for BCS pre-NET, 43.8% had BCS. Of the pre-NET cT2 tumors, 79% had BCS while only 45.5% of T3 tumors and 37.1% of T4 tumors had BCS. On surgical pathology, 474 (50.8%) pts were LN+ compared to pre-NET cN+ 39.1% and needle biopsy-proven 33.2%. For pts with pN0, 93.3% had SLNB alone. 6.7 % of pN0 had ALND alone or SLNB+ALND. For those with pN1-3 , 36.3% had SLN only; 37.3% SLN+ ALND; 26.4% ALND alone. Only 0.8% of the patients had no ALND or SLNB performed. Pts undergoing BCS were more likely to have SLNB alone for a +SLN compared to mastectomy pts (62.9% vs. 37.6%; chi-square p&lt;0.0001). For pts with pre-NET +LN on needle biopsy, only 26.8% underwent SLNB alone, while 37.4% underwent ALND alone. Of the 204 LN-positive pts having SLNB alone, 55.9% had only 1 + LN and 27% had only 2+ LNs. For pN+ pts who underwent SLNB +ALND, 42.1% had 1-2 + LNs. Conclusion: With NET, 69.9% of pts achieved BCS, including 43.8% deemed ineligible pre-NET. Given the low rate of pCR to NET, there should not be the expectation of pCR in +LNs. Based on the procedures performed in pts with +SLNs, it appears that surgeons were applying ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for pts having BCS, but were less likely to omit ALND for +LN in pts having mastectomy. The finding of only 1-2 +LNs in many of the LN+ pts suggests that omission of ALND may be a reasonable approach post-NET. Longer follow-up is required to assess local-regional recurrence. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: A. M. Leitch, T. Dockter, V. suman, A. Weiss, G. W. Unzeitig, J. Guenther, S. Sanati, K. Vij, J. Hoog, A. Caudle, A. Tiersten, M. Mita, W. Razaq, T. J. Hieken, Y. Wang, M. Rimawi, M. J. Ellis, E. Winer, K. K. Hunt, A. H. Partridge, L. A. Carey. Surgical outcomes in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) -a randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) trial in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF1-02.
Reaffirming the importance of nomenclature stability for Candida auris and its associated disease of candidiasis
Zhang, Sean X. , Hoog, Sybren G. de, Denning, David W. , Ahmed, Sarah , Alastruey-Izquierdo, Ana, Arendrup, Maiken Cavling, Borman, Andrew M. , Chen, Sharon, Chowdhary, Anuradha , Colgrove, Robert C. , Cornely, O., Filkins, Laura , Gangneux, Jean-Pierre, Gené, Josepa, Groll, A. H., Guillot, Jaques, HAASE, G., Jagielski, Tomasz , Kandemir, Hazal, Kidd, Sarah , Kwon-Chung, June, Mendoza, Leonel, Nguyen, M. Hong, Song, Yinggai , Stielow, J. Benjamin, Vilela, Raquel, Vitale, Roxana G. , Wengenack, Nancy L. , White, P. Lewis, Ostroski-Zeichner, Luis, Walsh, Thomas J., Alastruey‐Izquierdo, Ana , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Kandemir, Hazal , de Hoog, Sybren , Alastruey-Izquierdo, A , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Borman, Andrew , Filkins, Laura , Gené, Josepa , Groll, Andreas H , Halliday, Catriona , Hoenigl, Martin , Jagielski, Tomasz , Kandemir, Hazal , Kidd, Sarah E , Kus, Julianne V , Kwon-Chung, Kyung J , Lockhart, Shawn R. , Meis, Jacques F , Mendoza, Leonel , Nguyen, M Hong , Song, Yinggai , Vitale, Roxana G , Wengenack, Nancy L , White, Lewis , Walsh, Thomas J , Zhang, Sean X , Ahmed, Sarah A , Cornely, Oliver A. , Dufresne, Philippe J. , Gangneux, Jean‐Pierre , Groll, Andreas H. , Haase, Gerhard , Hawksworth, David L. , Hay, Roderick J. , Hoenigl, Martin , Hubka, Vít , Kus, Julianne V. , Kwon‐Chung, June , Meyer, Wieland , Sorrell, Tania Christine , Stielow, J. Benjamin , Vilela, Raquel, Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.01550-25 | PMID 41432443 Get It

Nomenclature for human and animal fungal pathogens and diseases: a proposal for standardized terminology
Walsh, Thomas J. , Ahmed, Sarah , Alastruey‐Izquierdo, Ana , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Borman, Andrew M. , Colgrove, Robert C. , Cornely, Oliver A. , Filkins, Laura , Groll, Andreas H. , Haase, Gerhard , Hubka, Vít , Kwon-Chung, June , Song, Yinggai , Vilela, Rachel, Vitale, Roxana G. , Wengenack, Nancy L. , de Hoog, Sybren , Walsh, Thomas J , Alastruey-Izquierdo, A , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Borman, Andrew , Filkins, Laura , Gené, Josepa , Groll, Andreas H , Hoenigl, Martin , Kidd, Sarah E , Kus, Julianne V , Kwon-Chung, Kyung J , Lockhart, Shawn R. , Meis, Jacques F , Mendoza, Leonel , Nguyen, M Hong , Vitale, Roxana G , Wengenack, Nancy L , White, Lewis , Zhang, Sean X , Cornely, Oliver A , Ahmed, Sarah A , Chen, Wen , Chowdhary, Anuradha , Denning, David W. , Dufresne, Philippe J. , Gangneux, Jean‐Pierre , Guillot, Jacques , Halliday, Catriona , Hawksworth, David L. , Hay, Roderick J. , Hoenigl, Martin , Jagielski, Tomasz , Kandemir, Hazal , Kidd, Sarah , Kus, Julianne V. , Kwon‐Chung, June , Meyer, Wieland , Song, Yinggai , Sorrell, Tania Christine , Stielow, J. Benjamin , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Zhang, Sean X.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | November 11, 2024 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.00937-24 | PMID 39526838 Get It

ABSTRACT Medically important pathogenic fungi invade vertebrate tissue and are considered primary when part of their nature life cycle is associated with an animal host and are usually able to infect immunocompetent hosts. Opportunistic fungal pathogens complete their life cycle in environmental habitats or occur as commensals within or on the vertebrate body, but under certain conditions can thrive upon infecting humans. The extent of host damage in opportunistic infections largely depends on the portal and modality of entry as well as on the host’s immune and metabolic status. Diseases caused by primary pathogens and common opportunists, causing the top approximately 80% of fungal diseases [D. W. Denning, Lancet Infect Dis, 24:e428–e438, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00692-8 ], tend to follow a predictive pattern, while those by occasional opportunists are more variable. For this reason, it is recommended that diseases caused by primary pathogens and the common opportunists are named after the etiologic agent, for example, histoplasmosis and aspergillosis, while this should not be done for occasional opportunists that should be named as [causative fungus] [clinical syndrome], for example, Alternaria alternata cutaneous infection. The addition of a descriptor that identifies the location or clinical type of infection is required, as the general name alone may cover widely different clinical syndromes, for example, “rhinocerebral mucormycosis.” A list of major recommended human and animal disease entities (nomenclature) is provided in alignment with their causative agents. Fungal disease names may encompass several genera of etiologic agents, consequently being less susceptible to taxonomic changes of the causative species, for example, mucormycosis covers numerous mucormycetous molds.
Reply to Kidd et al., “Inconsistencies within the proposed framework for stabilizing fungal nomenclature risk further confusion”
Walsh, Thomas J. , Ahmed, Sarah , Alastruey‐Izquierdo, Ana , Alexander, Barbara D. , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Babady, Esther , Balada-Llasat, Joan-Miquel, Borman, Andrew M. , Colgrove, Robert C. , Cornely, Oliver A. , Fuller, Jeff, Gibas, Connie Fe C., Glasgow, Heather, Groll, Andreas H. , Haase, Gerhard , Hanson, Kimberly E. , Harrington, Amanda, Hayden, Randall T. , Hubka, Vít , Johnson, Kristie, Li, Ruoyu , Lanternier, Fanny , Lee, Francesca , Luethy, Paul M. , Kwon‐Chung, Kyung J., Palavecino, Elizabeth , Pancholi, Preeti , Pappas, Peter G. , Procop, Gary W. , Rhoads, Daniel D. , Riedel, Stefan , Stevens, Bryan S. , Sullivan, Kaede Ota, Vergidis, Paschalis , Roilides, Emmanuel , Seyedmousavi, Amir, Tao, Lili , Vicente, Vânia Aparecida , Vitale, Roxana G. , Wengenack, Nancy L. , Westblade, Lars F. , White, Lewis, Wojewoda, Christina , Babady, N. Esther , Seyedmousavi, Seyedmojtaba , de Hoog, Sybren , Walsh, Thomas J , Alastruey-Izquierdo, A , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Borman, Andrew , Groll, Andreas H , Hanson, Kimberly , Hayden, Randall T , Hoenigl, Martin , Kus, Julianne V , Meis, Jacques F , Leal, Sixto M , Lockhart, Shawn R. , Kwon-Chung, Kyung J , Nguyen, M Hong , Palavecino, Elizabeth , Pancholi, Preeti , Rhoads, Daniel D , Riedel, Stefan , Vergidis, Paschalis , Roilides, Emmanuel , Wengenack, Nancy L , Wiederhold, Nathan , White, Lewis , Wojewoda, Christina M , Zhang, Sean X , Cornely, Oliver A , Ahmed, Sarah A , Luethy, Paul , Bai, Feng‐Yan , Chowdhary, Anuradha , Clark, Andrew, Dingle, Tanis C. , Dufresne, Philippe J. , Gangneux, Jean‐Pierre , Gräser, Yvonne , Guillot, Jacques , Hawksworth, David L. , Hoenigl, Martin , Kus, Julianne V. , Lackner, Michaela , Leal, Sixto M. , Martin, Isabella W. , Meyer, Wieland , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Redhead, Scott A. , Stevens, Bryan, Wang, Qiming , Wiederhold, Nathan P. , Zhang, Sean X.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | March 5, 2024 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.01625-23 | PMID 38441056 Get It

Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination
Cynthia, X. , Sanati, Souzan , Leitch, A. Marilyn , Unzeitig, Gary, Fernández-Martínez, Aranzazu , Fan, Cheng , Gibbs, Richard A. , Dockter, Travis , Hahn, Olwen, Guenther, Joseph M., Caudle, Abigail S. , Crouch, Erika C., Tiersten, Amy , Mita, Monica , Razaq, Wajeeha, Rimawi, Mothaffar F. , Weiss, Anna , Perou, Charles M. , Carey, Lisa A. , Dockter, Travis J, Carey, Lisa A , Perou, Charles M , Rimawi, Mothaffar , Fernandez-Martinez, Aranzazu , Suman, Vera J. , Vij, Kiran R , Anurag, Meenakshi , Hoog, Jeremy , Watson, Mark A. , Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Winer, Eric P. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Partridge, Ann H.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Oncology | January 18, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 362

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6038 | PMID 38236590 Get It

Importance Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or &amp;gt;66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023. Interventions Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression). Results Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], −90.4% [−95.2 to −81.9%] vs −76.7% [−89.0 to −55.6%]; P &amp;lt; .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588
A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC
Walsh, Thomas J. , Ahmed, Sarah , Alastruey‐Izquierdo, Ana , Alexander, Barbara D. , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Babady, Esther , Balada-Llasat, Joan-Miquel, Borman, Andrew M. , Colgrove, Robert C. , Cornely, Oliver A. , Fuller, Jeff, Gibas, Connie Fe C., Glasgow, Heather, Gräser, Yvonne , Groll, Andreas H. , Haase, Gerhard , Hanson, Kimberly E. , Harrington, Amanda, Hayden, Randall T. , Hubka, Vít , Johnson, Kristie, Li, Ruoyu , Lanternier, Fanny , Leal, Sixto M. , Lee, Francesca , Luethy, Paul M. , Kwon‐Chung, Kyung J., Palavecino, Elizabeth , Pancholi, Preeti , Pappas, Peter G. , Procop, Gary W. , Rhoads, Daniel D. , Riedel, Stefan , Stevens, Bryan S. , Sullivan, Kaede Ota, Vergidis, Paschalis , Roilides, Emmanuel , Seyedmousavi, Amir, Tao, Lili , Vicente, Vânia Aparecida , Vitale, Roxana G. , Wengenack, Nancy L. , Westblade, Lars F. , Wiederhold, Nathan P. , White, Lewis, Wojewoda, Christina , Babady, N. Esther , Seyedmousavi, Seyedmojtaba , de Hoog, Sybren , Walsh, Thomas J , Ahmed, Sarah A , Alastruey-Izquierdo, A , Arendrup, Maiken Cavling , Borman, Andrew , Groll, Andreas H , Hanson, Kimberly , Hayden, Randall T , Hoenigl, Martin , Kus, Julianne V , Meis, Jacques F , Leal, Sixto M , Lockhart, Shawn R. , Luethy, Paul , Kwon-Chung, Kyung J , Nguyen, M Hong , Pancholi, Preeti , Procop, Gary W , Rhoads, Daniel D , Riedel, Stefan , Vergidis, Paschalis , Vitale, Roxana G , Wengenack, Nancy L , White, Lewis , Wojewoda, Christina M , Zhang, Sean X , Cornely, Oliver A , Roilides, Emmanuel , Wiederhold, Nathan , Bai, Feng‐Yan , Chowdhary, Anuradha , Clark, Andrew, Dingle, Tanis C. , Dufresne, Philippe J. , Gangneux, Jean‐Pierre , Guillot, Jacques , Hawksworth, David L. , Hoenigl, Martin , Kus, Julianne V. , Lackner, Michaela , Martin, Isabella W. , Meyer, Wieland , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Redhead, Scott A. , Stevens, Bryan, Wang, Qiming , Zhang, Sean X.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | October 26, 2023 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.00873-23 | PMID 37882528 Get It

ABSTRACT The rapid pace of name changes of medically important fungi is creating challenges for clinical laboratories and clinicians involved in patient care. We describe two sources of name change which have different drivers, at the species versus the genus level. Some suggestions are made here to reduce the number of name changes. We urge taxonomists to provide diagnostic markers of taxonomic novelties. Given the instability of phylogenetic trees due to variable taxon sampling, we advocate to maintain genera at the largest possible size. Reporting of identified species in complexes or series should where possible comprise both the name of the overarching species and that of the molecular sibling, often cryptic species. Because the use of different names for the same species will be unavoidable for many years to come, an open access online database of the names of all medically important fungi, with proper nomenclatural designation and synonymy, is essential. We further recommend that while taxonomic discovery continues, the adaptation of new name changes by clinical laboratories and clinicians be reviewed routinely by a standing committee for validation and stability over time, with reference to an open access database, wherein reasons for changes are listed in a transparent way.
Abstract CT026: The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial
Fan, Cheng , Gibbs, Richard A. , Sanati, Souzan , Watson, Mark , Dockter, Travis , Hahn, Olwen, Guenther, Joseph M., Caudle, Abigail S. , Crouch, Erica M. , Tiersten, Amy , Mita, Monica , Razaq, Wajeeha, Leitch, A. Marilyn , Unzeitig, Gary, Winer, Eric, Weiss, Anna , Hunt, Kelly, Cynthia, X. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Anurag, Meenakshi , Hoog, Jeremy , Fernández-Martínez, Aranzazu , Vij, Kiran R , Watson, Mark, Crouch, Erica, Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Partridge, Ann H. , Perou, Charles M. , Suman, Vera J. , Carey, Lisa A.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: CT026-CT026

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct026 Get It

Abstract Introduction: The ALTERNATE trial randomized postmenopausal women with ER Allred 6-8 HER2- breast cancer to 6 months of NET with anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F) or the combination (A+F). Biopsies were taken preNET and after 4-weeks(wks). Patients with Ki67 values &gt;10% at 4-wks were offered triage to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with on-treatment Ki67 ≤ 10% who completed NET underwent surgery and Ki67 was reassessed. The primary endpoint was endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). ESD is defined as pCR or PEPI-0 residual disease (pT1-2, pN0, Ki67 ≤ 2.7%). We previously reported that the ESDR difference between the F-containing arms and the A arm was not &gt;10% (ASCO 2020) and that baseline RNA-seq-based intrinsic subtypes predicted outcomes overall (SABCS 2021). Herein we describe relationships between PAM50 intrinsic subtype and Ki67 values by treatment arm because comparative drug effectiveness in adjuvant endocrine therapy studies in ER+ HER2- breast cancer can be predicted by the degree of Ki67 suppression (PMC3518447). Methods: 743 of the 1297 eligible patients (A: 264; F: 231; A+F: 248) had RNA extracted from preNET frozen tumor biopsies with &gt;50% tumor content and subjected to RNA seq. Intrinsic subtypes were then assigned as LumA, LumB, and NonLum (Basal or HER2-E) using open-source PAM50-based informatics. Differences in the proportion with wk4 Ki67 &gt; 10%, % change in wk4 ki67, and surgical CCCA (Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) rate (sxCCCA) between treatments and by intrinsic subtype was assessed using stratified logistic regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher’s exact test, respectively. Analysis of sxCCCA excluded those who failed to complete NET for reasons other than disease progression or early Ki67 &gt;10%. Results: Amongst the 358 LumA cases there were no significant differences in Ki67-based endpoints between treatments. Among the 292 LumB cases, the wk4 ki67 &gt; 10% rate was lower with A+F (19.4%) than A (43%) (P=0.0002) and was somewhat lower in F (31%) versus A (P=0.076). The % change in wk4 Ki67 in LumB cases, adjusted for baseline Ki67, showed markedly superior suppression for A+F versus A (-90% vs. -77%; P=&lt;0.0001) and versus F (-90% vs. -80%; P=0.0026). Furthermore sxCCCA rates were significantly higher with A+F than A (53% vs. 25% P = &lt;0.0001) and somewhat higher for F (37%) than A (p=0.068), indicating that superior antiproliferative effects for A+F persist after 6 months on therapy. Lack of Ki67 suppression in response to treatment was observed in the majority of 43 NonLum samples regardless of treatment. Conclusion: The combination of A+F was significantly more effective than either drug alone for the control of LumB breast cancer cell proliferation. This suggests that A+F may be a more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy than A alone in LumB disease. The lower Ki67 suppression with A alone also suggests that poorer outcome in some LumB tumors may be due to insufficient ER targeting rather than ER-independent tumor growth Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50-CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01-CA214125, U24-CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: Matthew J. Ellis, Meenakshi Anurag, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Travis Dockter, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erica Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J. Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W. Unzeitig, Eric Winer, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Ann H. Partridge, Charles M. Perou, Vera Suman, Cynthia X. Ma, Lisa A. Carey. The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.
Abstract PD9-03: Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER
Cynthia, X. , Dockter, Travis , Fernández-Martínez, Aranzazu , Fan, Cheng , Gibbs, Richard A. , Sanati, Souzan , Watson, Mark , Hahn, Olwen, Guenther, Joseph M., Caudle, Abigail S. , Crouch, Erika C., Tiersten, Amy , Mita, Monica , Razaq, Wajeeha, Leitch, A. Marilyn , Unzeitig, Gary, Weiss, Anna , Fernandez-Martinez, Aranzazu , Anurag, Meenakshi , Hoog, Jeremy , Vij, Kiran R , Watson, Mark, Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Winer, Eric P. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Partridge, Ann H. , Carey, Lisa A. , Perou, Charles M. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Suman, Vera J.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD9-03-PD9-03

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd9-03 Get It

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers an opportunity to assess ET sensitivity for ER+ HER2- BC and potentially to tailor therapy. Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy after 2-4 weeks (wks) of NET identifies patients (pts) with intrinsic ET resistance; while pathologic complete response (pCR) and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index of 0 (mPEPI 0: pT1-2N0, Ki67 ≤2.7%) at surgery indicates sensitivity to ET. However, on-NET biopsy is not always acceptable or feasible and delays the ET sensitivity determination. PAM50 ROR score and intrinsic subtypes by tumor RNA profiling are prognostic in pts with early stage ER+ HER2- BC, and predict pCR rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (PMC2667820). We therefore hypothesized that PAM50 analysis on pre-NET biopsies could predict the likelihood of a) a high on-NET Ki67, b) mPEPI-0 or pCR at surgery and, c) pCR for pts triaged to NCT. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or both for 6 months before surgery. Research biopsy was required at pre-NET and wk 4, then optional at wk 12. Pts with Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy at wk 4 or 12 discontinued NET and were offered NCT. PAM50 intrinsic subtype and ROR-P values were generated from mRNA sequencing (RNASeq) analysis on pre-NET biopsies using open-source informatics (PMC7723687) and evaluated for prediction of on-NET Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12, pCR or mPEPI-0 post NET, and pCR post NCT. Results: 749 of 1,297 eligible trial pts were included in the analyses, after excluding 548 pts due to insufficient pre-NET tumor for RNASeq (n=511) or PAM50 normal subtype (n=37). Similar to the entire ALTERNATE population, the rate of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 was 24.4% (95% CI: 21.4-27.7%) and the rate of mPEPI-0/pCR post NET was 19.8% (95% CI: 17.0-22.8%). There were 393 (52.5%) Lum A, 302 (40.3%) Lum B, and 54 (7.2%) non-Lum (9 Basal, 45 HER2-E) BCs. These included 196 (26.2%) ROR-P low, 354 (47.3%) ROR-P medium and 199 (26.6%) ROR-P high BCs. Both the rates of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and mPEPI-0/pCR differed significantly with respect to PAM50 subtype or ROR-P category, such that Lum A or ROR-P low BCs were least likely to have a Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and most likely to achieve mPEPI-0/pCR (Table). 93 of 168 (55.4%) pts triaged to NCT had RNA-seq results, yielding 26 Lum A, 49 Lum B, 4 Basal and 14 HER2-E, with the pCR rates of 0%, 6.1%, 0%, and 21.4%, respectively. There were 10 ROR-P low, 39 medium, and 44 high tumors, with a pCR rate of 0%, 5.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that both baseline ROR-P and intrinsic subtype are predictive of early on-NET Ki67 &gt; 10% and mPEPI 0/pCR at surgery after NET. For pts triaged to NCT based on an early on-NET Ki67 &gt;10%, the HER2-E group had the highest pCR rate (20%) and no pCRs were observed in Lum A. These data may be useful for directing neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal pts with ER+ HER2- BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01 CA214125, U24CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588. Table 1.Rates of Ki67 &gt;10% and mPEPI-0/pCR post NET by PAM50 subtype and ROR-P categoryKi67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12mPEPI 0/pCR post NETPAM50 SubtypenYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLum A37251 (13.7%) 95% CI: 10.4-17.6%&lt;0.0001393104 (26.5%) 95%CI: 22.2-31.1%&lt;0.0001Lum B29394 (32.1%) 95% CI: 26.8-37.8%30243 (14.2%) 95%CI: 10.5-18.7%Non-luminal (Basal and HER2-E)5338 (71.7%) 95%CI: 57.6-83.2%541 (1.9%) 95%CI: 0.05-9.9%ROR-P CategorynYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLow18018 (10.0%) 95%CI: 6.0-15.3%&lt;0.000119660 (30.6%) 95%CI: 24.2-37.6%&lt;0.0001Intermediate34474 (21.5%) 95%CI: 17.3-26.2%35471 (20.1%) 95%CI: 16.0-24.6%High19491 (46.9%) 95%CI: 39.7-54.2%19917 (8.5%) 95%CI: 5.1-13.3% Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Meenakshi Anurag, Travis Dockter, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W Unzeitig, Anna Weiss, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Lisa A Carey, Charles M Perou, Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman. Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-03.
Abstract P2-13-01: Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant palbociclib, letrozole, and trastuzumab in patients with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (PALTAN)
Northfelt, Donald W. , Levine, Ellis , Yu, Tao , Summa, Tracy , Hammerschmidt, Trish, Guo, Zhanfang , Frith, Ashley , Weilbaecher, Katherine N. , Aft, Rebecca , Clifton, Katherine , Cynthia, X. , Ademuyiwa, Foluso O. , O’Connor, Tracey L. , Luo, Jingqin , Hoog, Jeremy , Laury, Marie L. , Opyrchal, Mateusz , Clifton, Katherine , Suresh, Rama , Bagegni, Nusayba , Hagemann, Ian S.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P2-13-01-P2-13-01

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-13-01 Get It

Abstract Background Patients (pts) with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (BC) are less likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade than pts with ER- HER2+ BC. Endocrine therapy (ET) plus trastuzumab is effective in advanced ER+ HER2+ BC, but pCR rate is low in the neoadjuvant setting. Inhibition of CDK4/6 and HER2 results in synergistic reduction in cell proliferation in preclinical studies. We therefore combined ET with CDK4/6 inhibition and trastuzumab in ER+ HER2+ BC as a chemotherapy-sparing regimen. Methods We evaluated the efficacy of palbociclib, letrozole, trastuzumab (PLT) in the neoadjuvant setting for pts with stages II or III ER+ HER2+ BC. Primary endpoint was pCR after 16 weeks of therapy. We assumed null of 15% pCR and pCR ≥ 30% warrants further investigation. To achieve 80% power at 1-sided 0.05 significance, 48 pts were to be enrolled. Evaluable population included pts who completed Cycle (C) 1 unless discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) prior to completing C1. All who received one dose on study were considered evaluable for toxicity. Biopsies were collected at baseline (BL), C1 day 15 (C1D15), and surgery for RNA sequencing and central Ki67 assessment, for PAM50 subtype distribution, complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: Ki67 ≤2.7%) at C1D15 and surgery, and treatment induced signaling changes. Results Accrual stopped early due to futility. 26 pts accrued were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. pCR (residual cancer burden- [RCB] 0) was 7.7% (95% CI 0.9 - 25.1%) and RCB 0/I was 38.5% (95% CI 20.2 - 59.4%). TEAEs (n= 337) were seen in all pts (71.5% grade [G] 1, 19.3% G2, 8.6% G3, 0.6% G4); the most common were leukopenia (7.7%), neutropenia (7.1%), anemia (5.9%). G3/4 TEAEs occurred in 19 pts (73.1%). Among the 19, incidence of G3/4 neutropenia was 50%, hypertension 26.9%, leucopenia 7.7%. TEAEs (hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, pulmonary edema) leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 1 pt. Two pts had at least one SAE. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Pt reported outcomes using NCI PRO-CTCAE revealed no differences in appetite, nausea, respiratory symptoms, edema, palpitations, rashes and dry skin, or concentration from BL to end of C4. Pts had worsening hair loss from BL to end of C4. Ki67 analysis indicated CCCA in 78% at C1D15, compared to 18% at surgery after only P had been discontinued approximately 4 weeks prior to surgery. RNA sequencing was performed on available biopsies collected at BL (N=16), C1D15 (N=5), and surgery (N=2) from 16 pts. Among 16 BL samples, PAM50 subtyping identified 5 (31.3%) basal-like, 2 (12.5%) HER2-E, 6 (37.5%) Lum B, and 3 (18.8%) normal. Subtype switching to Lum A at C1D15 (N=3, 1 each with HER2-E, Lum B, and normal at BL) or normal (N=2, 1 basal and 1 HER2-E at BL) was observed. 161 genes were differentially expressed (FDR p&lt;0.05); 145 downregulated and 16 upregulated comparing C1D15 to BL. MKI67, TK1, CCNB1, AURKB, PLK1 were among the downregulated genes, consistent with CCCA for majority of the samples at C1D15 by Ki67. Analysis of the Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark gene-sets comparing C1D15 and BL samples demonstrated downregulated biological processes involved in proliferation (E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, MYC targets, mitotic spindle), signaling (Estrogen response, mTORC1 signaling), and DNA damage (DNA repair) at C1D15, consistent with the mechanisms of action of the study drugs. E2F targets were higher in BL samples of RCB II/III, compared to RCB I (FDR p=0.042). Conclusions PALTAN did not meet its primary endpoint of pCR. Neoadjuvant PLT showed a pCR of 7.7% but was well tolerated. RNA sequencing and Ki67 data indicated potent anti-proliferative effects of study treatments, despite significant heterogeneity of intrinsic subtypes. Clinical trial information: NCT02907918. Citation Format: Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Donald Northfelt, Tracey O'Connor, Ellis Levine, Jingqin Luo, Yu Tao, Jeremy Hoog, Marie Laury, Tracy Summa, Trish Hammerschmidt, Zhanfang Guo, Ashley Frith, Katherine Weilbaecher, Mateusz Opyrchal, Rebecca Aft, Katherine Clifton, Rama Suresh, Nusayba Bagegni, Ian S Hagemann, Cynthia X Ma. Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant palbociclib, letrozole, and trastuzumab in patients with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (PALTAN) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.