Citations

Abstract Current discussion surrounding the clinical capabilities of generative language models (GLMs) predominantly center around multiple-choice question-answer (MCQA) benchmarks derived from clinical licensing examinations. While accepted for human examinees, characteristics unique to GLMs bring into question the validity of such benchmarks. Here, we validate four benchmarks using eight GLMs, ablating for parameter size and reasoning capabilities, validating via prompt permutation three key assumptions that underpin the generalizability of MCQA-based assessments: that knowledge is applied, not memorized, that semantic consistency will lead to consistent answers, and that situations with no answers can be recognized. While large models are more resilient to our perturbations compared to small models, we globally invalidate these assumptions, with implications for reasoning models. Additionally, despite retaining the knowledge, small models are prone to answer memorization. All models exhibit significant failure in null-answer scenarios. We then suggest several adaptations for more robust benchmark designs more reflective of real-world conditions.

Abstract Objective Unlocking clinical information embedded in clinical notes has been hindered to a significant degree by domain-specific and context-sensitive language. Identification of note sections and structural document elements has been shown to improve information extraction and dependent downstream clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks and applications. This study investigates the viability of a dynamic example selection prompting method to section classification using lightweight, open-source large language models (LLMs) as a practical solution for real-world healthcare clinical NLP systems. Materials and Methods We develop a dynamic few-shot prompting approach to classifying sections where section samples are first embedded using a transformer-based model and deposited in a vector store. During inference, the embedded samples with the most similar contextual embeddings to a given input section text are retrieved from the vector store and inserted into the LLM prompt. We evaluate this technique on two datasets comprising two section schemas, including varying levels of context. We compare the performance to baseline zero-shot and randomly selected few-shot scenarios. Results The dynamic few-shot prompting experiments yielded the highest F1 scores in each of the classification tasks and datasets for all seven of the LLMs included in the evaluation, averaging a macro F1 increase of 39.3% and 21.1% in our primary section classification task over the zero-shot and static few-shot baselines, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion Our results showcase substantial performance improvements imparted by dynamically selecting examples for few-shot LLM prompting, and further improvement by including section context, demonstrating compelling potential for clinical applications.

Abstract Background: Clinical information retrieval (IR) plays a vital role in modern healthcare by facilitating efficient access and analysis of medical literature for clinicians and researchers. This scoping review aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the current state of clinical IR research and identify gaps and potential opportunities for future studies in this field. Objectives: The main objective of this review is to identify and analyze published research on clinical IR, including the methods, techniques, and tools used to retrieve and analyze clinical information from various sources. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of clinical IR research and guide future research efforts in this field. Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and conducted a thorough search of multiple databases, including Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, from January 1st, 2012, to January 4th, 2023. The screening process involved multiple reviewers, and we included 184 papers for the final review. Results: We conducted a detailed analysis and discussion of various aspects of clinical IR research, including publication year, data sources, methods, techniques, evaluation metrics, shared tasks, and applications. Our analysis revealed key research areas in clinical IR, such as indexing, ranking, and query expansion, and identified opportunities for future research in these areas.

Abstract Objective Growing numbers of academic medical centers offer patient cohort discovery tools to their researchers, yet the performance of systems for this use case is not well understood. The objective of this research was to assess patient-level information retrieval methods using electronic health records for different types of cohort definition retrieval. Materials and Methods We developed a test collection consisting of about 100 000 patient records and 56 test topics that characterized patient cohort requests for various clinical studies. Automated information retrieval tasks using word-based approaches were performed, varying 4 different parameters for a total of 48 permutations, with performance measured using B-Pref. We subsequently created structured Boolean queries for the 56 topics for performance comparisons. In addition, we performed a more detailed analysis of 10 topics. Results The best-performing word-based automated query parameter settings achieved a mean B-Pref of 0.167 across all 56 topics. The way a topic was structured (topic representation) had the largest impact on performance. Performance not only varied widely across topics, but there was also a large variance in sensitivity to parameter settings across the topics. Structured queries generally performed better than automated queries on measures of recall and precision but were still not able to recall all relevant patients found by the automated queries. Conclusion While word-based automated methods of cohort retrieval offer an attractive solution to the labor-intensive nature of this task currently used at many medical centers, we generally found suboptimal performance in those approaches, with better performance obtained from structured Boolean queries. Future work will focus on using the test collection to develop and evaluate new approaches to query structure, weighting algorithms, and application of semantic methods.

AbstractObjectivesTo create test collections for evaluating clinical information retrieval (IR) systems and advancing clinical IR research.Materials and MethodsElectronic health record (EHR) data, including structured and free-text data, from 45 000 patients who are a part of the Mayo Clinic Biobank cohort was retrieved from the clinical data warehouse. The clinical IR system indexed a total of 42 million free-text EHR documents. The search queries consisted of 56 topics developed through a collaboration between Mayo Clinic and Oregon Health & Science University. We described the creation of test collections, including a to-be-evaluated document pool using five retrieval models, and human assessment guidelines. We analyzed the relevance judgment results in terms of human agreement and time spent, and results of three levels of relevance, and reported performance of five retrieval models.ResultsThe two judges had a moderate overall agreement with a Kappa value of 0.49, spent a consistent amount of time judging the relevance, and were able to identify easy and difficult topics. The conventional retrieval model performed best on most topics while a concept-based retrieval model had better performance on the topics requiring conceptual level retrieval.DiscussionIR can provide an alternate approach to leveraging clinical narratives for patient information discovery as it is less dependent on semantics. Our study showed the feasibility of test collections along with a few challenges.ConclusionThe conventional test collections for evaluating the IR system show potential for successfully evaluating clinical IR systems with a few challenges to be investigated.

Research in clinical information retrieval has long been stymied by the lack of open resources. However, both clinical information retrieval research innovation and legitimate privacy concerns can be served by the creation of intrainstitutional, fully protected resources. In this article, we provide some principles and tools for information retrieval resource‐building in the unique problem setting of patient‐level information retrieval, following the tradition of the Cranfield paradigm. We further include an analysis of parallel information retrieval resources at Oregon Health & Science University and Mayo Clinic that were built on these principles.