Citations

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a transformative modality for refractory hematologic malignancies; however, its adoption in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is severely constrained by prohibitive manufacturing costs, limited specialized infrastructure, and fragmented regulatory frameworks. To address this translational gap, we propose a pragmatic, cost-adapted model for establishing Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) laboratories tailored to the socioeconomic realities of LAC. This model advocates for decentralized, modular cleanroom facilities that integrate fully closed automated manufacturing platforms with risk-based quality management systems. Furthermore, we emphasize the strategic implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital health tools—such as electronic batch records and predictive analytics—to optimize resource utilization and ensure stringent regulatory compliance. Essential to this framework is the cultivation of a specialized local workforce and the promotion of regional regulatory harmonization through initiatives like PAHO’s Red PARF. Ultimately, this scalable approach provides a realistic roadmap to democratize CAR T-cell therapy in LAC, fostering regional biomanufacturing autonomy and promoting equitable patient access.

Abstract Aim To confirm or refute recent pilot studies showing unexpectedly high rates of undetected heart failure (HF) in cardiology patients. Methods We assessed the prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of undetected HF in a large prospective cohort study of patients referred for non-invasive coronary artery disease (CAD) work-up with cardiac positron emission tomography computed tomography. HF presence and phenotype were centrally adjudicated by an independent cardiologist according to clinical practice guidelines requiring three mandatory criteria: symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptides, and structural/functional cardiac abnormalities. The endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and acute HF (AHF) hospitalization through 2-year of follow-up. Results Among 1738 eligible patients (median age 67 years, 30% women), 138 patients (7.9%) had known HF, and 534 of 1600 patients (33.4%) without known HF had adjudicated undetected HF, resulting in a ratio of undetected HF to known HF of 3.9 (95%CI, 3.2–4.7)-to-1 and a number needed to screen to detect one patient with undetected HF of 3.0 (95%CI, 2.9-3.1). In undetected HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved in 72.3%, mildly reduced in 16%, and reduced in 11.7%. Older age, known CAD, atrial fibrillation, previous pacemaker implantation, and ECG abnormalities were associated with a higher likelihood for undetected HF. Undetected HF was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 7.37 [95%CI, 3.87-14.06], p<0.001, versus no HF). Conclusion One-out-of three patients referred for CAD work-up had undetected HF, which was associated with cardiovascular death and AHF hospitalization.

Background: The study aims to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of hiatal hernia repair with cruroplasty alone compared to the addition of fundoplication. We theorize that previously reported inferiority with crural-only repairs resulted from a lack of real-time feedback regarding the effectiveness of the repair. EndoFLIP TM allows for intraoperative assessment of the gastroesophageal junction. We predict equivalent postoperative outcomes will be achieved between hiatal hernia repairs performed by cruroplasty alone and with fundoplication when the final distensibility index (DI) is similar. Methods: This retrospective cohort review includes patients who underwent hiatal hernia repair with intraoperative EndoFLIP TM between 2020 and 2022. Propensity score-matching was utilized to identify cruroplasty alone and fundoplication patients with a final DI within 0.5 mm 2 /mmHg of one another. Postoperative development of dysphagia, reflux, or hernia recurrence were primary outcomes of interest. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the analysis. While the cruroplasty-alone cohort had an increased age at the time of surgery, 50% more redo repairs, and a slightly higher BMI, there were no significant preoperative or intraoperative differences between groups. Overall, the median duration of follow-up was 111 (IQR 213) days. During that time, there were no differences in the development of postoperative reflux or dysphagia between cohorts ( P = .228 and P = .451, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in time-to-event for either outcome. There were 3 radiographic recurrences, with 2 occurring after fundoplication ( P = .000). Conclusions: This is the first study to utilize intraoperative EndoFLIP TM to determine the need for fundoplication during hiatal hernia repair. The results demonstrate no additional short-term benefit from fundoplication performance. These findings argue against routine fundoplication when an acceptable DI can be achieved after cruroplasty. Further research is needed to validate these results.

Abstract Background Breast cancer chemoprevention is underutilized among high-risk women. We examined whether decision support could increase informed decision making. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a patient-facing decision aid (RealRisks) and provider tool (BNAV) compared with standard education on the number of women with high-risk breast lesions making informed choices. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was chemoprevention informed choice (defined as adequate knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included breast cancer risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict, and chemoprevention decision. Results Across 31 randomized sites, we enrolled 210 providers, who were primarily breast health specialists. Of these, 24 sites (14 intervention, 10 control) enrolled 412 patients. Among 287 patients evaluable for the primary outcome, there were no statistically significant differences in informed choice between the intervention and control arms at 6 months (35% vs 27%, respectively; P = .20) and 12 months (37% vs 25%, respectively; P = .05). At 6 months, women in the intervention compared with control arm were more likely to have accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (31% vs 21%, respectively; P = .03) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (33% vs 23%, respectively; P = .04). At 12 months, 52% of women in the control and 50% in the intervention arm self-reported initiating chemoprevention. Conclusion Decision support led to modest improvements in accurate risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge but not informed choice. Relatively high chemoprevention uptake was achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed mainly by breast health specialists. Trial Registration NCT04496739, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04496739?cond=NCT04496739&viewType=Card&rank=1

Purpose: The study compares refractive outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (SIOL) surgery performed by vitreoretinal, anterior segment, and both surgeons. Methods: Eyes included in this study underwent SIOL surgery from 2012 to 2024 and had a final postoperative visual acuity of 20/50 or better. Regression analysis compared refractive outcomes, and chi-squared analysis compared complications between subspecialty of SIOL surgeons. Results: A total of 94, 104, and 80 eyes were included in the retina surgeon, anterior segment surgeon, and combo surgeon cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in error between target and final postoperative spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.079), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.135), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.567). There was no significant difference in number of eyes with final spherical equivalence within 1 diopter of target spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.136), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.061), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.783). The retina cohort had higher postoperative corneal edema than the combo ( P = 0.017) and the anterior segment cohorts ( P = 0.035). The combo cohort had more postoperative retinal detachment than the anterior segment cohort ( P = 0.046). Conclusion: In eyes with good final vision, retina and anterior segment surgeons have similar refractive outcomes after SIOL surgery.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer (BC) chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) remains underutilized among high-risk women. Improving knowledge about BC risk and chemoprevention among high-risk patients and their healthcare providers may enhance informed decision-making about this BC risk reduction strategy. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of web-based patient and provider decision support, RealRisks and BNAV, to improve chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Thirty-one sites, including academic and community practices across the U.S., were randomized to standard patient educational materials alone or combined with RealRisks and BNAV. A total of 412 patients and 210 healthcare providers were enrolled. Patient surveys were administered at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome at 6 months was chemoprevention informed choice, defined as adequate chemoprevention knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision. Secondary endpoints included BC risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict and chemoprevention decision. Assuming 10% loss to follow up (LTFU), roughly equal accrual across sites, and an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.02, we had 90% power to detect a 15% absolute difference in informed choice if the event rate in the control arm was 10%. Results: Among 24 evaluable sites, 14 were randomized to the intervention arm and 10 to the control arm. Among 210 enrolled providers, median age was 46 (range, 28-83) and 78% were female; 75% physicians and 25% advanced practice providers/nurses; 53% medical oncologists, 29% surgeons, and 10% gynecologists/family practitioners/internists; and 83% had previously prescribed chemoprevention. Among 412 enrolled patients, median age was 53 (range, 35-74), including 77% White, 8% Black, and 10% Asian race, and 14% Hispanic ethnicity. In terms of BC risk factors, 77% had AH and 23% LCIS, 34% had a first-degree family history of BC, and 65% had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts on mammography. Thirty percent were unevaluable for the primary endpoint (1% ineligible, 26% LTFU, 3% missing data). Among 288 evaluable patients (148 at intervention sites, 140 at control sites), the proportion of patients exercising informed choice at 6 months in the intervention and control arms was 35% vs. 27%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]=1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84-2.46, p=0.19; observed ICC=0.006). Compared to patients in the control arm at 6 months, those in the intervention arm were more likely to have accurate BC risk perceptions (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.11-2.91) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.00-2.61). We observed no significant differences in BC worry, decision conflict, or chemoprevention decision between study arms. At 6 months, 49% of women in the control arm and 51% in the intervention arm decided to take a SERM or AI for BC chemoprevention (p=0.58), a rate higher than anticipated. Conclusions: We did not observe a significant increase in informed choice among patients and providers assigned to chemoprevention decision support compared to standard educational materials alone. Among women with AH or LCIS seen mainly by breast specialists who prescribed chemoprevention, about half decided to take a SERM or AI. Therefore, relatively high chemoprevention uptake may be achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed by breast specialists. Chemoprevention decision support may improve decision antecedents, such as accurate BC risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge, but may have a limited role in changing health behaviors. Citation Format: K. D. Crew, G. L. Anderson, K. B. Arnold, A. Michel, M. T. DeLucie, C. W. Law, S. Pruthi, A. C. Sandoval Leon, R. Shirley, M. T. Grosse Perdekamp, S. V. Colonna, S. L. Krisher, T. King, L. D. Yee, T. J. Ballinger, C. Braun-Inglis, D. A. Mangino, K. B. Wisinski, C. A. DeYoung, M. Ross, J. D. Floyd, A. Kaster, L. VanderWalde, T. Saphner, C. Zarwan, S. Lo, C. Graham, A. K. Conlin, K. J. Yost, D. M. Agnese, C. Jernigan, D. L. Hershman, M. L. Neuhouser, J. A. Zell, B. Arun, R. Kukafka. Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into care (MiCHOICE): Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, SWOG 1904 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-01-15.