Citations

Background: Epsilon (e) variants in the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene are well-established risk factors for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (s-ICH). We tested the hypothesis that APOE-e variants are also associated with warfarin-related ICH (w-ICH) and examined interactions between APOE and warfarin. Methods: Prospective multicenter 2-stage (discovery and replication) study. ICH was classified as lobar and non-lobar based on admission head CT. In the discovery stage, w-ICH cases were matched with warfarin-exposed controls (w-controls). In replication, w-ICH cases were matched with non-warfarin controls (nw-controls). APOE was directly genotyped. Association testing was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Gene-environment interaction between APOE and warfarin was formally tested using a case only approach (combining s-ICH and w-ICH cases). Results: The discovery stage included 316 w-ICHs (43% lobar and 57% non-lobar) and 355 w-controls. Results are presented in the Table: APOE-e2 was associated with lobar and non-lobar w-ICH, and APOE-e4 was associated with lobar but not with non-lobar w-ICH. In case-only analysis, 885 s-ICHs were combined with w-ICHs (total n=1201) and no evidence of interaction between APOE and warfarin was found (all p>0.20). The replication included 63 w-ICHs (44% lobar and 56% non-lobar) and 990 nw-controls. The distribution of APOE variants was similar in w-controls (discovery) and nw-controls (replication) for both e2 (p=0.81) and e4 (p=0.88). In replication, APOE-e2 and e4 were associated with lobar but not with non-lobar w-ICH. Conclusions: APOE-e variants constitute strong risk factors for lobar w-ICH. An effect may also exist between APOE-e2 and non-lobar hemorrhages, but given the lack of replication larger sample sizes are required to properly assess this association. APOE exerts its effect independently of warfarin, although power limitations render this absence of interaction preliminary.

Purpose: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the acute manifestation of a progressive disease of the cerebral small vessels. The severity of this disease appears to influence not only risk of ICH, but also the size of the hematoma. As the burden of high blood pressure(BP)-associated alleles is associated with hypertension-related end-organ damage, we sought to determine if this burden influences ICH admission hematoma volume (AHV). Methods: Prospective study undertaken in 441 ICH patients of European ancestry (210 deep and 231 lobar intracranial hematomas). Forty-three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to be associated with high BP were genotyped in Illumina610-Quad. Single-SNP association analyses with AHV were performed using linear regression. Subsequently, a genetic risk score was calculated as the sum of the products generated by multiplying, at each of the 43 loci, the number risk alleles times the reported effect of that allele on BP. The score was utilized as the independent variable of univariate and multivariate regression models for 2 outcomes: AHV and poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6). Principal components analysis was utilized to account for population structure. Results: Individually assessed, no single SNP was associated with AHV. In univariate linear regression, the genetic risk score was associated with AHV in all (deep and lobar) and deep locations (Figure 1), but not in lobar hemorrhages. In multivariate regression analyses, each additional standard deviation of the genetic risk score increased mean deep AHV by 21% (or 2.7-milliliter increase, beta=0.21, standard error=0.08, p=0.01) and risk poor clinical outcome by 55% (odds ratio=1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.28, p=0.03). No significant associations were observed when considering all (deep and lobar) and lobar hemorrhages. Conclusion: In deep ICH, increasing numbers of high BP-related alleles are associated with larger AHV and poor clinical outcome.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non‐BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE). Methods This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non‐BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non‐BZD ASM. Results We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.3) years. Thirty‐six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997–.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out‐of‐hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73–3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40–6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in‐hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01–2.06, p = .04). Forty‐seven percent of patients ( n = 94) with out‐of‐hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out‐of‐hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival ( n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival. Significance Failure to escalate from BZDs to non‐BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out‐of‐hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non‐BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in‐hospital settings.

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to describe long‐term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE.MethodsWe performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients.ResultsFollow‐up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow‐up duration was 1.6 (.9–2.7) years. The in‐hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty‐six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1–134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6–16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008–1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale‐Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion.SignificanceAbout one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow‐up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019. SETTING: Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3–9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55–491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3–120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5–1,255 min] vs 150 min [90–318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58–368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4–5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5–40 d] vs [1.8–8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.

AbstractObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children, and investigated the relationship between fever onset and status epilepticus (SE).MethodsPatients with refractory SE (RSE) between June 1, 2011 and October 1, 2016 were prospectively enrolled in the pSERG (Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group) cohort. Cases meeting the definition of NORSE were classified as "NORSE of known etiology" or "NORSE of unknown etiology." Subgroup analysis of NORSE of unknown etiology was completed based on the presence and time of fever occurrence relative to RSE onset: fever at onset (≤24 h), previous fever (2 weeks–24 h), and without fever.ResultsOf 279 patients with RSE, 46 patients met the criteria for NORSE. The median age was 2.4 years, and 25 (54%) were female. Forty (87%) patients had NORSE of unknown etiology. Nineteen (48%) presented with fever at SE onset, 16 (40%) had a previous fever, and five (12%) had no fever. The patients with preceding fever had more prolonged SE and worse outcomes, and 25% recovered baseline neurological function. The patients with fever at onset were younger and had shorter SE episodes, and 89% recovered baseline function.SignificanceAmong pediatric patients with RSE, 16% met diagnostic criteria for NORSE, including the subcategory of febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Pediatric NORSE cases may also overlap with refractory febrile SE (FSE). FIRES occurs more frequently in older children, the course is usually prolonged, and outcomes are worse, as compared to refractory FSE. Fever occurring more than 24 h before the onset of seizures differentiates a subgroup of NORSE patients with distinctive clinical characteristics and worse outcomes.