Citations

Background Uncontrolled hypertension is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Electro-hydraulic acoustic therapy (eHAT) is a non-invasive treatment that may lower blood pressure (BP), but its safety and efficacy in CKD remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate eHAT's feasibility and safety in this population. Methods In this single-arm, prospective, single-center proof-of-concept study, CKD patients received six eHAT treatments over three weeks. BP was assessed in-office (attended and unattended) at baseline and at 4-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks post-treatment. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at baseline, 12, and 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in systolic office BP (OBP) from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included additional BP measurements, kidney function, and safety. Results Fifteen patients completed all follow-ups. At 12 weeks, mean systolic OBP decreased by 9.73 mmHg (SD 14.77; p = 0.0032) and remained significantly lower at 24 weeks (−7.67 mmHg; p = 0.0335) and 48 weeks (−19.40 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Diastolic OBP reductions were significant at 12 ( p = 0.0413) and 48 weeks ( p = 0.0022). By 12 weeks, 26% of participants reduced the number or dose of antihypertensive medications. Kidney function remained stable throughout. No safety signals were detected. Conclusion Our study highlights the feasibility and tolerability of eHAT in patients with CKD and HTN. Nonetheless, due to the small sample size and lack of a control group, these findings should be considered preliminary.

Importance Sudden death and cardiac arrest frequently occur without explanation, even after a thorough clinical evaluation. Calcium release deficiency syndrome (CRDS), a life-threatening genetic arrhythmia syndrome, is undetectable with standard testing and leads to unexplained cardiac arrest. Objective To explore the cardiac repolarization response on an electrocardiogram after brief tachycardia and a pause as a clinical diagnostic test for CRDS. Design, Setting, and Participants An international, multicenter, case-control study including individual cases of CRDS, 3 patient control groups (individuals with suspected supraventricular tachycardia; survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest [UCA]; and individuals with genotype-positive catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia [CPVT]), and genetic mouse models (CRDS, wild type, and CPVT were used to define the cellular mechanism) conducted at 10 centers in 7 countries. Patient tracings were recorded between June 2005 and December 2023, and the analyses were performed from April 2023 to December 2023. Intervention Brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause (either spontaneous or mediated through cardiac pacing). Main Outcomes and Measures Change in QT interval and change in T-wave amplitude (defined as the difference between their absolute values on the postpause sinus beat and the last beat prior to tachycardia). Results Among 10 case patients with CRDS, 45 control patients with suspected supraventricular tachycardia, 10 control patients who experienced UCA, and 3 control patients with genotype-positive CPVT, the median change in T-wave amplitude on the postpause sinus beat (after brief ventricular tachycardia at ≥150 beats/min) was higher in patients with CRDS ( P < .001). The smallest change in T-wave amplitude was 0.250 mV for a CRDS case patient compared with the largest change in T-wave amplitude of 0.160 mV for a control patient, indicating 100% discrimination. Although the median change in QT interval was longer in CRDS cases ( P = .002), an overlap between the cases and controls was present. The genetic mouse models recapitulated the findings observed in humans and suggested the repolarization response was secondary to a pathologically large systolic release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Conclusions and Relevance There is a unique repolarization response on an electrocardiogram after provocation with brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause in CRDS cases and mouse models, which is absent from the controls. If these findings are confirmed in larger studies, this easy to perform maneuver may serve as an effective clinical diagnostic test for CRDS and become an important part of the evaluation of cardiac arrest.

Objective: Arterial hypertension (HTN) coexisting with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a significant global healthcare challenge, with limited effective clinical interventions. Electro-Hydraulic Acoustic Therapy (eHAT), a lower-energy modality vs. lithotripsy, emerges as a promising technique for relieving ischemia and promoting tissue regeneration. We hypothesized that eHAT would reduce blood pressure (BP) and preserve renal function in patients with hypertension and CKD. Design and method: Twenty medically treated patients with HTN and Stage IIIa/b CKD enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study were treated over 3-weeks with six eHAT sessions (2400 shockwaves/kidney; 0.09 mJ/mm2 at 2.66Hz; NephrospecTM, Curespec, Yehud, Israel). Follow-up (FU) visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months involved measurements of attended and unattended office BP, ambulatory BP and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results: The treatment was well tolerated. All BP measurements strongly tended to decline over 12 months and showed a similar pattern.(Table 1, Figs. 1-3), whereas eGFR was well preserved (Table 1, Fig. 4). Conclusions: Conclusion. eHAT is a tolerable and safe procedure and, moreover, a 3-week regimen tends to reduce BP and preserve eGFR in patients with HTN and CKD. Therefore, eHAT may constitute a novel, safe, and non-invasive alternative therapeutic approach in the management of HTN in the context of CKD.

Abstract Background and Aims Arterial hypertension (HTN) in association with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global healthcare burden, yet clinically proven treatments are limited. electro-Hydraulic Acoustic Therapy (eHAT), using ∼10% of the energy used in shockwave lithotripsy, is a promising technique to ameliorate ischemia and regenerate tissues. eHAT has been demonstrated to enhance healing in tissues such as bone, muscle, and myocardium, via several mechanisms, particularly by promoting neovascularization. Furthermore, previous animal studies demonstrated that eHAT reduces blood pressure (BP) and preserves renal function after ischemic kidney injury. The present pilot study explored the clinical safety and efficacy of eHAT and tested the hypothesis that eHAT would reduce BP and preserve renal function in patients with medically-treated hypertension and CKD. Method So far, a total of 15 patients with HTN and Stage III a/b CKD were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study. The patients were treated with six sessions of eHAT during a 3-week period. At each session, 2400 shockwaves were applied to each kidney with 0.09 mJ/mm2 at 2.66Hz (NephrospecTM by Curespec LTD, Yehud, Israel). Follow-up (FU) visits were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results The treatment was well tolerated with no major adverse events or need for analgesic treatment. Average Automated Office BP (AOBP) showed a strong tendency for a decrease in diastolic BP from baseline to the Primary Efficacy Objective at FU II (3 months post last treatment), which progressively decreased further at FU III (6 months) (Table 1). Similarly, average Office BP (OBP) detected a strong trend for a progressive decrease in systolic BP from baseline to the Primary Efficacy Objective (Table 1). Levels of eGFR appeared to slightly rise throughout the study, but this change has not reached statistical significance levels (Table 1). Conclusion The current study demonstrates that the eHAT procedure is tolerable and safe in this cohort. Moreover, a 3-week regimen tended to reduce BP and preserve eGFR in patients with controlled HTN and CKD. Therefore, electro-Hydraulic Acoustic Therapy may emerge as a novel, safe, and non-invasive alternative therapeutic approach in the management of HTN in the context of CKD.

Objective: Electro-Hydraulic Acoustic Therapy (eHAT), using ∼10% of the energy used in shockwave lithotripsy, is a promising technique to ameliorate ischemia and regenerate tissues. eHAT has been demonstrated to enhance healing in tissues such as bone, muscle, and myocardium, via several mechanisms, particularly by promoting neovascularization. Furthermore, previous animal studies demonstrated that eHAT reduces blood pressure (BP) and preserves renal function after ischemic kidney injury. The present pilot study explored the clinical safety and efficacy of eHAT and tested the hypothesis that eHAT would reduce BP and preserve renal function in patients with medically-treated hypertension and CKD. Design and method: So far, a total of 15 patients with HTN and Stage III a/b CKD were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study. The patients were treated with six sessions of eHAT during a 3-week period. At each session, 2400 shockwaves were applied to each kidney with 0.09 mJ/mm2 at 2.66Hz (NephrospecTM by Curespec LTD, Yehud, Israel). Follow-up (FU) visits were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: The treatment was well tolerated with no major adverse events or need for analgesic treatment. Average Automated Office BP (AOBP) showed a strong tendency for a decrease in diastolic BP from baseline to the Primary Efficacy Objective at FU II (3 months post-last treatment), which progressively decreased further at FU III (6 months) (Table 1). Similarly, average Office BP (OBP) detected a strong trend for a progressive decrease in systolic BP from baseline to the Primary Efficacy Objective (Table 1). Levels of eGFR appeared to slightly rise throughout the study, but this change has not reached statistical significance levels (Table 1). Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that the eHAT procedure is tolerable and safe in this cohort. Moreover, a 3-week regimen tended to reduce BP and preserve eGFR in patients with controlled HTN and CKD. Therefore, electro-Hydraulic Acoustic Therapy may emerge as a novel, safe, and non-invasive alternative therapeutic approach in the management of HTN in the context of CKD.

AbstractAimsIntraoperative defibrillation testing (DT) during implant or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has essentially been almost abandoned. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in DT during replacements. The aim of the present study was to evaluate frequency of significant findings and safety of DT in subjects undergoing device replacement.Methods and resultsA prospective observational multi-centre study included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. The primary outcome was a failure to terminate induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a single shock 10 J below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of DT. Patients were followed-up at 1- and 6-months post-procedure. A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented to the study, of which 84 underwent DT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were males. Induction of VF was successful in 84 patients as was a successful conversion on the first attempt in all. There were no procedure-related complications. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, ICD programming was changed. None suffered inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. Two deaths occurred, none of which was related to arrhythmia.ConclusionThe present study found DT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Maurice Kahn Foundation via the Mayo- Sheba Collaboration Fund. Background The need for intraoperative defibrillation testing (DFT) during implant and/or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and the Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has practically been nearly abandoned. Nevertheless, induction of VF for testing purposes (VFT) may still have an important role in selective populations at risk for defibrillation failure, who were not included in the SIMPLE and Nordic trials. One such population includes those who undergo device replacements. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in VFT during replacements. In the present study, we sought to test this observation. Objectives Evaluate frequency of significant findings and the safety of VFT in subjects undergoing device replacement. Methods A prospective observational multi-center study of VFT included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement in 5 centers in Israel, Europe, and the US. All centers followed the same VFT protocol. The primary outcome was defined as failure to terminate induced VF with a single shock at 10 Joules below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of VFT. Patients were followed-up at 1 month and 6 months post-procedure. Data collection included documentation of any peri-operative complications and clinical endpoints (occurrence of appropriate shock, inappropriate shocks, lead failure, need for re-intervention, and infection). Results A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented for the study, of which 84 underwent DFT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were male subjects. Induction of VF was successful in all 84 patients as well as VFT with a successful conversion on first attempt. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, the ICD programming was changed. None suffered an inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. A total of two deaths occurred, none of which were related to the device. Conclusion The present study found VFT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD/CRTD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information.

Abstract Aims To evaluate the benefit of speckle tracking radial strain imaging (STRSI)-guided left ventricular (LV) lead (LVL) positioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients (pts) with ischaemic cardiomyopathy with CRT indication. Methods and results We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were enrolled in nine centres with 2:1 randomization into two groups (guided vs. control). Patients underwent STRSI to identify the optimal LV position from six LV segments at midventricular level. Implantation via STRSI was attempted for recommended segment in the guided group only. Follow-up included echocardiography (6 months) and clinical evaluation (6 and 12 months). The primary endpoint was comparison % reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months with baseline. Secondary endpoints included hospitalizations for heart failure and death, and improvement in additional echocardiographic measurements and quality of life score. A total of 172 patients (115 guided vs. 57 control) were enrolled. In the guided group, 60% of the implanted LV leads were adjudicated to be successfully located at the recommended segment, whereas in the control group 44% reached the best STRSI determined segment. There was no difference between the groups in any of the primary or secondary endpoints at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion Our findings suggest that echo-guided implantation of an LV lead using STRSI does not improve the clinical or echocardiographic response compared with conventional implantation.