Citations

Abstract Background and Objectives Lucid episodes (LEs) in advanced dementia are characterized by spontaneous, transient recovery of functional abilities. Despite recent increases in research on this previously understudied phenomenon, standard definitional criteria are lacking, presenting challenges for research. Researchers have proposed a preliminary framework to guide uniform labeling and operationalization of salient data elements for investigating LEs and developing definitional criteria. This study leverages this framework to characterize reports of LEs from caregivers and advance their definition and measurement. Research Design and Methods Family caregivers (N = 259) completed an electronic survey with quantitative and open-ended questions about LEs they witnessed (N = 479 episodes). Respondents were purposively sampled for qualitative interviews. Open-ended question responses (n = 208) and in-depth interviews (n = 24) were analyzed using content analysis. Results Caregiver descriptions suggest that the content and context of LEs are heterogeneous. Descriptions included observable changes from baseline, with behavior or communication that was distinguishable from routine cognitive fluctuations. LEs were sometimes, but not always specified by logically organized actions; recognition or awareness of people, emotions, and surroundings; and insight of their cognitive limitations. Many LEs required deep personal knowledge to attribute it as a meaningful shift. Discussion and Implications Findings suggest that definitional features may universally specify a significant return of ability with more flexible criteria for how this return manifests in observed actions and domains of recovery (i.e., insight, function, and communication). The impact of LEs on observers may be better measured separately, although further research should explore this.

ABSTRACTA core tenant of the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.0—Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0‐ADC) is the inclusion of community members during all stages of clinical research. As such, we deliberately integrated and supported patient and public involvement in the evaluation and selection of GEAR 2.0‐ADC Pilot Research Grants by developing and adapting traditional grant application review structures, with input from community members, to create the GEAR 2.0‐ADC Community Review Committee approach. Community members, including persons living with dementia, effectively participated in all three rounds of research grant application review and selection, complementing the traditional scientific review process. The structure and flexibility of the GEAR 2.0‐ADC Community Review Committee approach serve as a model for patient and public grant application review involvement with strong potential for applications across grant reviews in other medical specialties.

Abstract Introduction The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network 2.0‐Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0‐ADC) aims to advance research efforts to improve the emergency care of persons living with dementia (PLWDs). Objective To support this objective, GEAR 2.0‐ADC convened a virtual consensus conference to prioritize emergency care research opportunities for PLWDs inclusive of perspectives of PLWDs to ensure identification of research gaps in response to their experiences and priorities. Inclusion of PLWDs as research partners is increasingly recognized as a best practice, however, approaches to facilitating consensus participation are lacking. Methods Best practices for supporting the engagement of PLWDs in a consensus conference, applied across its three phases (pre‐conference, during the conference, and post‐conference), include: establishing a learning environment focused on research priorities before the event, presenting information in ways that align with participants' learning preferences while accommodating cognitive impairments, and providing multiple opportunities and methods for gathering post‐conference feedback from PLWDs. Results These strategies were identified by PLWDs and care partners (CPs) through semi‐structured interviews, who were involved in the convening process, aimed at exploring ways to enhance facilitation techniques for participants. Conclusion Additionally, these summarized insights aim to encourage the use of community‐engaged approaches in discussions and consensus‐building around research priorities in emergency care, particularly for PLWDs and their CPs.

Abstract Episodes of lucidity (EL) in Alzheimer’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease related dementias (AD/ADRD), also termed “paradoxical lucidity,” have garnered increasing attention as an important area of research. Efforts to study lucidity suffer from a lack of clear definitional criteria, inconsistent conceptualization and diverse approaches to operationalizing features of these events. To advance systematic investigation of EL in AD/ADRD, there is a need for clarity and precision in labeling event attributes, markers, and specific measurement strategies that enable operational harmonization across distinct approaches to investigating the relatively broad and nascent phenomenon. To that end, we propose a preliminary research framework to guide harmonization of approaches to investigating EL in AD/ADRD. Our goal is to provide a systematized approach to characterizing operational decisions that facilitates comparability across different methodological approaches and measurement strategies while allowing for exploration of multiple definitional criteria, measurement standards, and interpretive approaches.

AbstractEpisodes of lucidity (ELs) in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease‐related dementias (AD/ADRD), have garnered increasing attention as an important area of research. Efforts to study lucidity suffer from a lack of clear definitional criteria, inconsistent conceptualization, and diverse approaches to operationalizing features of these events. To advance systematic investigation of ELs in AD/ADRD, there is a need for clarity and precision in labeling event attributes, markers, and specific measurement strategies that enable operational harmonization across distinct approaches to investigating the relatively broad and nascent phenomenon. To that end, we propose a preliminary research framework to guide harmonization of approaches to investigating ELs in AD/ADRD. Our goal is to provide an initial schematic that encourages uniform labeling of operational decisions about ELs.

Abstract Background The National Institute on Aging, in conjunction with the Department of Health and Human Services as part of the National Alzheimer's Project Act, convened a 2020 National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons with Dementia and their Caregivers . This review article addresses research participation by persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners in two different ways: as research participants with input on outcomes studied and as engaged research partners. Results This article summarizes each of the topics presented at this Summit session, followed by reflection from the session panelists. Lee Jennings examined collection of outcomes directly from PLWD and the potential for individualized outcomes to enhance measurement in intervention trials. Ron Petersen discussed the impact of nomenclature on research and clinical care, and how and why investigators should be mindful of the connection between dementia nomenclature and the conduct of dementia research. Tabassum Majid examined strategies for engagement in research, including specific examples of involving PLWD and their care partners (including staff in assisted living and skilled nursing facilities), and the potential for this research engagement to improve our understanding of interventions in dementia. Conclusions Research participation by PLWD and their care partners is evolving. This review summarizes three areas of opportunity and steps for researchers to work with PLWD and their care partners to design and conduct research that enhances knowledge based on what we learn from PLWD and their care partners, and creates knowledge with them.

Abstract Person-centered caregiving approaches emphasize efforts to protect and maintain the personhood of people living with dementia (PLWD). The influence on person-centered caregiving approaches on PLWD have predominantly focused on deficit-oriented outcomes, such as absence or reduction of behavioral symptoms. While important to quality of life, the absence of measurable “positive” responses to person-centered caregiving approaches limit opportunities to specify sensitive and meaningful outcome measures that more holistically represent PLWD’s care experiences as more than the absence of a negative outcome. To address these gaps, we conducted a secondary analysis of video-observations of PLWD (N=9) surrounding mealtime cares using a descriptive ethnographic approach. Our objectives were to descriptively summarize specific responsive behaviors demonstrated by PLWD surrounding person-centered caregiving interactions, specifying observable features of these responses and consider their utility in future video-observational research. Findings indicate PLWD contribute both verbal and non-verbal communication surrounding person-centered approaches which can be characterized as conversational (starting conversation, answering or asking questions), expressing preferences (indicating needs and preferences, agreeing or disagreeing, complying with or refusing caregiver requests, permission granting), emotional responses (mirroring caregivers’ emotions, demonstrating emotion e.g. smiling), and reflexive (mirroring of caregiver’s actions), with overlap between categories. Findings suggest that PLWD not only contribute and respond in meaningful ways to person-centered interactions, but also initiate a significant number of these interactions. This study contributes to a growing body of research and advocacy that examines the personhood and abilities of PLWD and establishes the utility of observational data in studying PLWD contributions.