Citations

Background: Uric acid (UA) concentration within carotid plaque and its association with cerebrovascular events have not been detected or quantified. Systemically, serum UA is a marker of inflammation and risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, its association with carotid plaque instability and stroke pathogenesis remains unclear. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we aimed to determine whether UA is present differentially in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid plaques and whether serum UA is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms (stroke, transient ischemic attack, or amaurosis fugax). Methods: Carotid atherosclerotic plaques were collected during carotid endarterectomy. The presence of UA was assessed using Gomori methenamine silver staining as well as anti-UA immunohistochemical staining and its quantity measured using an enzymatic colorimetric assay. Clinical information was obtained through a retrospective review of data. Results: UA was more commonly detected in symptomatic (n=23) compared with asymptomatic (n=9) carotid plaques by Gomori methenamine silver (20 [86.9%] versus 2 [22.2%]; P =0.001) and anti-UA immunohistochemistry (16 [69.5%] versus 1 [11.1%]; P =0.004). UA concentration was higher in symptomatic rather than asymptomatic plaques (25.1 [9.5] versus 17.9 [3.8] µg/g; P =0.021). Before carotid endarterectomy, serum UA levels were higher in symptomatic (n=341) compared with asymptomatic (n=146) patients (5.9 [interquartile range, 4.6–6.9] mg/dL versus 5.2 [interquartile range, 4.6–6.2] mg/dL; P =0.009). Conclusions: The current study supports a potential role of UA as a potential tissue participant and a systemic biomarker in the pathogenesis of carotid atherosclerosis. UA may provide a mechanistic explanation for plaque instability and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events.

Introduction: Uric acid (UA) level within carotid plaque specimens and its association with cerebrovascular events has not been detected or quantified. Systemically, serum uric acid (SUA) is a marker of inflammation and risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, its association with carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular events remains unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that UA may play a role in carotid artery atherosclerosis and stroke pathogenesis. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), we aimed to determine whether UA is present differentially in carotid plaques of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients and whether SUA is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms before surgery and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the follow-up to CEA. Methods: We prospectively collected 32 carotid plaques during CEA. We qualitatively assessed the presence of UA by using Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) staining and immunohistochemistry with anti-UA antibodies. We extracted and measured the quantity of UA in carotid plaques by using an enzymatic colorimetric assay. A retrospective analysis of a clinical database of 534 consecutive patients who underwent CEA was performed. We defined as symptomatic those patients with history of stroke, TIA and amaurosis fugax. Results: UA positive staining was detected in higher number of carotid plaques from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients on both staining, GMS [20 (86.9%) vs 2 (22.2%); p=0.001] and immunohistochemistry anti-UA [16 (69.5%) vs 1 (11.1%); p=0.004]. Moreover, we found a significantly higher concentration of UA in carotid plaque from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients [25.1 (9.5) μg/g vs 17.9 (3.8) μg/g; p=0.021]. SUA level in patients prior to CEA was significantly higher in the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic group [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.2 (4.4-6.3) mg/dL; p<0.001] and it was significantly higher in patients who developed MACE after CEA versus those that did not [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.4 (4.5-6.6) mg/dL; p=0.021]. Conclusions: UA may provide a mechanistic explanation as systemic biomarker and potential tissue contributor for carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular symptoms.

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) often results in permanent cardiac tissue necrosis and reduced heart functionality. Even with heart disease being the number one cause of death in the US, there are currently no effective methods of fully regenerating heart muscle post-myocardial infarction. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising therapeutic option given their multi-potent nature and low host immune reaction. Bioengineered polymeric nanofiber scaffolds provide a structured growing environment and encourage cell elongation. Overview: This study characterizes MSC biology on poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofiber scaffolds in order to establish electrospun PCL nanofibers as a working biological scaffold for MSC growth, and to exhibit potential for further exploration of PCL nanofiber-grown MSC implants as a treatment for MI. Methods: MSCs were seeded on PCL scaffolds; cell viability was analyzed via XTT, cell apoptosis was analyzed via TUNEL/DAPI staining, and differentiation markers were analyzed via RT-PCR. Results: TUNEL/DAPI staining of confluent MSCs on PCL scaffolds showed low cell apoptosis over time. RT-PCR results showed no amplification of CD40 expression. Conclusion: PCL nanofibers seem to provide a suitable microenvironment for MSC seeding and proliferation. Further Direction: RT-PCR for CD80, CD86, COL1A1 (collagen), aSMA/Acta2 (smooth muscle), Flk1/VEGF2 (endothelial), Sparc (Osteonectin, osteogenic), Adipoq (Adiponectin, adipogenic), Agre-cano (chondrogenic).

Introduction: Stem cells have poor survival after transplantation, what can limit the use of these therapies. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been recognized as a limiting event that can lead to cell death. Here, we hypothesized that the mitochondrial function of progenitor cells can be monitored in vivo using reporter gene-based molecular imaging. A better understanding of the biology of transplanted stem cells in the ischemic myocardium can lead to optimization of cell therapies. Methods: Using RT-PCR we identified the antioxidant NAD(P)H:Quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) enzyme as a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) that were treated with a mitochondrial stressor, diethyl maleate (DEM). We then constructed a luciferase reporter gene driven by the NQO1 promoter. After in vitro validation, MSCs were transplanted into a mouse model of ischemia/reperfusion (IR, n=4) and mitochondrial function was monitored by bioluminescence imaging. Results: MSCs treated with DEM had an increase in NQO1 reporter gene signal that inversely correlated with the amount of the mitochondrial by-product adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP, r = -0.9643, p = 0.0028; Fig 1A). Mitochondrial dysfunction was preserved by the use of a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant Mito-Tempo (MT), correcting ATP and NQO1 luciferase signal. In vivo studies showed that MSCs yielded higher Firefly luciferase activity in IR mice compared to sham and this signal was normalized when cells were pre-treated with MT (Fig 1B). Data was confirmed by ex vivo measurement of Firefly luciferase activity, which was 4.9-fold higher in the IR group than in shams, after correction for cell number (Fig 1C). Conclusions: We have developed a novel imaging strategy that allows noninvasive assessment of the mitochondrial status of transplanted stem cells in the ischemic myocardium. Knowing when transplanted cells “suffer’ from mitochondrial dysfunction may allow optimization of these therapies.

Background and Purpose: XO (xanthine oxidase) is a key enzyme of uric acid metabolism and is thought to contribute to oxidative pathways that promote atherosclerotic plaque progression, yet its role in plaque destabilization is not well elucidated. We hypothesized that XO is expressed in carotid plaque from symptomatic patients in association with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: Patients were stratified by symptoms, defined as presentation with an ipsilateral cerebral ischemic event. Carotid atherosclerotic plaques were obtained from 44 patients with symptomatic plaque and 44 patients without ischemic cerebral events. Protein expression of XO was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and the percentage of cells expressing XO and CD68 (macrophage marker) compared between the groups. Biochemical and demographic cardiometabolic risk factors of study participants also were measured. Results: Carotid atherosclerotic plaques from symptomatic patients were associated with significantly higher XO expression versus asymptomatic plaque (median [interquartile range]: 1.24 [2.09] versus 0.16 [0.34]; P <0.001) and with significantly higher circulating uric acid levels (mean±SD: 7.36±2.10 versus 5.37±1.79 mg/dL; P <0.001, respectively). In addition, XO expression in atherosclerotic carotid plaque was inversely associated with serum high-density lipoproteins cholesterol levels ( P =0.010, r =−0.30) and directly with circulating uric acid levels ( P <0.001, r =0.45). The average percentage of macrophages that expressed XO was significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaques (median [interquartile range]: 93.37% [25] versus 46.15% [21], respectively; P <0.001). Conclusions: XO overexpression in macrophages is associated with increased serum uric acid and low high-density lipoproteins cholesterol levels and may potentially have a mechanistic role in carotid plaque destabilization. The current study supports a potential role for uric acid synthesis pathway as a target for management of carotid atherosclerosis in humans.

Introduction: Myocardial infarction is an inflammatory condition that leads to scar deposition and cardiac remodeling. Stem cells (SC) are an alternative to prevent cardiac remodeling, but have poor survival after transplanted to an pro-inflammatory ischemic myocardium. Polymeric biocompatible scaffolds are biomaterials that can improve SC retention and survival, with the goal to improve regional cardiac function. Methods: We electrospun fibers of a) uniaxial polycaprolactone (PCL) and b) coaxial PCL (core) and gelatin methacrylate (sheath), an anti-inflammatory substance. We first tested the SC retention of each scaffold. Then, adipose derived mesenchymal SCs (MSCs) were co-cultured with M1 macrophages (pro-inflammatory) with and without scaffold and we measure the expression of inflammatory-related genes (RT-PCR). Lastly, PCL+GelMA scaffolds with and without MSCs (3.5x10 3 MSCs) were implanted after myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (IR) and followed for 2 weeks. Results: The average diameter of PCL and PCL+GelMA fibers were 730±40nm and 1110±50nm, respectively. PCL+GelMA scaffolds increased MSCs adhesion compared to PCL (absorbance: 0.09±.03 for PCL and 0.24±0.02 for coaxial, p<0.05). Figure A shows that MSCs in presence of M1 macrophages had a significant increase in inflammatory genes, which was significantly ameliorated in the presence of GelMA. In preliminary animal studies (n=1-4), MSCs delivered in a PCL+GelMA scaffold had partial preservation of regional function parameteres compared to IR only or IR+PCL+GelMA (no MSCs) (Figure B). Conclusion: Coaxially PCL+gelMA scaffolds attenuate the pro-inflammatory milieu of MSCs under ischemic-like conditions, and may improve regional cardiac remodeling.

AbstractCell therapy is being investigated as a powerful intervention to ameliorate the consequences of coronary artery disease. Among the different stem cell options, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are particularly attractive due to their high availability, as well as immune‐privileged status. However, it is still unclear whether mesenchymal stem cells can acquire cardiomyogenic characteristics after they are transplanted to the myocardium. In this article, we outline protocols that illustrate the plasticity of MSCs and their ability to acquire cardiogenic characteristics when they are in an ischemic‐like environment, as typically encountered after transplantation into the ischemic heart. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.This article was corrected on 26 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.Basic Protocol 1: Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)Support Protocol 1: Characterization of MSCs by flow cytometryBasic Protocol 2: Isolation of neonatal cardiomyoctes (NCMs)Support Protocol 2: Characterization of NCMsBasic Protocol 3: Cardiogenic plasticity of MSCs under ischemic‐like conditionsSupport Protocol 3: Characterization of the cardiomyogenic potential of MSCs

AbstractStem cell−based therapies for various ailments have attracted significant attention for over a decade. However, low retention of transplanted cells at the damaged site has hindered their potential for use in therapy. Tissue engineered grafts with fibrillar structures mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) can be potentially used to increase the retention and engraftment of stem cells at the damaged site. Moreover, these grafts may also provide mechanical stability at the damaged site to enhance function and regeneration. Among all the methods to produce fibrillar structures developed in recent years, electrospinning is a simple and versatile method to produce fibrous structures ranging from a few nanometers to micrometers. Coaxial electrospinning enables production of a mechanically stable core with a cell‐binding sheath for enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation. Furthermore, this process provides an alternative to functionalized engineered scaffolds with specific compositions. The present article describes the protocol for developing a polycaprolactone (PCL) core and gelatin/gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) sheath laden with stem cells for various regenerative engineering applications. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.This article was corrected on 18 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.Basic Protocol 1: Uniaxial PCL electrospinningBasic Protocol 2: Coaxial electrospinningSupport Protocol 1: Scaffold characterization for Basic Protocols 1 and 2Basic Protocol 3: Cell seeding on uniaxial and coaxial electrospun scaffolds and MTS assaySupport Protocol 2: Preparation of scaffold with cells for scanning electron microscopy

Introduction: Stem cell (SC) therapy is a potential method of repairing the heart after injury. However, SCs have been shown to have poor survival after transplantation, at least in part, due to a hostile pro-inflammatory ischemic myocardium. Thus, there is significant interest in the identification of strategies that can increase the retention/survival of SCs after transplantation. Here we seek to investigate whether the use of an immunomodulatory hydrogel, containing anti-inflammatory sinapic acid (SA), promotes the survival of SCs after transplantation. Methods: Myocardial infarction was induced in rats followed by the delayed delivery of A) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), B) MSCs in a hydrogel without SA or C) MSCs in a hydrogel containing SA (10μM). Delivery of MSCs (7.5 x 10 5 in 30μL) occurred 7 days after MI, representing the subacute stage and to minimize acute inflammation. Survival of MSCs, stably expressing firefly luciferase under the constitutive CMV promoter, was followed longitudinally using bioluminescence imaging. Results: Panels A-C provide representative images of the viability of MSCs in different groups, with the quantification shown in panel D. There were no differences in survival when MSCs were delivered alone (A) or in a hydrogel without SA (B). However, the survival of MSCs was significantly increased when they were transplanted in a hydrogel with the anti-inflammatory SA (C). Conclusions: Here we provide evidence of the potential for an immunomodulatory hydrogel to enhance the viability of MSCs after infarction, which may lead to improvement of cardiac function. Furthermore, use of this hydrogel in combination with stem cells could be a potential therapeutic strategy for ameliorating cardiac repair after significant damage.