Citations

PURPOSE STELLAR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02796261 ) was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent grade 3 astrocytoma. METHODS At trial initiation, eligibility criteria included: age ≥18 years, anaplastic astrocytoma (2016 WHO CNS Tumor classification [WHO CNS4]), first recurrence ≥6 months after radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), Karnofsky performance status ≥70, and no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Random assignment (1:1) was stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) mutation, age, resection extent, and geography. Patients received eflornithine (2.8 g/m 2 orally, every 8 hours [2 weeks on, 1 week off]) + lomustine (90 mg/m 2 orally, once every 6 weeks), or lomustine monotherapy (110 mg/m 2 once every 6 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 343 patients randomly assigned across 74 sites in eight countries, there was no difference in survival between eflornithine + lomustine and lomustine monotherapy (median OS 23.4 v 20.3 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.94). Following changes in classification and grading in the 2021 WHO CNS5, a subset analysis of patients with IDH- mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma (n = 196), defined in 2024, before unblinding, showed clinically meaningful improvements in median OS with eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy (34.9 v 23.5 months, HR, 0.64) and median progression-free survival (PFS, 15.8 v 7.2 months, HR, 0.57). No differences were observed among patients with CNS grade 4 disease. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events of relevance were related to reversible myelosuppression (eflornithine + lomustine 42% v lomustine monotherapy 29% of patients) and hearing impairment (24% v 0%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Clinically meaningful improvements were observed; eflornithine + lomustine doubled PFS and improved OS in patients with recurrent IDH -mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma, but not grade 4 tumors, after prior radiotherapy and TMZ, consistent with its cytostatic mechanism of action.

Abstract BACKGROUND STELLAR was a phase III randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine (ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor) with lomustine versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). We previously reported an overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of the combination in the patients with grade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Here we report updated OS and PFS outcomes based on additional molecular classification and blinded independent central review (BICR). METHOD Eligibility included: age ≥ 18 years, AA (2016 WHO criteria) with first recurrence ≥ 6 months after radiation, KPS ≥ 70, and no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Patients received eflornithine (2.8 g/m2 TID Q 2/3 weeks) with lomustine (90 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks) (Arm A) or lomustine alone (110 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks) (Arm B). Primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS Updated molecular data resulted in re-classification of the 343 AA patients enrolled into 3 WHO 2021 defined tumor subtypes, 196 tumors were IDHmut, CDKN2A/B intact, consistent with diagnosis of astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 3, 33 tumors had CDKN2A/B loss consistent with astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 4, 106 tumors were IDHwt consistent with diagnosis of glioblastoma, IDHwt, WHO grade 4. Updated results strengthen initial conclusion that eflornithine plus lomustine resulted in significant survival benefit in the astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 3 group (mOS 34.9 vs, 23.5 months, HR = 0.64, stratified log rank p =0.0136). PFS with eflornithine was also improved (15.8 vs, 7.2 months, HR = 0.57, stratified log rank p =0.0113). BICR demonstrated a high correlation between investigator and centrally determined PFS (p=0.0305), and high correlation between OS and PFS (p=.0001). CONCLUSION The clinically meaningful OS and PFS benefits observed with eflornithine in the molecularly defined 2021 WHO CNS grade 3 astrocytomas is further confirmed and expanded based on additional molecular classification and BICR of PFS.

Background We hypothesized treatment with nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) would be feasible, well tolerated, and may improve intracranial tumor control over SRS alone for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Methods The study is a phase Ib trial of nivolumab and SRS for BCBM. Clinical trial information: NCT03807765 . Key eligibility criteria include BCBM of all subtypes, age ≥18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performace Status (ECOG-PS)≤2 with ≤10 brain metastases. Treatment was initiated with a dose of nivolumab (480 mg intravenously) that was repeated every 4 weeks. The initial dose of nivolumab was followed 1 week later by SRS. Blood was collected at baseline and every 4 weeks for flow cytometry and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assessment. Results A total of 12 patients received SRS to 17 brain metastases. Breast cancer subtypes included triple negative (50%), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2− (33%), and HR−/HER2+ (17%). Median follow-up from start of protocol therapy is 56 months. No cases of radionecrosis were noted. Two lesions were noted to undergo local failure, both pathologically confirmed, for a 12-month local control of 94%. Median distant intracranial control was 7.4 months with a 12-month control rate of 33%. Median systemic progression-free survival was 7.7 months with a 12-month rate of 42%. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 months with a 12-month OS of 75%. Most patients were noted to have an increase in cfDNA throughout study treatment, at week 5 compared with baseline (83%), week 25 compared with baseline (89%), and 100% at first follow-up. Intracranial control was associated with lower levels of CD4 regulatory T cells (Treg) (p=0.03) and higher levels of CD4 T effector memory (p=0.04). Conclusions Nivolumab and SRS is a safe and feasible treatment option in BCBM. Long-term follow-up revealed no cases of radiation necrosis. Trial registration number NCT03807765 .

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), a grade 3 brain cancer, remains an unmet medical need. STELLAR was a phase III randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine (ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor) with lomustine versus lomustine alone, originally for patients with recurrent AA. However, as the WHO definition of AA evolved during trial conduct (e.g., excluding IDH wild-type disease), we determined results in both the original ITT population and by revised molecularly defined WHO 2021 diagnoses in pre-planned analyses. METHOD Key eligibility: age ≥ 18, AA (2016 WHO criteria), first recurrence ≥ 6 months after radiation and temozolomide, KPS ≥ 70, no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Stratification: IDH, age, resection extent, and geography. Patients were randomized to Arm A: eflornithine (2.8 g/m2 TID Q 2/3 weeks) with lomustine (90 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks) or Arm B: lomustine (110 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was OS. The pre-specified hazard ratio (HR) goal was 0.667 based on projected median OS (mOS) increase to 18 months from 12 months. RESULTS 343 pts (172/171 Arms A/B) were randomized (105 sites, 8 countries). ITT analysis found no difference between arms (mOS 23.4 vs. 20.3 months, HR = 0.94). However, a pre-specified subset analysis in IDH mutant, 2021 WHO-defined grade 3 astrocytoma (n=194), showed significant improvement with eflornithine (mOS 34.9 vs. 23.5 months, HR = 0.64, log rank p = 0.016) and PFS (15.8 vs. 7.2 months, HR = 0.58, log rank p = 0.015). No difference was observed in the IDH wild-type subset. AEs were consistent with historic data. CONCLUSION There was no difference in OS between arms in the ITT analysis. However, medically meaningful and statistically significant OS and PFS benefits were observed with eflornithine in the pre-planned analysis of patients with molecularly defined 2021 WHO CNS grade 3 astrocytoma.

Abstract BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is caused by pathogenic germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing individuals to malignancies, including glioblastoma (GBM). MMR-deficient tumors are resistant to monofunctional alkylators such as temozolomide but not to bifunctional alkylators such as the nitrosourea lomustine. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab represents another treatment option, which is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mismatch repair deficient cancers. METHODS We present a patient with multifocal GBM and Lynch syndrome who experienced rapid progression following standard-of-care chemoradiation, followed by durable responses to lomustine and then to pembrolizumab. RESULTS A 58-year-old man with Lynch syndrome (MSH2 mutation) and prior history of colon cancer presented with seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain identified right frontal and left parietal masses. Right frontal tumor was resected; pathology was consistent with GBM, IDH wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated. Both lesions were treated with radiation therapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. After two cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, his left parietal tumor progressed and was subtotally resected, followed by four cycles of lomustine (stopped due to myelotoxicity). He remained progression-free for 15 months. Surveillance MRI identified new enhancement involving the left frontal lobe, left periventricular white matter, and right internal auditory canal, concerning for leptomeningeal dissemination. MRI spine identified no additional lesions. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative for tumor cells on two occasions. Patient was treated with pembrolizumab. He remains on treatment with stable disease four months after ICI initiation and 31 months after GBM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MMR-deficient GBM resist standard chemoradiation. Alternatives such as nitrosourea or ICI therapy may achieve durable responses. While data is insufficient to administer these agents as upfront therapy in this specific setting, both should be considered as options for recurrent disease.

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of the following adult CNS cancers: glioma (WHO grade 1, WHO grade 2–3 oligodendroglioma [1p19q codeleted, IDH- mutant], WHO grade 2–4 IDH- mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 4 glioblastoma), intracranial and spinal ependymomas, medulloblastoma, limited and extensive brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, non–AIDS-related primary CNS lymphomas, metastatic spine tumors, meningiomas, and primary spinal cord tumors. The information contained in the algorithms and principles of management sections in the NCCN Guidelines for CNS Cancers are designed to help clinicians navigate through the complex management of patients with CNS tumors. Several important principles guide surgical management and treatment with radiotherapy and systemic therapy for adults with brain tumors. The NCCN CNS Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding molecular profiling of gliomas.

2027 Background: Breast cancer related leptomeningeal disease (BC-LMD) is a dire diagnosis for 5-8% of breast cancer patients with overall survival (OS) measured in weeks without treatment. As new treatments prolong survival with breast cancer, the risk of developing BC-LMD may be increasing. We hypothesized that the rate of BC-LMD diagnosis increased significantly with time. We also predicted that OS with BC-LMD had changed with time and in relationship to molecular subtype and treatment following BC-LMD diagnosis. Methods: With approval of the local Scientific Research Committee and IRB, we conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records for patients treated or diagnosed with breast cancer at MCC from 2011-2020. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to determine median overall survival (OS), progression of disease, and differences by molecular subtype. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine characteristics of primary tumors and treatments which affected OS. Results: Of the 133 cases identified, significantly more were diagnosed between 2016-2020 than 2011-2015 (p < 0.01). Significant increases were seen in HER2+ and TNBC patients (p < 0.05) but not for ER/PR positive (HR+) disease (p = 0.058). HER2+ LMD associated with longest overall survival (OS; 7mths) followed by HR+ disease (3mths) and TNBC with the shortest OS (2mths). Systemic metastases preceded BC-LMD diagnosis in 72% of cases and CNS metastases in 85% of cases. HER2+ disease also conferred increased survival after CNS metastases were diagnosed until progression to LMD (8mth vs 2mth for HR+ and 1mth for TNBC LMD; p < 0.05). Positive impact on survival by HER2 targeted therapies may account for improved OS in this population. Other factors which increased OS generally were: WBRT, continuation of systemic therapy, delivery of intrathecal chemotherapy, and participation in clinical trials. Having TNBC and decision to defer treatment were associated with reduced OS. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of identifying patients with BC-LMD early and with the intention to treat. Prospective clinical trials and population-based studies are needed to advance treatment of BC-LMD.

Abstract Background Validation of the 2016 RANO MRI scorecard for leptomeningeal metastasis failed for multiple reasons. Accordingly, this joint EORTC Brain Tumor Group and RANO effort sought to prospectively validate a revised MRI scorecard for response assessment in leptomeningeal metastasis. Methods Coded paired cerebrospinal MRI of 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid cancers at baseline and follow-up after treatment and instructions for assessment were provided via the EORTC imaging platform. The Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the interobserver pairwise agreement. Results Thirty-five raters participated, including 9 neuroradiologists, 17 neurologists, 4 radiation oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, and 2 medical oncologists. Among single leptomeningeal metastases-related imaging findings at baseline, the best median concordance was noted for hydrocephalus (Kappa = 0.63), and the worst median concordance for spinal linear enhancing disease (Kappa = 0.46). The median concordance of raters for the overall response assessment was moderate (Kappa = 0.44). Notably, the interobserver agreement for the presence of parenchymal brain metastases at baseline was fair (Kappa = 0.29) and virtually absent for their response to treatment. 394 of 700 ratings (20 patients x 35 raters, 56%) were fully completed. In 308 of 394 fully completed ratings (78%), the overall response assessment perfectly matched the summary interpretation of the single ratings as proposed in the scorecard instructions. Conclusion This study confirms the principle utility of the new scorecard, but also indicates the need for training of MRI assessment with a dedicated reviewer panel in clinical trials. Electronic case report forms with “blocking options” may be required to enforce completeness and quality of scoring.

Abstract BACKGROUND Validation of the 2016 LANO MRI scorecard for leptomeningeal metastasis failed for multiple reasons. The objective of this joint EORTC Brain Tumor Group and RANO effort was to validate the feasibility of the revised MRI scorecard for assessing response in leptomeningeal metastasis. METHODS Coded paired cerebrospinal MRI of 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid cancers at baseline and follow-up after treatment and instructions for assessment were provided via the EORTC imaging platform. The kappa coefficient (K) was used to evaluate inter-observer pairwise agreement. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS V9.4 software (Cary, NC). The sponsor of the study was the University Hospital Zurich (2018-00192). RESULTS Thirty-five raters participated, including 9 neuroradiologists, 17 neurologists, 4 radiation oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons and 2 medical oncologists. Among leptomeningeal metastases-related items at baseline, the best median concordance was noted for hydrocephalus (K=0.63), and the worst median for spinal linear enhancing disease (K=0.46). The median concordance for overall response was moderate (K=0.44). Notably, the interobserver agreement for the presence of parenchymal brain metastases at baseline was minimal (K=0.29). Significant differences were observed when considering the specialty of the raters. Only 394 of 700 ratings (56%) were fully completed. Among 394 fully completed ratings, perfect concordance was noted in 293 ratings (74%) when comparing the overall response according to the guidelines provided in the scorecard and the overall response provided by the raters. The main discordances were noted for partial response according to the rater versus stable disease according to the guidelines (n=44), followed by progression according to the raters versus stable disease according to the guidelines (n=23). CONCLUSION Electronic case report forms with "blocking solutions" are probably required to enforce completeness and quality of scoring. These results confirm the necessity of central review and the need for training of MRI assessment in clinical trials.

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.