Citations

BACKGROUND: End colostomy reversal with colorectal anastomosis (Hartmann’s reversal) is a technically challenging procedure associated with significant morbidity due to adhesions and distorted anatomy after the index surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for Hartmann’s reversal. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data. SETTINGS: High-volume tertiary referral center with specialized colorectal surgery expertise. PATIENTS: A total of 218 patients who underwent Hartmann’s reversal between May 2018 and April 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay and rate of conversion. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rates and time to return of bowel function. RESULTS: Of 218 patients, 139 (63.8%) underwent open surgery, 48 (22.0%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 31 (14.2%) underwent robotic surgery. Robotic surgery had the lowest estimated blood loss (median 77.5 vs 100 mL laparoscopic and 150 mL open, p < 0.0001). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 16.1% of robotic cases compared with 35.4% of laparoscopic cases ( p = 0.0618). Minimally invasive approaches were associated with shorter hospital length of stay (median 3.0 vs 4.0 days, p < 0.0001) and faster return of bowel function (median 2.0 vs 3.0 days, p = 0.0095) compared to open surgery. Overall 30-day morbidity was 23.4%, with no significant difference among approaches ( p = 0.30). The temporal trend showed increasing adoption of robotic techniques, from 0% in 2018 to 53.8% in 2023, and a decrease in the proportion of cases approached by open surgery, from 76.9% in 2018 to 23.1% in 2023. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and single-institution experience with limited follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches to Hartmann’s reversal are associated with improved short-term outcomes compared to open surgery. The robotic approach shows promise in reducing conversion rates, potentially extending the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to more patients undergoing this challenging procedure. See Video Abstract . COMPARACIÓN DE LOS ENFOQUES ABIERTO, LAPAROSCÓPICO Y ROBÓTICO PARA LA REVERSIÓN DE HARTMANN: LA EXPERIENCIA DE LA CLÍNICA MAYO ANTECEDENTES: La reversión de la colostomía terminal con anastomosis colorrectal (reversión de Hartmann) es un procedimiento técnicamente complejo asociado a una morbilidad significativa debido a las adherencias y la distorsión anatómica tras la cirugía inicial. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados perioperatorios de los abordajes abiertos, laparoscópicos y robóticos para la reversión de Hartmann. DISEÑO: Análisis retrospectivo de datos mantenidos prospectivamente. ENTORNO: Centro terciario de referencia de gran volumen con experiencia especializada en cirugía colorrectal. PACIENTES: Un total de 218 se sometieron a la reversión de Hartmann entre mayo de 2018 y abril de 2023. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Los resultados primarios incluyeron la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y la tasa de conversión. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron las tasas generales de complicaciones y el tiempo de recuperación de la función intestinal. RESULTADOS: De los 218 pacientes, 139 (63,8 %) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 48 (22,0 %) a cirugía laparoscópica y 31 (14,2 %) a cirugía robótica. La cirugía robótica tuvo la menor pérdida de sangre estimada (mediana, 77,5 ml frente a 100 ml en laparoscopia y 150 ml en cirugía abierta, p < 0,0001). La conversión a cirugía abierta se produjo en el 16,1 % de los casos robóticos frente al 35,4 % de los casos laparoscópicos ( p = 0,0618). Los abordajes mínimamente invasivos se asociaron con una estancia hospitalaria más corta (mediana de 3,0 días frente a 4,0 días, p < 0,0001) y un retorno más rápido de la función intestinal (mediana de 2,0 días frente a 3,0 días, p = 0,0095) en comparación con la cirugía abierta. La morbilidad global a los 30 días fue del 23,4 %, sin diferencias significativas entre los distintos enfoques ( p = 0,30). La tendencia temporal mostró un aumento en la adopción de técnicas robóticas, del 0 % en 2018 al 53,8 % en 2023, y una disminución en la proporción de casos abordados mediante cirugía abierta, del 76,9 % en 2018 al 23,1 % en 2023. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo y experiencia de una sola institución con una duración de seguimiento limitada. CONCLUSIONES: Los enfoques mínimamente invasivos para la reversión de Hartmann se asocian con mejores resultados a corto plazo en comparación con la cirugía abierta. El enfoque robótico es prometedor para reducir las tasas de conversión, lo que podría ampliar los beneficios de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva a más pacientes que se someten a este procedimiento tan complejo. ( AI-generated translation ).

Abstract Background Patients with Crohn disease (CD) face an elevated risk of developing small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), a malignancy characterized by late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. In this study we aimed to characterize surgical management and oncologic outcomes for CD-associated SBA. Methods A retrospective review was conducted across 3 tertiary IBD centers, analyzing 99 patients with CD who underwent surgery for SBA between 1992 and 2025. Data included patient demographics, CD history, surgical details, and oncologic outcomes. Results The median time from CD diagnosis to SBA was 25 years. The SBA diagnosis was incidental in 74.8% of cases, discovered during surgery for other complications. Tumors were predominantly located in the ileum (80.8%) and showed aggressive features: 56.6% were poorly differentiated (grade 3), and 85.9% were pathologically advanced (T3/T4 on TNM staging). Nodal involvement was present in 45.5% of patients, and 18.2% had distant metastases at diagnosis. A complete (R0) resection was achieved in 90.9% of surgeries, with a 30-day morbidity rate of 26.3%. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the distant recurrence rate was 28.3%, and overall mortality was 27.3% (18.2% cancer related). Conclusion In patients with long-standing CD, SBA is typically an incidental diagnosis made at an advanced stage. While high rates of complete surgical resection are possible, the prognosis remains guarded due to aggressive tumor biology and high recurrence rates. These findings highlight a critical need for improved risk stratification to guide surveillance and for the development of evidence-based adjuvant treatment strategies.

Objective: This study establishes objective benchmarks for robotic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) proficiency, evaluating individual surgeon learning curves using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. Summary Background Data: IPAA is a standard surgical treatment for conditions like refractory ulcerative colitis; robotic assistance offers potential advantages. However, the robotic IPAA learning curve is not clearly defined. Conventional analyses often overlook significant inter-surgeon variability and patient-specific factors, hindering surgical training optimization. Methods: A multi-site retrospective analysis of 123 consecutive robotic IPAA procedures performed by 11 surgeons between June 2015 and December 2023 was conducted. Patient-related variables were used for risk adjustment, and RA-CUSUM charts were generated to assess 30-day complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay at both aggregate and individual surgeon levels. Results: Aggregate RA-CUSUM data indicated general improvement trends for operative time and length of stay, alongside higher-than-expected complication rates in the early phase. Disaggregated analyses at the individual surgeon level revealed significant heterogeneity in performance trajectories and learning patterns across all three outcomes, directly challenging the concept of a standardized, uniform learning curve. Although postoperative complication and length of stay outcomes did not significantly differ between surgeons, operative time varied significantly. Conclusions: The acquisition of skill in robotic IPAA is a highly individualized process, suggesting the traditional uniform learning curve model is insufficient for contemporary surgical education. These findings strongly advocate for a shift towards personalized training paradigms that incorporate deliberate practice, targeted feedback, and simulation to optimize learning and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Emergency colorectal surgery traditionally uses open approaches, with limited minimally invasive adoption. Although robotic surgery demonstrates benefits in elective procedures, its role in emergency settings remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic and open approaches in emergency colorectal procedures and predicted future adoption trends. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 83,483 patients from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2012 to 2021) who underwent emergency colorectal surgery: 53,731 open, 26,649 laparoscopic, and 3,103 robotic procedures. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and g-computation analysis. Classification and Regression Trees were used to analyze surgical approaches to selection factors, whereas vector autoregressive models projected future usage trends. RESULTS: Robotic surgery demonstrated significantly lower conversion rates to open surgery compared with laparoscopy (7.8% vs 24.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36), shorter length of stay (incidence rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.69), and fewer surgical complications (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72). Robotic usage increased from 0% to 6.6% (2012 to 2021), with trends suggesting substantial growth toward 20.2% by 2025. Patient selection favored robotics for stable patients with diverticulitis (68.4%) and cancer without sepsis, whereas open surgery remained predominant in patients with perforation, severe sepsis, or significant comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In selected emergency colorectal procedures, robotic surgery demonstrates superior outcomes vs conventional approaches. These outcomes may be partially influenced by patient selection factors because robotic cases involved more clinically stable patients. These findings support expanded robotic platform availability for emergency procedures, although careful patient selection remains essential. The projected increase in robotic usage reflects a growing acceptance of this technology, suggesting that its technical advantages can extend to more complex emergency cases than previously considered.

Objective: To determine if a Super Learner (SL) machine learning approach could improve the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator (ACS-RC) for postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Summary of Background Data: Machine learning (ML) has shown significant potential to advance medical fields, including surgical risk prediction. Current tools, like the ACS-RC which uses logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting, are standard but may be enhanced by more advanced ML ensembles. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed colorectal surgery cases from the 2018-2022 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. An SL model, which combines multiple ML algorithms, was developed to predict fourteen postoperative outcomes. Its performance was compared against traditional logistic regression (LOG) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) models. Key performance metrics included discrimination (AUROC, AUPRC) and calibration (Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Results: The SL model demonstrated superior performance across all predicted complications when compared to both LOG and XGB. It showed superior discrimination for severe outcomes, achieving an AUROC greater than 0.94 for predicting mortality. The SL model was also more accurate in predicting infectious complications and length of stay, and its calibration metrics indicated a better overall fit and accuracy. Conclusions: The Super Learner model enhances the accuracy of postoperative risk prediction in colorectal surgery. Its superior performance suggests it is a promising tool for improving personalized patient counseling, aiding clinical decision-making, and optimizing resource allocation.

Objective: To assess trends in surgical approaches (robotic, laparoscopic, and open) for various procedures, including prostatectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy, colectomy, proctectomy, pancreatectomy, hepatectomy, and esophagectomy, and predict the future of these surgical approaches. Summary Background Data: The rapid adoption of robotic surgery has raised critical questions about the future of traditional laparoscopic techniques. Understanding the trends and potential dominance of robotic surgery is essential for surgical training, healthcare infrastructure, and resource allocation. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2023. Vector Autoregressive modeling analyzed trends and predicted future patterns for robotic, laparoscopic, or open surgical approaches across the specified procedures. The study included all reported cases in the database where the surgical approach was specified. Results: The analysis revealed a continued shift towards robotic surgery, particularly dominant in urologic procedures and rapidly adopted for complex operations like hepatectomy and esophagectomy. Laparoscopy’s use is declining across most specialties, though it remains significant in colectomy. Open surgery persists at high rates, especially in pancreatic and rectal operations. Projections suggest robotic surgery will surpass laparoscopy in colectomy (44.5%) and proctectomy (38.3%) by 2026. Conclusions: The transition toward robotic surgery continues across specialties at varying rates. These findings have significant implications for surgical training, healthcare infrastructure, and resource allocation. The high rates of open surgery in certain procedures highlight opportunities for broader adoption of minimally invasive techniques.

AbstractAimMinimally invasive transanal platforms are now the standard of care for select low‐risk rectal tumours. However, existing platforms come with persistent technical challenges. The da Vinci SP Surgical System™ offers a new alternative designed to work effectively in narrow spaces. This technology has the potential to enhance the feasibility and proximal extent of complex transanal resections. This study aimed to describe the morbidity and technical success in patients undergoing single‐port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SPR‐TAMIS). Secondary outcomes include rates of local recurrence.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent SPR‐TAMIS at our institution between February 2019 and December 2023.ResultsThe study included 31 patients (19 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 61 ± 13.3 years. The average tumour distance from the anal verge was 10 cm. Thirty patients completed SPR‐TAMIS, with one patient requiring conversion to robotic sigmoidectomy due to location in the mid‐sigmoid colon. The mean operating time was 106 ± 42 min. Twenty‐eight out of 30 patients underwent full‐thickness excision and all but two were successfully closed. All specimens were resected intact, and margins were negative in 93.5% of cases. The average tumour size was 13 ± 34 cm2, with 13 lesions classified as adenomas and 16 as adenocarcinomas. All patients who did not undergo associated procedures were discharged on the day of surgery. Two patients experienced 30‐day morbidity. At a mean follow‐up of 18 months (± 13), no local or systemic recurrences were identified.ConclusionSPR‐TAMIS for excision of low‐risk rectal tumours is associated with high rates of technical success and low 30‐day morbidity. Further research is needed to compare SPR‐TAMIS with other techniques to determine potential advantages over current transanal platforms.

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher risk of developing colorectal dysplasia and colorectal cancer compared to the general population. Although the use of surveillance protocols has improved the ability to detect dysplasia, some lesions are still missed at colonoscopy. This study aims to determine the rate of dysplastic lesions that are undetected at colonoscopies in IBD patients undergoing colectomy and to identify factors associated with missed dysplasia. Methods Patients who had received a total or subtotal colectomy at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota), between January 2003 and December 2022, and had a complete colonoscopy within 5 years before surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Data abstracted included demographic information, disease-related data, colonoscopy and pathology reports, and surgery pathology reports. Colonoscopy and surgery findings were compared, and patients were divided into 3 groups: no dysplasia at both, detected dysplasia, and undetected dysplasia. Results Among 1320 IBD patients undergoing colectomy, 5.4% had undetected dysplastic lesions identified only at surgery. Factors independently associated with dysplasia detection were endoscopic remission or mild endoscopic disease activity (odds ratio [OR], 2.326; P = .0081; 95% CI, 1.246-4.342), prior dysplasia detection (OR, 1.876; P = .0491; 95% CI, 1.002-3.511), colonoscopy performed for surveillance (OR, 2.380; P = .0048; 95% CI, 1.302-4.350), and longer disease duration at surgery (OR, 1.039; P = .0085; 95% CI, 1.010-1.070). Conclusions Clinicians should be aware of the risk of missing dysplastic lesions, especially when endoscopic disease activity is moderate/severe, and not only for longstanding disease. Efforts should be made to obtain endoscopic remission to make the “invisible” visible.

Objective: To compare robotic-assisted proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (R-IPAA) outcomes and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA within a specialized robotic surgery center, using matching techniques to minimize potential confounding factors. Background: Minimally invasive approaches, particularly laparoscopy, have improved outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing IPAA. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential technical advantages, but its definitive superiority over laparoscopy in this context remains under debate. Methods: This retrospective, “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology”–compliant study analyzed 234 consecutive patients undergoing IPAA (117 robotic and 117 laparoscopic). Data encompassed patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. We employed various matching techniques to address potential bias. Primary endpoints focused on 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay, blood loss, and stoma closure rates. Results: R-IPAA demonstrated a lower conversion rate to open surgery ( P = 0.02), a shorter hospital stay ( P = 0.04), and reduced blood loss ( P = 0.0003) compared with laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA. While overall 30-day morbidity rates were similar ( P = 0.4), matched analyses suggested a trend towards fewer reoperations and 3-month IPAA-associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure in the robotic group. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In a high-volume robotic surgery center, R-IPAA reduced the risk of conversion to open surgery while reducing intraoperative blood loss and providing shorter lengths of stay with equivalent perioperative outcomes. Promising trends to reduce 30-day reoperations and surgical complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure were observed after a matching analysis.