Citations

Abstract: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. While advances in treatment have improved outcomes, the greatest gains in public health will come from primary prevention. Risk stratification is the foundation of CVD prevention. Traditional tools, such as pooled cohort equations (PCEs) and SCORE2, do not capture non-traditional risk factors and individual variability, driving efforts to refine existing approaches. We critically discuss emerging risk determinants for primary CVD prevention. Coronary artery calcium scoring can reclassify CVD risk but has limitations related to cost, access, and unvalidated improvements in clinical endpoints. Biomarkers such as apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) may identify residual risk beyond LDL-C, particularly in patients with lipid discordance, but remain underused due to uncertain thresholds and the lack of prospective triallevel outcome data. Trials of colchicine in primary prevention have yielded mixed results, making the role of targeting inflammation unclear in CVD prevention. Polygenic risk scores can stratify genetic risk but face challenges in sensitivity, specificity, and generalizability. Multiomics approaches, while offering the promise of deeper phenotyping, lack established clinical applications and consensus on when their use is appropriate. Artificial intelligence may allow better prediction across cohorts but requires broader validation. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, a marker of inflammation and age-related CVD risk, lacks evidence supporting routine screening or intervention in younger, asymptomatic individuals. The proliferation of new risk stratification tools poses a key challenge: determining when additional data meaningfully alter clinical decisions. Until robust outcome-based evidence emerges, risk enhancers should guide, but not dictate, therapy in selected patients.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is associated with limited blood flow reserve due to reduced cardiac output (Q). HF is also associated with generalized respiratory muscle weakness, despite patients being exposed to an increased work and cost of breathing due primarily to increased flow resistive work from an altered breathing pattern. We hypothesized that the use of a respiratory training device during aerobic exercise training would positively impact patients with HF by training the inspiratory muscles and modifying their respiratory response to exercise. Methods: 15 subjects completed all study visits (age 67.5±10.0 yr, Ht 179.3±6.1cm, BMI 28.8±5.7 m/cm 2 ). Patients diagnosed with HF and currently enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) completed the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ), pulmonary function testing, and measures during exercise that included Q (soluble gas method), ventilation (V E ) and respiratory gas exchange. Measures were made at baseline and after completion of CR. Participants were randomized to no respiratory resistance (NR) or mild-moderate inspiratory resistance (MR, 15 to 20 cmH 2 O) provided by a respiratory resistance mask (Training Mask Co., Cadillac, MI) worn during aerobic portions of CR. Results: Participants completed on average 23.9 ± 2.5 CR sessions with 10 subjects in the MR group and 5 in the NR group. The MR group had a decrease on the MLHFQ score of 19.9±26.9 and the NR group had a decrease of 6.0±23.4 (p=0.330). At a matched workload of 30 Watts (W), V E declined by 4.0±7.0 L/min and increased by 2.2±13.1 L/min for subjects in the MR and NR groups, respectively (p=0.06). Respiratory rate (RR) decreased in MR by 1.2± 4.9 and decreased in NR by 0.67± 5.9 (p>0.05). Heart rate at 30W decreased with time in both the MR and NR groups 10.4±12.4 and 3.9±8.9 respectively (p=0.036, no difference between groups). Stroke volume at 30W tended to increase for both MR and NR (p>0.05, no difference between groups). Conclusion: The addition of moderate inspiratory resistance to the aerobic training during CR was well tolerated by HF patients and preliminarily suggests trends toward improved ventilatory responses when assessed during submaximal exercise.