Citations

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe, and report the outcomes of, a surgical technique that combines reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using an allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) with a lower trapezius transfer (LTT) to the infraspinatus of the allograft extended with the inferior capsule. Methods: Between 2019 and 2023, 2 surgeons performed a total of 27 RSAs using an APC in conjunction with an LTT. Once the RSA APC reconstruction had been performed, cuff-capsule allograft tissue was passed posterior to the glenosphere and secured to the harvested lower trapezius. One shoulder was resected for periprosthetic joint infection; the remaining 26 shoulders were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 2.7 years; range, 2 to 5 years). Results: The rate of revision or reoperation for humeral complications was 15% and included secondary bone grafting (2 shoulders), resection for infection (1 shoulder), and internal fixation of a periprosthetic fracture (1 shoulder). Other complications requiring surgery included hematoma treated with evacuation (2 shoulders), dislocation (1 shoulder), and glenosphere disassociation (1 shoulder). Preoperatively, 11 shoulders presented with pseudoparalysis, and the mean active elevation of the remaining 16 shoulders was 43°, with only 1 shoulder demonstrating >90° of active elevation. At the most recent follow-up, 3 shoulders were pseudoparalytic, 11 had <90° of active elevation, 8 had >90° of active elevation, and 3 had active elevation to 90°. The overall mean active elevation of the 25 shoulders that could be assessed was 79°. Preoperatively, only 4 (15%) of the 27 shoulders demonstrated active external rotation past neutral; at the most recent follow-up, 80% of surviving shoulders had active external rotation past neutral. Conclusions: LTT at the time of RSA using an APC has the potential to restore active external rotation in shoulders with proximal humeral bone loss and posterosuperior cuff deficiency. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Proximal pole scaphoid fracture nonunions are challenging conditions to treat. When significant comminution of the proximal pole and avascular necrosis is present, scaphoid proximal pole reconstructive options are considered. The proximal pole of the hamate is a local autograft option; however, little has been described on the outcomes of this procedure. Methods: Patients who underwent proximal pole scaphoid reconstruction using proximal hamate autograft at 3 tertiary care centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic union was classified by greater than 50% bony trabeculae across the reconstruction site on computed tomography scan. Results: Ten patients were included. Average age at the time of surgery was 27.9 years, and 60% were men. Average length of proximal hamate autograft harvested was 10 mm. All patients healed at an average of 14.3 weeks following surgery. At final follow-up, 3 patients reported no pain, 3 reported mild occasional pain, 2 reported moderate tolerable pain (1 at the hamate graft site), and 2 had no reports on their pain level. Conclusions: In small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions with fragmentation and avascular necrosis, ipsilateral proximal hamate autograft reconstruction of the scaphoid proximal pole is a viable and reproducible option with high rates of union and patient satisfaction.

Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes of lower trapezius tendon (LTT) transfer using an Achilles tendon allograft in patients with failed superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). Methods A retrospective therapeutic review was conducted on patients who underwent LTT transfer using an Achilles tendon allograft after SCR failure between January 2018 and May 2020. The inclusion criteria encompassed both structural and functional failures of SCR in patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis and a minimum follow‐up of 2 years. Exclusion criteria were insufficient clinical data or loss to follow‐up. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at final follow‐up using the visual analog scale (VAS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion (ROM). Results Eighteen patients were included, with a mean follow‐up of 42.5 months (range: 24‐62 months). All outcome measures demonstrated statistically significant improvement: VAS scores improved from 5.9 ± 1.3 to 1.8 ± 1.4; SSV scores improved from 18.0 ± 9.1 to 61.4 ± 18.5; Constant score improved from 33.3 ± 5.3 to 65.5 ± 17.4; and ASES score improved from 38.5 ± 5.2 to 67.1 ± 17.7 (all P < .001). On the basis of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using a 0.5 SD distribution‐based method, clinically meaningful improvements were observed in 88.9% of patients for VAS and ASES scores, and 94.4% for Constant and SSV scores. ROM gains included forward elevation (73° to 120°), abduction (57° to 93°), and external rotation (−22° to 40°). At final follow‐up, 77.8% of patients had resumed occupational activities, and 61.1% returned to sports. Four patients (22.2%) required conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Conclusions LTT transfer using an Achilles tendon allograft following failed SCR yields significant improvements in pain relief, functional outcomes, and ROM. LTT transfer using an Achilles tendon allograft following failed SCR may offer a potential treatment option, particularly in younger, active patients who seek to preserve native shoulder anatomy and function. Level of Evidence Level IV retrospective case series.

Abstract Background Salvage procedures for failed total wrist arthroplasty have variable results and limitations such as donor site morbidity, malunion, delayed or nonunion. We present a case of substantial bone loss after failed wrist arthroplasty and a surgical technique in which the distal ulna is transferred and intussuscepted to achieve union between the residual distal radius and metacarpals. Case Description A 48-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis presented with wrist prosthetic joint infection 16 years after total wrist arthroplasty. With extensive bone loss following implant removal and multiple debridements, the remaining distal ulna was resected and intussuscepted between the residual radius and second and third metacarpals. The patient achieved incorporation of the graft at 12 weeks and fusion at 20 weeks, with resolution of pain and restoration of digit function at 2 years. Literature Review Standard means of wrist arthrodesis utilizing iliac crest autograft and femoral head allograft may be limited to address substantial bone loss following total wrist implant removal. Intussusception has been utilized in the elbow, hip, and diaphysis to optimize graft–host bone contact and achieve union. While ulna-utilizing procedures have been described for oncologic and traumatic indications, to our knowledge, double intussusception has not been described for salvage procedures after failed wrist arthroplasty. Clinical Relevance Intussuscepting the distal ulna within the distal radius and metacarpals as an interpositional arthrodesis provides autologous graft, increased surface contact, and length restoration in cases of poor bone quality and significant bone loss following revision of a total wrist implant.

Abstract Introduction The costo-osteochondral autograft, vascularized medial femoral trochlear osteochondral autograft, and proximal hamate autograft have been used for the reconstruction of unsalvageable proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. Our hypothesis is that there is no difference in carpal kinematics after the proximal pole of the scaphoid is reconstructed with these three graft options. Methods Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus that was loaded through cyclical motion. Each specimen was tested under a series of the three reconstructed conditions and their kinematics compared. Results No significant differences were found in scapholunate and lunocapitate joint motion during wrist flexion-extension and wrist radioulnar deviation between the three reconstructed conditions (p > 0.05). Discussion and Conclusion There are minimal differences in carpal kinematics when comparing reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with the costoosteochondral, medial femoral trochlear, and proximal hamate grafts.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.” Results: The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction. Conclusions: Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.

AbstractIntroductionEndoprosthetic or allograft reconstruction are the preferred reconstruction techniques for proximal humeral bone tumors. Failure of these reconstructions may occur, but historically revision is performed rarely due to the lack of reliable options. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an allograft prosthetic composite (rAPC) may provide a revision option. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutional outcome of these procedures.MethodsEleven (6 male, 5 female) patients (mean age 51 ± 17 years) underwent revision of a failed oncologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus utilizing a rAPC. The most common indication for revision was subluxation (n = 6) and the most common previous implant was an endoprosthesis (n = 5).ResultsRevision resulted in improvements in shoulder elevation (39° vs. 62°, p = 0.02), external rotation (13° vs. 25°, p = 0.04), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (39 vs. 58, p = 0.004) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (51% vs 69%, p = 0.002). There were 2 re‐revision procedures performed. One for an allograft fracture and one for allograft resorption and loosening.ConclusionsRevision with a rAPC can effectively restore patient function. Due to the complexity of the cases, we advocate for these procedures to be performed by subspecialty upper extremity surgeons trained in complex revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: There continues to be controversy regarding the treatment of early-stage arthritis of the wrist, particularly in young patients, because of the large number of techniques, the poor long-term results for many of these techniques, and the overall paucity of high-level scientific data. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and 4-corner arthrodesis (4CA) have been established as the mainstay motion-sparing surgical treatment options in cases of early scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis. However, there is marked controversy surrounding the best treatment option for younger patients with greater physical demands because of the questionable outcomes associated with these motion-sparing options in such patients 1–9 . Traditionally, many surgeons prefer 4CA over PRC for young, high-demand patients, in part because studies have suggested that young age and work status as a laborer are important risk factors for worse outcomes following PRC 1,8 . However, the concern for symptomatic nonunion and potential for radiolunate arthritis in 4CA, as well as the lack of medium to long-term comparative studies in this subset, make this recommendation controversial 10 . Description: The wrist is accessed via the dorsal approach, creating a retinacular flap and a radially based ligament-sparing capsulotomy. The scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum are then excised en bloc. The radioscapholunate ligament is protected. The capsule and retinaculum and then repaired. Alternatives: Alternatives to PRC include nonoperative treatment, 4CA, capitolunate arthrodesis, posterior and anterior interosseous neurectomies, total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis. Rationale: A recent study by Wagner et al. compared patients <45 years old who underwent either PRC or 4CA 11 . Overall, PRC and 4CA had similar complication rates, postoperative pain levels, wrist function, and long-term outcomes free of conversion to arthrodesis. Patients who underwent PRC had improved motion and fewer complications, whereas patients who underwent 4CA had slightly lower rates of radiocarpal arthritis. Therefore, in this technique article, we describe PRC for wrist arthritis in patients <45 years old.

AbstractIntroductionThe proximal humerus is a common location for primary and non‐primary tumors. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus is commonly performed with an endoprosthesis with low rates of structural failure. The incidence and risk factors for stress shielding are under reported.MethodsThirty‐nine (19 male, 20 female) patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus and reconstruction with a cemented modular endoprosthesis between 2000 and 2018. The mean resection length was 12 ± 4 cm and was most commonly performed for metastatic disease (n = 26, 67%).ResultsStress shielding was observed in 9 (23%) patients at a mean of 29 (6–132) months postoperatively. Patients with stress shielding were noted to have shorter intramedullary stem length (87 vs. 107 mm, p < .001), longer extramedullary implant length (16 vs. 14 cm, p = .01) and a higher extramedullary implant to stem length ratio (2.1 vs. 1.1, p < .001). The incidence of stress shielding was higher (p = .003) in patients reconstructed with 75 mm stem (n = 6, 67%) lengths.ConclusionStress shielding of the humerus was associated with the use of shorter stems and long extramedullary implants. The long‐term ramifications of stress shielding on implant stability, complications at the time of revision surgery, and overall patient outcomes remain unknown.

AbstractIntroductionThe proximal humerus is a common site of primary and metastatic disease in the upper extremity. Historically, the goal of a hemiarthroplasty reconstruction was to provide a stable platform for hand and elbow function, with limited shoulder function. Techniques utilizing a reverse endoprosthesis (endoprosthetic replacement [EPR]) and allograft‐prosthetic composite (APC) have been developed; however, there is a paucity of comparative studies.MethodsA total of 83 (42 females, 41 males) patients undergoing an intraarticular resection of the humerus were reviewed. Reconstructions included 30 reverse and 53 hemiarthroplasty; including hemiarthroplasty EPR (n = 36) and APC (n = 17), and reverse EPR (n = 20) and APC (n = 10).ResultsReverse reconstructions had improved forward elevation (85° vs. 44°, p < .001) and external rotation (30° vs. 21°; p < .001) versus a hemiarthroplasty. Reverse reconstructions had improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (65 vs. 57; p = .01) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 scores (72 vs. 63; p < .001) versus hemiarthroplasty. Subluxation of the reconstruction was a common (n = 23, 27%), only occurring in hemiarthroplasty patients (EPR [n = 13, 36%] and APC [n = 10, 59%]).ConclusionThe current series highlights the improved functional outcome in patients undergoing reconstruction with a reverse arthroplasty compared to the traditional hemiarthroplasty. Currently reverse shoulder arthroplasty (APC or EPR) is our preferred methods of reconstruction in this patient population.