Citations

Abstract Background: Deletions in MTAP occur in 10-15% of cancers and are associated with poor prognosis. MTAP deletion (MTAPdel) leads to accumulation of MTA which causes partial inhibition of PRMT5, creating a synthetic lethality approach with PRMT5 inhibitors. Multiple investigational MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitors have demonstrated early clinical efficacy in MTAPdel NSCLC and other cancers. MTAPdel, PRMT5 expression, and clinical outcomes to standard of care immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapy (chemo) have not been well characterized. Methods: The Tempus Lens Platform (Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to query the Tempus multimodal de-identified database and establish and subsequently analyze a cohort of patients (pts)with NSCLC and DNA (Tempus xT) and RNA (Tempus xR) testing, treated with front-line (1L) ICI with or without chemo (N=3,676). PRMT5 expression was normalized as transcripts per million (TPM) and reported as log2(TPM + 1). Pts were classified into high vs low groups based on median PRMT5 expression and into MTAPdel vs intact (MTAPwt) based on MTAP biallelic loss. Immune infiltration was estimated using Quantiseq. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined as the time from 1L start to death or last known follow-up. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was defined as the time from 1L start to death, progression or last known follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for age, sex, histology, smoking status and PDL1 status. Results: PRMT5 expression was moderately increased in pts with MTAPdel (6.65 v 6.70, p=0.012). Alterations in MYC, SMARCA4 and KEAP1 were enriched in PRMT5-high tumors in both MTAPdel and MTAPwt pts (p<0.03). Pts with PRMT5-high tumors had decreased infiltrate of multiple immune cells, including B cells, macrophages (M1 and M2), NK cells, CD4 and CD8 T cells (p<0.001). Pts with MTAPdel/PRMT5-high expression had shorter rwOS compared to MTAPwt/PRMT5-low when treated with ICI alone (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.24, p=0.011) or with ICI + chemo (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.34-2.03, p<0.001). These associations persisted on multivariate analysis. Pts with MTAPdel/PRMT5-high expression were also associated with worse rwPFS when treated with ICI + chemo (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.22-1.86, p<0.001) on univariate and multivariate analysis, but did not associate with rwPFS in pts treated with ICI alone (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.42, p=0.9). Conclusion: PRMT5 expression defines an immune suppressed subpopulation of pts with NSCLC. Pts with elevated PRMT5 expression and MTAPdel have poor outcomes with ICI+/- chemo, indicating PRMT5 RNA expression levels can be used to inform clinical trial designs, particularly those that are testing novel combinatorial strategies. Citation Format: Natalie Vokes, Stamatina Fragkogianni, Pooja A. Shah, Santiago G. Trevino, Konstantinos Leventakos, Lei Deng, Matthew Lee, Tali Azenkot, KAYLA LAYNG, JACOB MERCER, Jyoti Patel, Jordi Rodon Ahnert. High PRMT5 expression is associated with decreased immune infiltrate and worse outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2446.

9009 Background: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) are a vital component of the US oncology workforce, representing nearly half of practicing medical oncologists. However, systemic barriers may influence their career trajectories differently. Understanding these challenges is essential for addressing workforce disparities and optimizing cancer care delivery across diverse geographic regions. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 13,497 medical oncologists using the 2024 Dec CMS Provider Dataset linked with the 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC). Medical oncologists were identified by their self-reported primary specialties, including Hematology/Oncology, Medical Oncology, and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant. Physicians were categorized by graduation origin (based on their self-reported medical school), career stage (early: 0–10 years, mid: 11–30 years, late: >30 years post-medical school graduation). The primary outcomes included practice at Main Campus of NCI Designated Cancer Centers (as an indicator of academic practice) and the geographical location of their practice (Metro, Non-Metro, Mixed). We employed chi-squared tests for statistical comparisons and performed stratified analyses by career stage to evaluate transition patterns over time. Results: 6920 IMGs constituted 48.7% of the oncology workforce, with similar gender distributions between IMG and non-IMG oncologists (37.9% vs 36.5% female, p=0.068). Notably, early career oncologists were less likely to be IMGs (IMG vs non-IMGs: 8.2% vs 12.5%, p<0.001). Compared to Non-IMGs, IMG oncologists are less likely to practice at main campuses of NCI Center (19.9% vs. 27.7%, p<0.001), especially as their career advances (all p<0.01). (Table). IMGs had higher representation in non-metropolitan areas than non-IMGs (11.4% vs 9.1%, p<0.001), particularly in late-career stages (14.7% vs 12.3%, p=0.033), indicating their unique role in serving underserved regions. (Table). Conclusions: Our findings reveal that, IMGs are less likely to practice at main campuses of NCI-Cancer Center than their non-IMG colleagues. Meanwhile, IMG oncologists are disproportionately serving rural communities. Supporting IMG pathways in oncology is critical to ensure a balanced cancer care delivery across the United States. Practice setting distribution and academic affiliation among international medical graduates (IMGs) and US graduates (USGs) by career stage. IMG (N=6,577) Non-IMG (N=6,920) IMG (N=6,577) Non-IMG (N=6,920) NCI Center Other NCI Center Other Metro Non-Metro/Mixed Metro Non-Metro/Mixed Total 19.9% 80.1% 27.7% 72.3% 88.6% 11.4% 90.9% 9.1% Career Stage Early (0-10y) 29.1% 70.9% 36.1% 63.9% 91.1% 8.9% 95.4% 4.6% Mid (11-30y) 21.3% 78.7% 28.8% 71.2% 90.1% 9.9% 91.6% 8.4% Senior (30+y) 15.0% 85.0% 22.0% 78.0% 85.3% 14.7% 87.7% 12.3%

PURPOSE International medical graduates (IMGs) are an essential component of the oncology workforce in the United States, comprising a third of all practicing oncologists and almost half of hematology/oncology fellows. In this article, we discuss the contributions of IMGs in the US oncology workforce, review unique challenges faced by IMGs, and propose potential solutions to overcome these challenges. METHODS ASCO's IMG Community of Practice was established with the mission to connect, mentor, guide, raise awareness, and overcome the challenges unique to IMGs interested in pursuing medical oncology in the United States. The content of this article is based on discussions at the IMG Community of Practice meetings at ASCO's 2023 and 2024 Annual Meetings. RESULTS IMGs bring an inherent diversity of thought and experience to the oncology workforce. They provide high-quality, culture- and language-concordant care to a diverse population of patients with cancer. However, IMGs in oncology face significant hardships throughout their careers, including visa-related restrictions, psychosocial and cultural struggles, as well as differential treatment while applying for residency and fellowship training, and early career positions. Greater awareness of these challenges among the members of the hematology/oncology community, along with institutional and individual efforts to support IMGs, is warranted. CONCLUSION We encourage oncology professionals and institutions to join our efforts in recognizing the unique paths of IMGs and providing support and advocacy to maximize the potential of IMGs in the US oncology workforce.

29 Background: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) comprise over one-third of internal medicine (IM) trainees and practicing oncologists in the United States. We aimed to examine challenges faced by IM IMG residents in pursuing hematology-oncology (HO) fellowship positions. Methods: We conducted a pilot survey using SurveyPluto to assess demographics and evaluate visa related challenges amongst ACGME residents interested in HO. The survey was disseminated through the ASCO IMG Community of Practice (CoP), the Heme-Onc Fellows Mentorship Empowerment (H.O.M.E) group and the IMG Oncologists social media homepage (@IMG_Oncologists). Results: A total of 59 IMG residents completed the survey (20% PGY-1, 36% PGY-2 and 44% PGY-3). The majority of trainees (88%) were from community or university-affiliated community programs. J-1 visa was the most common visa type (67.8%). The visa process was rated as difficult or very difficult by 36% of trainees. Annual visa renewal was required by 51% trainees and 55.9% reported visa related impact on plans for research grant applications (Table). The greatest challenges associated with visa status were disruption of travel plans and inability to unite with family (35.6%); obtaining documentation from home country (33.9%); visa renewal (28.8%) and lack of clarity in visa instructions (27.1%). Among resources that respondents wanted better access to, IMG networking groups (81.4%), legal/financial aids (47.5%), institutional visa seminars (45.8%) and flexibility from their program to visit family overseas (45.8%) were identified as priorities. Conclusions: Visa related barriers pose significant challenges to IMGs interested in HO. Policy changes, advocacy work and additional resources could be beneficial for future IMG oncologists. Challenges associated with visa status for hematology/oncology aspirants. Greatest visa related barriers during training % of respondents (n=59) Documentation from home country 33.9% Disruption in travel plans/ inability to unite with family 35.6% Lack of clarity in renewal instructions/ renewal process post document procurement 55.9% Ability to secure grant affected by visa 22% Non-monetary grant aspects affected by visa 13.6% Did not pursue grants due to visa 20.3% Desired resources during residency Institutional visa seminars 45.8% IMG network groups 81.4% Program flexibility to visit family overseas/ legal and financial aids 45.8%/47.5%

8555 Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with historically poor outcome. Excellent response of metastatic PSC to immunotherapy was previously reported, but its outcome compared with other NSCLCs is unknown in the immunotherapy era. Methods: NCDB was queried for stage IV NSCLC diagnosed from 2016 to 2020. Patients who were treated with chemotherapy only or immunotherapy only in the first course of treatment were included. Log-rank was used for survival analysis and adjusted by cox regression for age, gender, race, academic/integrated center, insurance, and comorbidity. Results: A total of 37,617 patients were identified, including 201 PSCs and 37,416 other NSCLCs. Pleomorphic (54%) was the most common PSC subtype. There was significant interaction between the survival effect of treatment and histology (interaction p = 0.024). When treated with immunotherapy alone, no significant difference was found between PSC and other NSCLCs (median survival 11.4 vs 12.4 months, logrank p = 0.56, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 – 1.30). However, when treated with chemotherapy alone, PSC remained significantly associated with worse survival (median survival 4.5 vs. 8.5 months, logrank p <0.001, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.83). Among PSC subtypes, spindle/giant cell PSCs were more likely to benefit from immunotherapy alone than pleomorphic PSCs (interaction p = 0.005), when compared with chemotherapy (Spindle/giant cell subtype: HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14 – 0.42; Pleomorphic subtype: HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 – 0.99). Conclusions: Compared with other NSCLCs, PSC may not be associated with worse survival when treated with immunotherapy alone as it was when treated with chemotherapy. Distinct PSC subtypes may respond differently to immunotherapy and warrants further research. [Table: see text]

Immunotherapy has transformed lung cancer management, but PSC remains an aggressive subtype with a poor prognosis. This study investigates the differential expression of PD-L1 and alternative immune checkpoints (ICs; B7x, B7-H3, and HHLA2), and genetic alterations in PSCs. Tumor specimens of 41 PSC patients were evaluated. PD-L1, B7x, B7-H3, and HHLA2 were positive in 75.0%, 67.6%, 73.0%, and 91.9% of tumors, respectively. PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in the epithelial compared to the sarcomatoid component (median TPS: 50% vs. 0%, p = 0.010). Expression of PD-L1 in both components was only seen in 32.1% of patients. However, at least one IC was expressed in 92.9% of epithelial and 100% of sarcomatoid components. Furthermore, METex14 was detected in 19.5% of patients and was associated with a higher sarcomatoid percentage. Our preclinical studies revealed that METex14 induced PD-L1 expression via MAPK or PI3K/Akt pathways, and MET inhibitors decreased PD-L1 expression. Our findings demonstrate distinct expressions of ICs in PSC subcomponents. Thus, combination IC inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in PSC warrants further exploration. A high percentage of METex14 in PSC and its role in regulating PD-L1 expression reveal different therapeutic targets in this aggressive NSCLC subtype.

Abstract Aims This observational study characterized cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk for multiple cancer sites, with respect to the following: (i) continuous calendar year, (ii) age at diagnosis, and (iii) follow-up time after diagnosis. Methods and results The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to compare the US general population to 3 234 256 US cancer survivors (1973–2012). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using coded cause of death from CVDs (heart disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and aortic aneurysm/dissection). Analyses were adjusted by age, race, and sex. Among 28 cancer types, 1 228 328 patients (38.0%) died from cancer and 365 689 patients (11.3%) died from CVDs. Among CVDs, 76.3% of deaths were due to heart disease. In eight cancer sites, CVD mortality risk surpassed index-cancer mortality risk in at least one calendar year. Cardiovascular disease mortality risk was highest in survivors diagnosed at &lt;35 years of age. Further, CVD mortality risk is highest (SMR 3.93, 95% confidence interval 3.89–3.97) within the first year after cancer diagnosis, and CVD mortality risk remains elevated throughout follow-up compared to the general population. Conclusion The majority of deaths from CVD occur in patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, or bladder cancer. We observed that from the point of cancer diagnosis forward into survivorship cancer patients (all sites) are at elevated risk of dying from CVDs compared to the general US population. In endometrial cancer, the first year after diagnosis poses a very high risk of dying from CVDs, supporting early involvement of cardiologists in such patients.