Citations

AbstractBackground and AimsComprehensive study of sural nerve biopsy utility based on individual histopathologic preparations is lacking. We aimed to quantify the value of different histologic preparations in diagnosis.MethodsOne hundred consecutive sural nerves were studied by standard histological preparations plus graded teased nerve fibers (GTNF), immunohistochemistry, and epoxy‐semithin morphometry. Three examiners scored the individual preparations separately by a questionnaire of neuropathic and interstitial abnormalities, masked to the biopsy number, versus a gold‐standard of all preparations. Multivariate modeling was utilized to determine best approach versus the gold‐standard.ResultsHighest confidence (range 8–9 of 10) and inter‐rater reliability (99%) for fiber abnormalities came from GTNF, and interstitial abnormalities from paraffin stains (range 7–8, 99%). Vasculitic neuropathy associated with GTNF axonal degeneration (moderate to severe 79%) with OR 3.8, 95% CI (1.001–14.7), p = .04, but not significantly with the other preparations. Clinicopathologic diagnoses associated with teased fiber abnormalities in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 80% (8/10); amyloidosis, 50% (1/2); adult‐onset polyglucosan disease 100% (1/1). GTNF and paraffin stains significantly correlated with fiber density determined by morphometric analysis (GTNF: OR 9.9, p < .0001, paraffin: OR 3.8, p = .03). GTNF combined with paraffin sections had highest accuracy for clinicopathologic diagnoses and fiber density with 0.86 C‐stat prediction versus morphometric analysis. Pathological results lead to initiation or changes of immunotherapy in 70% (35/50; initiation n = 22, reduction n = 9, escalation n = 4) with the remaining having alternative intervention or no change.InterpretationNerve biopsy paraffin stains combined with GTNF have highest diagnostic utility, confidence, inter‐rater reliability, improving accuracy for a pathologic diagnosis aiding treatment recommendations. Immunostains and epoxy preparations are also demonstrated useful supporting consensus guidelines. This study provides class II evidence for individual nerve preparation utility.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsIn the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the minimal nerve conduction (NC) criterion for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) was abnormality of NC in more than one peripheral nerve without specifying the attributes of NCs to be evaluated. In the present study, we assess individual and composite scores of NCs meeting the DCCT criterion and signs for improved diagnosis and assessment of DSPN severity.MethodsEvaluated were 13 attributes and 6 composite NC scores and signs and symptoms in 395 healthy subjects (HS) and 388 persons with diabetes (DM).ResultsPercent abnormality between subjects with DM and HS was remarkably different among individual attributes and the six composite NC scores. For diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT criterion, assessment of conduction velocities (CVs) and distal latencies (DLs) provided sensitive diagnoses of DSPN. NC amplitudes provided stronger measures of severity. In studied cohorts, DSPN was staged: N0, no NC abnormality using NC score 2 (CVs and DLs), 60.0%; N1, NC abnormality only, 18.4%; N2, NC abnormality and signs of feet or legs, 16.3%; and N3, NC abnormality and signs of thighs, 5.3%.DiscussionFor sensitive and standard diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT NC criterion, specifically defined composite scores of CVs and DLs, e.g., score 2, is recommended. A composite score of amplitudes, e.g., score 4, provides a stronger measure of neuropathy severity. Also, provided are HS reference values of evaluated attributes of NCs and estimates of staged severity of DSPN of mid North American DM cohorts.

Abstract Variable differences of nerve conduction amplitudes vs velocities and distal latencies (DLs) of healthy subjects assessed in ethnic cohorts. Introduction/Aims The variables affecting reference compound muscle (CMAP) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitudes as compared to ones affecting conduction velocities and DLs have not been adequately evaluated in previous studies. In this report, this subject is studied in healthy subject cohorts mainly of Northern European extraction, Northern Plains Indians, and Latinos. Methods Nineteen variables and 18 attributes of nerve conductions (NCs) were assessed using highly standard testing conditions and techniques. Classification and Regression Tree analyses were used to assess variable differences among amplitudes, conduction velocities, and DLs. Results The most important variable affecting CMAP and SNAP amplitudes was age. For conduction velocities (CVs) and DLs, the variables were height, ethnic cohort, and age. Discussion The variables affecting attributes of NCs were similar for the three ethnic cohorts evaluated. The differences of variables affecting amplitudes compared to CVs and DLs need to be taken into account in interpretation of NC results and in setting reference limits for use in medical practice, epidemiology surveys, and therapeutic trials. Scores of CMAP and SNAP amplitudes are suitable measures of sensorimotor polyneuropathy severity, whereas conduction velocities and DLs reflect physiologic/pathologic abnormality of nerve fibers.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: For sequential and somatotopic assessment of small fiber neuropathy, heat pain (HP) tests of hypoalgesia might be used instead of decreased counts of epidermal nerve fibers (ENFs), but then healthy subject reference values of HP thresholds are needed. Methods: Using the Computer Assisted Sensation Evaluator IVc system, HP thresholds of hypoalgesia were estimated for 10 unilateral sites and counts of ENFs for 4 of them in healthy subjects. Results: In healthy subjects, small but statistically significant differences of both HP thresholds of hypoalgesia and counts of ENFs were observed among tested sites. Significant correlations between HP thresholds and counts of ENFs were not found. Discussion: For the studied somatotopic sites, we provide ≥95th and ≥99th percentile reference limits for HP 0.5 and 5 of 1–10 HP thresholds of hypoalgesia and decreased counts of ENFs at ≤5th and ≤1st percentile levels. Muscle Nerve 58: 509–516, 2018

ABSTRACTIntroductionPolyneuropathy signs (Neuropathy Impairment Score, NIS), neurophysiologic tests (m+7Ionis), disability, and health scores were assessed in baseline evaluations of 100 patients entered into an oligonucleotide familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) trial.MethodsWe assessed: (1) Proficiency of grading neurologic signs and correlation with neurophysiologic tests, and (2) clinometric performance of modified NIS+7 neurophysiologic tests (mNIS+7Ionis) and its subscores and correlation with disability and health scores.ResultsThe mNIS+7Ionis sensitively detected, characterized, and broadly scaled diverse polyneuropathy impairments. Polyneuropathy signs (NIS and subscores) correlated with neurophysiology tests, disability, and health scores. Smart Somatotopic Quantitative Sensation Testing of heat as pain 5 provided a needed measure of small fiber involvement not adequately assessed by other tests.ConclusionsSpecially trained neurologists accurately assessed neuropathy signs as compared to referenced neurophysiologic tests. The score, mNIS+7Ionis, broadly detected, characterized, and scaled polyneuropathy abnormality in FAP, which correlated with disability and health scores. Muscle Nerve 56: 901–911, 2017

ABSTRACTIntravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], plasma exchange [PE], and corticosteroids are efficacious treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [CIDP]. IVIg is effective in multifocal motor neuropathy [MMN]. NIS, NIS‐weakness, sum scores of raw amplitudes of motor fiber (CMAPs) amplitudes, and Dyck/Rankin score provided reliable measures to detect and scale abnormality and reflect change; they are therefore ideal for office management of response‐based immunotherapy (R‐IRx) of CIDP. Using efficacious R‐IRx, a large early and late therapeutic response (≥ one‐fourth were in remission or had recovered) was demonstrated in CIDP. In MMN only an early improvement with late non‐significant worsening was observed. The difference in immunotherapy response supports a fundamental difference between CIDP (immune attack on Schwann cells and myelin) and MMN (attack on nodes of Ranvier and axons). Muscle Nerve 52: 488–497, 2015