Citations

Abstract Introduction: The ZRSR2 gene, located at Xp22.2, encodes a protein component of the RNA spliceosome. Alterations in ZRSR2 have been reported in various myeloid neoplasms (MN) and their precursors. They are frequently accompanied by other co-mutations, most commonly TET2. Isolated ZRSR2 mutations, however, are less commonly encountered and their clinicopathologic features have not been well documented. Aim: To describe the clinicopathologic features of MN and their precursors with isolated ZRSR2 mutations. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with confirmed/suspected MN using a 35-47 gene MN-targeting NGS panel. MN and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) cases with isolated likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) ZRSR2 mutations were identified. Pathology diagnoses were rendered following the 2022 WHO/ICC classification and the slides were reviewed by three pathologists. Electronic medical records were reviewed for collection of relevant laboratory data. This study was approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board. Results: Of 164 ZRSR2-mutated cases, 10 cases with isolated LP/P mutations in ZRSR2 were identified. Patients were all male, with a median age 69.5 years. Three patients were diagnosed with CCUS, five with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), one with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, MDS/MPN) and one with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Six patients had additional variants of undetermined significance (VUS) detected in ASXL1, CALR, EZH2, IDH2 and TET2. The other four patients had no additional variants identified by NGS but had cytogenetic abnormalities. One patient with MPAL had MECOM and IGH gene rearrangements detected on cytogenetic analysis. All patients had macrocytic anemia. One CMML patient with accompanying VUS in TET2 also had absolute monocytosis. BM cellularity and erythroid and granulocytic morphology were variable, ranging from unremarkable to left-shifted and dysplastic morphology. Nine (90%) cases showed atypical megakaryocyte morphology, characterized by hypolobated forms and osteoclast-like forms with separated and eccentrically located nuclear lobes. Interestingly, this megakaryocytic morphology was also observed in CCUS cases, albeit with lower frequency, below the 10% threshold necessary for the diagnosis of MDS. Megakaryocyte distribution was normal. Conclusions: Isolated LP/P ZSRS2 mutations are seen in a spectrum of myeloid neoplasms, including CCUS. They show a strong association with macrocytic anemia and megakaryocytic atypia/dysplasia. The presence of additional cytogenetic alterations and variants of undetermined significance is a confounding factor in determining the role of ZRSR2 mutations in driving the pathogenesis and morphologic features of these diseases.

Context.— Unlike B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL), there have been few therapeutic advances in T-cell ALL (T-ALL)/LBL, an aggressive ALL/LBL subtype. Objective.— To perform a focused tissue array study to elucidate tumor markers of therapeutic potential in T-ALL/LBL. Design.— Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated expression of leukemic antigens of interest, specifically CC-chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), among others, on available remnant diagnostic material, including tumor tissue slides obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded preserved tissues. Results.— Our analysis identified, for the first time, expression of CCR4 in T-ALL/LBL in 11 of 27 cases (40.7%) and confirmed common expression of BCL2, CD38, and CD47, as reported previously. We also identified the expression of CD123 in 4 of 26 cases (15.4%), whereas BCL6 and PDL1 were expressed in a small number of T-ALL/LBL cases. The potential novel target CCR4 was significantly more common in the Pre/Pro-T immunophenotypic subtype, 6 of 9 (66.7%, P = .01). No additional differences in clinical and epidemiologic variables were noted among positive or negative CCR4 cases. Conclusions.— These findings support preclinical and clinical testing of therapies targeting CCR4, CD47, BCL2, CD38, and CD123 in T-ALL/LBL, and may help guide the development of targeted clinical trials in T-ALL/LBL, a rare disease in urgent need of novel therapies.

AbstractObjectivesTo report the findings of the 2019 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop within the categories of reactive eosinophilia, hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), germline disorders with eosinophilia (GDE), and myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms associated with eosinophilia (excluding entities covered by other studies in this series).MethodsThe workshop panel reviewed 109 cases, assigned consensus diagnosis, and created diagnosis-specific sessions.ResultsThe most frequent diagnosis was reactive eosinophilia (35), followed by acute leukemia (24). Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) received 17 submissions, including chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS). Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MDS/MPN, and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms received 11, while GDE and HES received 12 and 11 submissions, respectively.ConclusionsHypereosinophilia and HES are defined by specific clinical and laboratory criteria. Eosinophilia is commonly reactive. An acute leukemic onset with eosinophilia may suggest core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia, blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1–positive leukemia, or t(5;14) B-lymphoblastic leukemia. Eosinophilia is rare in MDS but common in MDS/MPN. CEL, NOS is a clinically aggressive MPN with eosinophilia as the dominant feature. Bone marrow morphology and cytogenetic and/or molecular clonality may distinguish CEL from HES. Molecular testing helps to better subclassify myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia and to identify patients for targeted treatments.

AbstractIntroducing a sensitive and specific peripheral blood flow cytometric assay for Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides (SS/MF) requires careful selection of assay design characteristics, and translation into a laboratory developed assay through development/optimization, validation, and continual quality monitoring. As outlined in a previous article in this series, the recommended design characteristics of this assay include at a minimum, evaluation of CD7, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD26, and CD45, analyzed simultaneously, requiring at least a 6 color flow cytometry system, with both quantitative and qualitative components. This article provides guidance from an international group of cytometry specialists in implementing an assay to those design specifications, outlining specific considerations, and best practices. Key points presented in detail are: (a) Pre‐analytic components (reagents, specimen processing, and acquisition) must be optimized to: (i) identify and characterize an abnormal population of T‐cells (qualitative component) and (ii) quantitate the abnormal population (semi/quasi‐quantitative component). (b)Analytic components (instrument set‐up/acquisition/analysis strategy and interpretation) must be optimized for the identification of SS/MF populations, which can vary widely in phenotype. Comparison with expert laboratories is strongly encouraged in order to establish competency. (c) Assay performance must be validated and documented through a validation plan and report, which covers both qualitative and semi/quasi‐quantitative assay components (example template provided). (d) Ongoing assay‐specific quality monitoring should be performed to ensure consistency.

Abstract Objectives To summarize cases submitted to the 2019 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop under the category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2 rearrangements, focusing on recent updates and relevant practice findings. Methods The cases were summarized according to their respective gene rearrangement to illustrate the spectrum of clinical, laboratory, and histopathology manifestations and to explore the appropriate molecular genetic tests. Results Disease presentations were heterogeneous, including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), MDS/MPN, acute myeloid leukemia, acute B- or T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LBL), or mixed-lineage neoplasms. Frequent extramedullary involvement occurred. Eosinophilia was common but not invariably present. With the advancement of RNA sequencing, cryptic rearrangements were recognized in genes other than PDGFRA. Additional somatic mutations were more frequent in the FGFR1-rearranged cases. Cases with B-ALL presentations differed from Philadelphia-like B-ALL by the presence of an underlying MPN. Cases with FLT3 and ABL1 rearrangements could be potential candidates for future inclusion in this category. Conclusions Accurate diagnosis and classification of this category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms has important therapeutic implications. With the large number of submitted cases, we expand our understanding of these rare neoplasms and improve our ability to diagnose these genetically defined disorders.

Abstract Objectives The 2019 Society for Hematopathology and European Association for Haematopathology Workshop reviewed the spectrum of neoplastic, nonneoplastic, and borderline entities associated with reactive eosinophilia in tissue. Methods The workshop panel reviewed 46 cases covered in 2 workshop sessions. Results The 46 cases were presented with their consensus diagnoses during the workshop. Reactive eosinophilia in lymph nodes and other tissues may be accompanied by or be distinct from peripheral blood eosinophilia. Reactive etiologies included inflammatory disorders such as Kimura disease and IgG4-related disease, which may show overlapping pathologic features and reactions to infectious agents and hypersensitivity (covered in a separate review). Hodgkin, T-cell, and B-cell lymphomas and histiocytic neoplasms can result in reactive eosinophilia. The spectrum of these diseases is discussed and illustrated through representative cases. Conclusions Reactive eosinophilia in lymph nodes and tissues may be related to both nonneoplastic and neoplastic lymphoid proliferations and histiocytic and nonhematolymphoid processes. Understanding the differential diagnosis of reactive eosinophilia and the potential for overlapping clinical and pathologic findings is critical in reaching the correct diagnosis so that patients can be treated appropriately.