Citations

Abstract Introduction Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) identifies a hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), characterized by elevated resting left ventricular (LV) elastance (force = systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume). To evaluate the prognostic significance and functional correlates of HP. Methods In a prospective multicentre study, 10 677 patients with CCS underwent resting TTE to assess LV ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume, and force by quantitative volumetric echocardiography. All patients were followed for the endpoint of all-cause mortality. In a subset of 5834 patients, stress echocardiography (exercise or dobutamine) was performed for LV contractile reserve and heart rate reserve. Results Patients were stratified into Force quintiles (Q1–Q5). Patients with hypercontractile phenotype exhibited lower stroke volume at rest (Q5 = 34.8 ± 12.3 vs Q1–Q4 = 57.4 ± 19.1 mL; P < .01) and higher EF at rest (Q5 = 64.8 ± 6.9% vs Q1–Q4 = 58.1 ± 8.7%, P < .01). During a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range = 12–40 months), 509 deaths occurred. The exposure-adjusted death rate was lowest in Q3 (3.53–4.51 mmHg/mL; 1.03 per 100 person/years) and higher in Q1 (≤2.62 mmHg/mL, 2.88), Q2 (2.63–3.52 mmHg/mL, 1.86), Q4 (4.52–6.11 mmHg/mL, 1.56), and Q5 (HP, >6.11 mmHg/mL; 1.88; P < .0001 vs Q1 and Q3). Multivariable analysis identified HP (Q5; HR 1.531 vs Q3, 95% CI 1.116–2.099; P = .006) and EF (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.953–0.972; P < .0001) as independent predictors of death. During exercise or dobutamine stress, HP showed reduced LV contractile reserve (ΔEF: Q5 = 4.3 ± 9.4% vs Q1–Q4 = 7.0 ± 9.3%; P < .001) and blunted heart rate reserve (Q5 = 1.77 ± 0.33 vs Q1–Q4 = 1.85 ± 0.39; P < .01). All patients with force-based LV contractile reserve >4.1 (present in 185, 3.2% of the population) survived. Conclusion Patients with CCS with HP assessed by resting TTE demonstrate higher mortality and multilayered functional impairment, including reduced LV contractile and chronotropic reserves. Hypercontractile phenotype improved the prediction of mortality by EF. A ‘stronger’ heart is, in fact, functionally and prognostically weaker.

Abstract Background Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. Aim To assess the risk stratification value of CI during physical or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study design, we enrolled 13,445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echo in 19 sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n=2,594), dobutamine (n=2,440), or dipyridamole (n=8,411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echo monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) <1.22 (<1.17 in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole. All-cause death was the outcome measure. Results Heart rate reserve was available in all patients; there was no extra imaging or analysis time, and no intra- and inter-observer variability. CI was observed in 5,045 patients (38%); abnormal regional wall motion abnormality in 1,648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.5 years, there were 2,426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (p<0.0001). CI was associated with a significant (p<0.0001) increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from <54 years to >75 years. In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (p<0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use (Figure). Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was a significant predictor of mortality (HR 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.74; p<0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during physical or pharmacological stress is a simple, inexpensive, quantitative, and objective predictor of survival.

Abstract Background Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is increasingly recognized in clinical practice but effective therapy is difficult to apply due to the heterogeneity of pathophysiological substrates: structural coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), functional (vasospastic) CMD, epicardial artery vasospasm, non-cardiac chest pain. Current guidelines recommend invasive coronary function testing with inherent limitations in cost, risk, and access. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a step-wise, multi-marker, multi-stress assessment of ANOCA patients by stress echocardiography (SE). Methods In an observational, prospective, multicenter, international study, we enrolled 1146 ANOCA patients (age =65.6±11.6years, 636 men, 55, %). All patients underwent a vasodilator SE (adenosine or dipyridamole) with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery (LAD). In a subset of patients with a normal CFVR and strong clinical suspicion for vasospasm, a hyperventilation (HYPER) test (30 deep breaths/min for 5 min) was performed, followed by semi-supine exercise (EX) if negative. Positivity criteria were stress-specific: CFVR < 2.0 for vasodilators; coronary flow velocity (CFV) reduction ≤ 10% from baseline with HYPER; inducible RWMA 2.for HYPER and HYPER-EX Results Of the 1146 patients, 244 (21%) showed abnormal CFVR i.e. structural CMD (Figure 1). In the subset of 68 patients with normal vasodilator CFVR , entering a strategy of sequential stepwise approach, 40 pts underwent HYPER showing a paradoxical vasoconstrictor response despite the increase in the double product (59 %), with RWMA in 11 (16%). Of the remaining patients with normal CFVR and normal response to HYPER, 28 underwent HYPER-EX showing inducible RWMA in 7 (10%) patients. The remaining 21 patients (31%) showed all 3 tests normal: see figure 2. Conclusion In patients with ANOCA, a stepwise multi-marker (CFVR and RWMA) and multi-stress (vasodilators, HYPER, and EX) SE identifies 4 distinct phenotypes and actionable therapeutic targets: structural CMD (reduced CFVR with vasodilator); functional vasospastic CMD (paradoxical decrease of CFV with HYPER), epicardial artery vasospasm (inducible RWMA with HYPER or HYPER-EX); non-cardiac chest pain with normal response all tests and all markers. Our research emphasizes the usefulness of versatile, patient-tailored noninvasive testing in patients with ANOCA to unmask the functional heterogeneity of the endotypes underlying the same phenotype. Figures: 1. Overall population of ANOCA (N=1146)-vasodilator CFVR 2. Pilot study in ANOCA with CFVR>2.0 (N=68)Overall population of ANOCA (N=1146) Pilot study in ANOCA with CFVR>2.0

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B-lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, EKG-based heart rate reserve. Aim to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, international, effectiveness study. Methods From July 2016 to November 2024, we enrolled 7896 all-comers (age 65±11 years, 4742 [60.0%] males, ejection fraction 59±10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) referred from 27 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE, with ACE in all patients, step D in 6286, step B in 5951 and all 5 steps in 5918 pts. The employed stress modality was exercise (n=2407) or pharmacological stress (n=5489; with vasodilator, n=4503; or dobutamine, n=986). Each step was scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severely abnormal) following EACVI recommendations 2024. SE response ranged from a score of 0 (all steps normal) to a score of 15 (all steps severely abnormal). All-cause death was the only end-point. Results During a median follow-up of 685 days (interquartile range: 387-1227), 370 deaths occurred. Step A negativity was associated with a 1.5% annual mortality. Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% persons/year for score 0 (n=958, 12.1%) up to 6.19% person/year for score ≥10 (n=346, 4.3%). (Figure). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.008, 95% interquartile range [IQ]: 1.006-1.010, p<0.001), diabetes (HR 1.564, 95% CI: 1.263-1.936, p<0.001), resting ejection fraction (HR 0.983, 95% CI: 0.974-0.993, p=0.001), and ABCDE score 3-5 (HR 3.111, 95% CI 1.597-6.060, p=0.001), score 6-9 (HR 5.442, 95% CI 2.761-10.729, p<0.001), and score ≥10 (HR 8.826, CI 4.197-18.654, p<0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion In patients with known or suspected CCS, SE negativity by simple wall motion criterion is unable to identify a low-risk group. ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival.Figure

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of near normal, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance (also known as force) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. 680 patients finished follow-up with a composite end-point of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Patients were divided into three groups: low force (< 25th percentile, Group 1, < 3.24 mmHg/ml), intermediate force (≥ 25th percentile and ≤ 75 thpercentile, Group 2, 3.24-5.48 mmHg/ml), and high force (> 75 th percentile, Group 3, >5.48 mmHg/ml). Results The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, ESV, SV, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 16 months, 205 MACEs occurred in 138 patients. Cumulative MACEs rate was lowest in group 2 (14.7% person-year), higher in group 1 (16.1% person-year) and 3 (22.9% person-year, log rank p = 0.036). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with larger LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. The hypercontractile and hypocontractile phenotypes are associated with a higher risk of subsequent events.

Abstract Backgrounds Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) identifies a peculiar hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with high resting left ventricular (LV) elastance (also called force). Objectives To assess the functional response and its prognosis associated with HP in HFpEF by stress echocardiography (SE). Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 1213 patients with HFpEF were divided into two groups based on the highest quartile of rest force: non-hypercontractile phenotype group (non-HP, < 5.64 mmHg/mL, Group 1, n= 910), and HP group (≥5.64 mmHg/mL, Group 2, n= 303). All patients underwent SE with at least 4 of the following stress parameters assessed: wall motion score index (WMSI), B-lines (4-site score), force-based LV contractile reserve, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and heart rate reserve (HRR). The employed stress was exercise (n=687), dobutamine (n=195), or vasodilators (n=331). SE score ranged from 0 (all steps normal) to 1-5, according to the number of abnormal steps. Follow-up was completed in a subset of 260 patients. Results The 2 groups showed similar values of peak stress WMSI but the global functional burden was higher in Group 2 patients: see table. In a subset of 260 patients who finished follow-up, there were 212 non-HP patients and 48 HP patients. During a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range: 10-20), 26 deaths, 20 heart failure (HF) rehospitalizations, and 64 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred. The cumulative HF rehospitalization rate and MACEs rate were higher in HP group (log-rank p<0.01): see figure. Rest force (HR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.29; P: 0.040), rest SPAP (HR, 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14; P: 0.007) and ABCDE score (HR, 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.66; P: 0.032) were independently associated with MACEs. Conclusions HFpEF patients with HP are functionally weaker with multiple vulnerabilities during stress and at higher risk of subsequent events compared to non-HP patients.Relation between resting values of force

Abstract Aims Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to assess the risk stratification value of CI during exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study, we enrolled 13 445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echocardiography in 19 clinical sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n = 2594), dobutamine (n = 2440), or dipyridamole (n = 8411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echocardiography monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) ≤ 1.22 (≤1.17 if in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole stress. The primary outcome was all-cause death. CI was observed in 5045 patients (38%) and stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities in 1648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.6–9.1 years), there were 2426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (P < 0.0001). CI was associated with a significant increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from ≤54 years to ≥75 years (P < 0.0001). In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (P < 0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use. Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was an independent predictor of mortality (HR: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–1.74; P < 0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during exercise or pharmacological stress is a simple and objective predictor of survival.

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Abstract Background Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of reduced, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024 by 35 certified laboratories of 15 countries. HFpEF was diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed wall motion score index (WMSI), LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE, SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. In 271 (11.4%) patients, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was assessed. Patients were divided into three groups based on rest force: low rest force group (< 25% percentile, Group 1), median rest force group (≥ 25% percentile & ≤ 75% percentile, Group 2), and high rest force group (> 75% percentile, Group 3). Results 330 (13.9%) patients presented with ischemic RWMA. The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, SV, SVi, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). Patients in Group 3 have higher NTproBNP level and higher percentage of B-line compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). The 3 groups were similar for values of coronary flow velocity, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and E/e’ (see table). Univariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was correlated with force (r = 0.271, p < 0.001), VAC (r = 0.194, p = 0.001), LAVI (r = 0.327, p < 0.001), LVEDV (r = -0.245, p < 0.001), LVEDVi (r = -0.261, p < 0.001), LVESVi (r = -0.190, p = 0.002) and LVESV (r = -0.187, p = 0.002) (see figure). However, multivariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was independently associated with LAVI (β= 0.211, p < 0.001) and force (β= 1.804, p = 0.002). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. LV force is linearly correlated with cardiac natriuretic peptide levels. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with dilation of LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. heat map