Citations

Abstract Background and Aims Upadacitinib (UPA)—an oral, reversible selective Janus kinase inhibitor—has a favorable benefit–risk profile for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the benefit–risk of UPA in select subgroups with CD or UC. Methods Patients were randomized to UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO) induction for 12 (CD: U-EXCEED, U-EXCEL) or 8 weeks (UC: U-ACHIEVE, U-ACCOMPLISH). Clinical responders were re-randomized to QD UPA 15 mg (UPA15), UPA 30 mg (UPA30), or PBO for 52-week maintenance (CD: U-ENDURE; UC: U-ACHIEVE). This exploratory post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety outcomes (adverse events of special interest [AESIs]: serious infections, major adverse cardiovascular [CV] events, malignancies, and venous thromboembolic events) by CV risk, prior treatment failure, and age. Results This analysis included 1021 patients with CD and 1097 with UC during induction, and 673 with CD and 746 with UC during maintenance. Improved efficacy outcomes comparable to the overall study populations were observed with UPA versus PBO across subgroups. Patients receiving UPA30 generally showed numerically higher rates of improvements versus UPA15. AESI rates were generally comparable between UPA and PBO across subgroups except for numerically higher rates of herpes zoster and serious infections in CD with UPA. Conclusions UPA resulted in consistent benefit versus placebo across CV risk, prior treatment failure, and age subgroups. No treatment differences were seen in AESIs across subgroups except herpes zoster and serious infections, reinforcing the favorable benefit–risk profile for UPA in CD and UC seen in the overall study populations. Clinical trial numbers NCT02819635, NCT03653026, NCT03345836, NCT03345849, NCT03345823

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). One in ten CD patients may need a permanent ostomy (colostomy or ileostomy) during their disease course, and this may impact the efficacy of UPA, given its extended-release formulation. However, there is no data available in this population since patients with an ostomy are excluded from registrational CD trials. This study addresses this gap by comparing the real-world clinical effectiveness of UPA in CD patients with and without ostomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network of sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) CD patients treated with UPA from May 19th, 2023 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients were categorized based on presence or absence of an ostomy during the previous 5 years, after exclusion of patients with rheumatologic disease indications for UPA usage. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and CD severity indicators (CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid and other biologics usage, hemoglobin, and body weight). Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for clinical effectiveness as a composite outcome (corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits) and secondary individual outcomes, at one year post-treatment, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Results The study sample of CD patients on UPA included 170 with and 1,428 without a prior ostomy. There were 144 patients in each cohort after PSM. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts are shown in Figure 1. After PSM (Figure 2), there were no significant differences between patients with CD on UPA, with and without prior ostomy, for composite outcomes (HR 0.93, p = 0.64), corticosteroid use (HR 0.78, p = 0.18), hospitalizations (HR 1.13, p = 0.64), or emergency room visits (HR 0.99, p = 0.97). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 0.95, p = 0.76), switch to another advanced therapy (HR 1.62, p = 0.06), or elevated biomarkers, including CRP (>10 mg/L, HR 1.00, p = 0.99) and fecal calprotectin (>150 µg/g, HR 0.85, p = 0.63) at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In CD patients, UPA demonstrated similar effectiveness for clinical outcomes of corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits and other secondary outcomes, regardless of their ostomy status.

Abstract Background The SEQUENCE trial, in bio-exposed Crohn's disease (CD) patients, demonstrated non-inferiority for clinical remission at 24 weeks and superiority for endoscopic remission at week 48 for risankizumab (RZB) compared to ustekinumab (UST). However, this comparison has not been adequately explored in bio-naive CD patients. Our study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness among bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB vs. UST in a real-world setting, using data from a US-based multicenter cohort. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) bio-naive CD patients initiated on RZB or UST from June 17th, 2022 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients with prior advanced therapy usage and those with approved rheumatologic disease indications for RZB/UST were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and indicators of CD severity, including CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid use, hemoglobin, and body weight. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for one-year post-treatment composite outcomes (need for corticosteroids, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, surgeries) with a priori significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results The study sample included 1,630 bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB and 3,105 with UST. Among patients on UST, 658 (21%) were dosed every four to six weeks, after the first dose. Baseline characteristics of the PSM RZB and UST cohorts are shown in Table 1 with 1,568 patients in each cohort. After PSM (Figure 1), there were no significant differences in composite outcome (HR 1.077, p = 0.170), corticosteroid use (HR 1.099, p = 0.110), CD-related surgery (HR 1.231, p = 0.284), hospitalization (HR 0.947, p = 0.615) or ER visits (HR 1.041, p = 0.687). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 1.062, p = 0.366), switch to different advanced therapy (HR 1.097, p = 0.468) or elevated disease biomarkers, including CRP (>10mg/l, HR 1.186 p = 0.101) or fecal calprotectin (>150 µg/g; HR 1.109, p = 0.407) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In this real-world experience allowing for drug optimization, no difference was observed in bio naïve patients between UST and RZB as far as clinical remission and progression of CD.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC. METHODS: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed. DISCUSSION: Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Importance The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. Interventions For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Results Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No new safety risks were detected in the treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–associated peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) decreases quality of life and remains poorly understood. Given the prevalence of this condition and its negative impact, it is surprising that evidence-based disease definitions and diagnostic strategies are lacking. This systematic review summarizes available data to facilitate development and validation of diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, and imaging indices specific to this condition. Methods A literature search was conducted. Consensus or classification criteria, case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials related to diagnosis were included. Results A total of 44 studies reporting data on approximately 1500 patients with pSpA were eligible for analysis. Data quality across studies was only graded as fair to good. Due to large heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. The majority of studies incorporated patient-reported outcomes and a physical examination. A total of 13 studies proposed or validated screening tools, consensus, classification, or consensus criteria. A total of 28 studies assessed the role of laboratory tests, none of which were considered sufficiently accurate for use in diagnosis. A total of 17 studies assessed the role of imaging, with the available literature insufficient to fully endorse any imaging modality as a robust diagnostic tool. Conclusions This review highlights existing inconsistency and lack of a clear diagnostic approach for IBD-associated pSpA. Given the absence of an evidence-based approach, a combination of existing criteria and physician assessment should be utilized. To address this issue comprehensively, our future efforts will be directed toward pursuit of a multidisciplinary approach aimed at standardizing evaluation and diagnosis of IBD-associated pSpA.

Abstract Background The LIBERTY-CD study demonstrated a broad level of benefit for subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy compared with placebo in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe active Crohn’s disease (CD) who responded to intravenous IFX induction. Characterising subgroups of pts with different levels of response could help to better position SC IFX therapy. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of 231 pts from the CT-P13 SC arm of the randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CD study (NCT03945019). Unsupervised group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM) was conducted to deconvolute cohort-level data into response trajectories. Longitudinal patient reported outcomes (PRO-2: abdominal pain and stool frequency) were used to investigate whether pts who received SC IFX maintenance therapy cluster into response trajectories. Efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission and comprehensive disease control [CDC] rate) were analysed and compared between different trajectories. Trough levels of IFX (TLI) were evaluated by trajectory throughout the treatment period. Baseline characteristics were analysed in a descriptive manner to explore predictors for super-response. Results Four distinct trajectories were clearly separated and stabilised around Week (W) 10–14 (Figure): rapid and sustained improvement (super-responders, n=61), rapid, but slightly less drastic than super-responders, then sustained improvement (fast responders, n=56), gradual then sustained improvement (slow responders, n=63) and partial improvement during the maintenance phase (limited responders, n=51). Super-responders had the highest rates of W54 clinical remission (73.8%; p=0.002), endoscopic response (63.9%; p=0.009), corticosteroid-free remission (63.6%; p=0.007), endoscopic remission (42.6%; p=0.094) and CDC (37.7%; p=0.013) among trajectories (Table). Super-responders also maintained the highest TLI from W10 throughout the maintenance period. Super-responders showed a trend towards lower baseline body weight, body mass index and oral corticosteroid use, but higher Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score and prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor use compared to other trajectories. Conclusion Distinct subpopulations with different levels of responses were detected by GBTM using data from a large group of pts with moderate-to-severe active CD who were treated with SC IFX for 1 year. Super-responders with rapid and sustained improvements during SC IFX therapy had a higher likelihood of achieving desirable long-term outcomes, with substantial individual benefit (CDC). Baseline characteristics and TLI were associated with super-response.