Citations

PURPOSE Cancer survivors endure costly and time-intensive care throughout treatment and survivorship. Paid sick leave provides employment and financial stability while supporting time off for medical needs. We investigated whether paid sick leave is associated with financial hardship and overall and cancer-specific mortality risk in working adult cancer survivors. METHODS Working adults age 18-64 years with a cancer history were identified from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) between 2011 and 2023. Associations of paid sick leave and financial hardship (medical care delays, problems paying medical bills, worry about paying medical bills, and cost-related medication underuse) were examined with 2011-2018 and 2019-2023 data using separate multivariable logistic regressions because of survey redesign in 2019. Linked mortality files from the National Death Index were available for 2011-2018 respondents. The association of paid sick leave and mortality risk was examined with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 8,091 and 3,919 working cancer survivors were identified from the 2011-2018 and 2019-2023 NHIS, respectively. Paid sick leave was associated with decreased medical care delays because of cost (2011-2018 odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93]; P = .008; 2019-2023 OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.74]; P < .001) but not consistently with other forms of financial hardship. In adjusted analyses, paid sick leave was associated with significant reductions in risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.9]; P = .003) and cancer mortality (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91]; P = .003). CONCLUSION In working cancer survivors, paid sick leave is associated with decreased care delays and lower overall and cancer-specific mortality risk, which may be due to maintained employment, household income, and health insurance coverage leading to improvements in treatment access, affordability, and overall survivorship care.

11064 Background: Local and state paid sick leave (PSL) mandates have been associated with increased use of preventive services, including cancer screening, and reduced emergency care utilization. Little research has examined PSL policies and cancer after diagnosis. This study evaluates associations of PSL policies and timely treatment initiation among women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: We identified patients aged 18-64 years newly diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer from the National Cancer Database in 2004-2023 and linked then to area-level policy implementation, measured as the month and year the state, county, or city required PSL. Primary outcomes were receipt of definitive surgery or neoadjuvant therapy within 30, 60, and 90 days of diagnosis. We compared changes in treatment initiation between patients residing in areas with and without PSL policies during and after the month and year of diagnosis. We used a staggered difference-in-differences design to account for differential timing of implementation, adjusting for patient demographics, clinical, and area-level characteristics. Random errors were clustered at the state level. Supplemental analyses stratified by county-level unemployment rates and individual insurance coverage. Results: The study included 1,891,411 patients, of whom 249,313 (13.2%) resided in an area with PSL policies at diagnosis. Patients in areas with PSL policies were more likely to have Medicaid, reside in higher-income and metropolitan areas. PSL policy implementation was significantly associated with a 3.4 percentage point (PPT) increase in the probability of treatment ≤30 days (95% CI: 1.1-5.7), 3.0 PPT increase ≤60 days (95% CI: 1.6-4.3), 1.3 PPT increase ≤90 days (95% CI: 0.5-2.1) (Table). Improvements in timely treatment were concentrated in low-unemployment areas; no significant improvements were observed in high-unemployment areas. The magnitude of associations between PSL policies and treatment initiation was stronger among patients without private insurance than with private insurance. Conclusions: Local and state PSL mandates were associated with earlier treatment initiation among working-age patients with early-stage breast cancer, especially in areas with low female unemployment rate. Findings suggest that PSL policies play an important role in timely cancer treatment for employed women who may not have PSL through their jobs. Association of paid sick leave policies and breast cancer treatment initiation. Time from diagnosis to surgery/neoadjuvant therapy (days) DID PPT Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P-value Overall ≤30 3.4 1.1 5.7 0.004 ≤60 3.0 1.6 4.3 0.000 ≤90 1.3 0.5 2.1 0.001 Low female unemployment ≤30 2.2 -0.7 5.0 0.136 ≤60 3.8 1.8 5.8 0.000 ≤90 1.2 0.3 2.2 0.012 High female unemployment ≤30 1.8 -0.6 4.2 0.145 ≤60 -1.2 -4.5 2.0 0.459 ≤90 -1.4 -3.7 0.9 0.232

11078 Background: Unmet essential needs, such as food, transportation, and housing insecurity, can create barriers to timely cancer treatment. Delayed or prolonged courses of definitive radiotherapy (RT) can compromise cancer outcomes like recurrence and survival. There are limited prospective data testing interventions to improve timely cancer treatment completion by meeting essential needs. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic single-arm pilot study testing an enhanced financial assistance intervention for unmet needs during RT. Eligibility criteria included adults with a cancer diagnosis and unmet social needs (via social risk screening and/or social worker evaluation) who were prescribed or undergoing a course of RT with > 10 fractions remaining. Participants received standard institutional assistance (e.g., limited support for travel/lodging with strict eligibility criteria) plus the enhanced assistance intervention, including needs assessments prior to and during RT and up to $2000/patient of tailored unconditional monetary transfer via gift cards for all essential needs identified. The primary outcome was delay-free completion of RT (DFC: completing all prescribed RT fractions and delaying < 5 fractions). The study was powered (power = 80%, 1-sided alpha = 0.2 for this pilot study) to detect a 10-percentage point increase in % DFC relative to a historic benchmark of 83% (based on similar patients from our institution), with required sample size of N = 33. Due to delays in gift card administration (on average ~2 weeks after consent), we also present per protocol analysis, limited to patients who had > 10 fractions remaining after first receiving financial assistance. Post-hoc analyses using generalized linear mixed models evaluated percentages of delayed fractions prior to and after an individual’s receipt of financial assistance. Results: 35 met inclusion criteria and were approached, 33/35 enrolled. Participants received median assistance of $1800 ($700-2000) and had a median of 27 RT fractions after consent (range: 12-35) and 17 (3-34) after receiving assistance. In the overall cohort, 1 patient did not complete RT and 2 patients had ≥5 delayed fractions, leading to 30/33 achieving DFC (90.9%, 80% CI = 83.9 – 100), significantly higher than the 83% benchmark. In the per protocol analysis, 27/28 achieved DFC (96.4%, 80% CI = 89.7–100, P = .037). Among the 27 patients who started RT prior to receiving assistance, mixed model analysis showed more delayed fractions prior to (7.1%) vs. after (3.0%) receiving assistance (OR 2.84, 95% CI = 1.43-5.80, P = .003). Conclusions: In this prospective pilot study, a tailored enhanced financial assistance intervention for unmet essential needs led to improved delay-free completion of RT over a historic benchmark. Further analysis on patient-reported quality of life and financial toxicity will be reported in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT06582849 .

PURPOSE Since 2012, several states have implemented mandatory paid sick leave (PSL) policies. PSL can provide patients time and income continuity to undergo screening and/or timely diagnostic workup for new cancer-related symptoms and complete lengthy and expensive cancer treatment courses. This study aimed to examine the association between mandatory PSL policies and cancer stage at diagnosis and overall survival (OS). METHODS Adults age 18-64 years diagnosed with cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registries between 2010 and 2019. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were used to compare absolute changes in stage I and stage IV diagnoses and 1-year OS before and after policy implementation in states that enacted mandatory PSL relative to states that did not enact such policies. RESULTS A total of 1,052,307 patients with cancer were included. In adjusted DID analyses, there were a 0.83 (95% CI = –1.49 to –0.16, P = .014) PP decrease in stage IV diagnoses and a 0.63 (95% CI = 0.10 to 1.17, P = .021) PP increase in 1-year OS associated with implementation of mandatory PSL policies. In exploratory analyses, males and individuals with lung cancer experienced the greatest shifts in policy-associated changes in stage at diagnosis and OS. CONCLUSION PSL policy implementation is associated with decreased late-stage diagnoses and improved OS in patients with cancer. Policies that improve opportunities to receive medical care may facilitate earlier cancer detection and ultimately contribute to better patient outcomes.

Importance Patients with cancer have high utilization of health care services, and many have high financial burdens from care. High-deductible health plans (HDHPs), which offer lower premiums at the expense of higher deductibles and possibly higher out-of-pocket costs, are associated with decreased care utilization among survivors of cancer. However, it is unclear whether HDHPs are associated with cancer outcomes. Objective To determine whether HDHP status is associated with survival among cancer survivors and individuals without history of cancer and whether financial barriers to care mediate associations between HDHP status and survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study included US adults ages 18 to 84 years who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 2011 to 2018. Data were analyzed from December 14, 2023, to December 1, 2025. Exposure HDHP status. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Analyses were adjusted for insurance status, marital status, sex, comorbidities, education, household income, geographic region, and cancer site and time since cancer diagnosis (if applicable). Results A total of 147 254 respondents (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [16.4] years; 79 261 [50.9%] female) were identified, including 9799 (5.9%) with history of cancer. A total of 2331 cancer survivors (25.6%) and 37 473 individuals without history of cancer (28.5%) reported an HDHP at the time of NHIS participation. HDHP status was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and CSS (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77) among cancer survivors. In contrast, among adults without history of cancer, HDHP status was not significantly associated with OS (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96-1.21; P for interaction = .001). In mediation analyses, HDHP status among cancer survivors was associated with increased financial barriers to care, which mediated approximately 30% to 70% of the total association of HDHP with survival. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of nationwide population-based data, HDHPs were associated with worse OS and CSS among cancer survivors. However, HDHPs were not associated with mortality in adults without history of cancer. These data suggest that insurance coverage that financially discourages medical care may financially discourage necessary care and ultimately worsen cancer outcomes.

98 Background: Prior authorization (PA) purports to control costs and ensure adherence to evidence-based guidelines but negatively impacts cancer care. Radiation oncology (RO) represents a minority of overall cancer spending yet bears a disproportionately high PA burden. Limited research exists on the effects of PA on patient outcomes and administrative workload within RO clinics. Methods: From 9/2024 to 10/2024, an online survey was open to U.S. members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology assessing experiences with PA including disposition (approval/denial/appeal including peer-to-peer [P2P] review) and perceived impact on patient care and administrative workload. Outcomes included treatment delays, changes from recommended treatment, and patient event including hospitalization, ED visits, permanent disability, or death. Descriptive statistics evaluated responses. Results: Of 736 responding radiation oncologists (16% response rate), 83% reported a rise in PA over the past three years, with 58% noting the burden has increased greatly. In the past year, 50% reported that more than half of their cases required PA, with a median approval rate of 75% and median overturn rate of 82% for denials. For more than half of their cases, nearly half of physicians (43%) noted that P2P was a futile effort to overturn PA denials due to insurance policies. Most (75%) reported that PA resulted in their practice needing to reallocate staff; 91% reported worsening burnout due to PA. P2P reviews were particularly burdensome, averaging 1.65 hours per week. A third (30%) reported that PA requirements had caused serious complications for their patients, including 7% who reported PA had contributed to patient death. Almost all (91%) reported PA-related treatment delays for some of their patients, with 58% indicating average delays of ≥5 days. Most (81%) reported that at times they had to use radiation techniques they considered less optimal due to PA, including 58% who were forced to deviate from national guidelines. The most common reasons for not appealing a PA denial were anticipated delays (73%), perceived futility based on prior PA experiences (62%), and administrative burden (45%). Conclusions: The administrative and clinical burdens associated with PA have significant implications for patient care, physician well-being, and healthcare resource allocation in RO. Treatment delays, compromised therapies, and adverse patient outcomes are commonly reported and underscore the need for PA reform to improve patient outcomes, reduce physician burnout, and improve efficiency.

80 Background: The Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander (AA/NHPI) population is the fastest growing and most socioeconomically heterogeneous racial/ethnic group in the US. AA/NHPI breast cancer outcomes are often reported as superior to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) however evidence suggests aggregating AA/NHPI masks disparities among subpopulations. As NHPI is often ignored as one of five official US races, this study aims to disaggregate AA and NHPI to unmask breast cancer disparities. Methods: An IRB exempt, retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database was conducted for women diagnosed with breast cancer in 2004-2016. AA and NHPI patients were compared with the majority NHW group. AA was separated into pertinent geographical origins: East Asian (EA; Chinese, Japanese, Korean), South Asian (SA; Indian, Pakistani), and Southeast Asian (SEA; Filipino, Vietnamese, Laotian, Hmong, Cambodian). Descriptive statistics were used. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions assessed adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and adjusted Hazards Ratios (aHR), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Analyses were adjusted for patient factors (age, insurance, income, rural/urban, education, hospital region, hospital distance, Deyo comorbidity score) and cancer characteristics (grade, stage, metastases, diagnosis year, hormone status). Results: Of 2,073,822 women there were 28,311 EA, 13,259 SA, 21,645 SEA, 5,375 NHPI, and 2,005,232 NHW. The median age was 62 years with median 66 month follow-up. Compared to NHW (9.6%), presentation with late-stage disease (Stage III/IV) was higher in NHPI (12%), SA (12%), and SEA (11%), but not EA (7.5%). On adjusted analysis (Table), EA was the only group with a statistical difference from NHW with aOR=0.85 (95%CI=0.76-0.94). Kaplan-Meier test for overall survival (OS) showed differences between ethnic/racial groups with NHPI having worse OS than AA subpopulations (p<0.0001). On adjusted analysis (Table), all AA subpopulations had lower risk of death compared to NHW: EA (aHR=0.69; 95%CI=0.64-0.74), SA (aHR=0.65; 95CI=0.59-0.71), and SEA (aHR=0.78; 95%CI=0.73-0.84) however the NHPI group had a greater risk of death (aHR=1.14; 95%CI=1.02-1.28). Conclusions: NHPI women with breast cancer have worse outcomes compared to NHW. This is masked by superior AA outcomes when aggregated. The continual improper aggregation of AA with NHPI downplays NHPI cancer disparities. Proper disaggregation of NHPI from AA warrants greater attention.[Table: see text]

11040 Background: Although women outnumber men in US medical school enrollment, women constitute < 50% of faculty in academic oncology. This study aimed to determine factors affecting women oncologists’ decisions to pursue academic versus non-academic oncology in Hematology/Oncology (HO), Pediatric Oncology (PO), Radiation Oncology (RO), and Surgical Oncology (SO), and to characterize the challenges women oncologists face. Methods: A survey was designed to collect cross-sectional data on factors affecting career choices among US women oncologists. The survey was distributed via email and social media. Data were collected anonymously and analyzed using t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Results: Six hundred sixty-seven women oncologists responded: 245 (45.3%) specialized in HO, 173 (25.9%) RO, 88 (13.2%) PO, 56 (8.4%) SO, and 48 (7.2%) other. Four-hundred twenty-two (63.2%) women identified as an academic oncologist (AO); 245 (36.8%) women identified as a non-academic oncologist (non-AO). Approximately ¼ of women oncologists reported their partner (156, 23.5%) or family (176, 26.4%) extremely or moderately impacted their decision whether to pursue academic practice. There was no difference in the timing of childbearing between AO and non-AO. AO perceived the biggest sacrifice of pursuing academics to be time with loved ones (181, 42.9%). Non-AO perceived the biggest sacrifice for AO to be pressure for academic promotion (102, 41.6%), which was the third most common response (44, 18.0%) among AO. Thirty-three (7.9%) AO and 5 (2.0%) non-AO reported feeling that they rarely or never have a sense of belonging in their work environment (p < 0.01). AO and non-AO had significantly different perceptions on how their gender impacted their ability to obtain a chosen job (p < 0.01), with 100 (23.8%) AO and 52 (21.2%) non-AO reporting a negative or somewhat negative impact, and 116 (27.6%) AO and 101 (41.2%) non-AO reporting a positive or somewhat positive impact. More than half of women surveyed (230 AO, 54.6%; 123 non-AO, 50.6%; p = 0.61) felt that they were somewhat or much less likely to be promoted compared to male colleagues. The majority of women reported they would choose the same career path again (71% of AO, 69% of non-AO); however, 92 (21.9%) of AO responded that they were likely or very likely to pursue a career outside academics in the next 5 years. Conclusions: While partners/family have a substantial impact on 1 in 4 women oncologists, this does not differ between AO and non-AO. Significantly more non-AO find their gender to have positively impacted their ability to obtain their chosen job. In contrast, a meaningful number of AO report a poor sense of belonging and perceived discrimination in obtaining jobs and being promoted; 1 in 5 are considering leaving academia. Academic oncology remains at high risk for continued gender inequality if the culture is not addressed.

PURPOSE: Routine use of extended-fraction (> 10 fractions) radiation therapy (RT) for palliation of bone metastases is recognized as a low-value intervention by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. We examined contemporary practice patterns of, and physician characteristics associated with extended-fraction RT use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service data. We included patients who underwent 2- or 3-dimensional external-beam RT for bone metastases between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Physicians treating > 10 patients over the study period were analyzed for their individual practice. Hierarchic logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient- and physician-level factors associated with extended-fraction RT use. RESULTS: A total of 12,221 patients (median age, 75.6 years; 40.9% women, 87.6% white) were included. The rate of extended-fraction RT was 23.4%. A total of 1,432 physicians treated any patient. Among the 382 physicians treating > 10 patients, 127 (33.2%) used extended-fraction RT > 30% (consensus threshold). Physician factors associated with decreased odds of extended-fraction RT were years since medical school graduation (≤ 10 years and 11-20 years v ≥ 31 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.51] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.93]) and practicing in the Northeast or Midwest versus the South (aOR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.58] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.74]). Physicians treating > 20 patients ( v 11-14 patients) over the study period had increased odds of delivering extended-fraction RT (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10 to 2.12]). CONCLUSION: In this study, almost one fourth of patients received extended-fraction RT, and one third of physicians had an extended-fraction RT use rate of > 30%. Personalized feedback of performance data, clinical pathways and peer review, and updated reimbursement models are potential mechanisms to address this low-value care.