Citations

Kidney dysfunction after heart transplantation (HT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Recipient and perioperative factors may all influence the risk of kidney injury. Furthermore, data suggest that the incidence of kidney dysfunction, both acute and chronic, is increasing after the implementation of the United States’ 2018 allocation system due to increasing use of temporary mechanical circulatory support and changing recipient characteristics. While data are robust regarding nephroprotective therapies such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition and SGLT2i (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) to minimize the progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with heart failure, data in HT recipients are beginning to emerge. This state-of-the-art review will critically examine the existing literature regarding the epidemiology of kidney dysfunction after HT, mitigation strategies for acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease, including pharmacotherapeutics, the need for kidney transplantation after HT, and practical next steps for the larger HT community.

Abstract Introduction: Teclistamab is the first FDA approved BCMA-directed bispecific antibody for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). With BCMA-targeting CAR-T therapies, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a risk factor for cardiotoxicity. Teclistamab was associated with fatal cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in a recent US pharmacovigilance database analysis, but this analysis was limited by reporting bias. Therefore, the aim of our study is to conduct a multicenter study to define the real-world incidence of CVAEs in RRMM patients treated with teclistamab. Method We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study of patients receiving teclistamab at 5 medical centers. Baseline oncologic and cardiovascular characteristics (including vital sign and echocardiographic data) were collected. Baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as presence of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, severe or symptomatic valvular heart disease, or stroke at baseline. CVAE was collected and categorized based on CTCAE v5.0 by each institution. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was a composite outcome with any of the following: congestive heart failure, asymptomatic cardiomyopathy (interval LVEF drop >10% to resultant LVEF less than 50%), coronary artery disease requiring intervention, stroke or cardiovascular death. Arrhythmia was a composite outcome with any of the following: atrial tachyarrhythmia, ventricular tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia. Median follow-up was calculated through reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to define the relation between MACE and survival. Cause of death was categorized as myeloma-related death or non-myeloma-related deaths (i.e. CRS, infection or cardiovascular death). Cause-specific Cox regression was performed to define relationship between MACE and cause of death. Results In a cohort of 219 patients treated with teclistamab with median follow-up of 20.1 months, 7.3% (N=16) developed MACE, 7.3% (N=16) developed arrhythmia and 12.8% (N=28) developing any MACE or arrhythmia. MACE occurred at a median of 4.5 days (IQR 2.25-15.75 days) after teclistamab step-up. The incidence of MACE was 16.4% in patients with baseline CVD versus 2.7% in those without baseline CVD (p<0.001). Patients who developed MACE had inferior ECOG performance status (PS) (PS >=2: 62.5% vs. 27.7%; p=0.008). Additionally, baseline hemoglobin level (9 vs 10g/dL; p=0.072) was numerically lower in MACE, compared to no MACE. There was no difference in age, sex, bone marrow (BM) plasma cell burden, ferritin, C-reactive protein or LDH levels between MACE vs. no MACE group. Patients who developed MACE had lower baseline diastolic blood pressure (67.7 vs 73.8mmHg; p=0.041) and numerically lower LVEF (51.4 vs 59.3%; p=0.059; baseline echocardiogram performed in 86% of all cohort). Patients who developed MACE had similar incidences of CRS (Grade >=2: 25.0 vs 16.7%; p=0.620) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) grade 2 or higher (12.5 vs 7.5%; p=0.812). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, MACE was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.41-5.25; p=0.003), after adjusting for baseline CVD, age, high BM burden, extramedullary disease, and plasma cell leukemia. In cause-specific multivariable Cox regression analysis, MACE was independently associated with non-myeloma-related death (HR: 10.77 95% CI 4.39- 26.41; p<0.001) but not with myeloma-related death (1.54; 95% CI 0.64- 3.70; p=0.336). Conclusion In conclusion, in this large, real-world multicenter study, we observed that MACE occurred in over 7% of patients following teclistamab for RRMM, typically within 2 weeks of initiation. MACE was significantly associated with increased non-myeloma-related mortality. In contrast to CAR-T therapy, CRS or ICANS were not associated with MACE, whereas majority of patients who developed MACE had ECOG PS >=2 or baseline cardiovascular disease. More studies are necessary to define mechanisms and strategies to reduce these MACE and improve survival. Patients with baseline cardiovascular disease or poor performance status may benefit from cardiovascular optimization before and during teclistamab therapy.

Importance The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved cancer outcomes but at the cost of adverse events, mainly related to the immune system. Cardiovascular (CV) toxic effects, and especially myocarditis, are of particular concern and are the subject of this position statement by the International Cardio-Oncology Society with representation of experts from oncology, hematology, and cardiology. Observations CV toxic effects of ICI therapies include inflammation-associated diseases, such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and vasculitis, as well as the aggravation of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as atherosclerosis with acute ischemic complications (myocardial infarction and stroke). Patients taking ICI therapies can also develop cardiac dysfunction, stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo or apical ballooning syndrome), and heart failure without inflammatory cell infiltration of the myocardium. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can emerge in the setting of a systemic inflammatory milieu, myocarditis, or ischemia. Of all potential CV adverse effects, myocarditis remains of highest concern, although fatality rates have declined over time with a broadening spectrum of presentations ranging from troponin elevation of uncertain significance to smoldering, nonsevere, and severe or fulminant myocarditis. Conclusions and Relevance Concerns for myocarditis continue to dominate the spectrum of CV toxic effects in patients receiving ICI therapy. Recommendations for management vary according to severity. Multidisciplinary collaborations remain key for managing acute toxic effects and future cancer treatment decisions, including ICI rechallenge. Ischemic heart disease constitutes the main differential diagnosis in these patients, while pericarditis can be concomitantly present, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can also complicate the clinical picture. Several gaps in knowledge are identified and require further research.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) and is often observed in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Acoramidis achieves near-complete (≥90%) transthyretin (TTR) stabilization and is approved in the USA, the UK, Europe and Japan for the treatment of ATTR-CM in adults. In the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study (NCT03860935), acoramidis treatment significantly reduced the time to all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) at Month 30, and resulted in improved 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels relative to placebo. The clinical efficacy of acoramidis has not yet been reported in patients with ATTR-CM and with an AF or atrial flutter (AFL) diagnosis at baseline. Research Question: How does acoramidis treatment affect ACM or first CVH, 6MWD, KCCQ-OS scores, and NT-proBNP levels at Month 30 in participants with ATTR-CM with or without AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline? Methods: The ATTRibute-CM study design has been previously published. This post hoc analysis included participants in the modified intention-to-treat population (N=611) grouped by AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline (defined as recorded AF medical history or the presence of AF or AFL on an ECG at enrollment). The rate of ACM or first CVH at Month 30 was compared between groups using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Changes from baseline to Month 30 in 6MWD, KCCQ-OS scores and NT-proBNP levels were summarized descriptively. Results: Overall, 62.8% (384/611) of participants had an AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline (acoramidis: 255/409, placebo: 129/202). These participants had lower mean 6MWD and KCCQ-OS scores and higher median NT-proBNP levels than those without AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline. Treatment with acoramidis reduced ACM or first CVH, slowed the decline in 6MWD and KCCQ-OS scores and blunted the rise in NT-proBNP compared with placebo, regardless of AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline ( Table ). Conclusions: Acoramidis improved clinical outcomes (ACM, CVH), functional status, QoL and NT-proBNP levels relative to placebo in participants with ATTR-CM, regardless of AF/AFL diagnosis at baseline.

Introduction: Patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) typically have low serum transthyretin (sTTR) levels, worsening heart failure, and increased mortality. A recent study has shown the association of sTTR levels ≥20mg/dL with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (CVM). It has also been shown that regardless of baseline sTTR level, greater increases in sTTR levels are associated with greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes. Acoramidis, a near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilizer, demonstrated a rapid and sustained increase from baseline in sTTR by Day 28 and reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ATTR-CM. Hypothesis: Acoramidis-mediated early increase in sTTR levels ≥20 mg/dL (lower limit of normal) at Day 28 reduces risks of CVM and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (CVH) in patients with ATTR-CM. Methods: Analyses were conducted in the ATTRibute-CM modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (acoramidis: 409; placebo: 202). The sTTR concentrations (normal range is 20-40 mg/dL) were assessed using an immunoturbidimetric method (Abbott ARCHITECT system) in a central laboratory. The proportion of participants with sTTR levels below normal at baseline and Day 28 were determined. The relationship between sTTR levels <20 or ≥20 mg/dL, at Day 28 across the pooled acoramidis and placebo treatment groups, and subsequent risk of CVM and of CVH over 30 months were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test. Results: At baseline about 25% of study participants had sTTR levels below normal in both treatment groups. At Day 28, less than 2% of participants had sTTR levels <20 mg/dL in the acoramidis arm compared with 26% in the placebo arm ( Table 1 ). When acoramidis and placebo treatment groups were pooled based on sTTR levels <20 or ≥20 mg/dL at Day 28, participants with sTTR ≥20 mg/dL were associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint of CVM or first CVH at Month 30 in comparison with <20 mg/dL ( p <0.0001) ( Figure 1A ). Comparable findings were observed for the individual components (CVM, first CVH) ( Figure 1B and C ). Conclusion: Across treatment groups, sTTR levels above normal range (≥20 mg/dL) at Day 28 were associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes at Month 30, when compared with sTTR levels below normal range (<20 mg/dL). Thus, these observations demonstrate that higher sTTR levels over time may have the potential for clinical benefits in both CVM and CVH.

ABSTRACT Background Patients with cancer undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation face unique challenges. This study evaluates the outcomes and implications of CIED implantation in this population. Methods Using data from the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019, we analyzed CIED implantations in patients aged ≥18 years, categorized by cancer status: no cancer, historical cancer, and active cancer. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models assessed associations with in‐hospital, 30‐day, and 90‐day outcomes, adjusting for various patient characteristics. Results A total of 748,957 CIED procedures were analyzed among which 13.3% were in patients with historical cancer and 3.8% with active cancer. Active cancer was linked to higher odds of pacemaker implantation but lower odds for ICD and CRT devices. Patients with active cancer experienced higher index hospitalization mortality (aOR 1.68; 1.50–1.89; p < 0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (aOR 1.07; 1.02–1.14; p = 0.01), bleeding (aOR 1.36; 1.27–1.46; p < 0.01), and sepsis‐related (aOR 1.31; 1.19–1.44; p < 0.01) complications, with increased readmission rates at 30 (aOR 1.37; 1.30–1.44; p < 0.01) and 90 days (aOR 1.37; 1.31–1.44; p < 0.01) compared to those without cancer. Historical cancer was associated with better outcomes. Key predictors of adverse outcomes included chronic heart failure, kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, and protein‐calorie malnutrition. Conclusions Patients with active cancer undergoing CIED implantation have an increased risk of in‐hospital complications and readmissions as compared to those without cancer.

Abstract Background and Aims Accurate differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from phenotypic mimics remains challenging using current clinical and echocardiographic techniques. The accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) screening algorithm for echocardiography-based CA detection was assessed. Methods Utilizing a multisite, multiethnic dataset (n = 2612, 52% CA), a convolutional neural network was trained to differentiate CA from phenotypic controls using transthoracic apical four-chamber video clips. External validation was conducted globally across 18 sites including 597 CA cases and 2122 controls. Classification accuracy was assessed on the entire external validation dataset, and subgroup analyses were performed both on technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy referrals, and individuals matched for age, sex, and wall thickness. Model accuracy was also compared with the transthyretin CA score and the increased wall thickness score within a subset of older heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with increased wall thickness. Results Cardiac amyloidosis patients and controls displayed similar age, sex, race, and comorbidities. After the removal of uncertain AI predictions (13%), model discrimination and classification were excellent for the entire external validation dataset [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.93, sensitivity 85%, specificity 93%], irrespective of CA subtype (sensitivity: light-chain = 84%, wild-type transthyretin = 85%, and hereditary transthyretin = 86%). Performance was maintained in subgroup analysis in patients clinically referred for technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy imaging (AUROC 0.86, sensitivity 77%, specificity 86%) and matched patients (AUROC 0.92, sensitivity 84%, specificity 91%). The AI model (AUROC 0.93) also outperformed transthyretin CA score (AUROC 0.73) and increased wall thickness (AUROC 0.80) scores. Conclusions This AI screening model—using only an apical four-chamber view—effectively differentiated CA from other causes of increased left ventricular wall thickness.

Background: Acoramidis is a novel, potent, investigational, transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer under development for the treatment of TTR amyloidosis that results in near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization. In a phase 3 study, ATTRibute-CM, acoramidis demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in participants with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), including a 50% reduction in the risk of CVH compared to placebo over 30 months. The study also demonstrated that cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH) during the study predicted a higher subsequent mortality in participants with ATTR-CM. Hypothesis: CVH portends a higher risk of mortality in participants with ATTR-CM. Since acoramidis reduces CVH, it can improve the prognosis of participants with ATTR-CM. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between CVH and survival in the acoramidis group within ATTRibute-CM. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, the relationship between those with or without CVH and survival was analyzed within the acoramidis treatment group using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator method. Results: Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were mostly comparable between acoramidis-treated participants with and without CVH, although participants with CVH had a higher baseline NT-proBNP and lower eGFR. At Month 30, in acoramidis-treated participants, those without any CVH (n=300) had a higher survival [86.8% (95% CI = 82.2, 90.3)] versus 62.4% (95% CI = 52.6, 70.7) in those who had any CVH (n=109); p<0.0001 from log-rank test (Figure). Conclusion: In the ATTRibute-CM study, pts without any CVH receiving acoramidis have a higher survival rate. CVHs remain a powerful predictor of mortality. This reinforces the importance of an effective therapy that reduces CVH and in turn may improve survival in patients with ATTR-CM.