Citations

To determine the source(s) of blood and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triglyceride glycerol during fasting, four men ingested2H2O from 14 to 20 h into a 60-h fast to achieve ∼0.5% body water enrichment. At 60 h of fasting, glycerol flux was measured using [2-14C]glycerol. Blood was taken for measurement of2H enrichment at carbon 6 of glucose and at carbon 3 of free glycerol and VLDL-triglyceride glycerol.2H enrichment of the 2 hydrogens bound to carbon 3 of VLDL-triglyceride glycerol was 105 ± 2% of the2H enrichment of the 2 hydrogens bound to carbon 6 of glucose, indicating isotopic equilibrium between hepatic glyceraldehyde 3- P and glycerol 3- P. The2H enrichment of the 2 hydrogens bound to carbon 3 of free glycerol was 17 ± 3% of VLDL-triglyceride glycerol, indicating that a significant percentage of free glycerol in blood originated from the hydrolysis of circulating VLDL-triglyceride or a pool of glycerol with similar2H enrichment. Glycerol flux was 6.3 ± 1.1 μmol · kg−1· min−1. Glycerol appearing from nonadipose tissue sources was then ∼1.1 μmol · kg−1· min−1. Seven other subjects were fasted for 12, 42, and 60 h. A small percentage of glycerol in the circulation after 12 h of fasting was enriched with2H. The enrichment of the 2 hydrogens bound to carbon 3 of free glycerol in the longer periods of fasting was ∼16% of the enrichment of the 2 hydrogens bound to carbon 6 of glucose. Therefore, as much as 15–20% of systemic glycerol turnover during fasting is not from lipolysis of adipose tissue triglyceride.

OBJECTIVE—Measurement of plasma C2 glucose enrichment is cumbersome. Therefore, the plasma C5 glucose–to–2H2O rather than the plasma C5-to-C2 glucose ratio commonly has been used to measure gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. The validity of this approach is unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Ten nondiabetic and 10 diabetic subjects ingested 2H2O the evening before study. The following morning, insulin was infused at a rate of 0.6 mU · kg−1 · min−1 and glucose was clamped at ∼5.3 mmol/l for 5 h. Plasma C5 glucose, C2 glucose, and 2H2O enrichments were measured hourly from 2 h onward. RESULTS—Plasma C2 glucose and plasma 2H2O enrichment were equal in both groups before the clamp, resulting in equivalent estimates of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. In contrast, plasma C2 glucose and plasma C5 glucose enrichments fell throughout the clamp, whereas plasma 2H2O enrichment remained unchanged. Since the C5 glucose concentration and, hence, the C5 glucose–to–2H2O ratio is influenced by both gluconeogenesis and glucose clearance, whereas the C5-to-C2 glucose ratio is only influenced by gluconeogenesis, the C5 glucose–to–2H2O ratio overestimated (P < 0.01) gluconeogenesis during the clamp. This resulted in biologically implausible negative (i.e., calculated rates of gluconeogenesis exceeding total endogenous glucose production) rates of glycogenolysis in both the nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. CONCLUSIONS—Plasma C5 glucose–to–2H2O ratio does not provide an accurate assessment of gluconeogenesis in nondiabetic or diabetic subjects during a traditional (i.e., 2–3 h) hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. The conclusions of studies that have used this approach need to be reevaluated.

OBJECTIVE—The deuterated water method uses the ratio of deuterium on carbons 5 and 2 (C5/C2) or 3 and 2 (C3/C2) to estimate the fraction of glucose derived from gluconeogenesis. The current studies determined whether C3 and C5 glucose enrichment is influenced by processes other than gluconeogenesis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Six nondiabetic subjects were infused with [3,5-2H2]glucose and insulin while glucose was clamped at ∼5 mmol/l; the C5-to-C3 ratio was measured in the in UDP-glucose pool using nuclear magnetic resonance and the acetaminophen glucuronide method. RESULTS—Whereas the C5-to-C3 ratio of the infusate was 1.07, the ratio in UDP-glucose was <1.0 in all subjects both before (0.75 ± 0.07) and during (0.67 ± 0.05) the insulin infusion. CONCLUSIONS—These data indicate that the deuterium on C5 of glucose is lost more rapidly relative to the deuterium on C3. The decrease in the C5-to-C3 ratio could result from exchange of the lower three carbons of fructose-6-phosphate with unlabeled three-carbon precursors via the transaldolase reaction and/or selective retention of the C3 deuterium at the level of triosephosphate isomerase due to a kinetic isotope effect. After ingestion of 2H2O, these processes would increase the enrichment of C5 and decrease the enrichment of C3, respectively, with the former causing an overestimation of gluconeogenesis using the C2-to-C5 ratio and the latter an underestimation using the C3-to-C2 ratio. Future studies will be required to determine whether the impact of these processes on the measurement of gluconeogenesis differs among the disease states being evaluated (e.g., diabetes or obesity).

OBJECTIVE—To determine mechanisms by which pioglitazone and metformin effect hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Thirty-one subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (45 mg) or metformin (2,000 mg) for 4 months. RESULTS—Glucose was clamped before and after therapy at ∼5 mmol/l, insulin raised to ∼180 pmol/l, C-peptide suppressed with somatostatin, glucagon replaced at ∼75 pg/ml, and glycerol maintained at ∼200 mmol/l to ensure comparable and equal portal concentrations on all occasions. Insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance did not differ before and after treatment with either pioglitazone (23 ± 3 vs. 24 ± 2 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) or metformin (22 ± 2 vs. 24 ± 3 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). In contrast, pioglitazone enhanced (P < 0.01) insulin-induced suppression of both glucose production (6.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.2 ± 1.6 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) and gluconeogenesis (n = 11; 4.5 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 1.2 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Metformin did not alter either suppression of glucose production (5.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.0 ± 0.8 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) or gluconeogenesis (n = 9; 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.6 ± 0.7 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Insulin-induced suppression of free fatty acids was greater (P < 0.05) after treatment with pioglitazone (0.14 ± 0.03 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 mmol/l) but unchanged with metformin (0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.15 ± 0.07 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS—Thus, relative to metformin, pioglitazone improves hepatic insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes, partly by enhancing insulin-induced suppression of gluconeogenesis. On the other hand, both drugs have comparable effects on insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake.

OBJECTIVE—To determine the contribution of hepatic insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired fasting glucose (IFG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal were measured in 31 subjects with IFG and 28 subjects with normal fasting glucose (NFG) after an overnight fast and during a clamp when endogenous secretion was inhibited with somatostatin and insulin infused at rates that approximated portal insulin concentrations present in IFG subjects after an overnight fast (∼80 pmol/l, “preprandial”) or within 30 min of eating (∼300 pmol/l, “prandial”). RESULTS—Despite higher (P < 0.001) insulin and C-peptide concentrations and visceral fat (P < 0.05), fasting EGP and glucose disposal did not differ between IFG and NFG subjects, implying hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance. This was confirmed during preprandial insulin infusion when glucose disposal was lower (P < 0.05) and EGP higher (P < 0.05) in IFG than in NFG subjects. Higher EGP was due to increased (P < 0.05) rates of gluconeogenesis in IFG. EGP was comparably suppressed in IFG and NFG groups during prandial insulin infusion, indicating that hepatic insulin resistance was mild. Glucose disposal remained lower (P < 0.01) in IFG than in NFG subjects. CONCLUSIONS—Hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance contribute to fasting hyperglycemia in IFG with the former being due at least in part to impaired insulin-induced suppression of gluconeogenesis. However, since hepatic insulin resistance is mild and near-maximal suppression of EGP occurs at portal insulin concentrations typically present in IFG subjects within 30 min of eating, extrahepatic (but not hepatic) insulin resistance coupled with accompanying defects in insulin secretion is the primary cause of postprandial hyperglycemia.

To determine whether the hepatic insulin resistance of obesity and type 2 diabetes is due to impaired insulin-induced suppression of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis, 10 lean nondiabetic, 10 obese nondiabetic, and 11 obese type 2 diabetic subjects were studied after an overnight fast and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis were measured using the deuterated water method. Before the clamp, when glucose and insulin concentrations differed among the three groups, gluconeogenesis was higher in the diabetic than in the obese nondiabetic subjects (P < 0.05) and glycogenolysis was higher in the diabetic than in the lean nondiabetic subjects (P < 0.05). During the clamp, when glucose and insulin concentrations were matched and glucagon concentrations were suppressed, both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis were higher (P < 0.01) in the diabetic versus the obese and lean nondiabetic subjects. Furthermore, glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis were higher (P < 0.01) in the obese than in the lean nondiabetic subjects. Plasma free fatty acid concentrations correlated (P < 0.001) with glucose production and gluconeogenesis both before and during the clamp and with glycogenolysis during the clamp (P < 0.01). We concluded that defects in the regulation of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis cause hepatic insulin resistance in obese nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic humans.