Citations

Abstract Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is an aggressive head and neck cancer of the sinonasal cavity which has not benefitted from therapeutic advances over decades 1 . Though historically attributed to inhaled carcinogens such as hardwood dust and tobacco smoking 2 , SNSCC is incidentally associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 3,4 . Importantly, HPV is the primary oncogenic driver of >80% of anatomically adjacent oropharyngeal cancers 5 . While viral status drives clinical staging and treatment guidelines in these malignancies 6,7 , the potentially oncogenic consequences and prognostic value of host–virus interactions in SNSCC remain incompletely defined. Here, through paired host and viral whole-genome sequencing (WGS), we map the genomic footprint of HPV in SNSCC. Strikingly, lesser studied strains such as HPV45, 51, and 39 constitute driver infections in this rare but clinically credentialed cancer, where extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA)-associated viral integration and APOBEC mutagenesis are shown to underpin somatic tumor evolution. Statement of Significance Paired host viral and whole-genome sequencing of SNSCC nominates HPV as a primary oncogenic driver of SNSCC. HPV–human ecDNA amplicons harboring noncanonical strains such as HPV45, 51 mediate viral carcinogenesis. Routine clinical diagnostic HPV panels should be expanded to capture the activity of lesser studied strains.

Background: Understanding the accuracy of a woman's perceived breast cancer risk can enhance shared decision-making about breast cancer screening through provider and patient discussion. We aim to report and compare women's perceived lifetime breast cancer risk to calculated lifetime breast cancer risk. Methods: Women presenting to Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Minnesota in July 2016 completed a survey assessing their perceived breast cancer risk. Lifetime Gail risk scores were calculated from questions pertaining to health history and were then compared with perceived breast cancer risk. Results: A total of 550 predominantly white, married, and well-educated (≥college) women completed surveys. Using lifetime Gail risk scores, 5.6% were classified as high risk (>20% lifetime risk), 7.7% were classified as intermediate risk (15%–20%), and 86.6% were classified as average risk (<15%). Of the 27 women who were classified as high risk, 18 (66.7%) underestimated their risk and of the 37 women who were intermediate risk, 12 (32.4%) underestimated risk. Women more likely to underestimate their risk had a reported history of an abnormal mammogram and at least one or more relative with a history of breast cancer. Surveyed women tended to overestimate risk 4.3 (130/30) times as often as they underestimated risk. Conclusion: In a group of predominantly white, educated, and married cohort of women, there was a large portion of women in the elevated risk groups who underestimated risk. Specific aspects of medical history were associated with underestimation including a history of abnormal mammogram and family history of breast cancer. Overall, in our sample, more women overestimated than underestimated risk.