Citations

PURPOSE Age ≥40 years is regarded as a high-risk feature and an indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with lower-grade glioma in clinical practice guidelines. It is unclear whether age remains a relevant prognostic factor for contemporary definitions of lower-grade gliomas in the molecular era. METHODS The Prospective Gliomas Research (PROGRES) database contains individual patient-level data from 11 prospective clinical trials or observational registries of histologically defined lower-grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma. We determined the association of age (18-39 years v ≥40 years) with progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 ( IDH1/2 ) status, using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. We validated our findings in a separate multi-institutional retrospective cohort (Retrospective Glioma Research [REGRES] database). RESULTS We identified 1,619 and 1,292 eligible patients in the PROGRES and REGRES cohorts, respectively. IDH -wildtype tumors were more common in patients 40 years and older (38% v 5%, odds ratio: 11.3 [95% CI, 6.5 to 19.7]). Age was associated with PFS in IDH -wildtype (5-year PFS for ≥40 v 18-39 years: 6% v 24%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.50]) but not in IDH -mutant glioma (60% v 59%, HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05], P interaction < .001). In IDH -wildtype tumors, older age predicted aggressive molecular features, including TERT promoter mutation (65% v 28%), EGFR amplification (41% v 15%), and chromosome +7/–10 alteration (57% v 25%). In a pooled analysis of four clinical trials, age was not predictive of a benefit from chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for IDH -mutant glioma. CONCLUSION In the absence of additional clinical or molecular risk factors, age alone should not be considered an indication for administration or deferral of adjuvant treatment. Practice guidelines should be revised to reflect contemporary prognostic factors in the molecular era.

Abstract Background Multi-modality therapy has improved survival for many patients with brain metastases. However, neurocognitive sequelae remain a challenge. While advances in radiotherapy have reduced toxicity, the potential interaction with targeted therapy and immunotherapy and the consequent impact on neurocognitive outcomes remain poorly defined. We appraised the current evidence on neurocognitive outcomes in the era of modern combined-modality therapy. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included clinical trials reporting neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain metastases receiving radiotherapy ± concurrent systemic therapies. Studies published through December 31, 2024 were identified through PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science using pre-defined MeSH term-based search strings. Results 39 studies from 1997-2024 involving 6,617 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 27 whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]; n = 12 radiosurgery), including six studies evaluating combined-modality therapy in 1,161 patients. Baseline cognitive evaluation was performed inconsistently, but neurocognitive deficits were frequently observed prior to treatment. Most randomized trials reported improved cognitive outcomes and quality of life with advanced radiotherapy techniques (e.g., hippocampal avoidance, radiosurgery) vs WBRT. Among 20 randomized trials comparing radiotherapy with or without a concurrent investigational systemic therapy, only four included neurocognitive assessments. There was no evidence of cognitive sequelae with combined-modality therapy, though evaluable trials were limited due to inconsistent reporting of neurocognitive functioning. Conclusion As survival improves in patients with brain metastases, preserved cognition is an important outcome measure. The lack of neurocognitive endpoints in pivotal brain metastasis trials represents a critical evidence gap. The interaction between radiotherapy and novel systemic therapies, and their combined effects on neurocognition, remain unknown. To address this, we recommend 1) integrating sensitive, pragmatic, and tailored neurocognitive assessments into oncology trials to quantify additive toxicity, 2) early and systematically incorporating neuropsychology into care pathways, 3) expanding radiation dose-sparing and radioprotective strategies, and 4) evaluating the utility of cognitive rehabilitation programs.

Abstract Introduction Postoperative radiotherapy is an adjuvant therapy for brain metastases(BrMs) that improves local recurrence(LR). The radiosensitivity index(RSI) is a 10-gene index of pan-cancer molecular radiosensitivity previously validated for predicting radiotherapy response in clinical datasets. In this external validation study, we evaluate RSI as a predictor of local recurrence(LR) after radiotherapy in resected BrM. Methods Patients from University Health Network Toronto(UHN) and McGill University who had a resected BrM and subsequently underwent whole brain radiation(WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS). RSI was calculated using a ranked linear regression model from the weighted expression of 10 radiosensitivity genes, with higher values corresponding to radioresistance. Radiophenotype was determined using a previously validated RSI cutoff of &lt; 0.375 to identify radiosensitive tumors. LR was defined as recurrence in the resection cavity and overall survival(OS) was measured from time of BrM diagnosis. Results 106 BrM patients were included, comprising 29 breast, 37 GI, 33 lung, and 7 melanoma primary sources. Mean age at surgery was 59.2 years, 31.1%(n = 33) were male, 67.9%(n = 72) had WBRT, 23.6%(n = 25) had a subtotal resection, and 30.2%(n = 32) had postoperative chemotherapy. Overall, 34.0%(n = 36) patients had LR. Patients with breast BrMs had median RSI 0.70(IQR:0.55-0.75, 10.3% radiosensitive) with 48.3% LR(n = 14); gastrointestinal BrMs had median RSI 0.43(IQR: 0.35-0.46, 29.7% radiosensitive) and 24.3% LR(n = 9); lung BrMs had median RSI of 0.67(IQR:0.66-0.71, 9% radiosensitive) and 33.3% LR(n = 11); melanoma BrMs had median RSI of 0.72(IQR:0.53-0.92, 0% radiosensitive) and 28.6% LR(n = 2). After adjusting for demographics, primary organ, radiotherapy, resection extent, among others, RSI did not predict LR(p = 0.56) or OS(p = 0.61). Discussion RSI did not predict either LR or OS in patients with surgically resected BrMs status post radiotherapy, further establishing the need for improved predictive scores in this population.

Abstract Background Vorasidenib is Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treatment of grade 2 isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas and has demonstrated a benefit in progression‐free survival compared to a placebo. This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness of this treatment strategy compared to standard treatment: observation or chemoradiation (CRT). Methods The authors used an integrated Markov model to compare quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) gained and cost‐effectiveness of patients with IDH‐mutated low‐grade glioma (LGG) treated with vorasidenib, observation, or CRT. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. Treatment is considered cost‐effective if it meets the commonly accepted willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Results Based on model parameters, vorasidenib demonstrated an ICER of $356,756 per QALY when compared to CRT. When compared to observation, vorasidenib demonstrated an improved ICER of $215,191 per QALY. On one‐way sensitivity analysis compared to observation, median cost of vorasidenib and median overall survival were most likely to affect ICER with only marginal changes on analysis of other model factors. For ICER to become ≤$100,000 compared to observation, the cost of vorasidenib would need to drop to below $14,072 monthly or have a median survival gain of at least 11.9 years. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that vorasidenib was favored in none of 5000 Monte Carlo iterations. Conclusion Using the best available data, the current price of vorasidenib does not meet commonly accepted cost‐effectiveness thresholds in treatment of IDH‐mutated LGGs.

Abstract Purpose: Neurocognitive and endocrine dysfunction are potential complications of cranial irradiation. However, risk factors are poorly understood, impeding accurate prognostication and exploration of potential preventive interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of various vascular and genotypic risk factors for the development of radiation-related toxicities. Methods: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic and malignant primary brain tumors who received cranial irradiation as part of their initial tumor-directed therapy. Demographic and treatment characteristics were collected, as well as putative vascular and genotypic risk factors. Univariate, multivariate, and machine-learning analyses were performed using five pre-specified measures of radiation-related toxicity. The primary outcome was change in mini-mental status exam (MMSE). Results: Eighty patients (53% male, mean age 55.7, 53% primary and 44% metastatic brain tumors) were included. Elevated homocysteine and ApOE4genotype were the strongest predictors of MMSE decline in the multivariate model (OR 3.96 [6.5-200, p<0.001 and 2.85 [1.92-27.6], p=0.004). Elevated homocysteine was associated white matter change on MRI and both physician and patient assessment. ApoE4allele was associated with new endocrine deficiency, and physician assessment. An online nomogram provides risk predictions for each of the five late toxicity outcomes: (https://afranklin22.shinyapps.io/PRMMSERadiationRiskFactors/) Conclusion: Two pre-treatment laboratory values (elevated homocysteine and ApOE genotype) were strongly associated with post-radiation neurocognitive and endocrine dysfunction using a variety of simple but clinically meaningful definitions of dysfunction. Our predictive algorithm can aid clinicians in stratifying baseline risk and should be validated in prospective trials.

Importance Brain metastases are common in patients with cancer, and radiation is often used for management. Among patients with more than 4 brain metastases, the effects of stereotactic radiation targeting only individual tumors, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, which radiates both tumors and normal brain, remain unknown. Objective To determine whether stereotactic radiation improves symptom severity and interference with daily functioning, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 United States–based centers. Eligible patients had 5 to 20 brain metastases and no prior brain-directed radiation. Enrollment occurred between April 11, 2017, and May 17, 2024 (final follow-up, March 18, 2025). Intervention Stereotactic radiation, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean weighted patient-reported symptom severity and interference score change over 6 months postbaseline relative to baseline using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor instrument (scale, 0-10; score change range, −10 to 10; −10 = best). A clinically meaningful Δ was defined as 0.98. Results Of 196 randomized patients (mean age, 61 years; 129 [66%] female; 176 [90%] White; median number of brain metastases, 14 [IQR, 11-18]; 49 [25%] with prior neurosurgical resection), 83 (42%) completed the 6-month assessment. For the primary outcome, between baseline and postbaseline assessments through the 6-month follow-up, stereotactic radiation changed the weighted composite MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor score from 2.69 to 2.37 (mean change, −0.32) and hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation changed the score from 2.29 to 3.03 (mean change, 0.74) (mean difference, −1.06 [95% CI, −1.54 to −0.58]; P &amp;lt; .001). Related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (12%) in the stereotactic radiation group and 13 patients (13%) in the hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation group; grade 1-3 fatigue was most frequent (27 [28%] vs 43 [44%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with 5 to 20 brain metastases, these findings support stereotactic radiation over hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation to improve symptoms and interference with daily functioning, key components of quality of life. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03075072

OBJECTIVE Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond 3 months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluated prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at their institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived less than 90 days after SRS were identified and case matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. The authors modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole-brain radiation (OR 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of poor survival, whereas CNS progression before SRS (OR 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with survival < 90 days. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. CONCLUSIONS Key predictors of 90-day survival after SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurological deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe the long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the primary treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included. RESULTS A total of 749 patients met inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 566, 76%) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle at SRS. The median patient age at SRS was 62 years, half (50%) of the patients were women, and 744 (99%) exhibited House-Brackmann grade I facial nerve function at SRS. A total of 42 patients experienced radiosurgical failure and underwent salvage treatment; the median duration of follow-up for the patients who did not undergo salvage treatment was 7.0 years. Overall tumor control rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after SRS were 100% (100%–100%, 718), 98% (97%–99%, 589), 96% (94%–97%, 464), 92% (90%–95%, 258), and 91% (89%–94%, 125), respectively. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for a 10-year increase of 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.19; p = 0.5), presence of a macrocystic tumor (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14–2.46; p = 0.5), and treated tumor volume (HR for a 1-cm 3 increase of 1.02, 95% CI 0.88–1.18; p = 0.8) were not significantly associated with the risk of salvage. Three distinct post-SRS tumor behavior patterns were observed, with 13% of patients demonstrating tumor pseudoprogression, all but 4 of whom demonstrated pseudoprogression by year 5 post-SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS demonstrates durable tumor control through 15 years of follow-up in most patients (91%); however, a minority are found to still experience SRS failure even beyond 10 years of surveillance. Although occurring in only a minority of patients, tumor pseudoprogression can be evident out to 5 years or longer post-SRS.