Citations

Clear

9 citation(s) found for "Brooks, Rebecca".

Vaginal Cancer, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R, Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha R. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin, Brooks, Rebecca , Chon, Hye Sook, Crispens, Marta Ann, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Mutch, David, Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa, Nwachukwu, Chika, Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Nwachukwu, Chika , Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Arend, Rebecca C. , Bradley, Kristin , Chino, Junzo , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Glaser, Gretchen , Landrum, Lisa M. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 101-126

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0011 | PMID 41825134 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vaginal Cancer outline the recommended diagnostic workup, staging considerations, and treatment options for this rare malignancy. Because vaginal cancer is uncommon and shares many biologic and clinical characteristics with cervical cancer, several management recommendations, particularly systemic therapy, are extrapolated from evidence and practices established for cervical cancer. This guideline excerpt summarizes key components of management, including diagnostic evaluation and workup, principles of staging, pathology considerations, radiation therapy principles, and primary treatment recommendations for both early-stage and advanced disease. It also details approaches to manage relapses, including locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, and provides an in-depth overview of systemic therapy recommendations for vaginal cancer.
Impact of Dual Rheumatoid Factor and Anticitrullinated Protein Antibody Seropositive, Single Seropositive, and Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis on Outcomes
Brooks, Rebecca , Achenbach, Sara J., Kronzer, V., Myasoedova, E., Crowson, CS , Davis, John M. , Kronzer, Vanessa L. , Brooks, Rebecca T , Kronzer, Vanessa L , Myasoedova, Elena , Davis, John M , Myasoedova, Elena , Crowson, Cynthia S.

Mayo Clinic

Arthritis Care & Research | January 20, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acr.80009 | PMID 41556559 Get It

Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the association between dual seropositive, single seropositive, and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with radiographic erosions, disease flares, and death. Methods We performed a retrospective, population‐based study of residents in Southern Minnesota with incident RA who fulfilled criteria for RA in 2003 to 2019. Radiographic erosions and flares were evaluated within one year of incident RA. All‐cause mortality was obtained from medical records and death certificates. Cox models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, year of incident RA, and comorbidities were used. Results The study included 1,373 patients with RA. At RA incidence, 37% were dual seropositive, 13% seropositive for anti–cyclic citrullinated protein (anti‐CCP) only, 12% seropositive for rheumatoid factor (RF) only, and 38% seronegative. The highest proportion of radiographic erosions before or within one year of RA incidence was in the dual seropositive (31%) and lowest in those seropositive for anti‐CCP only (13%). Flares occurred in 69% of the dual seropositive and 51% of the seropositive for anti‐CCP only within the first year of RA incidence. Those seropositive for RF only had over a two‐fold increase in mortality rates compared with the seronegatives (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–3.24). In contrast, the dual seropositives had only a >50% increase in mortality rates (aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.28), and those seropositive only for anti‐CCP had a >30% increase in mortality rates (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 0.83–2.11). Conclusion Patients with RA seropositive for RF only have an increase in mortality rates compared with patients who are dual seronegative. RF positivity could be an indicator of inflammation that requires pharmacologic treatment to decrease mortality rates.
Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha, Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Landrum, Lisa M. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nieto, Karina , Nwachukwu, Chika , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Arend, Rebecca C. , Chino, Junzo , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 17, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 549-573

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0057 | PMID 41671440 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cervical Cancer provide diagnostic workup, staging, and various treatment recommendations for cervical cancer based on clinical and surgical staging. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for cervical cancer specifically focuses on diagnosis and workup, principles of staging and surgery, and primary treatment recommendations for early-stage and advanced disease and provides a detailed overview of systemic therapy recommendations for cervical cancer.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Uterine Neoplasms, Version 3.2025
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha, Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Landrum, Lisa M. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nieto, Karina , Nwachukwu, Chika , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel, Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Arend, Rebecca C. , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 5, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 284-291

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0038 | PMID 40763788 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. The NCCN Cervical Uterine Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions; examine relevant new data from publications, abstracts, and recent FDA approvals; and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s deliberations on the new FIGO 2023 staging system and updates on the new systemic therapy recommendations for the management of endometrial cancer.
Reply
England, Bryant R. , Brooks, Rebecca , Mikuls, Ted R. , Brooks, Rebecca T , Mikuls, Ted R , England, Bryant R

Mayo Clinic

Arthritis & Rheumatology | October 28, 2024 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 627-627

10.1002/art.43048 | PMID 39465496 Get It

The Risk of Lung Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Brooks, Rebecca , Luedders, Brent A. , Wheeler, Austin M. , Johnson, Tate , Yang, Yangyuna, Roul, Punyasha, Ganti, Apar Kishor , Sauer, Brian C. , Cannon, Grant W. , Brooks, Rebecca T, Luedders, Brent , Wheeler, Austin , Johnson, Tate M , Sauer, Brian C , Cannon, Grant W , Baker, Joshua F , Mikuls, Ted R , England, Bryant R , Ganti, Apar K , Singh, Namrata , Baker, Joshua F. , Mikuls, Ted R. , England, Bryant R.

Mayo Clinic

Arthritis & Rheumatology | July 29, 2024 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1730-1738

10.1002/art.42961 | PMID 39073264 Get It

ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate lung cancer risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and RA‐interstitial lung disease (ILD).MethodsWe performed a retrospective, matched cohort study of RA and RA‐ILD within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) between 2000 and 2019. Patients with RA and RA‐ILD were identified with validated administrative‐based algorithms, then matched (up to 1:10) on age, gender, and VA enrollment year to individuals without RA. Lung cancers were identified from a VA oncology database and the National Death Index. Conditional Cox regression models assessed lung cancer risk adjusting for race, ethnicity, smoking status, Agent Orange exposure, and comorbidity burden among matched individuals. Several sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsWe matched 72,795 patients with RA with 633,937 patients without RA (mean age 63 years; 88% male). Over 4,481,323 patient‐years, 17,099 incident lung cancers occurred. RA was independently associated with an increased lung cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52–1.64]), which persisted in never smokers (aHR 1.65 [95% CI 1.22–2.24]) and in those with incident RA (aHR 1.54 [95% CI 1.44–1.65]). Compared to non‐RA controls, prevalent RA‐ILD (n = 757) was more strongly associated with lung cancer risk (aHR 3.25 [95% CI 2.13–4.95]) than RA without ILD (aHR 1.57 [95% CI 1.51–1.64]). Analyses of both prevalent and incident RA‐ILD produced similar results (RA‐ILD vs non‐RA aHR 2.88 [95% CI 2.45–3.40]).ConclusionRA was associated with a >50% increased risk of lung cancer, and those with RA‐ILD represented a particularly high‐risk group with an approximate three‐fold increased risk. Increased lung cancer surveillance in RA, and especially RA‐ILD, may be a useful strategy for reducing the burden posed by the leading cause of cancer death.
Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , Zanotti, Kristine , McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Arend, Rebecca C. , Crispens, Marta Ann , Holmes, Jordan A. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Wethington, Stephanie L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 18, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-135

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0013 | PMID 38503056 Get It

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget’s disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Arend, Rebecca C. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Holmes, Jordan A. , Howitt, Brooke E. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Aggarwal, Shaili, Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Crispens, Marta Ann , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Mutch, David G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 11, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1224-1233

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062 | PMID 38081139 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for all aspects of management for cervical cancer, including the diagnostic workup, staging, pathology, and treatment. The guidelines also include details on histopathologic classification of cervical cancer regarding diagnostic features, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. The treatment landscape of advanced cervical cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates regarding the systemic therapy recommendations for recurrent or metastatic disease.
Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Han, Ernest , Holmes, Jordan A. , Howitt, Brooke E. , Mariani, Andrea , Mutch, David, Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , Zanotti, Kristine , McMillian, Nicole R., Aggarwal, Shaili, Arend, Rebecca C. , Chu, Christina , Crispens, Marta Ann , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Wethington, Stephanie L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 15, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 181-209

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0006 | PMID 36791750 Get It

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (also known as endometrial cancer, or more broadly as uterine cancer or carcinoma of the uterine corpus) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States. It is estimated that 65,950 new uterine cancer cases will have occurred in 2022, with 12,550 deaths resulting from the disease. Endometrial carcinoma includes pure endometrioid cancer and carcinomas with high-risk endometrial histology (including uterine serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma [also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor], and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma). Stromal or mesenchymal sarcomas are uncommon subtypes accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms focuses on the diagnosis, staging, and management of pure endometrioid carcinoma. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms is available online at NCCN.org .