Citations

Clear

35 citation(s) found for "Briganti, Alberto".

International Delphi consensus on single‐port robotic radical prostatectomy: patient selection, surgical technique, and training
Soputro, Nicolas , Bjurlin, Marc, Srivastava, Abhishek , Umbreit, Eric, Eltemamy, Mohamed , Pak, Raymond, Gelikman, David G. , Hopson, Nicholas, Geskin, Albert , Mehrazin, Reza, VanDyke, Maia, Nguyen, Carvell, Ornstein, David, Billah, Mubashir , Russell, Christopher, Yuh, Bertram, Thong, Alan, Olivares, Ruben, Shetty, Sugandh, Shakuri‐Rad, Jaschar , Baccala, Angelo, Osinski, Thomas, Simone, Giuseppe, Lee, D Y , Baker, Mark, Ramadan, Mohammad, Mattei, Agostino , Jafri, Mohammad, Galfano, Antonio, Link, Richard E. , Lam, Po, Jones, Marklyn, Bassett, Jeffrey C. , Musi, Gennaro, Schwen, Zeyad , Beksaç, Alp Tuna , Eden, C, Miller, Scott, Gontero, P, Amparore, Daniele, Porpiglia, Francesco, Vourganti, Srinivas , Ahmed, Mutahar, Montorsi, Francesco, Perdona, Sisto, Izzo, Alessandro, Stifelman, Michael D., Crivellaro, Simone, Briganti, Alberto, Kaouk, Jihad, Autorino, Riccardo, Soputro, Nicolas A , Eltemamy, Mohamed , Gelikman, David G , Geskin, Albert , Palese, Michael , Link, Richard E , Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Bjurlin, Marc A. , Umbreit, Eric , Mehrazin, Reza , VanDyke, Maia , Yuh, Bertram, Thong, Alan Eih Chih , Olivares, Ruben , Baccala, Angelo A., Osinski, Thomas L. , Simone, Giuseppe , Crouzet, Sébastien , Ramadan, Mohammad Said , Porreca, Angelo , Jafri, Syed M., Galfano, Antonio , Amparore, Daniele , Ahmed, Mutahar, Montorsi, Francesco , Perdonà, Sisto , Izzo, Alessandro , STIFELMAN, MICHAEL D. , Crivellaro, Simone, Briganti, Alberto , Kaouk, Jihad , Autorino, Riccardo

Mayo Clinic

BJU International | June 16, 2026 | Volume: 138 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 456-463

10.1111/bju.70346 | PMID 42297464 Get It

Introduction The introduction of the purpose‐built single‐port (SP) robotic platform has allowed for the advent of regionalized minimally invasive surgical approaches for robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP), including the extraperitoneal and transvesical techniques. This study sought to develop a best practice consensus on the key principles, patient selection, surgical techniques, expected clinical outcomes, and learning curves pertaining to SP‐RARP. Methods A modified Delphi consensus was developed by a panel of experts, consisting of a 33‐item questionnaire, with each statement rated using a binary Likert scale (‘agree’ or ‘disagree’). The survey was distributed via email to all practicing SP‐RARP surgeons across the USA and Europe. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on a given statement. Results A total of 53 surgeons participated in the Delphi Consensus across the two rounds. Of 33 statements, 28 (84.8%) reached agreement in the first round. The remaining consensus was achieved in the second round, involving 35 surgeons, and with one additional statement. The panel agreed that, although are no absolute contraindications to SP‐RARP, the preference towards specific SP‐RARP techniques should remain guided by the individual patients and surgical expertise. Although the SP extraperitoneal technique is recommended to pursue pelvic lymph node dissections, the panel agreed that transvesical SP‐RARP showed promise in promoting shorter hospital stay, faster recovery of urinary continence, and utility in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgery. Consensus was also reached on the need for a structured training pathway, with most recommending beginning with extraperitoneal SP‐RARP before advancing to the transvesical approach. Conclusion This Delphi consensus demonstrates broad agreement among experienced SP surgeons in the USA and Europe, forming the foundation for future research on the clinical utility and necessary training pathways for SP‐RARP. Nevertheless, empirical validation based on clinical data from large cohort studies remains important.
Refining BCG ‐failure classifications in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
Ślusarczyk, Aleksander , Contieri, Roberto, Krajewski, Wojciech, Claps, Francesco, Subiela, José Daniel, Mertens, Laura S., Mori, Keiichiro, Grobet‐Jeandin, Elisabeth, Velasco, J. Caño, Tully, Karl H., Soria, Francesco, Duran, P. Del Olmo, Puentedura, A. Lafuente, Lijnen, Renee A.G. , Longoni, Mattia, Marcq, Gautier, Mari, Andrea, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Afferi, Luca, Albisinni, Simone, Gallioli, Andrea, Giudice, Francesco Del, Boorjian, Stephen A., Briganti, Alberto, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Gontero, Paolo, Radziszewski, P., Moschini, Marco, Pradere, Benjamin, group, Urothelial carcinoma working, Mertens, Laura S. , Contieri, Roberto , Claps, Francesco , Subiela, José Daniel , Mertens, Laura S , Mori, Keiichiro , Tully, Karl H , Soria, Francesco , Mari, Andrea , Laukhtina, Ekaterina , Afferi, Luca , Albisinni, Simone , Gallioli, Andrea , Del Giudice, Francesco , Moschini, Marco , Scilipoti, Pietro , Krajewski, Wojciech R. , Mori, Keiichiro , Grobet-Jeandin, Élisabeth , Tully, Karl H. , Longoni, Mattia , Marcq, Gautier , Laukhtina, Ekaterina , Albisinni, Simone , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Briganti, Alberto, Shariat, Shahrokh F. , Gontero, Paolo , Moschini, Marco , Pradère, Benjamin

Mayo Clinic

BJU International | March 20, 2026 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1076-1087

10.1111/bju.70231 | PMID 41858138 Get It

Objective To validate International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) definitions of Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin (BCG)‐unresponsive and BCG‐exposed non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and assess prognostic heterogeneity across various BCG‐failure types. Patients and Methods From a multicentre international cohort of 3806 BCG‐treated patients, 591 who developed high‐grade NMIBC recurrence following BCG between 2003 and 2024 were included. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint; cancer‐specific (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) were secondary endpoints. Cumulative incidence functions, competing‐risk models and multivariable Cox regression were used. Results Patients with BCG‐unresponsive and BCG‐exposed disease showed similar PFS, CSM, and OM (all P > 0.05). When stratified into five subgroups, prognosis varied: 5‐year progression rates were 29% for BCG‐unresponsive, 32.5% for late relapse (between 6 and 24 months) after adequate BCG, 30% for BCG‐exposed with inadequate BCG (<24 months from induction), 6.2% for BCG‐resistant, and 14% for very late relapse (>24 months since last BCG) ( P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, BCG‐exposed after inadequate BCG (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–8.84), late relapse (sHR 3.74, 95% CI 1.59–8.78), and BCG‐unresponsive (sHR 2.34, 95% CI 1.00–5.44) were associated with higher progression risks compared to very late relapse. Limitations include retrospective design and treatment heterogeneity. Conclusions Under IBCG definitions, BCG‐unresponsive and BCG‐exposed NMIBC have similarly poor outcomes. A refined classification reveals prognostic heterogeneity, with late relapses after adequate BCG demonstrating outcomes comparable to BCG‐unresponsive, and very late relapses conferring better prognosis.
Utility of MRI perilesional biopsy in prostate cancer: impact of the Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System and biopsy history
Cannoletta, Donato , Quarta, Leonardo , Pellegrino, Francesco , Scuderi, Simone , Porzi, Maria Elena, Robesti, Daniele , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Montorsi, Francesco , Briganti, Alberto , Larcher, Alessandro , Stabile, Armando , Quarta, Leonardo , Pellegrino, Francesco , Scuderi, Simone , Robesti, Daniele , Mazzone, Elio , Karnes, Jeffrey , Montorsi, Francesco , Stabile, Armando , Barletta, Francesco Maria , Scilipoti, Pietro , Longoni, Mattia , Brembilla, Giorgio , COBELLI, Francesco DE , Rouprêt, Morgan

Mayo Clinic

BJU International | October 13, 2025 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 282-288

10.1111/bju.70027 | PMID 41077924 Get It

Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of perilesional biopsies (PLBx) compared to other biopsy strategies, assessing the impact of the Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score and biopsy history in patients with a visible lesion at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (mpMRI), as the European Association of Urology guidelines recommend combining MRI‐targeted biopsies (TBx) with PLBx as an alternative to systematic biopsies (SBx) even though evidence is limited. Patients and Methods We relied on a cohort of 2852 patients with PI‐RADS ≥3 lesions undergoing TBx + SBx at three tertiary referral centres. The primary outcome was detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group [ISUP GG] ≥2) of TBx + PLBx vs TBx + SBx. Results were stratified by PI‐RADS score and biopsy history. The PLBx cores were defined as samples taken from prostate sectors adjacent to the mpMRI lesion. We finally assessed insignificant PCa (insPCa, i.e., ISUP GG 1) detection across biopsy strategies. Differences were assessed using the chi‐square test. Results Detection of csPCa was 48%. Overall, TBx + SBx had a higher csPCa detection rate than TBx + PLBx (50% vs 45%, P = 0.03), particularly in PI‐RADS 3 lesions (26% vs 21%, P = 0.02) and active surveillance (AS) patients (46% vs 40%, P = 0.04). No significant differences were found in PI‐RADS 4 (53% vs 50%, P > 0.1) or PI‐RADS 5 (76% vs 75%, P > 0.1). In the biopsy naïve and previous negative biopsy groups, csPCa detection was similar between strategies ( P > 0.1). Conclusions Overall, TBx + SBx offers the highest detection of csPCa. Even though TBx + PLBx may be considered in PI‐RADS 4–5 lesions to reduce insPCa detection, TBx + SBx remains the preferred strategy for PI‐RADS 3 and AS patients.
Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Ng, Alexander , Asif, Aqua , Gómez‐Gómez, Enrique , Budäus, Lars, Barrett, Tristan , Radtke, Jan Philipp , Kesch, Claudia, Pham, Tho, Tewari, Ash , Cabello, M.A. Rodríguez , Mynderse, Lance A. , Borghi, Marcelo, Boesen, Lars , Singh, Paras B. , Renard‐Penna, Raphaële , Leow, Jeffrey J. , Pecoraro, Martina , Giannarini, Gianluca , Perlis, Nathan , López-Ruiz, Daniel, Rossiter, Marimo , Khetrapal, Pramit , Chan, Vinson Wai‐Shun , Haider, Aiman , Clarke, Caroline S. , Dickinson, Louise , Mitra, Anita, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Takwoingi, Yemisi , Emberton, Mark , Allen, Clare, Moore, Caroline M. , Kasivisvanathan, Veeru , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Briganti, Alberto , Evangelista, Alex, Freeman, Alex , Kirkham, Alex, Zlotta, Alexandre R. , Grey, Alistair, Ryan, Andrew, Borrelli, Antonella , Andrews, Antonette, Finelli, Antonio , Sancho, Arturo Platas, Baring, Ashley, Roy, Ashoke, Issa, Balqiisa, Israël, Bas , González, Carolina Aulló, English, Caroline, Zuiani, Chiara , Amate, Cristina, Yong, Daniel , Rozze, Davide, Lomas, Derek J. , Cannoletta, Donato , Chang, Eileen Wang, Chun, Felix, Zussino, Gaia , Antoch, Gerald , Gandaglia, Giorgio, Sauter, Guido , Thevarajah, Harini, Sorrell, Harriet, McBain, Hazel, Reis, Henning , Pita, Hernando Ríos , Potyka, Ingrid , Collavino, Jeanlou, Koshy, Jincy, Weng, Jing Yi , Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Piper, Jon, O’Brien, Jonathan , Rosa, José Valero, Sanz, Juan Luis , Quesada, Juan Mesa, Jannusch, Kai , Corr, Kateri , Haines, Kenneth, Umutlu, Lale , Quarta, Leonardo, Casarotto, Letizia, Gimeno, Linda , Moretti, Lucas, Laschena, Ludovica , Drewes, Lukas, Ostos, Manuel Sanchez, Peris, M., Volpacchio, Mariano , Prentice, Mark, Graefen, Markus , Soligo, Matteo, Boschheidgen, Matthias , Singhera, M., Wenzel, Mike, Fatterpekar, Monali, Al‐Nader, Mulham , Kachanov, Mykyta , Shaida, Nadeem , Muirhead, Nicola , Vasdev, Nikhil , Sanmugalingam, Nimalan , Nørgaard, Nis , Vicente, Pete, Incze, Peter , Ryan, Philip, Rouvier, Philippe , Mead, Phoebe, Mozer, Pierre, Viana, Públio César Cavalcante , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Novotta, Réka, Huang, Richard, O’Sullivan, Richard, Jepsen, Rikke Karlin , Frese, Robert, Clow, Rosemary, Al‐Monajjed, Rouvier , Lewis, Sara , Cashman, Sophia, Pizzolitto, Stefano, Lelie, S., Lindner, Sydney, Al‐Hammouri, Tarek , Sánchez, Teresa González, Reid, Thomas, McClure, Timothy, Maurer, Tobias , Peruzzi, Valeria, Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Chong, Yew Lam, Agarwal, Ridhi , Panebianco, Valeria , Girometti, Rossano , Ghai, Sangeet , COBELLI, Francesco DE , Pham, Tho, Taneja, Samir S. , Hu, Jim C. , Dias, Adriano Basso , Falkenbach, Fabian , Kastner, Christof , Schimmöller, Lars , Nathan, Arjun , Punwani, Shonit , Brew‐Graves, Chris , Brembilla, Giorgio , Margolis, Daniel , Giganti, Francesco , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Crestani, Alessandro , Sciarra, Alessandro , Evangelista, Alex, Kirkham, Alex P. S. , Grey, Alistair, Blanca, Ana , Bjartell, Anders , Tong, Angela , Warren, Anne Y. , Ciardi, Antonio , Rannikko, Antti , Stabile, Armando , Villers, Arnauld A. , Issa, Balqiisa, Hadaschik, Boris Alexander , English, Caroline L, Lee, Chau Hung , Caris, Christien T.M. , Stempel, Conrad von , Rozze, Davide, Messina, Emanuele , Chun, Felix, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Robert, G. , Caglič, Iztok , Theysohn, Jens Matthias , Grummet, Jeremy , Koshy, Jincy, Wilkinson, John, Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Deeks, Jonathan J , O'Brien, Jonathan, Quesada, Juan Mesa, Quarta, Leonardo , Orecchia, Luca , Moretti, Lucas, Rooij, Maarten de , Bicchetti, Marco , Gatti, Marco , Peris, María de los Desamparados Esteban, Roethke, Matthias Claudius , Monte, Maurizio Del, Wenzel, Mike, Takahashi, Naoki , Fleshner, Neil , Albers, Peter , Mead, Phoebe, Visschere, Pieter De , Huang, Richard, Shah, Syed Ahmar , Sanchez, Teresa González, Bathala, Tharakeswara K , Kwast, Theodorus van der , Reid, Thomas, Løgager, Vibeke , Prabhu, Vinay , Wagaskar, Vinayak Gorakhnath , Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Witjes, Wim P.J. , Chong, Yew Lam

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1170

10.1001/jama.2025.13722 | PMID 40928788 Get It

Importance Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without prostate biopsy, has become the standard of care for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Resource capacity limits widespread adoption. Biparametric MRI, which omits the gadolinium contrast sequence, is a shorter and cheaper alternative offering time-saving capacity gains for health systems globally. Objective To assess whether biparametric MRI is noninferior to multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, within-patient, noninferiority trial of biopsy-naive men from 22 centers (12 countries) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings) from April 2022 to September 2023, with the last follow-up conducted on December 3, 2024. Interventions Participants underwent multiparametric MRI, comprising T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiologists reported abbreviated biparametric MRI first (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted), blinded to the DCE sequence. After unblinding, radiologists reported the full multiparametric MRI. Patients underwent a targeted biopsy with or without systematic biopsy if either biparametric MRI or multiparametric MRI was suggestive of clinically significant prostate cancer. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer. The noninferiority margin was 5%. Results Of 555 men recruited, 490 were included for primary outcome analysis. Median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years and median PSA level was 5.6 (IQR, 4.4-8.0) ng/mL. The proportion of patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings was 12.7%. Biparametric MRI was noninferior to multiparametric MRI, detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in 143 of 490 men (29.2%), compared with 145 of 490 men (29.6%) (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points; P = .50). Biparametric MRI detected clinically insignificant cancer in 45 of 490 men (9.2%), compared with 47 of 490 men (9.6%) with the use of multiparametric MRI (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points). Central quality control demonstrated that 99% of scans were of adequate diagnostic quality. Conclusion and relevance In men with suspected prostate cancer, provided image quality is adequate, an abbreviated biparametric MRI scan, with or without targeted biopsy, could become the new standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis. With approximately 4 million prostate MRIs performed globally annually, adopting biparametric MRI could substantially increase scanner throughput and reduce costs worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571840
Combining PSA and PET features to select candidates for salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer
Bravi, Carlo Andrea , Heidenreich, Axel , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Cucchiara, Vito , Osmonov, Daniar , Juenemann, Klaus‐Peter, Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Kretschmer, Alexander , Büchner, Alexander , Hiester, Andreas , Albers, Peter , Joniau, Steven , Shariat, Shahrokh F., Graefen, Markus , Karakiewicz, Pierre I. , Montorsi, Francesco , Briganti, Alberto , Pfister, David, Larcher, Alessandro , Bravi, Carlo A , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Mazzone, Elio , Karnes, Jeffrey , Kretschmer, Alexander , Devos, Gaëtan , Montorsi, Francesco , Pfister, David , Joniau, Steven , Fossati, Nicola , Suardi, Nazareno , Stabile, Armando , Stief, Christian G. , Poppel, Hendrik Van , Grubmüller, Bernhard , Tilki, Derya , Gill, Inderbir S. , Mottrie, Alexandre

Mayo Clinic

BJUI Compass | August 5, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 123-129

10.1002/bco2.182 | PMID 36569505 Get It

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between pre‐operative PSA value, 68Ga‐prostate‐specific‐membrane‐antigen (PSMA) PET performance and oncologic outcomes after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (PCa).Patients and methodsThe study included 164 patients diagnosed with ≤2 pelvic lymph‐node recurrence(s) of PCa documented on 68Ga‐PSMA PET scan and treated with pelvic ± retroperitoneal sLND at 11 high‐volume centres between 2012 and 2019. Pathologic findings were correlated to PSA values at time of sLND, categorized in early (<0.5 ng/ml), low (0.5–0.99 ng/ml), moderate (1–1.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml). Clinical recurrence (CR)‐free survival after sLND was calculated using multivariable analyses and plotted over pre‐operative PSA value.ResultsMedian [interquartile range (IQR)] PSA at sLND was 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) ng/ml, and 131 (80%) patients had one positive spot at PET scan. All patients received pelvic sLND, whereas 91 (55%) men received also retroperitoneal dissection. Median (IQR) number of node removed was 15 (6, 28). The rate of positive pathology increased as a function of pre‐operative PSA value, with highest rates for patients with pre‐operative PSA > 1.5 ng/ml (pelvic‐only sLNDs: 84%; pelvic + retroperitoneal sLNDs: 90%). After sLND, PSA ≤ 0.3 ng/ml was detected in 67 (41%) men. On multivariable analyses, pre‐operative PSA was associated with PSA response (p < 0.0001). There were 51 CRs after sLND. After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant, non‐linear relationship between PSA level at sLND and the 12‐month CR‐free survival (p < 0.0001), with the highest probability of freedom from CR for patients who received sLND at PSA level ≥1 ng/ml.ConclusionsIn case of PET‐detected nodal recurrences amenable to sLND, salvage surgery was associated with the highest short‐term oncologic outcomes when performed in men with PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml. Awaiting confirmatory data from prospective trials, these findings may help physicians to optimize the timing for 68Ga‐PSMA PET in biochemical recurrent PCa.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions
Sorce, Gabriele , Motterle, Giovanni , Cucchiara, Vito , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Montorsi, Francesco , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Guccini, Ilaria , Briganti, Alberto , Larcher, Alessandro , Stabile, Armando , Montorsi, Francesco , Guccini, Ilaria , Stabile, Armando , Lucianò, Roberta , Scuderi, Simone , Barletta, Francesco Maria , Pellegrino, Francesco , Fossati, Nicola , COBELLI, Francesco DE

Mayo Clinic

BJU International | May 26, 2021 | Volume: 129 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 201-207

10.1111/bju.15498 | PMID 34038039 Get It

Objective To assess the relationship between the volume of the index lesion (IL) measured at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI; MRIvol) and at radical prostatectomy (RPvol), stratifying it according to Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score. Patients and Methods We identified 332 men with a positive mpMRI (single lesion with PI‐RADS ≥3) who underwent systematic plus targeted biopsy and subsequent RP at two tertiary referral centres between 2013 and 2018. All mpMRIs were reviewed by experienced radiologists using PI‐RADS scores. The study outcome was to assess the relationship between MRIvol (based on planimetry from MRI sequence best showing tumour) and RPvol (based on tumour involved area of each RP pathology slice). To achieve this endpoint, we performed a multivariable linear regression analysis (LRA) to predict RPvol using PI‐RADS, prostate‐specific antigen level, prostate volume, age, digital rectal examination, Gleason score at MRI‐targeted biopsy, biopsy history and time from mpMRI to RP as covariates. Non‐parametric locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) function was used to graphically explore the relationship between MRIvol and RPvol, stratifying for PI‐RADS score. Results Overall, 24%, 49% and 27% of men had visible PI‐RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions at mpMRI. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) MRIvol and RPvol were 0.67 (0.29–1.76) mL and 1.39 (0.58–4.23) mL. At LRA, MRIvol was significantly correlated with a RPvol underestimation (slope: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–46.3). The non‐parametric LOESS analysis showed a non‐linear relationship between MRIvol and RPvol. Significant underestimation was reported across all volumes with the highest differences between MRIvol and RPvol in the low volume range (<2 mL), where RPvol almost doubled MRIvol. A similar effect was observed across all PI‐RADS scores subgroups. Conclusions In the present study, mpMRI significantly underestimated the exact volume of the IL, especially for small visible lesions, regardless of PI‐RADS score. This should be considered when planning tailored focal therapy approaches often delivered to men with smaller prostatic lesions.