Citations

Importance Requiring personalized genetic counseling may introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress. Objective To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing. Design, Setting, and Participants Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023. Intervention Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret. Results A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling. Conclusions and Relevance In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993068

1506 Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is preventable when genetic risk is identified. We aimed to test whether pre and/or post-test genetic counseling is needed to optimally deliver online accessible genetic testing. Methods: MAGENTA (Making GENetic Testing Accessible) is a four-arm non-inferiority trial evaluating electronic genetic education and results delivery alone or combined with pre-test only, or post-test only telephone genetic counseling compared to mandatory pre- and post-test counseling (control arm) in women at risk of HBOC (NCT02993068). Regardless of assigned arm, all subjects with a pathogenic mutation received post-test telephone counseling. All subjects were enrolled electronically as part of either a family history cohort (FHC) or a cascade cohort (CC, known familial mutation). The primary outcome was cancer risk distress at 3 months and the trial was powered for the FHC. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing (i.e., received results), anxiety, depression, quality of life, and decisional regret, all measured by standardized scales. Results: Enrollment is complete and a total of 3,822 participants were randomized, 3,111 in FHC and 711 in CC. Participants were enrolled from all 50 states, but most were white/non-Hispanic (88%). Among participants that completed genetic testing, 173 (7.2%) had a mutation in a breast or ovarian cancer gene, with 114 (5.7%) of FHC and 59 (14.2%) of CC. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis of FHC, each of the three experimental arms was non-inferior to the control arm for distress at 3 months (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). In the CC, no and pre-test only counseling were also non-inferior (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). Distress was lowest in the arm with neither pre nor post-test counseling. Overall, 318 (18%) participants had very high distress at three month follow-up, and this rate was not significantly different across arms. Anxiety, depression and decisional regret did not have statistically significant differences across arms at follow-up. Test completion was highest in the no counseling arm (86.4%) and lowest in the control arm (60.6%). Conclusions: Electronic genetic education and results release without genetic counseling was non-inferior with regard to patient distress and was associated with higher test completion and lower distress. These results support use of a genetic testing paradigm providing individualized genetic counseling only for patients with positive test results. Clinical trial information: NCT02993068.

A challenge in returning genomic test results to research participants is how best to communicate complex and clinically nuanced findings to participants in a manner that is scalable to the large numbers of participants enrolled. The purpose of this study was to examine the features of genetic results letters produced at each Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network site to assess their readability and content. Letters were collected from each site, and a qualitative analysis of letter content and a quantitative analysis of readability statistics were performed. Because letters were produced independently at each eMERGE site, significant heterogeneity in readability and content was found. The content of letters varied widely from a baseline of notifying participants that results existed to more detailed information about positive or negative results, as well as materials for sharing with family members. Most letters were significantly above the Centers for Disease Control-suggested reading level for health communication. While continued effort should be applied to make letters easier to understand, the ongoing challenge of explaining complex genomic information, the implications of negative test results, and the uncertainty that comes with some types of test and result makes simplifying letter text challenging.

Abstract Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can have a profound effect on the quality of life (QOL) of patients living with the illness. To our knowledge, no studies to date have evaluated the influence of the doctor-patient relationship on patient’s emotional distress or QOL. Methods: We conducted an international, web-based survey of patients with CLL using standardized instruments to evaluate QOL. Additional questions on the survey explored how often patients thought about their disease and evaluated their satisfaction with specific aspects of their relationship with the physician caring for them. Patients were also asked to indicate what phrases their physicians had used to describe/characterize CLL. Results: Between June and October 2006, 1482 patients responded to the survey. The diagnosis of CLL was validated in a randomly selected subset of patients. Over half (55.9%; n=822) of patients reported they thought about their CLL diagnosis daily. Although the proportion of patients who thought about CLL daily decreased with time, two or more years after diagnosis over 50% of patients still thought about their disease every day. When asked to indicate their satisfaction with various aspects of the physician caring for their CLL, more than 90% (n=1340) of patients felt their doctor had a good understanding of how their disease was progressing (i.e., the stage, blood counts, lymph nodes) but only 69% (n=1024) felt their physician had a good understanding of how CLL affected their QOL (anxiety, worry, fatigue, etc.). Similarly, while 90% (n=1324) of patients felt comfortable talking to their doctor about treatment and management of CLL, only 77% (n=1134) felt comfortable talking to their doctor about how CLL affected QOL. Reported satisfaction with their physician in these areas strongly related to patients’ measured emotional and overall QOL on standardized instruments (all p&lt;0.001). This effect on QOL remained (p&lt;0.002) after adjustment for age, extent of co-morbid health conditions, measured fatigue, and treatment status in a regression analysis. Finally, patients were asked to indicate whether the physician caring for them had used specific phrases to describe CLL. Thirty-three percent of patients had been told “CLL is the ‘good’ leukemia,” 24% had been told “don’t worry about your CLL,” and 35% had been told “if you could pick what cancer to have, this is what you would choose.” Overall, 52% of patients had received one or more of these characterizations of CLL by their physician. The emotional and overall QOL were worse among patients who reported their physician had used these phrases to describe CLL (all p≤0.001). This effect on QOL remained after regression analysis (p&lt;0.002). Patients whose physician had used one of these phrases to describe CLL were also less likely to feel their physician understood how CLL was effecting their QOL and to feel comfortable discussing the effects of CLL on their QOL with their physician (all p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Physicians play an important role helping patients adjust to the physical, intellectual, and emotional challenges of CLL. The effectiveness with which physicians accomplish these tasks appears to impact the QOL of patients with CLL. Additional studies exploring how physicians can best support patients with CLL are needed.

Abstract Background: CLL is still an incurable lymphoid malignancy. The current standard of care is to treat only patients with obvious clinical progression as defined by the National Cancer Institute Working Group in 1996 (NCI–WG 1996). High risk CLL can be identified at diagnosis by a variety of tests including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IgVH) analysis, and expression of ZAP-70 or CD38. With this information we can identify patients with high risk, early stage disease who are candidates for novel low toxicity therapies that could alter the natural course of their disease. Our hypothesis was that combination monoclonal antibody (MoAb) therapy using alemtuzumab and rituximab would significantly reduce the high risk clone in early stage CLL. Methods: This phase II trial was conducted with IRB approval and accrued the planned 30 patients between January 2005 and July 2007 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. The study enrolled consenting patients with Rai stage 0–II CLL without NCI–WG 1996 criteria for treatment who had high risk CLL as defined as one or more of the following 17p13–, 11q22–, unmutated (UM) IgVH (&lt; 2%) and expression of ZAP–70 (≥ 30%) and/or CD38 (≥20%). Treatment was one 30 day cycle (alemtuzumab 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg days 1–3 then 30 mg 3 × week × 4 weeks with all doses subcutaneously and rituximab at 375 mg/m2/week IV × 4 doses from day 8). Patients received 7 days of allopurinol and antimicrobial prophylaxis against PCP and herpes virus infections for 7 months. CMV testing by PCR was done weekly during treatment, then monthly × 6. Results: All 30 patients have completed therapy and 27 have been evaluated for response. The median age of these 27 patients was 62 yr (range 29–77) with 8 patients &gt; 70 years. There was a male predominance (67%) with median time from diagnosis to treatment of 0.7 yr (range 0.1 – 6.1). Stage (Rai) at the start of therapy was 0 in 7 (26%), I in 19 (70%), and II in 1. High risk markers were 17p13– in 9 (33%), 11q22– in 7 (26%), UM IgV and expression of either ZAP–70 or CD38 in 11 (41%). All 27 patients completed therapy without interruption. Non hematological grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 3 patients (2 drug reactions caused by SMX/TMP, 1 CMV reactivation responsive to IV therapy). Response evaluation at 2 months after completion of therapy using NCI–WG 1996 criteria showed an ORR of 93% with 12 (44%) CR, 8 (30%) nPR, and 5 (19%) PR. Two (7%) patients had disease progression. Median duration of follow up was 14.1 months (range 1.9 – 27.2). Median time to disease progression in the 25 responding patients was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.9 – 22.4). Seven (26%) patients have received subsequent treatment for CLL (median 5.2 months, range 2.4 – 20.1). A minimal residual disease assay using 3-color flow cytometry on peripheral blood was negative in 6 of the 7 patients with CR who had no evidence of residual CLL on immunohistochemical examination of the bone marrow. These 6 patients all remain in sustained CR (median follow up 15 months, range 2 – 27.2). Conclusion: Alemtuzumab and rituximab is an effective and tolerable therapy in patients with high risk early stage CLL. A randomized controlled trial is now required to test if this intervention is better than the standard observation approach. In addition, this combination MoAb regimen could be used as a platform to develop even more effective combination treatments for patients with CLL.

Abstract BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is used to characterize patients who have a circulating population of clonal B-cells, a total B-cell count of &lt;5 x 109/L, and no other features of another B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. In most patients the immunophenotype is similar to that of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with co-expression of CD19 and CD5. The natural history of CLL-phenotype MBL is unclear. We used the Mayo Clinic hematopathology database to identify patients with CLL-phenotype MBL and abstracted clinical information on natural history and prognostic parameters from clinical and research records. METHODS: Using hematopathology records, we identified a cohort of 1820 patients seen at Mayo Clinic between August 1998 and May 2006 who underwent investigation using peripheral blood flow cytometry and who were found to have a clonal B-cell population of CLL phenotype. After elimination of patients with advanced stage (Rai I-IV), previously treated CLL, and individuals with an established diagnosis of CLL/MBL &gt;1 year prior to flow, 636 unique patients with isolated lymphocytosis were identified. Based on our prior analysis (Leukemia Research 32:1458) demonstrating that nearly all patients with an ALC &gt;10x109/L have a B-cell count &gt;5x109/L, we focused the remaining analysis on the 405/636 patients who had an ALC &lt;10x109/L and the necessary raw data from flow cytometry analysis to determine the B-cell count. RESULTS: Among the 405 individuals with an ALC &lt;10x109/L, 306 (76%) had a B-cell count &lt;5x109/L at the time of flow and met the current criteria for the diagnosis of MBL (BJH 130:325). Median age at the time of MBL diagnosis was 70 years (range 34 – 93). A slight male preponderance was observed (59% male). B-cell counts ranged from 0.02 to 4.99x109/L and ALC ranged from 0.3–9.6 x109/L. CD38 status was available for 268 (88%) MBL patients of whom 20% were CD38 positive using the 30% threshold. Cytogenetic analysis by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was available in 130 (42%) MBL patients. Using the hierarchical classification system of Dohner and colleagues, 57 (44%) were 13q-, 23 (18%) were trisomy 12, 5 (4%) were 11q-, 4 (3%) were 17p-, and 39 (30%) had no defect detected. ZAP-70 status was available for 77 (25%) patients of whom 13% were ZAP-70+ positive. Patients underwent sequential monitoring with a median follow-up of 1.7 yrs (range 0–8.1 yrs). Time from diagnosis to treatment for patients meeting criteria for MBL (n=306) as compared to Rai stage 0 CLL patients with B-cell counts between 5.0 and 10.0 x109/L (n=99) was not significantly different and is shown in Figure 1 (p=0.87). For individuals with MBL, survival free of treatment was 98% (95%CI: 96–100%) at 1 year, 93% (95%CI: 89–98%) at 2 years, and 77% (95%CI: 67–89%) at 5 years. While gender (p=0.10), and B-cell count as a continuous variable (p=0.15) were not found to be associated with time to treatment (TTT) among MBL patients, age (p=0.02, HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.89–0.99) and CD38 status (p&lt;0.02, HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.2–9.2) did show a relationship with TTT. CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed a low rate of progression among individuals meeting criteria for MBL, TFS was similar to individuals meeting current criteria for Rai stage 0 CLL who had B-cell counts between 5.0 – 10.0 x109/L . Among individuals meeting criteria for MBL, younger patients and those who were CD38 positive had a shorter time to treatment. Additional studies are needed to determine what B-cell count or other characteristics should be used to distinguish between MBL and Rai stage 0 CLL. FIGURE: FIGURE:.

Abstract BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of CLL among asymptomatic patients without lymphadenopathy or cytopenias has historically been based on documenting a characteristic lymphocyte clone and the presence of lymphocytosis. Currently, there are no data regarding what lymphocyte type (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] or B-cell count) or threshold should be used for this diagnosis. We analyzed the relationship of these lymphocyte counts to clinical outcome in a cohort of 459 patients to determine whether the CLL diagnosis: should be based on ALC or B-cell count what lymphocyte threshold should be used for diagnosis whether any lymphocyte counts has independent prognostic value after accounting for molecular prognostic markers. METHODS: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all Rai stage 0 patients diagnosed with CLL between 1/1/00 and 12/31/07 who were evaluated and had flow cytometry at Mayo within 12 months of diagnosis. All patients had lymphocytosis (ALC ≥5 x 109/L) and fulfilled the 1996 criteria for CLL. Raw data from the peripheral blood flow analysis was used in conjunction with blood counts to determine ALC and absolute B-cell count at diagnosis. Estimates of survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: To assess whether B-cell count or ALC more strongly related to clinical outcome, we evaluated the relationship of these variables with treatment free survival (TFS) and overall survival (OS; n=459). When treated as continuous variables (i.e. measuring risk of each 1.0 x 109/L increase in cell count), both ALC and B-cell count were related to TFS (hazard ratio [HR] ALC=1.02; p&lt;0.0001; HR B-cell count=1.02; p&lt;0.0001) and OS (HR ALC=1.02; p=0.04; HR B-cell count=1.02; p=0.02). Because B-cell count and ALC related to TFS and OS as a continuous variables, we next evaluated what threshold (nearest 1.0 x109/L) at diagnosis best related to an individual’s risk of requiring chemotherapeutic treatment and/or dying of CLL using the HR (log rank statistic) and c-statistic [c=1 indicates perfect discrimination between poor survivors and good survivors; c=0.5 equivalent to chance]. The B-cell threshold that best predicted OS was 11 x 109/L (HR=2.36, p=0.01; c=0.60). This threshold also predicted TFS (HR=3.02; p&lt;0.0001; c=0.64). With respect to ALC, a threshold of 12 x 109/L was able to predict TFS (HR=2.28, p=0.003; c=0.62) but not OS (HR=1.62, p=0.12; c=0.56). The B-cell threshold used in the current diagnostic criteria (5 x 109/L) was able to predict TFS (HR=3.24, p&lt;0.0001; c=0.63), but not OS (HR=1.64, p=0.13; c=0.55) Finally, we evaluated the ability of B-cell count to predict TFS independent of IGHV mutation status, ZAP-70 status, CD38 status, and FISH. Since not all patients had all prognostic tests performed, the predictive value of B-cell count (&lt; or ≥11 x 109) independent of the other prognostic variable was assessed for each variable independently. B-cell count retained prognostic value independent of IGHV mutation status, ZAP-70 status, CD38 status, and FISH (all p≤0.001) [Table]. CONCLUSIONS: Although B-cell count and ALC have similar ability to predict TFS and OS as continuous variables, B-cell count may be a better predictor of TFS and OS when a defined lymphocyte threshold is used. These findings provide evidence to justify the recent proposal by Hallek et al (Blood 111:5446) to base the diagnosis of CLL on B-cell count rather than ALC. The results also provide justification for retaining the size of the B-cell count as part of the diagnostic criteria even in the era of molecular/biologic prognostic markers, but imply a threshold of 11 x 109 is the B-cell count that best predicts patient’s TFS and risk of death. Differentiating between CLL and MBL based on a patient’s likelihood of developing clinical symptoms and dying of disease could minimize unnecessary psychologic distress caused by labeling asymptomatic individuals at low risk for adverse clinical consequences as having leukemia. TABLE: TREATMENT FREE SURVIVAL HR p-value CD38 + 3.20 0.0002 B-cell ≥11 3.10 0.0001 ZAP + 8.33 &lt; 0.0001 B-cell ≥11 6.86 &lt; 0.0001 Unmutated 5.26 &lt; 0.0001 B-cell ≥11 3.06 0.001 FISH (17p- or 11q-) 3.97 0.01 B-cell ≥11 3.67 &lt; 0.0001

Members of the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium conducted an expert‐driven literature review to identify a list of domains and to evaluate potential measures of these domains for inclusion in a list of preferred measures. Measures were included if they were easily available, free of charge, and had acceptable psychometrics based on published peer‐reviewed analyses. A total of 22 domains and 52 measures were identified during the selection process. Taken together, these measures form a reliable and validated list of measurement tools that are easily available and used in multiple cancer trials to assess patient‐reported outcomes in relevant patients.

Abstract Background: Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is characterized by the presence of a circulating population of clonal B-cells where the total B-cell count is <5 × 109/L and criteria for the diagnosis of other lymphoproliferative disorders are not present. In most patients the immunophenotype is similar to that of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with co-expression of CD19 and CD5. The natural history of MBL is unclear. We used the Mayo Clinic hematopathology database to identify patients with MBL and abstracted clinical information on natural history and prognostic parameters from clinical and research records. Methods: After IRB review and approval, we reviewed the hematopathology records of 2292 patients seen at Mayo Clinic between August 1998 and May 2006 who had a clonal B-cell population on flow cytometry phenotypically consistent with CLL and fewer than <5 × 109/L B-cells. Clinical records were then reviewed to identify patients who fulfilled the criteria for MBL (no evidence of other lymphoproliferative disorders, no adenopathy on exam). Patient characteristics, prognostic parameters, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the clinical and research records of these patients. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate association between prognostic markers and time to treatment. Results: A total of 118 patients meeting the criteria for MBL were identified. Median age at the time of MBL diagnosis was 69.4 years (range 39.0 – 91.4). A slight male preponderance was observed (54% male). CD38 status was available for 106 (90%) patients of whom 20% were CD38 positive using the 30% threshold to classify CD38. Cytogenetic analysis by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was available in 58 (49%) patients. Using the hierarchical classification system of Dohner and colleagues, 26 (44.8%) were 13q-, 10 (17.2%) were trisomy 12, 2 (3.4%) were 11q-, 1 (1.7%) was 17p-, and 19 were (32.8%) no defect was detected. ZAP-70 status was available for 32 patients of whom 22% were ZAP-70+ positive. IgVH gene mutation status was only available for 15 (12.7%) patients of whom 40% were unmutated. Time from MBL diagnosis to treatment is shown in Figure 1. Survival free of treatment was 92.7% (95%CI: 86.8–99.1%) at 1 year, 90.9% (95%CI: 84.2–98.2%) at 2 years, and 87.5% (95% CI: 78.7–97.4%) at 5 years. While age (p=0.68) and gender (p=0.14) were not found to be associated with time to treatment (TTT), CD38 status showed a strong relationship with TTT (p<0.001, HR: 22.7, 95% CI: 3.4–239.6). Conclusion: The distribution of prognostic parameters (e.g. CD38, FISH) in patients with MBL appears similar to that of patients with early stage CLL. We observed a low rate of progression, with 5 year survival free of treatment greater than 87%. TTT among newly diagnosed MBL patients was associated with the CD38 status of clonal B-cells. Figure Figure

Abstract Backgrounds B cell receptor (BCR) signals and microenvironment protection have been recognized to have key influences on CLL survival and activation. Akt activation is down-stream of the BCR signaling cascade and is critical in the mediation of the bi-directional interactions between CLL B-cells and bone marrow stroma. MK2206 is an allosteric Akt inhibitor previously tested for safety in solid tumor patients. Our preclinical data has demonstrated the synergy of MK2206 with bendamustine (B) to induce CLL apoptosis in vitro. MK2206 also abolished the signal activation and cytokine production induced by BCR ligation in CLL leukemic cells (Ding, ASH 2012). Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 trial testing the safety and efficacy of MK2206 in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods A phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as the safety and efficacy of 3 dose levels (90 mg or 135 mg or 200 mg weekly) of the oral Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with bendamustine (70 mg/m2 daily for 2 days in each cycle) and rituximab (cycle 1: 375 mg/m2, cycle 2-6: 500 mg/m2) therapy in relapse/refractory CLL patients. To test the targeting efficacy of MK2206 on Akt and downstream signals, we designed a one-week “run-in” of single agent MK2206 before the initiation of BR during cycle 1. MK2206 was then given along with BR on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Tumor response was evaluated 2 months after the 6th/last cycle of therapy based on IWCLL 2008 criteria. Correlative laboratory studies included assessment of Akt signaling and the plasma cytokine levels (multiplex beads assay (Invitrogen)) at baseline and after one week of first dose of single agent MK2206. Results Nine patients (median age 68) were enrolled in the phase I portion of this trial. All 9 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region genes (IGHV) and 4 had del(11q). Six had received prior chemoimmunotherapy (CIT: FCR or PCR or PCO) and 5 had high risk disease defined as early progression within 26 months of the last CIT. Three had received alemtuzumab containing regimen. We have observed potent lymphocyte mobilization in all evaluated patients (n=7) after one-dose of MK2206 during week 1 (mean increase ALC: 35%) as well as reductions of plasma CCL3, CCL4 and CCL2 in the majority of the patients. A single dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia and hemolytic anemia) was observed at dose level 1 (90 mg weekly) among 6 patients treated at this dose. Two patients with dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 2 (135 mg weekly) were observed where one patient had a rash and one patient had dehydration and febrile neutropenia among three patients treated at this dose. Accordingly, the 90 mg once weekly dose was determined to be the MTD for phase 2 trial testing. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed to date were neutropenia (44%) including febrile neutropenia (22%), rash (22%), diarrhea (22%), nausea and vomiting (11%), dehydration (11%), hemolytic anemia (11%) and thrombocytopenia (11%). The frequency of cytopenias was similar to the published German experience with BR (50% grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities compared to 44% in N1087) in relapsed CLL patients (Fischer, JCO 2011). The median number of cycles received was 6 (range 1-6). Using an intent to treat analysis, two patients achieved complete response (CR, n= 2, 22%), one patient achieved nodular partial response (nPR, n=1, 11%) and five patients achieved a partial response (PR, n=5, 56%). The overall response rate (ORR) is 89%. Conclusion The Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with BR is well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Single dose of MK2206 inhibits Akt phosphorylation, mobilizes leukemic cells and decreases plasma cytokines involved in BCR signals. The preliminary efficacy of this combination demonstrated promising results with a 89% ORR and 22% CR albeit in the small phase 1 cohort. These results compare favorably to BR alone (9% CR and 59% ORR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Phase 2 testing of this combination is now underway. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the funding from NCI grant K23CA160345 (WD), NCI grant CA95241 (NEK) and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (CA025224 and CA33601). Disclosures: Off Label Use: MK2206, used in a phase 1 trial of relapsed CLL disease. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding. Zent:Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxSmithKline: Research Funding; Biothera: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech : Research Funding. Reeder:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding.