Citations

ABSTRACT Precision oncology has transformed cancer care globally through biomarker-driven and genomically guided treatment strategies. In Asia, where nearly 60% of the world’s population resides, the implementation of molecular profiling presents both significant opportunities and unique challenges. Despite increasing adoption, precision diagnostics remain largely concentrated in urban and academic centers, with disparities in access, infrastructure, and expertise across the region. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), including targeted gene panels, comprehensive genomic profiling, whole exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing, have enabled the identification of actionable alterations across multiple tumor types. Liquid biopsy approaches, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), are further transforming cancer care by enabling real-time disease monitoring and detection of resistance mechanisms. Integration of multiomics platforms is increasingly enhancing clinical decision-making. Molecular tumor boards play a critical role in interpreting complex genomic data and facilitating genomically guided treatment decisions, including targeted therapy selection, off-label treatment recommendations, and clinical trial enrollment. However, several barriers continue to limit widespread implementation of genetic testing in Asia, including high costs, limited reimbursement, inadequate infrastructure, lack of trained personnel, and insufficient genomic databases representing Asian populations. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current molecular diagnostic approaches, clinical applications, and evolving precision oncology practices in Asia. We also highlight key challenges and propose practical solutions, including physician and patient education, expansion of trial-matching platforms, and development of region-specific genomic datasets. Strengthening these areas will be essential for advancing equitable, accessible, and effective precision cancer care across Asia.

Background Competition for urgent and emergent operating-room access is a significant challenge in many hospitals. Evidence-based benchmarks for early intervention are well established for emergencies like acute appendicitis or hip fracture. In contrast, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis or symptomatic cholelithiasis is often delayed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy across the US. Methods The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients aged ≥18 years admitted between 2021 and 2022 undergoing urgent or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were stratified based on operative timing (<3 vs ≥ 3 days). The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included VTE, SSI, and total cost. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using 46 covariates. Linear regression assessed the cost associated with each additional hospital day prior to surgery, with a subgroup analysis of safety-net hospitals. Results Among 136,893 patients, 24,496 (17.9%) experienced delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After matching (n = 48,992), delays were associated with increased odds of readmission (9.5%; OR 1.22 [1.15-1.29], P < 0.001) and VTE (1.5%; OR 1.51 [1.30-1.77], P < 0.001). SSI (0.2%) was not significantly different. The mean total cost was $25,957 ± $21,609 for delayed patients vs $20,784 ± $20,027 for early surgery. Linear regression revealed an incremental cost of $1,695 per additional hospital day prior to surgery, rising to $2071 per day in safety-net hospitals ( P < 0.001). Discussion Delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy have significant clinical and economic impacts, underscoring the urgent need for national benchmarks to standardize operative timing and reduce disparities for patients in safety-net hospitals.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer/ Union for International Cancer Control version 9 TNM staging system for human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provides an updated framework for radiology reporting, incorporating cautious assessment of unequivocal imaging-detected extranodal extension and acknowledging the emerging, complementary role of circulating tumor tissue–modified viral HPV DNA in surveillance.

Abstract Early-phase clinical trials of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degraders have demonstrated efficacy in patients with BTK inhibitor-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). How clinical resistance to BTK degraders arises is unknown. Here we sequenced serial CLL samples from patients enrolled in the phase I trials of zelebrudomide and bexobrutideg and observed recurrent expansion of preexisting BTK A428D mutations at relapse. Unlike previously studied BTK inhibitor resistance mutations, BTK A428D conferred pan-resistance to BTK inhibitors and degraders. In the absence of BTK-directed therapies, however, cells bearing BTK A428D exhibited a competitive disadvantage. A crystal structure of BTK A428D revealed that the mutant aspartate clashes with the adenine ring of ATP and the adenine-mimetic moiety of BTK inhibitors and degraders. Combining BTK degraders with venetoclax mitigated the expansion of BTK A428D. These results provide the molecular basis for clinical resistance to BTK degraders and will inform the development of next-generation BTK degrader therapies.

Importance There is no consensus on staging and surveillance imaging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Although imaging has been shown to affect management, broad recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have led to variability in clinical practice. Objective To develop multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the use of staging and surveillance imaging of localized CSCC. Evidence Review A multidisciplinary expert panel across academic and clinical practice settings convened a Delphi consensus, with 3 iterative survey rounds from January to June 2025. Data were analyzed from February 2025 to January 2026. Eligibility defined by at least 1 to 2 CSCC publications during the previous 5 years, involvement in a relevant clinical trial, experience treating at least 3 patients monthly with CSCC, and/or 5 years or longer of clinical practice. Fifty-four experts were invited and 45 (83%) completed all 3 rounds and were included in the final analysis. Structured Delphi surveys evaluated clinical scenarios, imaging modalities, and surveillance strategies for CSCC. Consensus and near-consensus recommendations were generated, defined as 80% or greater and 70% to 79% agreement, respectively. Findings The 45 participants (21 female individuals [47%] and 24 male individuals [53%]; 14 Asian individuals [31%], 1 multiracial individual [2%], and 30 White individuals [67%]) consisted of dermatology (15 [33%]), medical oncology (7 [16%]), radiation oncology (9 [20%]), radiology (9 [20%]), surgery (3 [7%]), and otolaryngology specialists (2 [4%]). The Delphi panel recommended staging and surveillance for CSCCs with at least a 15% risk of metastasis. Consensus or near consensus was reached to recommend staging and surveillance imaging for tumors with a concern for metastasis, bone invasion, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat, large-caliber nerve invasion, or a diameter of 4 cm or larger or the combination of tumors with poorly differentiated histology and any of the following: diameter of 2 cm or larger, lymphovascular invasion and subcutaneous fat invasion, or lymphovascular invasion and small-caliber perineural invasion. Computed tomography imaging was the preferred modality for nodal staging (38 [84%]) and surveillance (35 [78%]). For surveillance duration, consensus was reached to provide imaging for at least 2 years, and near consensus was reached for at least 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides an expert consensus–based framework to standardize imaging in localized CSCC that may inform future guidelines.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and/or other tissues. It is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths from leukemias in the United States. 1 The NCCN Guidelines Panel for AML convenes annually to update recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AML in adults. These recommendations are based on a review of recently published clinical trials that have led to significant improvements in treatment or have yielded new information regarding biologic factors that may have prognostic importance. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding the monitoring and management of measurable (minimal) residual disease.

Abstract The persistent global rise in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) challenges the effectiveness of current risk factor-based algorithms in primary prevention. Most myocardial infarctions occur in individuals without prior symptoms or recognized standard modifiable risk factors, underscoring the need to improve risk stratification. Coronary CT imaging, including coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), enables direct non-invasive visualization of coronary atherosclerosis, supporting a shift from population-based prevention towards personalized, disease-based risk assessment and targeted preventive treatment. CCTA provides comprehensive evaluation of plaque burden, composition, stenosis severity, and high-risk plaque (HRP) features, thereby refining risk stratification and guiding personalized treatment decisions. The presence and total burden of coronary atherosclerotic plaque are considered the primary CCTA-derived markers for guiding preventive therapy, while noncalcified plaque burden and HRP features may support treatment intensification. Advances in CT technology, including photon-counting CT, and the application of artificial intelligence-based tools may further refine risk assessment by enabling accurate and reproducible plaque quantification and characterization. Although no randomized trials have yet demonstrated that CCTA-based screening improves clinical outcomes in asymptomatic individuals compared with standard care, the same is true of traditional cardiovascular risk scores. Three large ongoing randomized trials are currently evaluating whether CCTA-guided, personalized prevention strategies can reduce ASCVD events. The results are eagerly awaited and may redefine the role of CCTA in asymptomatic individuals.

e24089 Background: Pancreatic cancer is associated with high symptom burden and frequent acute care utilization. Although early palliative care improves quality of life in advanced malignancies, real-world data describing its timing and downstream impact in pancreatic cancer remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Epic Cosmos (2015–2025). Adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer were identified using ICD-10 code C25.*. Early palliative care was defined as a documented palliative care encounter (ICD-10 Z51.5) within 0–2 months of cancer diagnosis. Patients were categorized as early palliative care versus not-early palliative care (late or no palliative care). A landmark approach was applied, with outcomes assessed beginning 2 months after diagnosis to mitigate immortal time bias. Outcomes included opioid use, antiemetic use, occupational/physical therapy (OT/PT) utilization, emergency department (ED) encounters resulting in inpatient admission, and inpatient length of stay. Results: Among 4,641 patients with pancreatic cancer, 464 (10.0%) received early palliative care, 365 (7.9%) received palliative care later, and 3,812 (82.1%) had no documented palliative care encounter. Compared with patients without early palliative care, early palliative care recipients demonstrated higher utilization of symptom-directed interventions, including opioids (40.6% vs 22.5%), antiemetics (37.2% vs 20.3%), and occupational/physical therapy services (6.2% vs 3.2%). Early palliative care was associated with a higher proportion of emergency department encounters resulting in inpatient admission (52.5% vs 23.6%), consistent with earlier consolidation of symptom-driven care. Mean inpatient length of stay was similar between groups (6.0 vs 6.2 days). Overall survival appeared comparable between groups; however, survival estimates in EHR-based analyses are limited by residual confounding and timing constraints. Conclusions: In a large national EHR cohort, early palliative care within two months of pancreatic cancer diagnosis was infrequently used but was associated with greater engagement in symptom-directed medications and supportive services, as well as a distinct downstream pattern of acute care utilization. These findings suggest that earlier integration of palliative care may improve coordination of symptom-focused care and represent an actionable quality-of-care target in pancreatic cancer.

e19559 Background: Timely initiation of systemic therapy is critical in multiple myeloma (MM), yet real-world variation in time to treatment initiation (TTI) and its association with clinical outcomes, treatment-related toxicities, and supportive care utilization remain incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Epic Cosmos database (2015–2025). Adults with MM were identified using ICD-10-CM code C90. TTI was defined as days from MM diagnosis to first exposure to systemic anti-myeloma therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Patients were stratified into TTI < 30 days (n = 90015), 30–60(n = 81190), and > 60 days(119,245). Primary outcomes included mortality, infection (sepsis or pneumonia), AKI within 30 days, DVT/PE, and bone marrow transplant (BMT). Secondary outcomes included hemodialysis initiation, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, herpes zoster reactivation, and use of bone-protective therapy (zoledronic acid, pamidronate, or denosumab) and antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir/valacyclovir). Outcomes are presented as unadjusted percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Mortality demonstrated a U-shaped association with TTI, occurring in 22.99%, 21.32%, and 21.32% of patients in the < 30-day, 30–60-day, and > 60-day cohorts, respectively. Infection rates were 16.42%, 17.11%, and 17.30%, while AKI < 30 occurred in 16.01%, 16.38%, and 16.49%. BMT utilization was highest in the 30–60-day cohort (19.14%) compared with < 30 days (18.28%) and > 60 days (18.21%). VTE rates increased modestly with delayed treatment (9.39%, 9.82%, and 10.10%). HD occurred in 3.15%, 3.08%, and 3.07% of patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 17.15%, 18.03%, and 17.55%, thrombocytopenia in 13.34%, 13.93%, and 13.86%, and herpes zoster reactivation in 1.21%, 1.29%, and 1.42%. Antiviral prophylaxis use was highest in the 30–60-day cohort (91.25%) compared with < 30 days (88.48%) and > 60 days (88.23%). Bone-protective therapy use was also highest in the 30–60-day cohort (31.68%) versus < 30 days (28.90%) and > 60 days (23.79%). Conclusions: In this large real-world analysis, initiation of systemic therapy within 30–60 days of MM diagnosis was associated with lower mortality, higher transplant utilization, and greater use of guideline-recommended supportive care compared with both earlier and delayed treatment initiation. Patients treated within 30 days appeared to represent a higher-acuity phenotype, while delays beyond 60 days were associated with lower supportive care uptake and higher thrombotic risk. These findings suggest that time to treatment initiation may reflect both disease severity and care delivery quality, and identify a potentially actionable window to optimize treatment pathways and supportive care in multiple myeloma.