Citations

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by persistent restriction or avoidance of food intake leading to clinically significant nutritional, medical, and/or psychosocial consequences, without associated body-image disturbance. Although historically described in pediatric populations, ARFID is increasingly recognized in adults, particularly among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Emerging data demonstrate a strong bidirectional relationship between ARFID and GI disease—especially disorders of gut–brain interaction—where fear of GI symptoms commonly drives restrictive eating, and chronic undernutrition may worsen GI motility, visceral sensitivity, and symptom severity, reinforcing a self-perpetuating cycle. Despite growing recognition of ARFID in adult gastroenterology patients, evidence guiding nutritional management and the use of nutrition support therapies in this population remains limited. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature on the epidemiology, clinical features, and nutritional consequences of ARFID in adults with GI disease, with a focus on screening and diagnostic considerations relevant to GI clinicians and principles of multidisciplinary management. Particular attention is given to the role of nutrition support therapies, including oral nutritional supplementation, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition. While oral strategies are foundational to nutritional rehabilitation, available evidence supporting enteral or parenteral nutrition in adults with ARFID is sparse and largely extrapolated from pediatric or retrospective studies. Expert guidelines caution against routine or prolonged use of invasive nutrition support due to risks of reinforcing food avoidance, medical complications, and poor long-term outcomes, recommending their use only in carefully selected, medically necessary, and time-limited circumstances. Overall, ARFID represents an underrecognized but clinically significant contributor to malnutrition and symptom burden in adult patients with GI disorders, underscoring the need for routine screening, individualized multidisciplinary care, and high-quality prospective research to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.

AbstractThe dual burden of undernutrition and overnutrition requires a greater understanding and commitment to physician training and specialization in nutrition support. Despite the significant healthcare need and existence of organizations focused on nutrition support such as the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), physician involvement in the nutrition care of high‐risk patients remains low. In an ASPEN survey of members, inadequate training among physicians was reported along with significant barriers to involvement in nutrition support, such as insufficient protected time, reduced reimbursement and financial support, inadequate support from administrators or supervisors, as well as a nationwide reduction in number of nutrition support teams. These changes in the healthcare landscape prompted the ASPEN Physician Engagement Committee to develop a critical review focused on domains of nutrition risk assessment, enteral and parenteral access and support, scholarly activities, board certification, administrative responsibilities, education and training opportunities, coding, and reimbursement. The aim of this critical review is to capacitate physicians to engage in nutrition support and enhance their acumen in clinical nutrition to improve patient care and enrich personal and professional development.

AbstractDepending on the remaining bowel anatomy and the degree of bowel adaptation, patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) may require parenteral nutrition (PN) and/or intravenous fluid support, sometimes temporarily and sometimes permanently. Although the use of parenteral support in SBS is often lifesaving, it is not without its limitations. Herein, we undertake a focused review of several issues related to use of parenteral support in patients with SBS, including initiation of parenteral support, considerations when formulating PN, select complications, short‐term and long‐term nutrition monitoring, and weaning strategies.

AbstractShort bowel syndrome (SBS) occurs when a patient loses bowel length or function significantly enough to cause malabsorption, oftentimes requiring lifelong parenteral support. In adults, this occurs most commonly in the setting of massive intestinal resection, whereas congenital anomalies and necrotizing enterocolitis predominate in children. Many patients with SBS develop long‐term clinical complications over time related to their altered intestinal anatomy and physiology or to various treatment interventions such as parenteral nutrition and the central venous catheter through which it is administered. Identifying, preventing, and treating these complications can be challenging. This review will focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of several complications that can occur in this patient population, including diarrhea, fluid and electrolyte imbalance, vitamin and trace element derangements, metabolic bone disease, biliary disorders, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, d‐lactic acidosis, and complications of central venous catheters.

AbstractSystemic oxalosis is a condition in which calcium oxalate crystals deposit into various bodily tissues. Although this may occur as the result of a rare primary syndrome in which an error of glyoxylate metabolism causes an overproduction of oxalate, it is more often seen as a secondary process characterized by increased enteric oxalate absorption. Here, we describe a patient with short bowel syndrome on long‐term parenteral nutrition support who developed a unique manifestation of systemic oxalosis, leading to deposition of oxalate crystals within the bone marrow contributing to pancytopenia. In this report, in addition to reviewing the literature on this presumably rare manifestation of oxalosis, we also discuss its pathogenesis in the setting of short bowel syndrome and its management, including prevention.

While the history of nutrition support dates to the ancient world, modern home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) has been available since the 1960s. Home enteral nutrition is primarily for patients in whom there is a reduction in oral intake below the amount needed to maintain nutrition or hydration (i.e., oral failure), whereas home parenteral nutrition is used for patients when oral-enteral nutrition is temporarily or permanently impossible or absorption insufficient to maintain nutrition or hydration (i.e., intestinal failure). The development of home delivery of these therapies has revolutionized the field of clinical nutrition. The use of HPEN appears to be increasing on a global scale, and because of this, it is important for healthcare providers to understand all that HPEN entails to provide safe, efficacious, and cost-effective support to the HPEN patient. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the indications, patient requirements, monitoring, complications, and overall process of managing these therapies at home. Whereas some of the information in this article may be applicable to the pediatric patient, the focus is on the adult population.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a rare disorder characterized by severe intestinal dysfunction leading to malabsorption of macronutrients and micronutrients that often results in permanent need of parenteral nutrition support. Patients can develop SBS because of massive intestinal resection or loss of intestinal function and consequently experience significant morbidity and increased healthcare utilization. The remaining anatomy and length of bowel after intestinal resection have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Because patients with SBS constitute a heterogenous group, management is complex and multifaceted, involving nutrition support, fluid and electrolyte management, and pharmacologic therapies in particular to control diarrhea. Surgical interventions including intestinal transplantation may be considered in selected individuals. Successful care of these patients is best accomplished by a multidisciplinary team that is experienced in the management of this syndrome.