Citations

Background Medication nonadherence has been associated with poor outcomes in transplant recipients yet identifying these behaviors pre-transplant remains challenging. The simplified medication adherence questionnaire (SMAQ) is a brief, reliable instrument to assess medication adherence. The aim of this study was to perform SMAQ testing on thoracic organ candidates and examine correlations between these scores and individual patient factors predicting medication nonadherence. Methods Consenting waitlisted lung, heart, and heart-lung transplant candidates from six thoracic transplant centers were mailed a survey that included demographic information and the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess association between pre-transplant medication adherence and demographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, and mortality. Results Among 298 participants, 60.7% were medication nonadherent. Nonadherence was associated with some college education (OR: 1.73; CI: 1.06, 2.81), lower positive affect (OR: 0.95; CI: 0.92, 0.99), and higher uncertainty (OR: 1.02; CI: 1.01, 1.04). Higher positivity ratio predicted adherence. Conclusion Identifiable patient-specific characteristics associated with medication nonadherence can be screened for during thoracic transplant evaluation. Interventions aimed at improving these factors during the pre-transplant period may improve clinical post-transplant outcomes, however, larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Introduction Despite its demonstrated effectiveness at improving outcomes, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underutilized. Sensor-generated data from wearable devices have the potential to mitigate this challenge by generating digital endpoints that provide insights into patient behaviors at home; however, there is no consensus on how to measure home-based PR (HBPR) outcomes with these tools. This review aims to describe (1) the most frequent digital endpoints used in HBPR studies and (2) the devices used to capture these endpoints, summarizing gaps in their applications to HBPR for COPD patients. Methods We completed a scoping review using the PRISMA checklist across databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and OVID) from January 1, 2005 to June 1, 2025. We included peer-reviewed articles on HBPR for COPD, excluding reviews, commentaries/editorials, poster abstracts, and conference proceedings. Eligible articles included cohort studies and clinical trials of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with COPD participating in HBPR that include one or more digital endpoints. Results Among eligible articles ( n = 218), 13 (6.0%) met inclusion criteria, the majority of which were published after 2020 (61.5%). Most studies enrolled fewer than 100 COPD patients (76.9%) for an average monitoring period of 12.5 weeks. Activity trackers were the most commonly used device (46.2%) to capture data. The most frequently used digital endpoints were step count (84.6%), time spent active (38.5%), and time spent sedentary (30.8%). Two study designs were used: randomized controlled trial (76.9%) and observational cohort. Study designs were heterogenous with more than one-third (38.5%) presenting a lack of statistically significant results. Discussion Although we identified analogous digital endpoints in some studies, dissimilar methods and study designs remain barriers to synthesizing results generated from HBPR programs for COPD. Wearable devices have the potential to build novel PR models, but more work is needed to translate real-world data into clinically meaningful measures. Future research should elucidate which participants would benefit most from and complete HBPR to build an evidence base for the validation of HBPR-relevant digital endpoints, particularly those derived from less common sources like cardiovascular and sleep measures.

Purpose: Lifestyle and social frailty factors are a new focus in the multidimensional concept of frailty, as recent reports have found strong associations with negative health outcomes. We searched for specific social and lifestyle frailty factors independently associated with 5-year survival and the risk of hospitalization in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed questionnaire data from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) and identified items related to the published definition of social frailty. Classification and Regression Tree, a machine learning method, was used to select variables most strongly associated with survival time or hospitalizations beyond 12 months of NETT study enrollment. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine relationships between social/lifestyle variables and hospitalization and survival. Results: Four social and lifestyle frailty factors were significantly related to survival (impaired lifting, bathing and dressing, in-store shopping, and loneliness). Two social and lifestyle frailty factors were significantly related to risk of hospitalization (emotional distress and difficulty performing work or activities). A combination of 6 questions provided clinical phenotypes that were robustly and independently associated with mortality risk and hospitalization with hazard ratios that ranged from 2.4 to 11.2 and 2.2 to 3.5 for survival and hospitalization, respectively, after adjustment for age, sex, disease severity, and physical frailty. Conclusion: Lifestyle and social frailty factors that could be easily identified in practice may represent a novel approach to a multidimensional frailty assessment to predict survival and hospitalization in patients with severe COPD.

Purpose: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and symptoms of depression have increased health care utilization and lower quality of life. There is a knowledge gap regarding feasible and effective approaches for the management of depressive symptoms in patients with COPD. The objective of this randomized clinical trial sub-study is to determine whether 12-weeks of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with health coaching is feasible and effective for improving depressive symptoms in patients with COPD. Methods: Patients with severe COPD and symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] ≥5 points) randomized to the intervention (N = 90) or control (N = 78) groups in the parent study were included. The primary outcome of this sub-study was the 12-week change in the PHQ-9 score. Secondary outcomes included dyspnea, fatigue, emotions, and mastery (self-management) as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and daily physical activity and sleep measured by ActiGraph. Results: Home-based PR with health coaching was associated with improved measures of depression ( P = .07), dyspnea, fatigue, emotion, and mastery (self-management) ( P < .001). Being in the intervention group was associated with a higher odds of improving by the minimal clinically important difference on the PHQ-9 (OR = 2.10: 95% CI, 1.06-4.27), CRQ-Dyspnea (OR = 2.37: 95% CI, 1.11-5.26), CRQ-Fatigue (OR = 3.35: 95% CI, 1.59-7.35), CRQ-Emotions (OR = 4.59: 95% CI, 2.13-10.40), and CRQ-Mastery (OR = 3.36: 95% CI 1.60-7.28) after multivariable adjustment. The improvement in depression symptoms was maintained for 3 and 6 months after finishing the intervention. Conclusion: Home-based PR with health coaching is feasible and possibly effective in improving depressive symptoms and quality of life in patients with COPD and symptoms of depression.

11118 Background: Lung cancer survivors experience more physical and mental challenges, heavier symptom burden, and poorer quality of life than survivors of other cancers. Many symptoms persist or worsen for survivors beyond 5 years of cancer diagnosis, referred as long-term lung cancer survivors (LTLCS). Social determinants of health (SDoH) factors negatively impact patient reported outcomes (PROs) among cancer survivors, but their role in outcomes is under reported in lung cancer survivors and unknown in LTLCS. We investigated the impact of SDoH on PROs in a 20-year prospective lung cancer cohort. Methods: Our cohort includes 19,251 lung cancer patients (cases) diagnosed from 1997 through 2016 and followed up to 27 years, of whom 4799 (25%) became LTLCS. SDoH information was obtained by a lung cancer study PRO questionnaire or an institution SDoH questionnaire. Analyzed in this report are 2982 cases and 480 controls who had a low-dose chest CT scan and were ruled out for cancer, all answered at least one PRO questionnaire (first response); and 1366 LTLCS answered 5 years after diagnosis (long-term response). Along with fatigue and dyspnea, 5 SDoH variables, i.e., financial concerns, legal concerns, family and friends support, spiritual well-being, and social activity were scored on a 0 (worst) - 10 (best) scale and dichotomized as 0-5 (deficit/worse/lower) or 6-10 (no deficit/better/higher). We also assessed employment and health-related work experience. A difference of 1.0 unit or more in score was considered clinically meaningful along with a 2-sided test P-value less than 0.05; Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used accordingly. Results: Compared to controls, cases were younger (mean age: 62 vs. 65 years, P<0.05); more women than men reported worse financial concerns (56% vs. 38%, P<0.01) and lower spiritual well-being (43% vs. 26%, P=0.04) at first response; this sex disparity reduced but remained significant at long-term. Worse dyspnea (4.4-4.8 vs. 5.6) and fatigue (4.7-4.8 vs. 5.8-5.9) were seen in cases with more financial and legal concerns compared to those with fewer concerns (Ps<0.01). Cases with higher family and friends support, spiritual well-being and social activity had less dyspnea (5.7-6.0 vs. 4.2-4.5) and fatigue (5.5-5.9 vs. 3.9-4.4) than those with lower scores (Ps<0.04). Employment and health-related work experience data were provided by 2213 responders: Comparing 1735 cases to 478 controls, a lower proportion of cases was employed (28% vs. 39%), more cases “often felt tired after work” (49% vs. 28%), and more cases had “quite a lot” of difficulty in daily work or could not work at all” (26% vs. 9%, Ps<0.01). Conclusions: We found that in lung cancer survivors, more women than men reported worse financial concerns, and lower SDoH status was correlated with worse dyspnea and fatigue, indicating SDoH-driven interventions are important to improve lung cancer survivors’ PROs.

A self-management intervention is a personalized approach to individuals aiming to engage individuals in a behavior change to develop skills to live better with their condition. Self-management involves an iterative process between participants and providers in which goals are formulated and feedback is given. All respiratory societies advocate self-management as part of chronic care because it may improve quality of life and health-care utilization. Self-management is an integral part of pulmonary rehabilitation. Self-management interventions usually involve education and exercise prescription, and that is an asset of current programs; however, recent reports indicate that effective strategies for motivation and a behavior change focus are often missed. A recent systematic review on self-management urges the need for a specific aspect and characteristic of self-management interventions: iterative interactions between participants and health-care professionals competent in using behavior change practices to elicit participants’ motivation, confidence, and competence to develop skills to better manage their disease. A recent review of self-care intervention in chronic disease states that the major deficits found in self-care interventions included a lack of attention and/or innovation to the psychological consequences of chronic illness, technology, and behavior change techniques to help patients manage symptoms. There is a need for exploration of mechanisms to explain the relationships between both anxiety and depression, and adherence to treatment in COPD. The latter is particularly appropriate for pulmonary rehabilitation, for which greater adherence is needed. This report aims to introduce basic aspects of behavior change and a proposed roadmap to introduce behavior change into pulmonary rehabilitation and chronic care programs.