Citations

Abstract Aims Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to assess the risk stratification value of CI during exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study, we enrolled 13 445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echocardiography in 19 clinical sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n = 2594), dobutamine (n = 2440), or dipyridamole (n = 8411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echocardiography monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) ≤ 1.22 (≤1.17 if in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole stress. The primary outcome was all-cause death. CI was observed in 5045 patients (38%) and stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities in 1648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.6–9.1 years), there were 2426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (P < 0.0001). CI was associated with a significant increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from ≤54 years to ≥75 years (P < 0.0001). In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (P < 0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use. Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was an independent predictor of mortality (HR: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–1.74; P < 0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during exercise or pharmacological stress is a simple and objective predictor of survival.

Abstract Aims Our aim was to assess the clinical and prognostic significance of the left ventricular (LV) hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which until now remains unclear. Methods and results We enrolled 1533 HCM patients (age 51 ± 15 years, 965 males, 63%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 27 laboratories from 13 countries. Two-dimensional volumetric TTE assessment included LV outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), LV EF, and LV force (systolic blood pressure + LVOTG/ESV, mmHg/mL). HP was defined as the highest quartile of the force (> 7.32 mmHg/mL). Survival analysis was performed in a subset of 1200 patients with follow-up information. Compared with non-HP patients, HP showed higher heart rate (72 ± 14 vs. 67 ± 14 beats per minute, P < 0.001), lower stroke volume (50 ± 22 vs. 67 ± 22 mL, P < 0.001), larger left atrial volume index (44 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 16 mL/m2, P = 0.011) and higher coronary flow velocity in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery (n = 325, 41 ± 12 vs. 37 ± 14 cm/s, P = 0.021). Force was moderately related to LV EF (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) and weakly to LVOTG (r = 0.36, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 87 months (interquartile range 45–143 months), 131 all-cause deaths occurred. At multivariable Cox analysis, a force > 7.32 mmHg (the fourth quartile for analyzed patients) was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.44 (95% Confidence intervals 1.00–2.07) for all-cause death, independently of LVOTG and LV EF. Conclusion HP in HCM is associated with a disadvantageous systemic, cardiac and coronary hemodynamic profile as well as lower survival in the long-term.

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Background Resting coronary flow velocity (CFV) in the mid‐distal left anterior descending coronary artery can be easily assessed with transthoracic echocardiography. In this observational study, the authors sought to assess the relationship between resting CFV, CFV reserve (CFVR), and outcome in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and Results In a prospective multicenter study design, the authors retrospectively analyzed 7576 patients (age, 66±11 years; 4312 men) with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Recruitment (years 2003–2021) involved 7 accredited laboratories, with interobserver variability <10% for CFV measurement at study entry. Baseline peak diastolic CFV was obtained by pulsed‐wave Doppler in the mid‐distal left anterior descending coronary artery. CFVR (abnormal value ≤2.0) was assessed with dipyridamole. All‐cause death was the only end point. The mean CFV of the left anterior descending coronary artery was 31±12 cm/s. The mean CFVR was 2.32±0.60. During a median follow‐up of 5.9±4.3 years, 1121 (15%) patients died. At multivariable analysis, resting CFV ≥32 cm/s was identified by a receiver operating curve as the best cutoff and was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10–1.40]; P <0.0001) together with CFVR ≤2.0 (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.57–2.02]; P <0.0001), age, diabetes, history of coronary surgery, and left ventricular ejection fraction. When both CFV and CFVR were considered, the mortality rate was highest in patients with resting CFV ≥32 cm/s and CFVR ≤2.0 and lowest in patients with resting CFV <32 cm/s and CFVR >2.0. Conclusions High resting CFV is associated with worse survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The value is independent and additive to CFVR. The combination of high resting CFV and low CFVR is associated with the worst survival.

Abstract Objectives A new standard of practice in stress echocardiography (SE) was founded with the development of the ABCDE protocol, which added functional information to conventional ischemia diagnosis. Each step showed to provide incremental prognostic information: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. However, the utility of SE and ABCDE protocol in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has never been tested. Background A growing body of evidence suggests that AF patients have a significant residual risk of myocardial infarction despite anticoagulant treatment; furthermore, they have an increased risk of heart failure and all-cause death. However, ABCDE-SE has never been applied in this population. Methods Of the 3965 patients who completed clinically indicated ABCDE-SE and with available information on rhythm stored in the shared data bank and enrolled from 13 certified centers, 3891 were in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1) and 50 in permanent AF (Group 2) at the time of the test. ABCDE-SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). The employed stress was an exercise in 1626 (41%), vasodilator in 1864 (47%), and dobutamine in 475 (12%). Results Group 2 pts were older than Group 1 patients, more frequently hypertensives and diabetics, with lower ejection fraction, and with more signs of pulmonary congestion at rest. During stress, differences were magnified, and Group 2 patients showed more peak stress B-lines and higher values of peak WMSI compared with Group 1 (see Table). In addition, patients with AF had higher ABCDE scores (Group 1= 1.5 ±1.4 vs. Group 2= 2.6±1.6, p&lt;0.0001). The distribution of the score in patients in SR and AF is shown in Figure. Conclusions Patients with AF are scarcely represented among patients undergoing SE. Patients with AF showed a higher prevalence of positivity in each step and a higher ABCDE score. More specifically, AF patients are more vulnerable than patients in SR to coronary microvascular dysfunction and chronotropic incompetence during stress.TableFigure

Abstract Functional testing with stress echocardiography is based on the detection of regional wall motion abnormality with two-dimensional echocardiography and is embedded in clinical guidelines. Yet, it under-uses the unique versatility of the technique, ideally suited to describe the different functional abnormalities underlying the same wall motion response during stress. Five parameters converge conceptually and methodologically in the state-of-the-art ABCDE protocol, assessing multiple vulnerabilities of the ischemic patient. The five steps of the ABCDE protocol are (1) step A: regional wall motion; (2) step B: B-lines by lung ultrasound assessing extravascular lung water; (3) step C: left ventricular contractile reserve by volumetric two-dimensional echocardiography; (4) step D: coronary flow velocity reserve in mid-distal left anterior descending coronary with pulsed-wave Doppler; and (5) step E: assessment of heart rate reserve with a one-lead electrocardiogram. ABCDE stress echo offers insight into five functional reserves: epicardial flow (A); diastolic (B), contractile (C), coronary microcirculatory (D), and chronotropic reserve (E). The new format is more comprehensive and allows better functional characterization, risk stratification, and personalized tailoring of therapy. ABCDE protocol is an ‘ecumenic’ and ‘omnivorous’ functional test, suitable for all stresses and all patients also beyond coronary artery disease. It fits the need for sustainability of the current era in healthcare, since it requires universally available technology, and is low-cost, radiation-free, and nearly carbon-neutral.

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2-SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4-SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5-Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6-Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7-SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF); 8-SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10-SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11-SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12-SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021–2025) ≥10,000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time, and in any patient.

Stress echo (SE) 2030 study is an international, prospective, multicenter cohort study that will include >10,000 patients from ≥20 centers from ≥10 countries. It represents the logical and chronological continuation of the SE 2020 study, which developed, validated, and disseminated the “ABCDE protocol” of SE, more suitable than conventional SE to describe the complex vulnerabilities of the contemporary patient within and beyond coronary artery disease. SE2030 was started with a recruitment plan from 2021 to 2025 (and follow-up to 2030) with 12 subprojects (ranging from coronary artery disease to valvular and post-COVID-19 patients). With these features, the study poses particular challenges on quality control assurance, methodological harmonization, and data management. One of the significant upgrades of SE2030 compared to SE2020 was developing and implementing a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)-based infrastructure for interactive and entirely web-based data management to integrate and optimize reproducible clinical research data. The purposes of our paper were: first, to describe the methodology used for quality control of imaging data, and second, to present the informatic infrastructure developed on RedCap platform for data entry, storage, and management in a large-scale multicenter study.