Citations

Background Rilonacept, a once‐weekly interleukin‐1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin‐1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long‐term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision‐making during 24 additional months of open‐label rilonacept treatment. Methods and Results Seventy‐four patients commenced the long‐term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off‐treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18‐month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient‐year versus 4.4 events/patient‐year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18‐month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18‐month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P <0.0001). Conclusions In the RHAPSODY long‐term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18‐month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Abstract Objectives Diagnosis of light chain amyloidosis (AL) requires demonstration of amyloid deposits in a tissue biopsy followed by appropriate typing. Previous studies demonstrated increased dimerization of monoclonal serum free light chains (FLCs) as a pathological feature of AL. To further examine the pathogenicity of FLC, we aimed at testing amino acid sequence homology between circulating and deposited light chains (LCs). Methods Matched tissue biopsy and serum of 10 AL patients were subjected to tissue proteomic amyloid typing and nephelometric FLC assay, respectively. Serum FLC monomers (M) and dimers (D) were analyzed by Western blotting (WB) and mass spectrometry (MS). Results WB of serum FLCs showed predominance of either κ or λ type, in agreement with the nephelometric assay data. Abnormal FLC M–D patterns typical of AL amyloidosis were demonstrated in 8 AL-λ patients and in one of two AL-κ patients: increased levels of monoclonal FLC dimers, high D/M ratio values of involved FLCs, and high ratios of involved to uninvolved dimeric FLCs. MS of serum FLC dimers showed predominant constant domain sequences, in concordance with the tissue proteomic amyloid typing. Most importantly, variable domain sequence homology between circulating and deposited LC species was demonstrated, mainly in AL-λ cases. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate homology between circulating FLCs and tissue-deposited LCs in AL-λ amyloidosis. The applied methodology can facilitate studying the pathogenicity of circulating FLC dimers in AL amyloidosis. The study also highlights the potential of FLC monomer and dimer analysis as a non-invasive screening tool for this disease.

Introduction: Rare cardiac complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination include pericarditis and myocarditis. Patients with recurrent pericarditis may be at increased risk of triggered recurrence. The known efficacy of the interleukin (IL)-1 antagonist rilonacept in treating and preventing recurrence could inform COVID-19 disease and vaccination management. Methods: The Phase 3 trial RHAPSODY was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal study. A long-term extension (LTE) enabled up to 24 months further open-label treatment from May 2020 until June 2022. Concomitant vaccination data and adverse events, including COVID-19, were collected. Results: No COVID-19 cases were reported during the run-in and randomized withdrawal periods (n=86). As of the 6 May 2022 data cutoff, a COVID-19 AE was reported in 19% (14/74) of LTE subjects, of whom 12 were on rilonacept: 5 of 44 fully-vaccinated (≥14 days beyond second serial dose) subjects (11.4%) and 9 of 30 unvaccinated or partially-vaccinated subjects (30.0%). Of the fully-vaccinated subjects, 1 case occurred ~11 months post primary vaccination cycle (no booster). COVID-19 severity was mild (n= 11), moderate (n=2), or severe (n=1). All cases resolved except the severe AE complicated by comorbidities; the subject discontinued. Of 12 subjects receiving rilonacept at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 10 maintained dosing with rilonacept, 1 interrupted rilonacept for ~4 weeks, and 1 discontinued rilonacept permanently; none experienced a pericarditis recurrence (PR) after the AE. The remaining 2 subjects had previously interrupted rilonacept for off-treatment observation: one had a PR >4.5 months after suspending rilonacept and 18 days after COVID-19 resolution; no PR in the other (>6 months). There were no PR AEs associated with COVID-19 vaccination (all subjects were receiving rilonacept). Conclusions: In patients on rilonacept in this study, although numbers are small, vaccination reduced COVID-19 events, pericarditis recurrence was not increased by vaccination or disease, and no pericarditis recurrences occurred during rilonacept treatment. One pericarditis recurrence occurred remotely after rilonacept suspension in the peri-COVID-19 period.

Introduction: Rilonacept reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 trial RHAPSODY. The long-term extension (LTE) enabled further insights into efficacy, safety, and clinical decision making. Methods: The RHAPSODY run-in (RI) and randomized-withdrawal periods were followed by an LTE that enabled open-label rilonacept treatment up to 24 additional months. A decision at 18 months after the most recent recurrence was based on clinical status at investigator discretion: 1) continue rilonacept on-study, 2) suspend rilonacept for observation or 3) discontinue from the LTE without observation. Endpoints included recurrence and quality of life. Results: In May 2020, 74 of 75 eligible subjects continued to LTE; US subjects (n=45) switched to commercial therapy or discontinued in April 2021 (treatment duration from RI baseline [median; maximum] 18; 27 months). Non-US subjects (n=29) completed the LTE in June 2022 (treatment duration from RI baseline [median; maximum] 27; 33 months). Concomitant oral medications during LTE: 22% NSAIDS, 20% colchicine, 0% corticosteroids, 43% none. Inflammation signs (CRP), RP symptoms (PGIPS), and recurrences were low on-treatment. Before the 18-month decision (n=74), there were 3 investigator-assessed recurrences (0.04 per patient-year). At the 18-month decision (n=52), 64% (n=33) continued rilonacept on-study, 15% (n=8) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (n=11) discontinued the study without observation, of whom 7 switched to commercial rilonacept. There was a 75% recurrence rate (n=6/8) in the off-treatment observation group (median time to event 11.8 [3.7, Not-Estimable (NE)] weeks) but only 1 recurrence in subjects on rilonacept (time to event NE [too few events]) associated with a 4-week interruption; HR 0.018, p<0.0001; Fig 1. Conclusions: Continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued treatment response, whereas treatment suspension at 18 months may be associated with pericarditis recurrence.

Abstract Aims In this protocol-predefined substudy of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence. Methods and results RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial that demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging substudy. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with prespecified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (n = 9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (n = 16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs. 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received a placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized-withdrawal period, among patients receiving a placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence. Conclusions Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform the duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy and larger studies should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03737110

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health‐related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin‐1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL‐1α and ‐β cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient‐reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient‐reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health‐related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run‐in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run‐in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run‐in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health‐related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved ( P <0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run‐in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient‐reported health‐related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.