Introduction and importance: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, often presenting with nodal or extranodal masses. However, involvement of the chin region is extremely rare and underreported in literature. This case highlights an unusual extranodal manifestation of germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL. Case presentation: A 56-year-old man with a history of hypertension and type II diabetes presented with an 8-month history of a painless, progressively enlarging chin mass. Prior antibiotic therapy failed to resolve the lesion. Examination revealed a firm, 4 × 3 cm subcutaneous swelling involving skin and mucosa. Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT imaging revealed hypermetabolic soft tissue lesions in the chin and right buccogingival region. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed GCB-type DLBCL. The patient received six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone chemotherapy, resulting in a significant reduction in lesion size and metabolic activity. Follow-up showed no recurrence. Clinical discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by extranodal DLBCL in atypical locations. Misdiagnosis as an infection led to a delayed diagnosis. Immunophenotyping revealed expression of both B- and T-cell markers, which complicated the classification of the lymphoma. A prior history of spontaneously resolving axillary masses suggested an indolent precursor phase that later transformed into aggressive DLBCL. Conclusion: DLBCL may present in rare extranodal sites such as the chin, mimicking benign conditions. Persistent lesions unresponsive to antibiotics should prompt a malignancy workup. Comprehensive evaluation, including imaging and immunohistochemistry, is critical for timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Further research is needed to understand unusual immunophenotypes and progression pathways in DLBCL.
Heterogeneity of the Immunological and Pathogenic Profiles in Patients Hospitalize Early Versus Late During an Acute Vital Illness as Shown in Native SARS-CoV-2 Infection
The immune system’s response to an invading pathogen is the critical determinant in recovery from illness. Here, we hypothesize that the immune response will swiftly follow classical activation and a resolution trajectory in patients with the rapid evolution of symptoms if challenged by a viral pathogen for the first time. Alternatively, a dysregulated response will be signified by a protracted clinical trajectory. Consequently, we enrolled 106 patients during the first wave of COVID-19 and collected their blood within 24 h, 48 h, 7 days, and over 28 days from symptoms onset. The pathogenic burden was measured via serum levels of the S-spike protein and specific immunoglobulin titers against the S and N proteins of SARS-CoV-2. The nonspecific immunological response was gauged using interleukin 6, leukocytosis, and C-reactive protein. Coagulation status was assessed. Several serum biomarkers were used as surrogates of clinical outcomes. We identified four clusters depending on the onset of symptoms (immediate [A], 6 days [B], 12 days [C], and over 21 days [D]). High variability in the S-spike protein in cluster A was present. The corresponding immunoglobulin titer was random. Only procalcitonin differentiated clusters in terms of markers of nonspecific inflammation. Coagulation markers were not significantly different between clusters. Serum surrogates on cardiomyopathy and neuronal pathology exhibited significant variability. Implementation of ECMO or noninvasive ventilation was more prominent in cluster C and D. Interestingly, SOFA or APACHE II scores were not different between nominal (A and B) versus dysregulated clusters (C and D).