Citations

Importance Timely identification of aortic stenosis (AS) is essential for appropriate clinical management, yet screening remains limited by dependence on comprehensive echocardiography and trained imaging personnel. Objective To develop and validate a deep learning algorithm for detection of moderate or greater AS and prospectively evaluate its performance using artificial intelligence (AI)–guided focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) acquired by novice operators. Design, Setting, and Participants This diagnostic study included retrospective algorithm development and validation and prospective evaluation of AI-guided FoCUS across Mayo Clinic sites in the Midwest, Arizona, and Florida. The model was developed using 6753 patients and evaluated in internal validation (n = 852), internal test (n = 844), and validation (n = 1912) cohorts. Performance was assessed on FoCUS acquired by experienced sonographers (n = 602) and prospectively by novice operators (n = 1302). The retrospective model development and validation cohorts comprised studies performed from January 2005 through September 2022. Prospective study was conducted in 2 enrollment periods from June to August 2024 and from June to September 2025. Participants from both periods were combined to comprise the final prospective cohort. Exposure AI-guided FoCUS acquisition and automated deep learning–based assessment for detection of moderate or greater AS. Main Outcomes and Measures Detection of moderate or greater AS. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Results The model demonstrated excellent discrimination in the internal test cohort (AUROC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and geographically distinct validation cohorts in Arizona (AUROC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00) and Florida (AUROC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00). Among FoCUS examinations acquired by experienced sonographers, sensitivity was 95% (95% CI, 82-99) and specificity was 97% (95% CI, 95-98). In the prospective novice-operator cohort, 1258 of 1302 examinations (96.6%) were suitable for automated analysis. Sensitivity was 93% (95% CI, 82-99) and specificity was 96% (95% CI, 95-97). Expert review of AI-positive and uninterpretable examinations increased the positive predictive value from 49.4% to 91.1%, with sensitivity of 85.4%. Conclusions and Relevance A deep learning algorithm accurately detected moderate or greater AS across validation cohorts in this study. In prospective evaluation, novice operators were able to acquire AI-guided FoCUS examinations that enabled accurate detection of moderate or greater AS. These findings support a scalable strategy that may expand access to AS detection in settings with limited echocardiography resources.

Abstract Rationale Sotatercept is a novel activin signaling inhibitor approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Sotatercept has been studied in randomized clinical trials, but little is known regarding the real-world use of sotatercept. We sought to describe the safety, tolerability and efficacy of sotatercept in our clinical practice. Methods We performed a combined prospective and retrospective cohort study of all patients treated with sotatercept at Mayo Clinic Rochester since its approval in March 2024. Patients enrolled in a separate clinical trial of sotatercept were excluded from this analysis as their data will be reported separately. Clinical data was abstracted from the electronic health record. Follow-up data was collected at 6 ± 3 months after initiation of sotatercept. Data is summarized as n (%) and mean ± SD. We used paired t-tests to compare baseline and follow-up characteristics within individuals. Results Fifty-eight PAH patients treated with sotatercept were included. Patients were 48.4 ± 37.6 years old at treatment initiation and were predominantly female with a mean duration of PAH of 6.7 years and a range of PAH etiologies including portopulmonary hypertension, congenital heart disease, and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (Table 1). Twenty-one (36%) of patients had mixed etiologies of PH. Six months after initiation of sotatercept, patients had a significant improvement in NTproBNP (1922 ± 4464 to 363 ± 596 pg/ml, p = 0.04), 6 minute walk distance (378.8 ±144.6 to 395.7±129.5 meters, p = 0.02) and right ventricular systolic pressure (74.6 ± 20.5 to 60.6 ± 20.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001). No patients permanently discontinued due to abnormal laboratory values. Mean highest hemoglobin achieved over the initial 6 months of treatment was 15.5 ± 2.1 g/dL and mean lowest platelet count was 181 ± 74K. Seven patients discontinued sotatercept at a range of 170-275 days after starting. Four patients discontinued due to possible treatment-related adverse effects: 1 each of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage, hypoxia/intrapulmonary vasodilatation and spontaneous bilateral subdural hematomas. Three patients discontinued due to other reasons: newly diagnosed metastatic cancer leading to transition to hospice and two due to lack of improvement. Conclusions In this real-world registry of sotatercept in PAH, sotatercept was well-tolerated among patients with PAH and associated with improvements in exercise capacity, echocardiographic parameters, and NTproBNP. Overall discontinuation due to possible treatment-related adverse effects was low and reasons for discontinuation included bleeding and hypoxia attributed to intrapulmonary vasodilatation. This abstract is funded by: None

Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular disorder that can affect patients’ quality of life and survival. The impact of TR etiology on overall survival and the associated risk factors in each subgroup are not well studied. Methods Multisite, retrospective study evaluating survival based on TR etiology using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. Stepwise approach was used to define TR etiology (≥moderate): primary (PTR; presence of a primary valvular pathology), lead associated (LTR; lead interfering with closure), and secondary TR (STR) in the setting of left‐sided valvular disease, left ventricular disease, other causes of pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular disease, and atrial secondary TR. Results A total of 12 899 patients were included (3% PTR, 90% STR, 7% LTR). The mean age was 68±14, 73±13, and 71±13 years, respectively (44%–55% female patients). Adjusting for age, sex, and TR severity, patients with PTR had better overall survival (PTR: reference; STR hazard ratio [HR], 1.4 [1.2–1.6], LTR HR, 1.5 [1.1–1.7]). On multivariable Cox regression, the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes score was associated with mortality across all groups ( P <0.05 for all). In addition, other risk factors associated with worse outcomes included pulmonary hypertension and ≥moderate right ventricular enlargement in PTR; left‐sided valvular disease, pulmonary hypertension, and ≥moderate right ventricular dysfunction in STR; and left ventricular disease and ≥moderate right ventricular dysfunction in LTR. Conclusions Patients with PTR have better survival than STR and LTR. Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes score was associated with mortality across etiologies, whereas other risk factors are etiology specific. Improved risk profiling may enhance patient selection, treatment decisions, and outcomes.

Importance Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular lesion. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines include class I recommendations for intervention for severe primary MR at the onset of symptoms, significant left ventricular (LV) enlargement (end-systolic dimension ≥40 mm), or dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤60%), with a class IIA recommendation for mitral valve repair when performed at an experienced surgical center. Recent data suggest a survival penalty when waiting for class I surgical guideline indications, and novel markers of decompensation are under investigation. Observations Comprehensive assessment of MR severity using echocardiography is critical, and when warranted, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is complementary. Assessment of LV size and function, as well as serial changes in both, is crucial for determining timing of surgery. New-onset atrial fibrillation, left atrial enlargement, pulmonary hypertension, and exercise-induced changes in LV function should also be considered in borderline scenarios. The roles of LV volumes, global longitudinal strain, CMR-derived measures of myocardial dysfunction, and cardiac biomarkers are worthy of further investigation regarding consideration for early surgical intervention. Conclusions and Relevance A more refined approach incorporating assessment of extravalvular cardiac injury, novel imaging markers, and biomarkers is needed to optimize surgical timing in primary MR. Further research is warranted to validate these emerging parameters and refine guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is associated with significant cardiac remodeling, but the prevalence and prognostic impact of extravalvular cardiac damage remain unexplored. METHODS: Adults with moderate or greater chronic AR identified on echocardiogram between January 2008 and July 2024 were included. Exclusion criteria were acute AR, hypertrophic and infiltrative cardiomyopathies, prior cardiac surgery, and valve stenosis. Cardiac damage was classified into hierarchical stages: no cardiac damage (stage 0), left ventricular damage (stage 1), moderate or greater mitral regurgitation or left atrial enlargement or atrial fibrillation (stage 2), pulmonary hypertension or moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (stage 3), and significant right ventricular dysfunction (stage 4). The primary outcome was the association between cardiac damage stages and all-cause mortality under medical surveillance. RESULTS: Of 4026 patients (median age, 72 [61–80] years), 78% had moderate AR, 11% had moderate-severe, and 11% had severe AR. Cardiac damage was present in 87% of patients: 14% in stage 1, 53% in stage 2, 18% in stage 3, and 2% in stage 4. In a multivariable model, including age, sex, AR severity, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, cardiac damage stages were associated with mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04–1.96) for stage 1, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.21–2.06) for stage 2, 2.78 (95% CI, 2.10–3.67) for stage 3, and 5.34 (95% CI, 3.67–7.76) for stage 4. Adding cardiac damage staging to multivariable models improved predictive accuracy for mortality, increasing the concordance statistics from 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71–0.75) to 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac damage is present in nearly 90% of patients with moderate or greater AR and is associated with increased mortality, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive evaluation of cardiac structure and function beyond the aortic valve and left ventricle.

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with significant morbidity, but individualized treatment and timing of intervention are yet to be defined. We previously proposed and validated artificial intelligence electrocardiography (AI-ECG) scores for various diseases. Whether incorporating AI-ECG information adds to risk stratification above and beyond classical clinical parameters is unknown. Objectives: To identify AI-ECG scores independently associated with all-cause mortality in chronic TR and to create a composite AI-ECG risk score. Methods: Patients with a first echocardiographic diagnosis of ≥moderate TR between 2005-2016 and an ECG within ±15 days were included. The Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcome (TRIO) score was calculated as previously described based on 8 simple parameters (age, sex, severe TR, heart failure, lung disease, heart rate, creatinine and AST). AI-ECG probabilities of low ejection fraction, aortic stenosis, amyloid, cirrhosis, atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were estimated by existing algorithms; the first 4 were associated with all-cause mortality and a composite AI-ECG risk score was calculated (0-4; 1 point for each AI-ECG above specific threshold). Results: A total of 12,377 pts were included (age 72±13 yrs, 55% women). Over a median follow-up of 1.3 yrs (IQR 0.1 to 4.4), 7,121 pts (58%) died. Mortality risk increased significantly with higher composite AI-ECG risk score (Fig. 1A). On multivariable analysis (proportional hazards method), the composite AI-ECG risk score remained independently associated with death, even after adjusting for age, sex, high NT-proBNP levels (>2,500 pg/mL), right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), diuretic use and TRIO risk score category (Fig. 1B). Conclusions: Patients with ≥moderate TR show progressively worse survival with increasing composite AI-ECG risk score. Incorporating AI-derived information from a simple and inexpensive ECG may identify patients with the highest risk of mortality beyond clinical risk scores as TRIO or classical clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters. Prospective validation of this approach needs to be tested in future trials.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) impacts management decisions in valvular heart disease but its significance in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is not well established. Objectives To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic role of AF in patients with chronic, haemodynamically significant AR. Methods Adults with chronic ≥moderate-to-severe AR, from March 2004 to April 2019, were retrospectively identified. Those with acute AR, moderate or worse other valve disease or prior valve surgery were excluded. Patients with AF were identified based on 12-lead ECGs, 1-lead ECGs (showing AF for ≥30 s), or episodes recorded by implanted cardiac devices. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox regression models were used to assess associations with mortality: model 1 adjusted for age, symptoms (New York Heart Association class II–IV), Charlson Comorbidity Index, left ventricle (LV) end-systolic volume index and AF; model 2 added left atrial volume index and model 3 further added systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Results Of the 1006 included patients (age 59±18 years; 822 (82%) men), 446 (46%) had hypertension and 364 (36%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. AF was present in 161 (16%) patients at the time of ≥moderate-to-severe AR diagnosis. During a median follow-up of 1.6 years (IQR 0.2–6.2), AF was associated with an increased mortality risk in univariate and in all three multivariable models (HR 1.61 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.43), HR 2.21 (95% CI 1.31 to 3.72) and HR 2.06 (95% CI 1.21 to 3.52), respectively), including after propensity matching (HR 1.58 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.48)). Conclusions AF is present in one in six patients with chronic≥moderate-to-severe AR and is associated with an increased risk of mortality even after adjusting for measures of LV systolic and diastolic function. There is a need for future prospective studies to validate these findings and evaluate AF as a potential trigger for early surgery.

Background Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) if symptoms persist despite optimal medical therapy. The definition of optimal therapy for TR is unclear beyond managing underlying conditions. Diuretics are the primary treatment for volume retention in TR, but it is unknown whether a “safe diuretic dose” exists for conservative management. We sought to evaluate the association between diuretic dose and outcomes. Methods Adult patients with ≥moderate–severe isolated TR were retrospectively identified from echocardiographic reports. Clinical and echocardiographic data were extracted from electronic medical records and manually reviewed. The primary end point was all‐cause mortality. Loop diuretic doses were converted to furosemide equivalent and categorized into 4 groups: <40 mg, 40 to 79 mg, 80 to 159 mg, and ≥160 mg daily. Results Of 1302 patients (age 72±13 years, 60% female), 565 (43%) had moderate–severe TR and 737 (57%) had severe TR. Median follow‐up was 8.7 (1.4, 14.0) years. Comorbidities increased with higher diuretic doses. A linear relationship between diuretic dose and mortality was observed in spline‐curve analysis. Hazard ratios (and CIs) for mortality adjusted for age, sex, coronary disease, chronic kidney disease, mild pulmonary hypertension, and New York Heart Association III/IV symptoms were 1.21 (0.96–1.53) ( P =0.12) for <40 mg, 1.50 (1.23–1.82) ( P <0.001) for 40 to 79 mg, 1.86 (1.46–2.37) ( P <0.001) for 80 to 159 mg, and 2.90 (2.18–3.88) ( P <0.001) for ≥160 mg furosemide equivalent. Any diuretic dose was associated with significant symptoms (New York Heart Association III–IV), with more patients experiencing symptoms at higher doses. Conclusion A daily loop diuretic dose ≥40 mg furosemide equivalent is associated with increased mortality and greater symptom severity in patients with TR.

Abstract Aims Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is common and associated with increased mortality. The interaction between the pulmonary artery (PA) circulation and the right ventricle (RV) and association with outcomes is incompletely understood. The effective PA elastance (PA Ea) is a composite measure of RV afterload that refers to the pulmonary vascular load that the RV must overcome to eject blood. Whether PA Ea discriminates mortality risk in unselected patients with significant TR is unknown. Methods and results In consecutive patients with ≥moderate TR, we compared all-cause mortality at 5 years based on the PA Ea (defined as the RV systolic pressure/stroke volume as measured by transthoracic echocardiography). In a total of 12 682 patients, the median PA Ea was 0.7 mm Hg/mL (interquartile range 0.5, 0.9). Increasing levels of PA Ea were associated with heart failure, liver and kidney disease, and clinical markers of risk such as the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes score. Increasing levels of PA Ea were associated with larger RVs, worse RV systolic function, higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and greater degrees of right heart failure. After adjusting for age and sex, PA Ea was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio 1.55 per 0.5 mm Hg/mL change of PA Ea; 95% confidence intervals 1.51–1.60; P &lt; 0.0001). In multivariable modelling incorporating available clinical variables, PA Ea was independently predictive of outcome compared with other indexes of RV–PA coupling. Conclusion In patients with significant TR, higher PA Ea is progressively associated with RV dysfunction, right heart failure, and worse survival. Incorporating PA Ea into the routine echo assessment may help stratify risk.

Abstract Introduction Echocardiography is the recommended modality for non-invasive assessment of pulmonary pressures. However, in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the reliability of echocardiographically derived systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) is questioned. Limited data exists on the correlation between echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC) in selected group of patients with severe TR. Purpose To evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements for sPAP in patients with varying TR severity. Method Patients who underwent echocardiography and RHC within three days at a large single referral center were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria included incomplete echocardiographic and RHC data, ≥moderate pulmonary stenosis, low-quality images, and pregnancy. Echocardiographic sPAP was calculated using simplified Bernoulli equation. Echocardiographic right atrial pressure (RAP) was assessed by evaluating inferior vena cava (IVC) dimension and collapsibility. A difference of ≥10 mmHg between the two modalities for sPAP was considered clinically significant. Results Of 3696 patients included, mean age was 64±14 years, 1689 (46%) were females, 1659 (45%) had systemic hypertension, and 582 (16%) had atrial fibrillation. TR was &lt;moderate in 2475 (67%) patients, moderate in 499 (14%), moderate-severe in 277 (7%), and severe in 445 (12%). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was diagnosed in 3079 subjects (83%). A good correlation was found between sPAP derived by echocardiographic and RHC in the whole cohort (correlation coefficient (LCC) 0.79, CI 0.78-0.80), in severe TR subgroup (LCC 0.78, CI 0.75-0.82), and in severe TR with PH subgroup (LCC 0.76, CI 0.71-0.79). The mean echocardiographic misestimation for sPAP in severe TR was 3.97 mmHg (CI -5.24 to -2.71). The correlation between the two modalities for RAP was moderate in the whole cohort (LCC 0.59, CI 0.57-0.61) and fair in severe TR (LCC 0.35, CI 0.27-0.42). A clinically significant difference between the two modalities for sPAP was found in 1504 patients (41%), predominantly due to the right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation, rather than RAP misestimation, in patients with no PH (67% vs 33%), patients with mild-moderate PH (mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) 21-34 mmHg) (67% vs 33%) and severe PH (mPAP ≥35 mmHg) (76% vs 24%). Conclusion The correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements is good for sPAP, even in severe TR patients, while it is only fair to moderate for RAP. A clinically significant difference between echocardiographic and RHC sPAP is more commonly observed in patients with PH, with right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation being the most common cause.