Citations

Abstract Artificial intelligence is spreading through public health agencies and healthcare systems faster than workforces are trained to govern it. We describe RHAMI (Responsible Health AI Readiness and Maturity Index), the first human-centered automated composite index for health organizations to score AI readiness and maturity as one measurable system of science, economics and ethics, and the physician certification-to-Master’s pathway built to teach what it measures—both designed jointly by frontline public health professionals, clinicians, ethicists, engineers, leaders, and policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries.

Poor diet is the leading preventable risk factor for death worldwide, associated with over 10 million premature deaths and USD 8 trillion related costs every year. Artificial intelligence or AI is rapidly emerging as the most historically disruptive, innovatively dynamic, rapidly scaled, cost-efficient, and economically productive technology (which is increasingly providing transformative countermeasures to these negative health trends, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and underserved communities which bear the greatest burden from them). Yet widespread confusion persists among healthcare systems and policymakers on how to best identify, integrate, and evolve the safe, trusted, effective, affordable, and equitable AI solutions that are right for their communities, especially in public health nutrition. We therefore provide here the first known global, comprehensive, and actionable narrative review of the state of the art of AI-accelerated nutrition assessment and healthy eating for healthcare systems, generated by the first automated end-to-end empirical index for responsible health AI readiness and maturity: the Responsible Health AI readiness and Maturity Index (RHAMI). The index is built and the analysis and review conducted by a multi-national team spanning the Global North and South, consisting of front-line clinicians, ethicists, engineers, executives, administrators, public health practitioners, and policymakers. RHAMI analysis identified the top-performing healthcare systems and their nutrition AI, along with leading use cases including multimodal edge AI nutrition assessments as ambient intelligence, the strategic scaling of practical embedded precision nutrition platforms, and sovereign swarm agentic AI social networks for sustainable healthy diets. This index-based review is meant to facilitate standardized, continuous, automated, and real-time multi-disciplinary and multi-dimensional strategic planning, implementation, and optimization of AI capabilities and functionalities worldwide, aligned with healthcare systems’ strategic objectives, practical constraints, and local cultural values. The ultimate strategic objectives of the RHAMI’s application for AI-accelerated public health nutrition are to improve population health, financial efficiency, and societal equity through the global cooperation of the public and private sectors stretching across the Global North and South.

Abstract Rationale Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (hereafter bronchiectasis) is a chronic and progressive respiratory disease. Neutrophilic inflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs), especially neutrophil elastase, have been associated with disease progression and poorer clinical outcomes. Brensocatib, an oral, selective, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1, prevents activation of NSPs. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind ASPEN trial (NCT04594369), treatment with once-daily brensocatib 10- or 25-mg significantly reduced the annualized rate of adjudicated pulmonary exacerbations over 52 weeks vs placebo; brensocatib 25-mg also significantly reduced lung function decline and improved patient-reported symptoms. Here, we further evaluate the impact of brensocatib on lung function in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods ASPEN enrolled patients with bronchiectasis and a history of pulmonary exacerbations in the 12 months prior to screening (adults [18-85 years], ≥2; adolescents [12-<18 years], ≥1). Patients were randomized to receive once-daily brensocatib (10- or 25-mg) or matching placebo for 52 weeks (adults, 1:1:1; adolescents, 2:2:1). Post-hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate the extent of lung function response to treatment, as measured by change from baseline in post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over the 52-week treatment period in patients who did vs did not have ≥1 on-study pulmonary exacerbation, and the level of change in post-BD FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) at week 52. Results A total of 583 patients received brensocatib 10-mg, 575 received brensocatib 25-mg, and 563 received placebo. Overall, a greater decline in FEV1 was observed among patients with ≥1 on-study pulmonary exacerbation vs those without. Treatment with brensocatib 10-mg or 25-mg led to less FEV1 decline at week 52 vs placebo for patients regardless of on-study exacerbation (no exacerbation: -42mL, -8mL, vs -48mL; ≥1 exacerbation: -59mL, -41mL, vs -70mL, for 10-mg, 25-mg brensocatib and placebo, respectively [Figure]). In the overall population, no change or an improvement (≥0 mL difference vs baseline) in post-BD FEV1 at week 52 was observed in 38.7%, 45.4%, and 31.2% of patients in the brensocatib 10-mg, 25-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Similar impacts of brensocatib were observed in FVC (no change or improvement, 10-mg: 41.3%; 25-mg: 48.9%; placebo: 31.8%). Conclusions Overall, greater lung function decline was observed in patients who had on-study pulmonary exacerbations vs those who did not. Brensocatib 25-mg reduced lung function decline vs placebo regardless of whether patients had on-study exacerbations, consistent with overall ASPEN results.

Abstract Introduction Persistent dyspnea increases the risk of disability and impairs quality of life in older patients with bronchiectasis. The impact of dyspnea and fatigue on patients with bronchiectasis in long term follow-up has not been adequately established. We sought to determine if fatigue and higher-grade dyspnea are associated with worse clinical outcomes in 5-years of longitudinal follow-up. Methods We analyzed data collected from a prospective cohort of adult patients with bronchiectasis enrolled in the US Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research Registry. Patients with a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score collected at baseline and during 3-5 years of follow-up were included and stratified as mMRC<2 versus mMRC ≥2. Kruskal-Wallis, independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to test the differences in medians and means for continuous variables and associations between categorical variables, respectively, between the baseline mMRC groups and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) components at follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between dyspnea and clinical outcomes (exacerbations and hospitalizations) at follow-up. Results 1185 adult patients with bronchiectasis met the inclusion criteria. The median age (interquartile range) was 76 (68 to 83) years. At baseline, patients with mMRC ≥2 had a higher proportion of co-existing diagnoses such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), otitis/rhinosinusitis, rheumatologic disease, and pneumonia compared to patients with mMRC <2 (all p<0.05, data not shown). Furthermore, patients with mMRC > 2 compared to patients with mMRC <2 had higher prevalence of fatigue, acute exacerbations and pulmonary related hospitalizations, and lower mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at follow-up (all p< 0.05) (Table 1). Interestingly, body mass index was slightly higher among those with baseline mMRC ≥2 compared to mMRC <2 (p=0.02). Among those with mMRC ≥2 at both baseline and follow-up (n=67, 42%), the odds of having ≥1 exacerbation was 2.4 times higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-4.1) and 2.8 times higher for ≥1 hospitalization (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.45-5.2) during follow-up after adjusting for fatigue. Conclusion Elevated dyspnea was associated with a greater proportion of patients with bronchiectasis exhibiting acute exacerbations and pulmonary related hospitalizations and lower lung function during follow-up. Research is still needed to understand the causes (drivers) of dyspnea to implement better treatment strategies and reduce adverse outcomes in bronchiectasis patients.

Abstract Rationale Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS), as part of a combination antibacterial regimen, is currently the only FDA-approved treatment for patients with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (rMACLD). MAC is the most common cause of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTMLD). A real-world evidence study demonstrated significant decreases in hospitalizations from baseline over a 12-month follow-up period following ALIS initiation; however, study conclusions were limited by the absence of a comparator arm. In this study, we compared healthcare resource utilization in US patients who initiated ALIS versus non-ALIS antibiotic treatment for possible rMACLD. Methods This was a retrospective claims analysis using the Merative™ MarketScan® databases between 2016 and 2021. As no diagnosis codes for MACLD exist in claims, we defined 2 cohorts of patients receiving treatment for possible rMACLD as follows: 1) patients who initiated ≥28 days of continuous treatment with ALIS; and 2) patients who initiated ≥28 days of continuous treatment with ≥1 non-ALIS antibiotic used to treat rMACLD (i.e., parenteral aminoglycoside, clofazimine, fluoroquinolones, linezolid, tedizolid, or bedaquiline) ≥6 months after initiating treatment used for MACLD (i.e., with a combination of ≥2 antibiotics from a macrolide, ethambutol, and a rifamycin). The date of initiating treatment with ALIS or non-ALIS antibiotic for rMACLD was referred to as the index date. Other inclusion criteria: ≥1 diagnosis code for NTMLD anytime pre-index, ≥6 months continuous eligibility pre-index, and ≥12 months continuous eligibility post-index. Hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, NTMLD-related) and emergency room (ER) visits at 0-6 and 7-12 month post-index periods were compared with baseline (6 month pre-index period) per treatment arm. Results A total of 116 patients comprised the ALIS cohort and 63 patients the non-ALIS cohort. In the ALIS cohort, statistically significant reductions from baseline in all-cause, respiratory-related, and NTMLD-related hospitalizations were observed during the 7-12 month post-index period (Table). In contrast, the non-ALIS cohort did not show significant reductions from baseline in hospitalizations at follow-up. No statistically significant changes from baseline in ER visits were observed in either group. Conclusions Patients treated with ALIS for rMACLD had statistically significant reductions in hospitalizations from baseline during the 7-12 month post-index period, whereas no statistically significant improvements in hospitalizations were observed in the non-ALIS antibiotics group.