Citations

632 Background: Paltusotine is an oral, nonpeptide, selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist. In a phase 2 study, treatment with once-daily paltusotine reduced the frequency and severity of carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptoms and was well tolerated. The effect of paltusotine on biomarkers of serotonin and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) was further explored. Methods: This exploratory study, without formal power calculations, included an 8-week randomized treatment phase (completed) and a 102-week open-label extension phase (currently ongoing). The purpose was to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy endpoints, including changes in biomarkers of paltusotine treatment. Enrolled patients were adults with a stable, documented grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and CS. These patients were actively symptomatic and either untreated with somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy (average of ≥4 bowel movements [BMs] per day or >2 flushing episodes per day in ≥2 days over a 2-week period) or washed out of SRL therapy (symptoms previously controlled on SRL), with demonstrated symptom worsening after washout. Patients were randomized to once-daily paltusotine 40 mg or 80 mg; one optional uptitration (from 40 mg to 80 mg or 80 mg to 120 mg) was permitted. Blood samples for assessment of biomarkers (serum serotonin and plasma 5-HIAA) were collected longitudinally from screening to end of treatment. Upper limit of normal was prespecified as 541 ng/mL for serotonin and 22 ng/mL for 5-HIAA. This analysis focuses on changes in biomarker from baseline to the end of 8-week randomized treatment phase and after approximately one year (48 weeks). Results: Thirty-six patients (n=9 untreated; n=27 SRL washout) were randomized. Mean age was 60.8 years (range 35-83), and 52.8% were female. Nineteen patients had grade 1 NETs, and 17 had grade 2 NETs. As reported previously, treatment with once-daily, oral paltusotine was well tolerated and reduced the frequency and severity of CS symptoms, justifying further clinical development of the 80 mg dose. Mean serum serotonin decreased from 1553.0 ng/mL at baseline to 643.9 ng/mL at Week 8, and mean plasma 5-HIAA decreased from 245.1 ng/mL to 159.7 ng/mL. There was a trend of untreated patients achieving a greater reduction in comparison to washout patients. At 48-week follow-up, mean serum serotonin was stabilized at 791.50 ng/mL (n=20), and mean plasma 5-HIAA was stabilized at 190.45 ng/mL (n=20). Conclusions: Paltusotine significantly reduced serotonin and 5-HIAA levels, with effects maintained at 48 weeks. Biomarker reductions paralleled reductions in BM and flushing frequency. These findings support further investigation in the ongoing phase 3 study (CAREFNDR, NCT07087054). Clinical trial information: NCT05361668 .

622 Background: Colorectal small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC and LCNEC) comprise <1% of colorectal cancers and have poor prognosis. Detailed survival information is limited due to rarity. We analyzed survival outcomes using Survival, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database (2000-2022) and compared with NETs and adenocarcinoma (AC). Methods: All patients with SCNEC, LCNEC, NETs or AC with colorectal primaries were extracted. AJCC stage was calculated with 8 th ed. TNM classification. Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox regression (including AJCC stage, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy variables) were used to analyze survival outcomes. Results: Comparing colon and rectal primaries, the only significant mOS difference was in stage IV SCNEC (2 vs 7 months, p<0.0001). Comparing LCNEC and SCNEC, the only significant mOS difference was in stage IV colon SCNEC and LCNEC (2 vs 5 months, p<0.0001). Stage III and IV colorectal SCNEC and LCNEC had significantly shorter mOS than stage III and IV AC and NETs. In multivariate Cox regressions, surgery and chemotherapy were associated with significantly improved survival for both SCNEC and LCNEC at both primaries (p<0.001), while radiation was never significant. Conclusions: Most colorectal SCNEC and LCNEC patients present with stage IV disease. Stage IV colon SCNEC had significantly shorter mOS than both stage IV colon LCNEC and stage IV rectal SCNEC. Further research should explore early diagnosis and effective therapies for this rare, aggressive malignancy. Median overall survival (months) Colon SCNEC (n/mOS) Colon LCNEC (n/mOS) Colon NETs (n/mOS) Colon AC (n/mOS) SCNEC vs NETs in colon: P-value LCNEC vs NETs in colon: P-value SCNEC vs AC in colon: P-value LCNEC vs AC in colon: P-value SCNEC vs LCNEC in colon: P-value Rectal SCNEC (n/mOS) Rectal LCNEC (n/mOS) Rectal NETs (n/mOS) Rectal AC (n/mOS) SCNEC vs NETs in rectum: P-value LCNEC vs NETs in rectum: P-value SCNEC vs AC in rectum P-value LCNEC vs AC in rectum SCNEC vs LCNEC in rectum: P-value Colon SCNEC vs rectal SCNEC P-value Colon LCNEC vs rectal LCNEC: P-value Stage I 19/32 17/122 4496/NA 114,213/144 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.34 0.25 27/23 10/28 5185/NA 54,702/160 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.00047 0.88 0.99 0.24 Stage II 17/38 30/49 259/NA 121,757/106 0.0015 <0.0001 0.4 0.0068 0.65 17/16 3/NA 33/NA 38,417/106 <0.0001 0.57 <0.0001 0.87 0.3 0.065 0.55 Stage III 40/14 107/13 582/184 104,793/82 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.48 50/19 37/17 103/102 46,687/107 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.45 0.48 0.47 Stage IV 245/2 217/5 393/49 83,542/13 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 260/7 57/6 158/36 36,652/17 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.25 <0.0001 0.95

392 Background: PAC+RAM is the standard second-line therapy for advanced GEA. However, PAC-related neuropathy is a major challenge, particularly since many pts have pre-existing neuropathy from prior platinum exposure. An effective “neuropathy-free” regimen remains an unmet need. We evaluated FTD-TPI+RAM as an alternative to PAC+RAM. Methods: This multi-center, randomized, phase II study enrolled GEA pts who progressed on or were intolerant to fluoropyrimidine+ platinum therapy. Pts were randomized to FTD-TPI+RAM (Arm A) or PAC+RAM (arm B) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time interval between randomization date and the date of disease progression or death; Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). The design hypothesized non-inferiority (NI) of Arm A to Arm B with a NI margin of hazard ratio 1.19. 90 PFS events from 116 pts provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.15. The interim futility analysis, conducted in December 2024 with 20 events, did not cross the futility boundary (Z statistic ≥ 1.172 ) and continued enrolling pts. The trial closed enrollment in March 2025 due to slow accrual. At the time of interim analysis, 20 events had occurred and the Z statistic was 0.4532. Final analysis included the 29 pts that were eligible, consented, randomized, and received any protocol treatment. Results: Among 29 pts (15 Arm A; 14 Arm B), baseline characteristics were balanced (in Arms A vs B, median age 64 vs 63; 80% vs 85.7% male; 86.7%% vs 78.6% White; 80% vs 78.6% ECOG 1). At data freeze of 8/4/2025, 26 PFS events were reported. Median PFS was 3.2 vs. 3.9 months in Arm A vs. Arm B (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.61-3.02). NI was not demonstrated (Z =0.34, threshold for NI<-1.036). Median OS was 8.4 vs. 10.7 months, in Arms A and B, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 93% (Arm A) vs 71% (Arm B) with hematologic AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than Arm B (53% vs 29%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy (any grade) occurred more frequently in Arm B (86%) vs. Arm A (47%). Conclusions: Although NI was not achieved due to early closure and small sample size, FTD-TPI+RAM was relatively safe and associated with less neuropathy compared with PAC+RAM. This regimen warrants further evaluation for pts in whom neuropathy limits taxane use. Clinical trial information: NCT04660760 .

381 Background: In RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442), patients (pts) with LA unresectable or metastatic ESCC who received TIS (intravenously, 200 mg, every 3 weeks) + CT (platinum + fluoropyrimidine or paclitaxel) had longer median overall survival (OS) than pts who received PBO + CT at the interim analysis; improvement was maintained after a ≥3-year follow-up. Post hoc analyses in the PD-L1 TAP ≥1% subgroup showed clinically meaningful improvement with TIS + CT. These data supported the US FDA approval for unresectable or metastatic ESCC. Here we report the subgroup analysis of pts who had LA ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1%. Methods: Pts who had LA unresectable ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1% were included in this post hoc analysis. Efficacy outcomes (OS, progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR], duration of response [DoR]) and safety were analyzed. Results: At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), of 649 pts randomized, 63 had LA ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1% (TIS + CT n=31; PBO + CT n=32; median age 67.0 years; 85.7% male). At median follow-up (TIS + CT 24.4 months; PBO + CT 24.5 months), efficacy with TIS + CT was improved vs PBO + CT (Table) and was consistent with the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Efficacy was maintained after a ≥3-year follow-up (data cutoff: Nov 24, 2023; Table). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, the median OS for pts receiving TIS + CT exceeded two years. The regimen was well tolerated. While the findings require validation in future clinical trials, first-line TIS + CT is an encouraging option for pts who have LA unresectable ESCC with PD-L1 TAP score ≥1%. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . Interim Analysis 3-Year Follow-up TIS + CT (n=31) PBO + CT (n=32) TIS + CT (n=32) e PBO + CT (n=31) f Median OS, mo(95% CI) 25.6 (15.3, NE) 11.5(9.0, 21.8) 25.6 (15.3, NE) 12.3(9.0, 21.8) HR (95% CI) a 0.36 (0.17, 0.77) – 0.50 (0.26, 0.95) – Median PFS, a mo(95% CI) 13.2(6.8, NE) 6.7(4.2, 9.7) 13.2(6.8, 27.7) 6.7(4.2, 9.7) HR (95% CI) a 0.46 (0.22, 0.96) – 0.47 (0.23, 0.96) – ORR, b,c n (%) 18 (58.1) 10 (31.3) 19 (59.4) 10 (32.3) Median DoR, b,d mo(95% CI) Not reached (8.4, NE) 5.7 (1.5, 9.6) 22.1 (6.1, NE) 5.7 (1.5, 9.6) a Stratified. b Investigator assessed. c Unconfirmed. d Based on unconfirmed ORR. e One patient’s disease status at baseline was changed to LA after interim analysis. f One patient’s disease status at baseline was changed to metastatic after interim analysis. NE, not estimable.

380 Background: KRAS amplifications (amp) occur in ~2% of solid tumors, representing a high unmet need for effective targeted therapies. BI3706674 binds to GDP-bound KRAS and locks KRAS protein in an inactive form. In preclinical models, BI3706674 has shown potent inhibition of KRAS-amp tumors. Methods: This is a Phase Ia/b trial (NCT06056024) to explore the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy of BI 3706674 in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic KRAS wild type amp or KRAS G12V mutated (mut) solid tumors. The trial aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Pts (ECOG 0 -1) received BI 3706674 daily per os at 50 - 1200 mg doses. Dose escalation (DE) was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model. This report focuses on KRAS wt amp pts from Phase Ia (DE). Results: As of 31 July 2025, 46 pts had received BI 3706674. Pts (n=15/46) with KRAS wt amp tumors had upper gastrointestinal tract (uGI) cancer [n=9: gastric (GAC;n=5), oesophageal (EAC; n=2), gastroesophageal junction (GEJC; n=2) cancers], Cholangiocarcinoma (n=1), colorectal (CRC; n=4), and ovarian (OC; n=1) cancers. Pts were treated at 200 mg (n=2), 400 mg (n=1), 800 mg (n=5), 1200 mg (n=7) doses; males: n=11; ECOG 1: n=10; median age - 62 years (range 38–83); median number of prior treatment lines was 3 (range 1-6). AEs were reported in 15 pts (100%), including 12 pts (80%) with treatment-related AEs (TRAE). High-grade AEs (Grade 3-5) were reported in 10 pts (66.7%), including 4 pts (26.7%) with TRAEs. SAEs were reported in 7 pts (46.7%), including 2 pts (13.3%) with TRAEs. The most-frequent AEs were mostly low-grade (Grade 1-2) diarrhoea (10 pts, 66.7%), nausea (10 pts, 66.7%), and vomiting (9 pts, 60.0%), often reported as TRAE. Two dose limiting toxicities were observed in 1200 mg group: nausea (Grade 3) and vomiting (Grade 3). MTD was not reached. BI 3706674 PK parameters followed the predicted non-linear PK model; dose dependent systemic exposure reached plateau at 800 mg. 12/15 pts with KRAS wt amp tumors, including 10/12 pts in 800 – 1200 mg groups, were efficacy evaluable; Disease control rate (DCR) was 58.3% (7/12 pts): 3/ 12 pts with partial response (PR), 4/12 had stable disease (SD), 5/12 pts - disease progression (PD). In 800 – 1200 mg groups 1 - OC, 2 – CRC pts achieved SD. PK/PD/efficacy correlation data is pending. Conclusions: BI 3706674 showed a tolerable safety profile and clinical efficacy in pts with KRAS amp tumors. Study results provide clinical proof of concept. KRAS wt amp is a druggable target and KRAS-targeting treatment is active in KRAS wt amp uGI cancer pts. Clinical trial information: NCT06056024 . Anticancer activity of BI 3706674 in efficacy evaluable pts with KRAS wt amp tumors. All pts, 200 – 1200 mg, N=12 Pts with uGI cancers,800 – 1200mg, N=7 ORR, n (%) 3* (25%) 3* (43%) SD, n (%) 4 (33.3%) 1 (14%) DCR, n (%) 7 (58.3%) 4 (57%) PD, n (%) 5 (41.7%) 3 (43%) *Tumor shrinkage: -60.3%, -34% and 34.3%.

117 Background: Oxaliplatin remains a cornerstone of colorectal cancer (CRC) chemotherapy but is frequently complicated by chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI). This manifests as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), or porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD). These microvascular changes lead to portal hypertension (PH), splenomegaly, and thrombocytopenia, interrupting chemotherapy delivery and compromising survivorship. Despite increasing recognition, the incidence, spectrum, and management of oxaliplatin-induced portal hypertension (OIPH) remain undefined. Methods: We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane through August 2025 for prospective and retrospective cohorts of oxaliplatin-treated CRC patients reporting OIPH incidence, pathology, radiology, or interventional management. Case reports were excluded. Outcomes included incidence, latency, complications, misdiagnosis, and interventions such as bevacizumab and partial splenic embolization (PSE). Results: Eight studies including 730 patients were analyzed. OIPH developed in ~20–30% of patients, with 2–5% progressing to clinically overt disease requiring variceal banding, Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS), PSE, or management of liver failure. Latency to presentation was typically 4–10 years after oxaliplatin exposure. Common features included splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, varices, and ascites. Histopathology consistently showed sinusoidal dilatation, congestion, perisinusoidal fibrosis, NRH, and microthrombi, confirming endothelial-mediated injury. Up to half of chronic cases were misclassified as metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD/NAFLD) or cryptogenic cirrhosis. Bevacizumab demonstrated consistent hepatoprotection, delaying splenic enlargement and reducing thrombocytopenia, likely via preservation of sinusoidal endothelial integrity and reduction of von Willebrand factor–mediated platelet microthrombi. Interventional radiology provided therapeutic options: in a prospective phase II study, PSE restored platelet counts >130×10⁹/L in 94% and enabled chemotherapy resumption within a median of 14 days, with no grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusions: OIPH is an under-recognized complication of CRC chemotherapy, with latency spanning years after treatment. Splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia serve as early clinical signals, while misdiagnosis as MASLD or cirrhosis is common. Bevacizumab provides hepatoprotection, and PSE offers a safe and effective option for chemotherapy-limiting thrombocytopenia. Routine monitoring of spleen volume and platelet trends should be integrated into follow-up, and prospective validation of prophylactic and interventional strategies is urgently needed.

Abstract Background Adenovirus is a ubiquitous dsDNA virus with potential for end-organ disease. End-organ or disseminated adenoviral disease (EOD) occurs more frequently in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We aim to characterize the clinical manifestations and outcome of adenovirus viremia in adults, including HSCT and SOT recipients. We describe severity of illness, organ-involvement, and graft and patient survival. Methods This retrospective, multi-site, study enrolled adults patients with positive adenovirus PCR in blood and other clinical specimens from January, 2010 through April, 2025. We excluded patients with insufficient medical records, follow up less than 30 days, and isolated conjunctivitis without viremia. EOD was defined by the presence of clinical signs or symptoms consistent with organ involvement, confirmed by a positive adenovirus PCR or by histopathology. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed using R. Results Fifty patients with adenovirus viremia were included in this study. The most common immunocompromising conditions were corticosteroid use (84%, n = 42), HSCT (40%, n = 20) and SOT (34%, n = 17) (Table 1). Only 3 patients (6%) had no known immunocompromising condition. 20 patients (40%) had EOD while 30 patients (60%) had isolated viremia. Lungs were the most affected organ, followed by the gastrointestinal tract and liver (Figure 1). EOD was more prevalent in older patients (60 vs. 41 years, p =0.03) and in those with higher initial plasma viral load (673364 vs. 6593, p=0.005). The most common treatment was reduction in immunosuppression (Table 2). Cidofovir was more often used in patients with EOD. Adenovirus-related outcomes were worse in patients with EOD [higher rates of mortality (45% vs. 13.3%) and ICU admission (60% vs. 20%)] vs. without EOD (Table 3). Conclusion Adenovirus viremia is associated with high mortality in a cohort of mostly immunocompromised adults, particularly those with EOD. Older age and a higher initial plasma viral load are associated with EOD. Patients with EOD had worse clinical outcomes such as ICU admission and adenovirus-related mortality. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is FDA-approved for prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults following completion of antibiotic treatment. The safety and efficacy of RBL have been demonstrated in trials, but few studies have evaluated outcomes in real-world populations. The primary objective of ROAR (NCT05835219) is to assess RBL effectiveness in reducing rCDI through 8 weeks in clinical practice. Table 1. Treatment success rates by subgroup Methods ROAR is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-interventional registry of patients receiving RBL for rCDI prevention in the United States. Adults who completed antibiotics for rCDI and are not in an interventional trial are eligible. The primary endpoint assesses the proportion of patients who experience treatment success (no CDI recurrence through 8 weeks). Other objectives describe rCDI management in real-world clinical practice and adverse events (AEs) after RBL administration. This analysis includes patients who received RBL within 30 days of completing antibiotics for rCDI. Results As of September 18, 2024, 76 patients received RBL within 30 days of completing antibiotics and completed 8 weeks of follow-up. Patients were mostly White (93.4%) and female (76.3%), with a median age of 69 years (range, 19-96 years) and a median body mass index of 24.4 (range, 16.5-49.4). Through 8 weeks, 82.9% of patients (63/76; 95% CI, 72.5%-90.6%) experienced treatment success. Similarly, the rate of treatment success was 87.8% (36/41) in the subgroup of patients who received RBL after an antibiotic washout period &gt; 72 hours. Treatment success rates ranged from 77-100% across patient subgroups, including those stratified by age and number of previous CDI episodes within the past 3 years (Table). Overall, 18 (23.7%) patients experienced an AE, 6 (7.9%) experienced a serious AE, and 1 (1.3%) experienced an AE of special interest (large bowel obstruction). AEs assessed as related to RBL occurred in 3 patients (3.9%). There was 1 fatal AE during the study, considered unrelated to RBL. Conclusion Initial results from ROAR are consistent with previous RBL trial results, indicating that RBL is effective and safe for preventing rCDI through 8 weeks after administration in real-world practice. Disclosures Nicholas W. Van Hise, PharmD, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Grant/Research Support|Innoviva: Advisor/Consultant Teena Chopra, MD, MPH, Cepheid: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Speaker|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Speaker|Shinogi: Speaker Kelly R. Reveles, PharmD, PhD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant Sahil Khanna, MBBS, MS, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|ProbioTech Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Rise: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Vedanta: Grant/Research Support Lasse Nielsen, MS, Ferring: Employee Lorien E. Urban, PhD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employee

Abstract Background Lyme arthritis is a manifestation of disseminated infection with Borrelia spp., typically presenting as knee monoarthritis weeks to months after infection. Most patients respond to antibiotics, but some develop antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis (ARLA), characterized by proliferative or autoimmune synovitis despite clearance of active infection, with proposed risk factors including treatment delay, host genetics, and intra-articular steroid use prior to antibiotics. Table 1 Characteristics of cohort. IQR = interquartile range, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP = C-reactive protein, WBC = white blood cell. Table 2 Comparison of characteristics and outcomes between ARLA and non-ARLA patients Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with Lyme PCR-positive synovial fluid at our center between 01/2004 and 02/2025. ARLA was defined as persistent inflammatory arthritis despite ≥8 weeks of antibiotics and/or negative repeat PCR after antibiotics. Statistical analysis was done on R and STATA. Figure 1 Type of antibiotics administered during the first course (A) and the second course (B) Figure 2 Box plot comparing the median time from symptom onset and treatment initiation in patients who had complete symptomatic resolution with any duration of antibiotic therapy, and those that did not have symptomatic resolution with antibiotic therapy. Results Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study cohort. Definitive Lyme arthritis was diagnosed in 67 patients. Of these, 35 patients (52%) achieved complete symptom resolution after one course of antibiotics, and 45 patients (67%) achieved resolution after up to two courses. Doxycycline was used as first-line therapy in 97% of cases (Figure 1). Antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis (ARLA) developed in 20 patients (30%); of these, 7 required disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and 3 underwent synovectomy. ARLA was associated with incomplete response to a single antibiotic course and persistent joint effusion on post-treatment radiography (Table 2). Intra-articular steroid use prior to antibiotic therapy was associated with a threefold increased odds of ARLA, although this did not reach statistical significance. Patients who responded to antibiotics had a shorter median time to treatment (19 days) compared to non-responders (42 days) (Figure 2). Conclusion In this cohort, 30% of patients were ultimately diagnosed with antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis (ARLA), a rate notably higher than the previously reported 10%. Despite advancements in Lyme disease diagnostics, we observed significant delays in diagnosis and initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy, as well as the use of intra-articular steroids prior to antibiotics. These factors may contribute to the development of ARLA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most prevalent and important infections following solid organ transplant (SOT). Treatment is often challenging, especially when dealing with refractory and resistant CMV infections.Table 1:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with early refractory CMV infectionTable 2:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with resistant CMV infection Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients with clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) at a tertiary transplant center in the US during 2010-2016. The primary outcome was early refractory CMV infection and secondary outcomes were drug resistance, CMV recurrence, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimation, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable Cox regression were used for outcome analysis.Table 3:Multivariable Cox regression analysis of associations with recurrent CMV infection after primary treatment endedNote: Refractory CMV was not included in the model for recurrent CMV as no patients with refractory infection had recurrence. Results A total of 145 SOT recipients with csCMVi were included. Most patients were recipients of liver (49%), followed by kidney (22.1%), heart (6.9%), lung (5.5%), and pancreas (4.1%). Multiple organ transplants accounted for 12.4% of the cohort. Most common induction was an anti-IL-2 antibody (43.9%) followed by ATG (29.5%). 82 (56.5%) had CMV D+/R- mismatch. In total, 34 (23.4%) had CMV syndrome, 38 (26.2%) had tissue-invasive CMV disease, while the rest (50.3%) were asymptomatic. After the initial 3 weeks of antiviral therapy, 13 (8.9%) patients had probable refractory csCMVi; most of them (10 [76.9%]) were CMV D+/R- mismatch. Longer time after transplant had lower risk (OR 0.68; CI 0.48-0.95, p=0.029) while lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was higher risk of early refractory csCMVi (OR 1.54; CI 1.01-2.44, p=0.048) (Table 1). Drug-resistant CMV occurred in 7 patients (4.8%); a high initial CMV DNA level was associated with resistant csCMVi (OR 2; CI 1.08-3.93, p=0.031) (Table 2). Of 144 patients with post-treatment follow-up, 25 (17.2%) experienced recurrent csCMVi within 6 months. Table 3 shows the associations with recurrence of csCMVi after initial treatment. 30 patients (20.7%) died during a median follow-up of 4 years, but refractory, resistant or recurrent CMV were not associated with mortality. Conclusion Refractory csCMVi is associated with low ALC and an earlier onset post-transplant. Resistant csCMVi is associated with high levels of initial CMV DNA. Recurrence of csCMVi is common and possibly associated with low ALC at the end of antiviral treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures