Citations

Introduction: Cilta-cel is approved in the US and EU for the treatment (tx) of patients (pts) with len-refractory MM after ≥1 line based on the randomized, phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827). At the first interim analysis (15.9-month [mo] median follow-up), cilta-cel significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs SoC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26 [protocol-specified weighted analysis]; P<0.0001). At the second interim analysis, overall survival (OS) was significantly improved with cilta-cel vs SoC (HR, 0.55; P=0.0009). MRD negativity is a prognostic marker of prolonged survival outcomes for pts with MM. We report MRD negativity, including overall and sustained MRD negativity, overall MRD-negative complete response or better (≥CR), and MRD-negative ≥CR at mo 12, from the prespecified second interim analysis of CARTITUDE-4. Methods: Eligibility criteria were previously described. Pts were assigned 1:1 to cilta-cel or SoC (pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [PVd]/daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone [DPd]). Pts in the cilta-cel arm underwent apheresis, received bridging therapy (PVd/DPd), and then a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose, 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5-7 days (d) after the start of lymphodepletion. PFS was the primary endpoint; ≥CR rate, overall response rate, overall MRD-negativity rate, and OS were key secondary endpoints. MRD was assessed centrally via next-generation sequencing (clonoSEQ v2.0; Adaptive Biotechnologies). MRD was evaluated at d 56 post infusion in the cilta-cel arm; and in both arms at suspected ≥CR and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo post infusion (cilta-cel arm) or cycle 1 d 1 (SoC arm), as well as yearly until progression/start of subsequent therapy in pts in ≥CR. Sustained MRD negativity (10−5) was defined as confirmed MRD negativity ≥12 mo apart and without MRD positivity in between. Pts were evaluable for sustained MRD negativity if they achieved MRD negativity and had ≥1 evaluable MRD sample ≥12 mo after the first negative result or progressed/died/started subsequent tx <12 mo after the first negative result. Results: 419 pts were randomized (intent-to-treat [ITT] set; cilta-cel, n=208; SoC, n=211); 176 pts in the cilta-cel arm received cilta-cel as study tx. As of May 1, 2024, median follow-up for the study was 33.6 mo. At the 10−5 threshold, 145 pts in the cilta-cel arm and 103 in the SoC arm were evaluable for MRD. MRD-negativity rates (10−5) in the ITT set and the MRD-evaluable subset were higher with cilta-cel vs SoC (ITT, 62% vs 18%; MRD evaluable, 89% vs 38%; both P<0.0001). Across subgroups, cilta-cel vs SoC consistently increased overall MRD-negativity rates (10−5). In the ITT set, 48% of the cilta-cel arm achieved MRD negativity (10−5) by d 56, with the MRD-negative rate rising to 60% by 6 mo post cilta-cel infusion. Overall MRD-negativity rates at the 10−6 threshold in the ITT set were higher with cilta-cel vs SoC (57% vs 9%; P<0.0001). In the cilta-cel arm, 119 (57%) pts vs 26 (12%) in the SoC arm achieved overall MRD-negative (10−5) ≥CR (P<0.0001). At the 12-mo MRD assessment, 92 (44%) pts in the cilta-cel arm vs 17 (8%) in the SoC arm (P<0.0001) had MRD-negative (10−5) ≥CR. In pts with MRD-negative (10−5) ≥CR at mo 12, median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, not estimable [NE]-NE) with cilta-cel and 37.8 mo (95% CI, 25.0-NE) with SoC; median OS was NR (95% CI, NE-NE) and NR (95% CI, 37.8 mo-NE), respectively. Sustained MRD-negativity rates (10−5) in the ITT set were 40% in the cilta-cel arm vs 6% in the SoC arm (P<0.0001); among 110 and 26 evaluable pts for sustained MRD, sustained MRD-negativity rates were 75% vs 50% (P=0.0159). Among the 176 pts who received cilta-cel as study tx, overall MRD negativity at 10−5 was achieved by 129 (73%) pts (89% of 145 evaluable pts). Conclusions: At 33.6-mo median follow-up in CARTITUDE-4, cilta-cel vs SoC significantly increased overall MRD-negativity rates >3-fold in the ITT set, with pts achieving MRD negativity rapidly post cilta-cel. The prognostic value of MRD-negative ≥CR at mo 12 was shown, as median PFS was >3 years in pts with MRD-negative ≥CR at mo 12, regardless of tx. These data further underscore the benefit of cilta-cel, which led to significant >3-fold increases vs SoC in rates of MRD-negative ≥CR at any time and at mo 12, and sustained MRD negativity. Our MRD data demonstrate higher rates of deep and sustained MRD negativity achieved with cilta-cel vs SoC in tx of len-refractory MM as early as first relapse.

Background Endpoints for GVHD treatment trials use early response (i.e, day (D)28 of treatment) as a surrogate for long term survival. Overall response (OR) that combines complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) at day (D) 28 is the conventional endpoint for primary acute GVHD trials because of similar survival outcomes between CR and PR. D28 OR ignores symptom severity at baseline and D28, however, and the PR category encompasses a wide range of responses from minimal improvement to near complete resolution of symptoms. D28 OR is the only endpoint currently approved by the FDA for efficacy, but it has not been re-evaluated as an endpoint for primary treatment (1L) in fifteen years and little is known regarding the prognostic value of D28 OR as an endpoint for second line treatment (2L) of GVHD. We hypothesized that refinement of the current D28 OR criteria, particularly through recategorization of PR in the GI tract, the main driver of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), would more accurately reflect disease control and better predict survival outcomes than current D28 response. Methods The Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (JSTCT) collaborated with the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) to develop and validate D28 refined response (RR) criteria for 1L and 2L treatment (tx) in patients with Grades II-IV acute GVHD. To maximize the correlation between treatment success (i.e, response) with long term survival, our primary measured metric was the negative predictive value (NPV). We first randomly divided the 1L tx cohort of JSTCT into the training (n=2341) and validation sets (n=1156). In the training set we used a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to generate RR criteria that predicted 6-month (mo) NRM based on symptoms both at tx onset and D28. We then compared the two D28 response endpoints (RR vs OR) as surrogates for 6-mo NRM in two validation sets of both 1L tx (JSTCT: n=1156; MAGIC: n=1141) and 2L tx (JSTCT: n=510; MAGIC: n=196). Results The CART algorithm defined a RR as GVHD Grades 0/I at D28 without additional tx; all other D28 grades were considered refined nonresponses. As expected, RR successfully stratified the risk of 6-mo NRM in both 1L tx validation sets (JSTCT: 8% vs 38%, p<0.01; MAGIC: 9% vs 37%, p<0.01). We defined a discordant nonresponse as a nonresponse by RR criteria but a response by OR criteria, which accounted for the majority (~75%) of differences between RR and OR. 6-mo NRM in discordant nonresponders was four fold higher than in responders (JSTCT: 35%; MAGIC: 30%). The large majority (>80%) of discordant nonresponders had persistent GI GVHD at D28. Because the proportion of discordant nonresponders was small (<7% of the total population) in the 1L setting, the improvements of an already high NPV were small (JSTCT: 93% vs 91%; MAGIC: 91% vs 90%). In the 2L tx validation sets, RR also stratified the risk of 6-mo NRM (JSTCT: 26% vs 56%, p<0.01; MAGIC: 13% vs 55%, p<0.01). At the time of 2L tx, the discordant nonresponders are more common and half of the discordant nonresponders experienced 6-mo NRM (JSTCT: 45%; MAGIC: 59%); as a result, RR achieved much higher NPVs than OR (JSTCT: 75% vs 66%; MAGIC: 87% vs 76%). Deaths in responders from acute GVHD (vs. other causes such as infection) were more frequent in OR than RR in both 2L tx validation sets (JSTCT: 41% vs 20%; MAGIC: 41% vs 13%) and 1L tx validation sets (JSTCT: 25% vs 18%; MAGIC: 32% vs 29%). D28 RR is superior to OR because it more accurately reflects control of serious GVHD in four independent validation cohorts, particularly in patients with GI disease. Conclusion We conclude that RR is a more accurate endpoint than OR in patients with grade II-IV GVHD primarily because it classifies persistent GI GVHD at D28 as a non-response instead of a response, which correlates with 6-mo NRM and achieves a higher NPV. This validated RR metric can serve as a better endpoint than OR in assessing treatment efficacy in both primary treatment trials that enrich for high risk GVHD, e.g. GI involvement, and second line treatment trials.

Introduction. Platelet-activating anti-Platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies mediate a number of thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndromes, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and more recently recognized conditions, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), adenovirus-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). In MGTS (Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776), a monoclonal IgG antibody to PF4 mediates a chronic prothrombotic state characterized by recurrent thrombosis. More recent evidence suggests that MGTS may present with negative results in HIT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA), and positivity only in PF4-dependent functional assays such as the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; submitted). The presence of MGUS in patients has long been associated with high risks of thrombotic disease (Blood. 2010 Jun 17;115(24):4991-8), but the mechanism by which they predispose to thrombosis has been relatively unexplored. In this study, we evaluated a cohort of MGUS patients who experience thrombosis for the presence of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies. M ethods. An administrative database search was performed of Mayo Clinic records to identify patients who had a diagnosis of MGUS, and thrombosis. Research samples from 134 MGUS patients with IgG monoclonal protein and thrombosis were obtained from Mayo Clinic's dysproteinemia biobank and subjected to PF4 antigen-based and functional screening. Research studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic. Results. Of the 134 patients, 17 (12.7%) activated platelets in the PEA (≥19%). To exclude non-specific activation (e.g. due to HLA antibodies), secondary PEA testing was performed to assess whether platelet activation was mediated by a HIT-like antibody (i.e., PF4- and IgG-dependent, and inhibitable with high concentrations of heparin). Four patients, hereafter referred to as patients 1-4, were identified as having a HIT-like antibody, as demonstrated by PF4-dependent platelet activation that could be inhibited with high concentrations of heparin (100 U/mL), and blockade of the platelet IgG receptor, FcγRIIa. Patients 1 and 2 had persistent, platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies based on PEA testing of multiple samples obtained several years apart. Patient 1 had a recurrent, multi-year history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), while patient 2 had one DVT episode. Patient 3 demonstrated a HIT antibody-like profile in the PEA in two of three samples available for testing and had a history of thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Patient 4 demonstrated a HIT-like platelet-activating antibody in only one of four samples tested, and consistent with this finding, had an MGUS identified on clinical testing at only one time point (“small” IgG lambda, not quantified), 3 months prior to the platelet-activating sample. This patient experienced multiple thrombotic events including DVTs, left atrial thrombus and embolic CVA, pulmonary embolism and acute limb ischemia. All patients tested negative in two FDA-approved antigen-based HIT assays tested (Immucor PF4 IgG and Zymutest HIA IgG), similar to a recent MGTS case (submitted). SRA was negative in both Patients 1 & 2, weakly positive in Patient 3 (33%, with high CV), and positive (72%) in Patient 4. Conclusions. Definitive diagnosis of patients with MGTS provides insight into a mechanism of “unexplained” thrombosis and may offer additional treatment pathways for these patients with recurrent thrombosis (New Eng J of Med, 2024 Aug 8). Serologic testing in two patients correlated strongly with observations of thrombosis, and the study confirmed recent findings that anti-PF4 antibodies may present with unusual serology that is neither HIT- nor VITT-like (with negative results in both ELISA and SRA). The incidence of confirmed/suspected MGTS was 3% (4/134) in this population of MGUS patients with thrombosis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Introduction BCL-2 inhibition with venetoclax (ven) was a major advance in CLL treatment, but the 5-week dose ramp-up to mitigate the risk of tumor lysis syndrome and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) challenge treatment optimization. Lisaftoclax is an investigational, oral BCL-2i with a short half-life, allowing it to be ramped-up on a daily schedule. We present updated results of a phase 1b/2 study of lisaftoclax alone or combined with acalabrutinib or rituximab in pts with treatment-naïve (TN; lisaftoclax-acalabrutinib arm), relapsed/refractory, or prior ven-treated CLL/SLL (NCT04215809). Methods Pts were treated with a rapid 4- to 6-day daily ramp-up of lisaftoclax from 20 mg to a target dose of 400, 600, or 800 mg, receiving daily oral lisaftoclax alone or, plus continuous acalabrutinib or 6 cycles of rituximab in 28-day cycles, starting on Cycle 1 Day 8 (C1D8) until disease progression, complete response by C24, or unacceptable toxicity. Intensive blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses. Results From March 20, 2020, to June 27, 2024, 176 pts were enrolled: 46 in monotherapy and 39 and 91 in rituximab and acalabrutinib combination cohorts, respectively; 154/176 (87.5%) were R/R and 22/176 (12.5%) TN. The median (range) age was 63 (34-80) years; 67% were male; 25.6% had del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation; and 70.6% had unmutated IGHV. Median (range) duration of treatment with lisaftoclax was 16.5 (1-54; monotherapy), 24 (3-39; rituximab), and 27 (1-43; acalabrutinib) months. In R/R pts, the median (range) number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (1-15), and 14 (9%) pts had been treated with ven. Prior ven pts had a median (range) age of 65 (51-78); 79% were male; of evaluable pts, 50% had del(17p), 36% TP53 mut, 64% del(11q), 38% complex karyotype (≥ 3 abnormalities), and 92% unmutated IGHV; 57% were BTKi naïve; and the median (range) number of prior therapies was 3 (1-6). Incidence and severity of TEAEs were similar across cohorts. Common (>10%) any-grade TEAEs in all cohorts combined were neutropenia (59 [33.5%]), diarrhea (38 [21.6%]), anemia (27 [15.3%]), and thrombocytopenia (26 [14.8%]). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were neutropenia in 15 (32.6%), 10 (25.6%), and 22 (24%) pts and anemia in 10 (21.7%), 5 (12.8%), and 12 (13.2%) pts in monotherapy, rituximab, and acalabrutinib combination cohorts, respectively. Comprehensive E-R analyses indicated that lisaftoclax had similar systemic exposure as monotherapy or when combined with acalabrutinib or rituximab; lisaftoclax had no DDI when combined with acalabrutinib or rituximab. No discontinuations were attributed to lisaftoclax TRAEs. Forty-four (95.7%) pts in monotherapy discontinued treatment. Most discontinuations were due to progressive disease (n = 41 [23.3%]) and 13 (7.4%), AEs; 9 (5.1%) pts withdrew consent; 7 (4%) achieved complete response or MRD negativity after ≥ 24 cycles; 5 (2.8%) died; and 18 (10.2%) discontinued for other reasons. Clinical (n = 2) and laboratory (n = 3) TLS was observed in 5 (2.8%) pts on lisaftoclax (by Howard/Cairo-Bishop criteria), with cases rapidly resolving to resume lisaftoclax safely. ORR for lisaftoclax plus acalabrutinib in 87 pts was 96.6%, and the median DOR (95% CI, 23-NR) and median PFS (95% CI, 34-NR) were not reached. The 12- and 18-month PFS rates were 89% and 86%, respectively. Fourteen R/R CLL ven-exposed pts received lisaftoclax plus acalabrutinib, of whom 9 had progressed on ven, 3 relapsed after completing ven, and 2 discontinued due to ven intolerance. Median (range) duration of treatment was 16 (3-25) months. Safety profile was similar to that of other study cohorts. ORR was 85.7% (12/14), 100% (8/8), and 66.7% (4/6) in the ven-exposed, ven-exposed but BTKi-naïve, and ven- and BTKi-exposed pts, respectively. The median duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The 12- and 18-month PFS rates were 84% and 73%, respectively. Conclusions Our data suggest that lisaftoclax combined with acalabrutinib is effective for pts with prior ven exposure, including those with progression on ven. In this updated analysis with longer follow-up, no DDIs or new safety findings were observed in TN or R/R CLL/SLL pts treated with lisaftoclax monotherapy/combinations. We continue to accrue pts with prior ven exposure to further evaluate this promising signal. A global registrational phase 3 study GLORA (NCT06104566) is recruiting.

Background: Chromosomal rearrangements involving the KMT2A gene and mutations involving the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene have been associated with response to menin inhibitors in multiple studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients characterized by these genetic alterations. Both alterations are more common in younger AML patients and those with NPM1 mutations historically perform better. However, the prevalence and outcomes of older (≥60 years) AML patients with these alterations who are treated with current therapies is less well understood. We present results from the Beat AML Master Trial (BAMT) that analyze the outcomes of this large, but less common subset of patients in an older AML population. Methods: Patients were consented and enrolled on this precision medicine-based Beat AML Master Trial (NCT03013998) from November 2016 to June 2024. Patients were included in this analysis if they harbor either the classic NPM1 mutation or a KMT2A rearrangement (over 10 different gene partners). Additionally, 2 patients with a NUP98 rearrangement were included with the KMT2A cohort as they are known to have similar biology in terms of menin dependence. These patients were treated with the following therapies: a sub-study specific targeted therapy for the dominant clone, venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven/HMA), intensive chemotherapy (IC), alternative non-intensive therapy (NIT), or no therapy. Clinical/genetic characteristics and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed in each group separately. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from master consent and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 1096 AML patients enrolled on the BAMT, 246 patients had either an NPM1 (N=207, 18.9%) or KMT2A (N=39, 3.6%) genetic alteration. The baseline characteristics for the NPM1 cohort were median age 72 years (range: 60-92), 50% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-16%, 1-58%, 2-25% and 3-1%. Additional disease characteristics include treatment related AML at 11% and complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) at 3%. Median OS for the entire NPM1 cohort was 18.4 months (95% CI: 14.2-24.7). Patients were treated on a sub-study (35%), Ven/HMA (19%), IC (26%), NIT (8%) or no treatment (9%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 12.8-31.7) for those treated on a sub-study, 22 months (95% CI: 12.6-not reached (NR)) for Ven/HMA, 41.6 months (95% CI: 18.2-NR) for IC, and 6.3 months (95% CI: 1.3-23) for NIT, which was significantly different (p<0.0001). The baseline characteristics for the KMT2A cohort were median age 69 years (range: 60-88), 44% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-19%, 1-45%, 2-35% and 3-0%. Treatment related AML occurred in 23% of patients and complex karyotype in 31%. Median OS for the KMT2A cohort was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.6-31.6). Patients were treated on a sub-study (38%), Ven/HMA (15%), IC (15%), NIT (15%), or no treatment (5%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 31.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-NR) for sub-study, 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-NR) for Ven/HMA, 12.7 months (95% CI: 4.9-NR) for IC, and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-NR) for NIT, which was also significantly different (p<0.0001). Conclusions: In this cohort of older AML patients who possess NPM1 or KMT2A mutations, initial demographics and clinical characteristics upon presentation are as expected. Within each cohort and depending on the type of therapy received, there were interesting differences in survival. Median OS was the highest for the NPM1 cohort that received IC while the KMT2A cohort had the highest median OS when enrolled on a KMT2A targeted sub-study; a finding that supports precision-based medicine for this high-risk KMT2A group characterized by poor outcomes. As menin inhibitor combinations with induction chemotherapy or Ven/HMA move to the frontline setting, we anticipate seeing significant improvement in outcomes for AML patients in both of these genomic subsets. Further multivariable analysis will be performed to validate treatment effect on OS. Our analyses for these two cohorts also provide valuable outcome benchmarks for the design of future precision oncology studies that seek to improve survival in these subsets of older AML patients.

Introduction In ELM-2 (NCT03888105), a Phase 2, open-label, multicohort study, odronextamab monotherapy demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy, generally manageable safety, and maintenance of patient-reported outcomes in R/R FL (Chong et al. AACR 2024; Tessoulin et al. ASH 2023). In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials comparing CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies in R/R FL, two unanchored MAICs were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of odronextamab versus mosunetuzumab and epcoritamab in patients with R/R FL in the third-line or later (3L+) setting. Methods Patient-level data from the ELM-2 R/R FL cohort receiving odronextamab (N=128; data cutoff: October 2023) were compared with published data from similar cohorts in the GO29781 trial of mosunetuzumab (N=90; Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022) and EPCORE NHL-1 trial of epcoritamab (N=128; Linton et al. Lancet Haematol 2024). To adjust for baseline differences in the trial populations, a priori-identified prognostic variables (progression of disease within 2 years, primary refractory, refractory to last line of therapy [LOT], number of prior LOTs, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, age at start of LOT, and Ann Arbor disease stage) were included in the base-case MAICs. Two additional variables (double refractory and prior autologous stem cell transplant), reported in ELM-2 and the comparator studies, were included in a sensitivity analysis. The MAICs reported here were focused on response outcomes as assessed by independent central review, which were reported across trials. Relative treatment effects before and after matching were presented as odds ratios (ORs), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The effective sample size for odronextamab was 102.0 after matching with mosunetuzumab and 90.6 after matching with epcoritamab in the base-case MAICs. All key prognostic variables were balanced between ELM-2 and both comparator trials in each analysis. Before and after matching, odronextamab demonstrated comparable objective response rates (ORRs) and significantly higher complete response (CR) rates versus mosunetuzumab (before matching: ORR 80.5% vs 80.0%, OR 1.03 [95% CI 0.52-2.03], p=0.93; CR rate 73.4% vs 60.0%, OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.04-3.28], p=0.04; after matching: ORR 83.5% vs 80.0%, OR 1.27 [95% CI 0.61-2.65], p=0.53; CR rate 75.7% vs 60.0%, OR 2.08 [95% CI 1.12-3.86], p=0.02). Odronextamab demonstrated numerically higher CR rates versus epcoritamab before and after matching (before matching: CR rate 73.4% vs 62.5%, OR 1.66 [95% CI 0.98-2.82], p=0.06; after matching: CR rate 69.4% vs 62.5%, OR 1.36 [95% CI 0.77-2.41], p=0.29). The ORRs of odronextamab and epcoritamab were comparable before matching (ORR 80.5% vs 82.0%, OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.48-1.69], p=0.75) and after matching (ORR 78.1% vs 82.0%, OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.40-1.53], p=0.47). Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials comparing bispecific antibodies in the setting of 3L+ FL, MAICs demonstrate that odronextamab was associated with higher CR rates compared with mosunetuzumab and epcoritamab. Since achieving a CR in the R/R FL setting is an important treatment goal, our results highlight the potential of odronextamab as an effective treatment option in R/R FL.

Introduction Establishment of reference intervals (RI) for quantitative assays requires a minimum of 120 qualified normal donor (ND) samples for each partition of an analyte. Based on CLSI EP28 A3C guideline [CLSI. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline-Third Edition. CLSI document EP28-A3c. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.], verification of previously established and/or published RI can be performed with a minimum of 20 NDs, especially given complexities of finding qualified NDs. Reagent manufacturers typically provide adult RI, thus facilitating RI verification as a viable option. NDs for the Pediatric (Peds) (<18 years of age) population are difficult to obtain, published RIs are performed with sample cohorts less than the suggested number or only performed with specific instrument/reagent combinations. Herein, we report our experiences with Peds RI. Methods After IRB approval, healthy pediatric outpatients ages 0-18yrs were recruited and consented. Plasma obtained from umbilical cord, finger/heel/ear stick, or venipuncture blood samples (no more than 50 mL or 3 mL per kg) and collected in 3.2% sodium citrate. Assays included Protein (P) C antigen (PCAG) and chromogenic activity (PCFX); P S total (PST), free (PSF) antigen, and functional (SFX); antithrombin antigen (ATAG) and chromogenic activity (ATFX); plasminogen (PLGN) and alpha-2-plasmin inhibitor (A2PI). Assay kits were PCFX - HemosIL® (Werfen, Beford, MA) Protein C, PST - LIATEST® (Diagnostica Stago S.A.S., Asnières sur Seine, France) Protein S, PSF - HemosIL® Free Protein S, SFX - HemosIL® Protein S Activity, ATAG - LIATEST® AT III , ATFX - HemosIL® Liquid Antithrombin, PLGN - HemosIL® Plasminogen, and A2PI - HemosIL® Plasmin Inhibitor performed on the ACL TOP 700 (Werfen) instrument. PCAG - REAADS® Protein C Antigen Test Kit (Corgenix, Inc. Broomfield, CO) was performed on the Janus G3 liquid handler (Revvity, Waltham, MA) and Synergy Neo2 microplate reader (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Assay mean and range were calculated. Results Insufficient numbers of patients <1yr were collected. Type of assay, age range in yr and number of samples (n), assay mean in % and range results respectively were as follows: PCAG 1-5 (n=15) 87(46-146); 5-10 (n=82) 81 (45-158); 10-15 (n=169) 84 (44-157); 15-18 (n=107) 91 (57-149). PCFX 1-5 (n=20) 97 (56-140); 5-10 (n=84) 89 (62-135); 10-15 (n=188) 91 (55-140); 15-18 (n=124) 96 (54-138). PST (males): 1-5 (n=10) 120 (96-145); 5-10 (n=46) 108 (75-150); 10-15 (n=91) 111 (80-168); 15-18 (n=63) 113 (72-184). PST (females): 1-5 (n=9) 104 (67-146); 5-10 (n=37) 111 (81-159); Ages 10-15 (n=94) 107 (78-153); 15-18 (n=63) 101 (65-148). PSF (males): 1-5 (n=10) 94 (74-109); 5-10 (n=47) 101 (66-141); 10-15 (n=93) 101 (69-151); 15-18 (n=62) 111 (74-187). PSF (females): 1-5 (n=9) 78 (9-124); 5-10 (n=37) 107 (79-137); 10-15 (n=95) 99 (63-138); 15-18 (n=63) 97 (60-132). SFX (males): 1-5 (n=9) 100 (85-128); 5-10 (n=48) 104 (66-144); 10-15 (n=93) 103 (66-168); 15-18 (n=59) 109 (72-157). SFX (females): 1-5 (n=8) 94 (18-121); 5-10 (n=37) 107 (81-143); 10-15 (n=90) 101 (65-147); 15-18 (n=60) 97 (53-135). ATAG 1-5 (n=19) 104 (80-121); 5-10 (n=83) 104 (78-121); 10-15 (n=188) 104 (66-126); 15-18 (n=126) 101 (67-126). ATFX 1-5 (n=20) 112 (94-135); 5-10 (n=84) 107 (87-123); 10-15 (n=188) 105 (84-138); 15-18 (n=126) 101 (84-129). PLGN 1-5 (n=17) 96 (76-124); 5-10 (n=85) 88 (65-125); 10-15 (n=183) 90 (49-151); 15-18 (n=119) 94 (64-151). A2PI: 1-5 (n=17) 134 (118-151); 5-10 (n=85) 126 (107-139); 10-15 (n=183) 121 (104-140); 15-18 (n=118) 116 (91-143). Conclusions Based on CLSI EP28 A3C criteria for verification, no more than 10% of results should fall outside of established/published RI, for example adult RI. Thus, compared to the SCL adult RI, PLGN assay meets criteria in all age ranges and no additional ND are needed. For the remaining assays, additional ND for ages 1-5 are needed. For ages 5-18 criteria for verification are satisfied for all analytes except PCAG. PCAG has 27, 61, and 19 patients falling below lower RI for ages 5-10, 10-15, and 15-18, respectively.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is common after injury and reliable quantification of its severity is lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether thrombin generation would be significantly altered if whole blood samples from trauma patients were collected without (citrate-only) and with corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI+). In a prospective cohort study, 36 trauma pts presenting to a Level I Trauma Center within 12 hours of injury, had whole blood collected simultaneously in citrate-only (3.2%) and citrated plus CTI (CTI+ [final 25 ug/mL]), and processed to platelet free plasma by double centrifugation (3000g, 15 minutes). Samples were stored at -80C with no thawing until analysis. Thrombin generation profiles were measured using the ST Genesia assay (Diagnostica STAGO SAS) and parameters included endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), lag time (LT), peak height, start of tail, velocity index, and time to peak (ttPeak) were analyzed for trauma pts. Data presented as median [IQR] or n (%), with paired t-test and Spearman's correlation analysis were performed between citrated non-CTI and citrated CTI spiked blood samples, with p-value <0.05 statistically significant. Pts presented with significant injury ISS 13 [5, 21], age 45 [29, 59] years, 80.6% male, BMI 26.9 [25.4, 28.3], 94.4% blunt trauma, 22.3% had surgery by day 1 of admission. Significant differences were found between the citrated-only and CTI +tubes in several thrombin generation parameters: ETP (1339 Nm*min [1172.5,1417], 1124.5 [925.4,1285], p<0.001), peak height (222.3 Nm [186.0, 275.6], 160.6 [132.7,208.3], p<0.001), ttPeak (5.64 min [4.86,6.63], 6.19 [5.36, 7.34], p<0.001), start of tail (19.4 min [17.6,21.3], 21.6 [18.9, 23.6], p=0.014), and velocity index (117.6 Nm/min [77.9, 163.1], 71.9 [54.9,106.0], p<0.001). However, LT (3.14 min [2.74, 3.90], 3.08 [2.84, 3.96], p=0.665) did not show a statistically significant difference. Spearman's correlation analysis showed high correlation between citrate-only and CTI+ citrated plasma samples, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for LT (0.941), peak height (0.760), ttPeak (0.928), ETP (0.770), start of tail (0.869), and velocity index (0.766) respectively. The results suggest that use of CTI+ decrease thrombin generation kinetics from blood samples obtained from trauma patients. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of sample collection and processing for use of thrombin generation assays in clinical setting. However, there is very strong correlation of the thrombin parameters obtained from citrated-only plasma to CTI+ plasma samples, suggesting they capture similar information. CTI-spiked citrated tubes appear to reduce contact activation with respect to thrombin generation profiles compared to standard citrated only tubes. This should be a consideration for platform-based lab processing of thrombin generation assays for assessment of coagulopathy after injury; however, given the cost of CTI, citrated-only tubes can be an option for characterization of thrombin generation profile in clinical samples.

Introduction: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are effective therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Their use can be limited by intolerance and/or acquired resistance, due to BTK mutations. BGB-16673 is a bivalent small molecule that induces BTK degradation by binding specifically to BTK and the E3 ligase. The E3 ligase catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin molecules to BTK which marks BTK for destruction by the proteasome. In preclinical models, BGB-16673 degraded wild-type and mutant forms of BTK associated with resistance to covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors, leading to tumor suppression. CaDAnCe-101 (BGB-16673-101, NCT05006716) is an ongoing, open-label, first-in-human, phase 1/2 study designed to evaluate BGB-16673 monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Here, updated results in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL enrolled in the phase 1 portion are presented. Methods: Eligiblepatients must have confirmed R/R CLL/SLL (≥2 prior therapies), an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function. In the US, EU, and Australia, patients must have previously received a covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi). BGB-16673 was dosed once daily orally in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation used a Bayesian optimal interval design (6 planned dose levels, 50-600 mg once daily). Primary objectives were to assess safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5.0 and iwCLL hematologic toxicity criteria), and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first 4 weeks (cycle 1). A secondary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR, iwCLL 2018 criteria or 2014 Lugano criteria for SLL), with the first assessment occurring after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: As of May 24, 2024, 49 patients with CLL were enrolled and treated (50 mg, n=1; 100 mg, n=5; 200 mg, n=16; 350 mg, n=15; 500 mg, n=12). The median age was 70 years (range, 50-91 years), and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-10), including prior cBTKis (n=45 [92%]), BCL2 inhibitors (n=42 [86%]), and noncovalent BTK inhibitors (ncBTKis; n=12 [24%]). Of tested patients, 63% (31/49) had del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation and 82% (32/39) had unmutated IGHV. The median follow-up was 7.9 months (range, 0.3-23.1 months). Ninety-six percent of patients reported any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; grade ≥3, 57%), of which the most common (≥25%) were fatigue (35%; grade ≥3, 2%), contusion (29%; no grade ≥3), and diarrhea (27%; grade ≥3, 2%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs (≥10%) were neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (20%) and pneumonia (10%). One patient (2%) each experienced hypertension (grade 1), febrile neutropenia (in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia and norovirus diarrhea), and major hemorrhage. No atrial fibrillation was observed. Three patients (6%) experienced a TEAE that led to dose reduction. One DLT occurred in 1 patient at 200 mg (grade 3 maculopapular rash on day 27; decreased to grade 1 after 5-day hold; patient continues on treatment). The MTD was not reached. Three patients had TEAEs that led to death (septic shock, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/cerebral aspergillosis, and pneumonia in the context of disease progression; n=1 each); none of the deaths were considered related to treatment. In 49 response-evaluable patients, the ORR (partial response with lymphocytosis or better) was 78% (38/49), and the CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery rate was 4% (n=2). At 200 mg, the ORR was 94% (15/16) including the 2 CRs. Median time to first response was 2.8 months (range, 2.6-8.3 months). Seventeen patients remained on treatment for ≥9 months and all 17 have ongoing responses. Responses were seen at the lowest dose, as well as in patients previously treated with a cBTKi, ncBTKi, double- (cBTKi and BCL2i) and triple- (cBTKi, BCL2i, ncBTKi) exposed patients, and in patients with and without BTK mutations. Conclusions: Emerging data from this ongoing, first-in-human study demonstrate that the novel BTK degrader BGB-16673 has a tolerable safety profile and shows promising and deep overall responses in heavily pretreated patients with R/R CLL/SLL, including those with prior BTK inhibitor treatment and BTK resistance mutations.

Background: In TRANSCEND CLL 004 (NCT03331198),monotherapy with liso-cel, an autologous, CD19-directed CAR T cell product (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells [dose level (DL) 2]), resulted in 43% ORR and 18% CR/CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) rate per IRC in pts with third-line or later R/R CLL/SLL who had PD on Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and failed venetoclax (Siddiqi T, et al. Lancet 2023). Ibr + other CAR T cell therapies has shown high ORR and reduced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) severity in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. In the phase 1 dose-escalation ibr combination cohort, DL2 was the recommended dose of liso-cel for expansion (Wierda WG, et al. Blood 2020). Here, we report results of liso-cel + ibr in pts with R/R CLL/SLL from TRANSCEND CLL 004. Methods: Eligible pts ≥ 18 y of age with CLL/SLL had ≥ 1 of the following: 1) receiving BTKi with PD at entry, 2) high-risk disease and < CR after ≥ 6 mo on BTKi, 3) BTK/PLCγ2 mutation ± ibr PD, 4) prior BTKi with no contraindications to ibr, and 5) (per amendment) PD on BTKi and received prior venetoclax. At enrollment, pts started or continued ibr (420 mg daily or less for toxicity) through leukapheresis and for up to 90 d (or longer per investigator [inv]) after liso-cel (target dose of 50 × 106 CAR+ T cells [DL1] or DL2). Response was per inv by 2018 iwCLL criteria. Primary endpoint was CR/CRi rate at DL2; secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR/CRi (DOCR), time to response, time to CR/CRi, PFS, OS, and undetectable MRD (uMRD) rate in blood. Cellular kinetics was exploratory. Efficacy analyses were at DL2 and safety at DL1 + DL2. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE) occurred the latter of ≤ 90 days after liso-cel or ≤ 30 days of ibr completion. Liso-cel-treated pts who completed or withdrew from study could enroll in a separate long-term follow-up (LTFU) study (NCT03435796) for safety and OS ≤ 15 y after liso-cel. Results: A total of 65 pts underwent leukapheresis; 56 received ibr + liso-cel (DL1, n = 5; DL2, n = 51). At data cutoff (01/12/2024), 28 of 56 (50%) pts had discontinued the study, 11 (20%) completed the study, and 17 (30%) were ongoing; 5 of 28 (18%) eligible pts enrolled in LTFU. Median (IQR) on-study follow-up (including LTFU) was 24.8 mo (14.2-34.6). Median (range) age was 65 y (44-77); 55 (98%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics, such as del(17p) (n = 25), TP53 mutation (n = 24), and unmutated IGHV (n = 39); 43% had LDH ≥ ULN; and median (range) SPD was 27 cm2 (1-218). Pts had a median (range) of 5 (1-13) prior therapies (≤ 2, n = 13 [23%]). Median (range) time from leukapheresis to liso-cel availability was 25 d (17-79). Median (range) ibr exposure was 34 d (15-188) before and 94.5 d (6-1517) after liso-cel. At DL2, ORR (95% CI) was 86% (73.7-94.3), median (range) time to first response was 1.0 mo (0.9-6.0), and median (95% CI) DOR was 41.4 mo (23.3-not reached [NR]). CR/CRi rate (95% CI; primary endpoint) was 45% (31.1-59.7), median (range) time to first CR/CRi was 3.1 mo (0.9-12.1), and median (95% CI) DOCR was NR (26.6-NR). Median (95% CI) PFS and OS was 31.4 mo (20.1-NR) and NR (27.5-NR), respectively. uMRD rate (95% CI) in blood and marrow was 86% (73.7-94.3) and 84% (71.4-93.0), respectively. Grade (gr) ≥ 3 TEAEs occurred in 48 (86%) pts (most commonly neutropenia [52%] and anemia [41%]) with no gr 5 TEAEs. Liso-cel-related gr ≥ 3 TEAEs occurred in 32 (57%) pts and ibr-related gr ≥ 3 TEAEs in 24 (43%) pts including cardiovascular events of hypertension (7%) and atrial fibrillation (2%). Any-gr CRS occurred in 45 (80%) pts (gr ≥ 3, n = 2 [4%]) and any-gr neurological events (NE) in 23 (41%) pts (gr ≥ 3, n = 6 [11%]). Eight (14%) pts had gr ≥ 3 infections and 5 (9%) had second primary malignancies. Twenty-five (45%) pts had prolonged cytopenias (gr ≥ 3 at D30); most recovered to gr ≤ 2 by D90. Sixteen pts died after infusion (PD, n = 6; unknown, n = 6; COVID-19, n = 3; mixed septic/cardiogenic shock, n = 1). Liso-cel showed rapid expansion (median tmax, 10 d) and was detected up to 42 mo after infusion. Conclusions: Combined liso-cel + ibr demonstrated substantial efficacy with deep remissions (86% ORR, 45% CR rate, and 86% blood uMRD rate) and manageable safety in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. Though comparisons should be made with caution and there were differences in disease characteristics between cohorts, liso-cel + ibr showed a numerically higher ORR/CR rate and lower gr ≥ 3 CRS/NE rates vs liso-cel monotherapy, supporting the combination as a promising new therapeutic strategy for pts with R/R CLL/SLL.