Citations

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved in recent years. Targeted therapy with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors has emerged as an effective chemotherapy-free option for patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Undetectable minimal residual disease after the end of treatment is emerging as an important predictor of progression-free and overall survival for patients treated with fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitor-based treatment. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the updates to the NCCN Guidelines for CLL/SLL specific to the use of chemotherapy-free treatment options for patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory disease.

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org .

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors and avoidance techniques for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) in the upper thoracic spine with an emphasis on bone mineral density (BMD) as estimated by Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS A retrospective chart review identified patients at least 50 years of age who underwent instrumented fusion extending from the pelvis to an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) between T1 and T6 and had a preoperative CT, pre- and postoperative radiographs, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. HU were measured in the UIV, the vertebral body cephalad to the UIV (UIV+1), and the L3 and L4 vertebral bodies. Numerous perioperative variables were collected, including basic demographics, smoking and steroid use, preoperative osteoporosis treatment, multiple frailty indices, use of a proximal junctional tether, UIV soft landing, preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, spinopelvic parameters, UIV screw tip distance to the superior endplate, UIV pedicle screw/pedicle diameter ratio, lumbar lordosis distribution, and postoperative spinopelvic parameters compared with age-adjusted normal values. RESULTS Eighty-one patients were included in the study (21 men and 60 women) with a mean (SD) age of 66 years (6.9 years), BMI of 29 (5.5), and follow-up of 38 months (25 months). Spinal fusion constructs at the time of surgery extended from the pelvis to a UIV of T1 (5%), T2 (15%), T3 (25%), T4 (33%), T5 (21%), and T6 (1%). Twenty-seven patients (33%) developed PJK and/or PJF; 21 (26%) had PJK and 15 (19%) had PJF. Variables associated with PJK/PJF with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariable analysis, including HU at the UIV/UIV+1, HU at L3/L4, DXA femoral neck T-score, UIV screw tip distance to the superior endplate, UIV pedicle screw/pedicle diameter ratio, and postoperative lumbar lordosis distribution. Multivariable analysis (area under the curve = 0.77) demonstrated HU at the UIV/UIV+1 to be the only independent predictor of PJK and PJF with an OR of 0.96 (p = 0.005). Patients with < 147 HU (n = 27), 147–195 HU (n = 27), and > 195 HU (n = 27) at the UIV/UIV+1 had PJK/PJF rates of 59%, 33%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with upper thoracic–to-pelvis spinal reconstruction, lower HU at the UIV and UIV+1 were independently associated with PJK and PJF, with an optimal cutoff of 159 HU that maximizes sensitivity and specificity.

AbstractLafora disease is a rare inherited neurodegenerative disease with onset in adolescence. Patients present with progressive myoclonic seizures and cognitive decline. The disease is linked to mutations in either of the two genes encoding malin and laforin, and it is associated with the accumulation of polyglucosan inclusions (Lafora bodies [LBs]) in various tissues, such as brain, liver, muscle, and skin, with the skin being particularly accessible for biopsy. Histopathologic examination of affected tissue with demonstration of LBs, together with the presence of pathologic mutation in EPM2A or NHLRC1 genes, is sufficient for diagnosis of this neurologic disorder when clinically suspected. Here, we report the case of a 16‐year‐old female with progressive neurologic symptoms and homozygous mutation in the NHLRC1 gene encoding malin. The skin biopsy was instrumental in reaching the final diagnosis by showing LBs in sweat glands by histopathologic and electron microscopic examination.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by stromal fibrosis, hypoxia, and nutritional deprivation. PDAC tumors grow aggressively, diagnosis is typically made after metastasis and the disease remains associated with poor outcomes. The triplet chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel with cisplatin was associated with a median overall survival of 16.4 months in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting (Jameson et al., 2020). Nutritional, metabolic interventions offer an opportunity to fundamentally change the tumor microenvironment and improve outcomes for patients. A medically supervised ketogenic diet (MSKD) defined as lower carbohydrate, lower protein, and higher fat can significantly reduce glucose and insulin and increase metabolically active ketone bodies. A ketogenic diet combined with triplet chemotherapy (gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin) was shown to inhibit murine pancreatic KPC tumor growth and to triple the survival benefit of chemotherapy alone. The ketogenic diet combined with triple chemotherapy was associated with glucose depletion, altered TCA substrate usage, and NADH elevation. Methods: In this Phase II randomized clinical trial (NCT04631445), we are evaluating a medically supervised ketogenic diet (MSKD) versus a standard diet when combined with the triplet therapy in patients with treatment-naive advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint is progression free survival for triplet therapy while on MSKD or non-MSKD. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (PR+ CR+ SD for at least 9 weeks), change in CA 19-9 (or CA125, or CEA if not expressers of CA 19-9), average insulin levels, HbA1c, body weight, a comparison of gut microbial diversity, changes in serum metabolites and quality of life via the EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. Unlike prior ketogenic intervention studies, the MSKD is being supported by a continuous care nutrition intervention through Virta Health Corp, that offers tracking of daily ketone and glucose levels, a web-based software application, education, and communication with a remote care team to ensure sustained nutritional ketosis. A total of 40 patients with untreated metastatic PDAC are planned for enrollment, 20 randomized to each arm. The trial opened for accrual November 2020. Citation Format: Diana Hanna, Gayle S. Jameson, Drew W. Rasco, Angela Alistar, Richard C. Frank, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Julia E. Wiedmeier, Caroline Roberts, Brandon Fell, Sarah Hallberg, Denise Roe, Derek Cridebring, Joshua Rabinowitz, Stephen Thomas Gately, Daniel D. Von Hoff. Randomized Phase II trial of two different nutritional approaches for patients receiving treatment for their advanced pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT549.

Abstract Chronic inflammation is a well-established carcinogenic pathway for colorectal cancer (CRC), but the role of inflammation in CRC prognosis is not well understood. Since cytokines are central in extensive biological networks to regulate inflammation, it is of great importance to investigate inflammatory cytokines and CRC survival. Among an NCI-sponsored adjuvant chemotherapy trial for patients with stage III colon cancer conducted between 2010 and 2015 (CALGB/SWOG 80702), we collected serum samples from 1,498 participants at a median of 1.6 months (interquartile [IQR]: 1.3-1.9 months) after surgery. IL-6, TNFR2, and hsCRP were assayed as biomarkers of chronic inflammation and were categorized into quintiles. The primary outcome was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomization to recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and time to recurrence. We estimated the associations of inflammatory biomarkers with survival using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 1,498 participants (median follow-up: 5.9 years), mean age was 61.3 years, 82.2% were White, 55.5% were male, and 387 experienced recurrence or death. Medians (IQRs) of biomarkers were 2.6mg/L (1.2-5.6mg/L) for IL-6, 2.9×103pg/mL (2.3-3.6×103pg/mL) for TNFR2, and 2.6mg/L (1.2-5.6mg/L) for hsCRP. Compared to the lowest quintile (Q1), the highest quintile (Q5) in inflammatory biomarkers was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratios were 1.52 [95% CI, 1.08-2.15] for IL-6, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.22-2.54] for TNFR2, and 1.66 [95% CI, 1.17-2.35] for hsCRP). Similar patterns were observed for overall survival and time to recurrence. Our findings suggest that higher levels of inflammation after diagnosis were significantly associated with worse survival among those with stage III colon cancer, and reducing inflammation may be considered as a potential intervention to improve CRC survival. ‬‬ Associations of Inflammatory Biomarkers with Survival after Adjustment for Clinicopathologic Factors Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P for Trend Disease-free survival IL-6 1.00 1.14 (0.80-1.62) 1.37 (0.97-1.94) 1.44 (1.02-2.03) 1.52 (1.08-2.15) 0.02 TNFR2 1.00 1.21 (0.84-1.74) 1.43 (0.99-2.05) 1.56 (1.09-2.25) 1.76 (1.22-2.54) 0.002 hsCRP 1.00 1.34 (0.95-1.90) 1.62 (1.15-2.29) 1.26 (0.88-1.80) 1.66 (1.17-2.35) 0.04 Overall survival IL-6 1.00 1.44 (0.91-2.29) 1.56 (0.98-2.48) 1.48 (0.93-2.34) 1.68 (1.07-2.65) 0.09 TNFR2 1.00 1.57 (0.94-2.63) 1.88 (1.13-3.13) 1.92 (1.15-3.20) 2.31 (1.39-3.84) 0.003 hsCRP 1.00 1.27 (0.81-2.00) 1.72 (1.11-2.65) 1.22 (0.77-1.92) 1.73 (1.12-2.69) 0.06 Time to recurrence IL-6 1.00 1.34 (0.92-1.95) 1.48 (1.01-2.16) 1.55 (1.06-2.27) 1.54 (1.05-2.26) 0.07 TNFR2 1.00 1.14 (0.78-1.67) 1.28 (0.87-1.87) 1.48 (1.01-2.16) 1.54 (1.04-2.27) 0.02 hsCRP 1.00 1.27 (0.87-1.83) 1.64 (1.14-2.36) 1.21 (0.82-1.77) 1.55 (1.07-2.26) 0.12 Citation Format: En Cheng, Shi Qian, Anthony F. Shields, Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano, Andrew B. Nixon, Ardaman P. Shergill, Katherine A. Guthrie, Felix Couture, Philip Kuebler, Pankaj Kumar, Dequincy Lewis, Benjamin Tan, Eileen M. O'Reilly, Justin C. Brown, Philip A. Philip, Bette J. Caan, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt. Associations of inflammatory biomarkers with survival among patients with stage III colon cancer (CALGB/SWOG 80702 [Alliance]) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 682.

Abstract Background: NL-201 is a selective and long-acting computationally designed alpha-independent agonist of the IL-2 and IL-15 receptors, which share beta and gamma signaling subunits. NL-201 is being developed as a potent activator of CD8+ T cells and NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Binding to the beta and gamma subunits stimulates dose-dependent expansion and tumor infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and NK cells, thereby enhancing the immune response in the tumor. The absence of binding to the IL-2 alpha subunit reduces the undesirable effects of traditional IL-2 therapies, such as vascular leak syndrome and expansion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. As such, NL-201 is designed to promote the desired immunomodulatory anti-tumor effects of IL-2 with an improved safety profile. Methods: NL201-101 is a Phase 1 first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study consisting of two parts. Part 1 is a monotherapy dose-escalation study in up to 60 adult patients with advanced and/or refractory solid tumors to define the safety profile and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule of NL-201. During dose escalation, two different schedules will be evaluated: dosing every 21 days (Schedule A), or on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle (Schedule B). Tumor response will be assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 and/or RECIST for use in cancer immunotherapy trials (iRECIST). In Part 2, patients with pathologically proven diagnosis of melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (up to N=30/cohort), who have advanced and/or refractory measurable disease and have failed at least one line of treatment, which may include checkpoint inhibitors, will be enrolled. Key exclusion criteria include history of brain cancer or active brain metastases, carcinomatous meningitis, neurologic autoimmune disease; patients previously receiving CAR-T or IL-2-based therapies are not eligible. Recruitment of Part 1 began in April 2021, and the trial is actively enrolling. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04659629. Citation Format: Aung Naing, Margaret Callahan, Brian A. Costello, Brendan Curti, Evan Hall, Aaron Hansen, Georgina V. Long, Anthony M. Joshua, Cynthia Wetmore, Andrew Weickhardt. A first-in-human phase 1 study of NL-201 in patients with relapsed or refractory cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT250.

Abstract Lung cancer (LC) is the most common cause of cancer mortality and the third most common cancer by incidence in the United States. While environmental factors play an important role in its development, LC risk also exhibits a high degree of heritability. Linkage analyses and genome-wide association studies have identified multiple loci associated with increased LC risk; however, much of the heritability has yet to be explained by these loci. Structural mutations, including copy number variations (CNVs), contribute to phenotypic diversity through dosage and/or cis-regulatory effects. Unbiased CNV mapping is only possible with the use of high-depth, short-read sequencing and remains much more complicated and prone to false positives than SNP detection. As the tools necessary for CNV detection have improved, both somatic and germline CNVs have been shown to play an important role in disease, especially cancer, and often they account for a significant proportion of pathogenic variants. Little has been done to understand the role of germline CNVs in the biological pathways of hereditary lung cancer (HLC). The goal of the current project is to utilize the whole exome sequencing (WES) data in identifying the CNVs in the HLC families (≥3 LC/family) recruited by the Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium (GELCC). This work uses germline WES data from 203 individuals (60 with a LC diagnosis) from 25 HLC families (≥3 LC affected/family). We limited our investigation to CNVs called by two independent tools using read depth to infer copy number changes and genomic breakpoints: GATK 4 (https://gatk.broadinstitute.org) and XHMM (https://atgu.mgh.harvard.edu/xhmm/). We have identified CNVs (deletions) in the following protein coding genes: KIR2DL1 (19q13.42; OR=1.77), DMBT1 (10q26.13; OR=1.56), SIBPB1 (20p13; OR=1.53), LILRA6 (20p13; OR=1.53), and HLA-DRB5 (6p21.32; OR=1.64) in ≥3 families in at least two individuals/family. All of these genes with the exception of HLA-DRB5 were previously reported in LC studies; HLA-DRB5 was reported in other cancer studies. DMBT1 was reported to be a candidate tumor suppressor gene and frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was observed in several human tumors. It is highly expressed in lung and loss of expression was reported in LC cell lines. All CNVs identified in our study are consistent with Mendelian expectations and appear to be uncommon in the general population. CNVs in these genes may contribute to the lung cancer risk in the HLC families. Further validation of the identified variants is ongoing. We will consider overall CNV burden and disease association with identified deletions and duplications. The enrichment of rare variants in oncogenically associated genes that co-segregate with LC provides specific mutations for future work and improves our understanding of the inheritance and pathogenesis of LC. Citation Format: John Waldron, Kirsten W. Termine, Anthony M. Musolf, Mariza de Andrade, Colette Gaba, Ramaswamy Govindan, Ping Yang, Ming You, Ellen Jaeger, Angelle F. Bencaz, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Diptasri M. Mandal. Analyses of whole exome sequencing (WES) data of hereditary lung cancer families identify germline copy number variations (CNVs) in multiple genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1452.

Abstract In an effort to enhance the trustworthiness of its clinical practice guidelines, the Endocrine Society has recently adopted new policies and more rigorous methodologies for its guideline program. In this Clinical Practice Guideline Communication, we describe these recent enhancements—many of which reflect greater adherence to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development—in addition to the rationale for such changes. Improvements to the Society’s guideline development practices include, but are not limited to, enhanced inclusion of nonendocrinologist experts, including patient representatives, on guideline development panels; implementation of a more rigorous conflict/duality of interest policy; a requirement that all formal recommendations must be demonstrably underpinned by systematic evidence review; the explicit use of GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks; greater use and explanation of standardized guideline language; and a more intentional approach to guideline updating. Lastly, we describe some of the experiential differences our guideline readers are most likely to notice.