Citations

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can be treated conservatively. However, some SCAD patients can develop cardiogenic shock (CS). We evaluated the outcomes of SCAD-related CS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2019. In our study of 32,640 patients with SCAD, about 10.6% of patients presented with CS. We found that SCAD patients with CS had higher mortality and greater complications including use of mechanical circulatory devices, arrhythmias, respiratory support, and acute heart failure compared to those without CS. When comparing CS due to SCAD with that due to coronary artery disease, we found that although mortality rates were similar, those with CS due to SCAD were associated with higher risk of use of mechanical circulatory support, major bleeding, blood transfusion, and respiratory failure.

TPS4201 Background: Poorly differentiated, extrapulmonary NEC are rare cancers with median overall survival (OS) <1 year. Treatment is extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with use of P (cisplatin or carboplatin) + E. More effective treatment regimens and predictive biomarkers are needed to improve outcomes. In SCLC, induction therapy with combination of P/E + PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab and maintenance atezolizumab improved OS (12.3 months vs 10.3 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.91, P=0.007) vs P/E alone (1). No study to date has compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition during induction only vs during induction and maintenance therapy. In SCLC, distinct molecular subtypes can be identified by the presence of specific transcription factors (e.g., ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3) or an inflamed gene signature (SCLC-I), with SCLC-I pts more likely to benefit clinically from the addition of immunotherapy (2). In this study we plan to test the benefit of adding atezolizumab to induction P/E as well as the role of adding maintenance atezolizumab after induction P/E plus atezolizumab. We also plan to correlate tumor- and blood-based subtype biomarkers with response to therapy. Methods: Eligible pts ≥18 years old have evaluable, histologically confirmed extrapulmonary NEC, Zubrod PS ≤2, and are allowed to have up to 1 cycle of P/E prior to enrollment. P (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, iv) on day 1, E 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3, and atezolizumab 1200 mg iv on day 1 of q21 day cycles. Pts are randomized to 1 of 3 arms: A) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> maintenance atezolizumab B) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> observation C) Induction P/E -> observation. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS, from randomization) between arms in a fixed sequence: A vs C -> B vs C -> A vs B. Secondary objectives include comparing OS (from start of maintenance/observation), progression free survival, response rate, duration of response, and safety/tolerability across arms. Tumor and blood samples will be banked for future biomarker analyses, including immunohistochemistry of transcription factors on tissue and whole exome sequencing on tumor and circulating tumor DNA. With 189 pts (168 eligible), the study has 84% power to detect an improvement in 12-months OS from 35% to 57.5% (HR 0.53). This study was activated December 2021 with 3 pts enrolled over 1 year due to restricting enrollment of NEC of small cell histology only. The protocol was amended in January 2023 to broaden eligibility to all NEC subtypes (small cell, large cell, and undefined histology with Ki-67 ≥55%). As of January 2024, 35 patients have been enrolled. A protocol amendment is planned to remove the need for Ki-67 index for NEC of genitourinary origin to improve accrual. 1. Horn L, et al. N Engl J Med 2018. 2. Gay CM, et al. Cancer Cell 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05058651 .

Abstract Background Risk of bias (RoB) tools are critical in systematic reviews and affect subsequent decision‐making. RoB tools should have adequate interrater reliability and interconsensus agreement. We present an approach of post hoc evaluation of RoB tools using duplicated studies that overlap systematic reviews. Methods Using a back‐citation approach, we identified systematic reviews that used the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies‐of Interventions (ROBINS‐I) tool and retrieved all the included primary studies. We selected studies that were appraised by more than one systematic review and calculated observed agreement and unweighted kappa comparing the different systematic reviews' assessments. Results We identified 903 systematic reviews that used the tool with 51,676 cited references, from which we eventually analyzed 171 duplicated studies assessed using ROBINS‐I by different systematic reviewers. The observed agreement on ROBINS‐I domains ranged from 54.9% (missing data domain) to 70.3% (deviations from intended interventions domain), and was 63.0% for overall RoB assessment of the study. Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.131 (measurement of outcome domain) to 0.396 (domains of confounding and deviations from intended interventions), and was 0.404 for overall RoB assessment of the study. Conclusion A post hoc evaluation of RoB tools is feasible by focusing on duplicated studies that overlap systematic review. ROBINS‐I assessments demonstrated considerable variation in interconsensus agreement among various systematic reviewes that assessed the same study and outcome, suggesting the need for more intensive upfront work to calibrate systematic reviewers on how to identify context‐specific information and agree on how to judge it.

Abstract Context Low vitamin D status is common and is associated with various common medical conditions. Objective To support the development of the Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guideline on Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease. Methods We searched multiple databases for studies that addressed 14 clinical questions prioritized by the guideline panel. Of the 14 questions, 10 clinical questions assessed the effect of vitamin D vs no vitamin D in the general population throughout the lifespan, during pregnancy, and in adults with prediabetes; 1 question assessed dosing; and 3 questions addressed screening with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess certainty of evidence. Results Electronic searches yielded 37 007 citations, from which we included 151 studies. In children and adolescents, low-certainty evidence suggested reduction in respiratory tract infections with empiric vitamin D. There was no significant effect on select outcomes in healthy adults aged 19 to 74 years with variable certainty of evidence. There was a very small reduction in mortality among adults older than 75 years with high certainty of evidence. In pregnant women, low-certainty evidence suggested possible benefit on various maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. In adults with prediabetes, moderate certainty of evidence suggested reduction in the rate of progression to diabetes. Administration of high-dose intermittent vitamin D may increase falls, compared to lower-dose daily dosing. We did not identify trials on the benefits and harms of screening with serum 25(OH)D. Conclusion The evidence summarized in this systematic review addresses the benefits and harms of vitamin D for the prevention of disease. The guideline panel considered additional information about individuals’ and providers’ values and preferences and other important decisional and contextual factors to develop clinical recommendations.

Background: In animal studies, scallop consumption has been shown to reduce atherosclerotic aortic burden, body weight, visceral adipose tissue, serum lipid, and leptin levels. Data in human models, however, is scarce. We aim to assess baseline demographic and cardiovascular health characteristics of scallop consumers and compare them to non-scallop consumers in the United States. Methods: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data between 1999 and 2016 were analyzed. This descriptive analysis compares baseline characteristics and cardiovascular health risk between scallop-consumers and non-consumers using demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, dietary and lifestyle factors. Results: Of the total 4,177 individuals in this cross-sectional analysis, 11.6% of individuals report consuming scallops. The data show older individuals tended to consume scallops (p <0.001). Caucasian ethnicity was associated with scallop consumption (p< 0.0001), while Mexican Americans had a significantly negative association with scallop consumption (p< 0.0001). Scallop consumption was more common among married and divorced individuals (p<0.0001)). Regarding medical comorbidities, more scallop consumers had baseline underlying coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia as compared to those who did not consume (p= 0.0026, p< 0.0001, p=0.0023, p<0.0001). There was notably no significant association with baseline congestive heart failure, asthma or stroke history, and scallop consumption. Conclusion: Scallop consumption is likely associated with the prevalence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Prospective studies and clinical trials are needed to determine further the relationship between scallop consumption and cardiovascular health risk.

Introduction: Current dietary guidelines no longer recommend against egg consumption despite the high cholesterol content. However, considerable controversy remains on the relationship between high egg consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the association between egg consumption and CVD events. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from database inception through April 2015 for observational studies with hazard ratio (HRs) or relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) that reported the association between egg consumption and CVD events which included coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. Data were extracted by one reviewer followed by independent screening and extraction of study characteristics and outcome data by two other reviewers. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool the hazard ratios or relative risks from the included studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. The quality of the included studies and publication bias were assessed. Results: We identified 5 cross-sectional and 6 prospective studies with median follow-up of 13.1 years. A total of 301,339 individuals and 10,262 total CVD events were included with 7,225 CHD and 3,037 stroke cases. Compared to consumption of less than 1 egg/day, higher egg consumption was associated with an increased risk of CVD events (pooled HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; p=0.012; I 2 = 65.7% and pooled RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.34; p=0.145; I 2 = 41.4%). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that higher consumption of eggs (more than 1 egg/day) may be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Large and diverse prospective community-based cohorts will be necessary to establish optimal dietary recommendations for public health.

Abstract Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Despite extensive data supporting its use, outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity groups are limited. Here, we report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in patients with R/R LBCL by race and ethnicity in both real-world and clinical trial settings. In the real-world setting, 1290 patients who received axi-cel between 2017 and 2020 were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database; 106 and 169 patients were included from the ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 trials, respectively. Overall survival was consistent across race/ethnicity groups. However, non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had lower overall response rate (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63) and lower complete response rate (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97) than NH White patients. NH Black patients also had a shorter progression-free survival vs NH White (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90) and NH Asian patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59). NH Asian patients had a longer duration of response than NH White (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) and Hispanic patients (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). There was no difference in cytokine release syndrome by race/ethnicity; however, higher rates of any-grade immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in NH White patients than in other patients. These results provide important context when treating patients with R/R LBCL with CAR T-cell therapy across different racial and ethnic groups. ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: #NCT02348216 and #NCT03391466, respectively) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Abstract Aims Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has become increasingly recognized. It accounts for &lt;1-4% of acute coronary syndrome presentations. Overall, however, it makes up over 40% of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. Furthermore, pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is described to have a greater degree of clinical manifestations, including left ventricular dysfunction, shock, and left main or multivessel involvement. The findings are disconcerting, though many studies evaluating P-SCAD are based on case series data or are single centre studies. Methods and results The aim of this study was to evaluate a larger national dataset to evaluate the outcomes of SCAD and specifically P-SCAD in an attempt to better characterize the severity and clinical nature of this condition. To conduct this study, we analysed the National Readmission Database from January 2016 to December 2020. Propensity matching was done using the Greedy 1:1 method. Multivariate logistics and time-to-event Cox regression analysis models were built by including all confounders significantly associated with the outcome on univariable analysis with a cut-off P-value of 0.2. In multivariate regression analysis, P-SCAD patients had a non-propensity matched odds ratio (OR) of 0.21 (0.3-1.54, P = 0.123) of dying and a propensity matched OR of 0.11 (0.02-0.61, P = 0.012) of dying. Thirty-day readmission rate for P-SCAD was 15.8% (n = 93) and for non-pregnant spontaneous coronary artery dissection (NP-SCAD) was 11.2% (n = 2286); non-propensity matched OR for readmission for PSCAD patients was 1.68 (1.24-2.29, P = 0.001) and propensity matched OR was 3.39 (1.93-5.97, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patient, P–SCAD was associated with similar clinical outcomes and reduced incidence of death when compared with NP–SCAD, though had higher rates of 30–day readmission. Larger–scale observational data will be needed to ascertain the true incidence of cardiovascular complications as it relates to P–SCAD.

Abstract Background Pancreatic cysts (PC) are increasingly detected through abdominal imaging, prompting exploration of alternatives such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst ablation (EUS-PCA) due to the risks and costs associated with surgery. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of EUS-PCA's short-term efficacy and complications for PC management. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and TRIP electronic databases. The primary outcome was cyst resolution (partial and complete) and persistence on imaging 12 months after ablation. The secondary outcome was procedure-related adverse events. Results Eight studies were eligible for analysis. Complete cyst resolution on imaging 12 months after EUS ablation was 50% [95% CI 36, 63, I2 = 85.31%]. Partial cyst resolution was 27% [95% CI 15, 41, I2 = 87.07%], and cyst persistence was 17% [95% CI 11, 24, I2 = 62.11%]. The rate of complete resolution varied depending on the treatment agent (for ethanol 29% [95% CI 10, 53], lauromacrogol 51% [95% Cl 36, 67], ethanol and paclitaxel 63% [95% CI 48, 76], paclitaxel and gemcitabine 67% [95% CI 45, 83], ethanol, paclitaxel and gemcitabine 61% [95% CI 39, 80]). Post-procedure adverse events included abdominal pain in 4% [95% CI 0, 11], pancreatitis in 3% [95% CI 1, 5], and fever in 1% [95% CI 0, 3] of all patients. Conclusion The treatment of pancreatic cysts with EUS ablation results in acceptable levels of complete resolution, and low incidence of severe adverse events. The effectiveness of this treatment is further enhanced when chemoablative agents are employed.