Citations

Abstract High-risk breast lesions (HRLs) encompass a heterogeneous group of pathologies that coexist with an adjacent or synchronous malignancy, confer an increased risk of future breast cancer, or warrant surgical consideration because of upgrade potential or local behavior. Despite their clinical importance, management of HRLs remains variable. The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) and the Society of Breast Imaging are collaborating to establish unified, evidence-based guidelines for managing these lesions. While these recommendations are currently in development, this review summarizes the existing literature and current guidance, including ASBrS recommendations, to provide context for multidisciplinary management. The article reviews the histopathologic features, imaging appearance, and management strategies for HRLs, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), papillomas with and without atypia, radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion (RS/CSL), mucocele-like lesion (MLL), desmoid tumor, and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH). Recent literature supports nonoperative management for specific radiologic-pathologic concordant lesions, particularly limited ADH, pure FEA, and pure RS, highlighting the important role of multidisciplinary discussion for personalized care. Lesions such as LCIS subtypes, papilloma with atypia, and MLL with atypia continue to warrant excision due to higher reported upgrade rates to malignancy. Beyond short-term management, HRLs such as ADH, ALH, and LCIS serve as biomarkers of long-term breast cancer risk, informing recommendations for surveillance, risk assessment, and chemoprevention counseling. Achieving a consensus among radiology, pathology, and surgical disciplines is essential to ensure oncologic safety while minimizing overtreatment in the era of precision breast care.

Abstract Aim This study aims to assess the treatment burden and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods Online survey on experienced treatment burden (Treatment Burden Questionnaire, TBQ, 0–150, higher scores indicate higher burden) and HRQoL (Type 1 Diabetes and Life questionnaire for ages 18–25 and 26–45, T1DAL, 0–100, higher scores indicate better HRQoL) among Dutch young adults with T1D (aged 18–30). Results In total, 294 young adults with T1D completed the survey. Mean TBQ score was 59.5 (SD = 24.9). Regular medical care reminding participants of their health problems scored highest. Mean T1DAL scores were 55.9 (SD = 12.9) for ages 18–25, and 62.1 (SD = 13.2) for ages 26–30. Lowest scores were in the subcategory ‘Emotional experiences and daily activities’ (18–25: median = 41.7, IQR = 24.9; 26–30: median = 47.8, IQR = 22.5). TBQ was strongly negatively correlated with T1DAL ( r = −0.69, 95% CI [−0.74, −0.62], p < 0.001). Characteristics associated with higher treatment burden and lower HRQoL included female gender, lower time in range and dissatisfaction with diabetes management approach. Conclusion Young adults with T1D report considerable treatment burden and moderate HRQoL, suggesting a high impact of diabetes care on their lives. Treatment burden is particularly affected by regular medical care activities, whereas diabetes affects the daily functioning and emotional experiences domains of HRQoL. Further research is needed to understand how young adults make care fit and to improve care for these patients, resulting in minimally disruptive care plans. While cautiously interpreted, this may be especially relevant for women and those with adverse clinical outcomes.

Abstract Background Wide-spread mast cell (MC)-associated symptoms and MC activation syndrome (MCAS) are often reported in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). The goal of this study was to develop a novel MC score based on 11 self-reported MC-related conditions with clinical and research utility to better understand MC symptoms in hEDS and HSD patients. Methods From November 1, 2019, to June 13, 2025, patients ( n =2,141) filled out an Intake Questionnaire at the Mayo Clinic Florida EDS Clinic that included 11 self-reported questions related to categories of MC-related conditions for a MC score ranging from 0/11 to 11/11. Based on the MC score distribution in hEDS and HSD patients, a MC score of 0-1 was considered a low MC score and ≥5 was considered a high MC score. Symptoms/comorbidities were compared between patients with high vs. low MC scores. Results From the 2,141 hEDS/HSD patients, 535 (25.0%) had a MC score ≥5 (Hi MC). MCAS-specific symptoms such as nausea and vomiting were reported more often in hEDS/HSD patients with a high vs. low MC score ( p <0.0001). Random clinical blood tryptase and urinary MC markers were not elevated in patients with high MC scores ( n =50/group), although high MC scores were found to significantly reduce urinary creatinine levels indicating that the protein used to normalize data was affected by MC activity. In contrast, random blood IgE, tryptase and major basic protein (MBP) by ELISA were increased in patients with high MC scores (e.g., IgE hEDS p =0.0004, HSD p =0.003). Of note, the percentage of patients reporting abuse or post-traumatic stress disorder was nearly doubled in patients with high vs. low MC scores (Abuse and PTSD: hEDS p < 0.0001; HSD p < 0.0001). Overall, 109/135 (80.7%) in hEDS and 129/135 (95.6%) in HSD reported more symptoms/comorbidities if they had a high MC score. Conclusions We found that hEDS/HSD patients with high MC scores self-reported more widespread symptoms/comorbidities and higher MC-related blood markers than patients with low MC scores indicating the utility of this tool to evaluate the level of widespread MC activity in hEDS, HSD and other patients.

Abstract Background Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and preterm labor (PTL) are adverse obstetrical outcomes that are strongly associated with cervical high-risk human papilloma virus (cHPV) infection at the time of pregnancy. Persistent cHPV may lead to oncogenic changes in the cervico-vaginal tract and can cause inflammation in gestational tissues, but it is unknown how persistent cHPV infection may affect obstetrical outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether persistent cHPV infection is associated with recurrent PPROM or PTL among patients with a prior spontaneous preterm birth due to PPROM/PTL, and to examine clinical and pathologic characteristics of cHPV infection in this population. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients delivering at Mayo Clinic Rochester or Mayo Clinic Health System (5/1/2018–12/31/2023). Eligible patients had ≥ 1 spontaneous preterm birth due to PPROM/PTL and positive cHPV testing. Demographics and pregnancy outcomes from index and subsequent pregnancies were abstracted. Persistent cHPV was defined as > 1 pregnancy with positive cHPV testing. Results Of 191 index pregnancies, 90 (47.1%) and 30 (33.3%) had one and two subsequent pregnancies, respectively. Patients were predominantly White (91.3%), non‑Hispanic (94.2%), non-smokers (72.0%), and 34.8% were unvaccinated for HPV. Approximately one‑third (31%) experienced recurrent PPROM/PTL in the second pregnancy, with recurrence in 40.7% of those with persistent cHPV and 27.4% without (p = 0.69). Excisional procedures occurred before 12.0% of index pregnancies and 20–24% of subsequent pregnancies; recurrence of PTL/PPROM remained high regardless of procedure history. HPV strain data were available for 132 index pregnancies, and types 16 and 18 were more likely to persist into a subsequent pregnancy (p = 0.0043). CIN persistence occurred at similar rates in patients with and without persistent cHPV infection. Placental inflammation rates were high in both patients with persistent and non-persistent cHPV. Conclusion Recurrent PPROM/PTL, CIN persistence, and placental inflammation were common; a finding independent of persistent cHPV infection, excisional procedure history, or HPV vaccination status. These findings suggest that factors other than cHPV persistence may play a larger role in recurrent preterm birth. Larger studies with higher cHPV prevalence and subsequent pregnancies are needed to provide clarity.

Ziftomenib - a potent, selective, oral menin inhibitor - is approved as monotherapy for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (NPM1-m AML). The KOMET-007 phase 1 trial investigated clinical activity and tolerability of ziftomenib in combination with standard therapies for R/R and newly diagnosed AML. Here, we report outcomes of adults with R/R NPM1-m AML treated with ziftomenib plus venetoclax/azacitidine. In phase 1a, patients received ziftomenib 200, 400, or 600 mg once daily with standard doses of venetoclax/azacitidine. In phase 1b, ziftomenib 600 mg was selected for expansion. Sixty-seven patients were treated (27 phase 1a; 40 phase 1b). Median age was 66 years, and 55% were men. Median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-8); 55% received prior venetoclax and 22% had prior transplantation. Most common (≥20%) grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (28%), febrile neutropenia and neutropenia (25% each). Six patients developed QTc prolongation (1 ziftomenib-related; grade 1), and 2 experienced differentiation syndrome (grade 3); all events were successfully managed. In patients receiving ziftomenib 600 mg, composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 46% (22/48), with 67% (12/18) achieving central measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity (&lt;0.01% threshold). In venetoclax-naïve and -exposed patients, CRc rates were 70% (16/23) and 24% (6/25), with MRD-negativity rates of 75% (9/12) and 50% (3/6), respectively. Median duration of response was 8.6 months, and median overall survival was not reached. The combination of ziftomenib 600 mg with venetoclax/azacitidine was well tolerated with deep and durable clinical activity in R/R NPM1-m AML. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT05735184.

Abstract Epilepsy affects more than 50 million individuals globally and has a substantial genetic component that remains to be completely understood. Traditional studies have focused on severe, early onset cases enrolled through clinical or research settings. Recent biobank‐based approaches, leveraging large‐scale population datasets, offer opportunities to explore genetic associations in broader epilepsy phenotypes, including milder, later onset forms. We analyzed data from more than 750 000 individuals across the UK Biobank, All of Us, and Massachusetts General Brigham Biobank, including 20 026 individuals with epilepsy. Rare coding variant burden testing revealed a significant association with LGI1 , a known epilepsy gene. Among the other top 10 associated genes, seven had prior evidence linking them to epilepsy ( GABRG2 , ATP1A3 ), neurological disorders with comorbid seizures ( HTRA2 , KRIT1 , STAG1 ), possible involvement in seizure phenotypes ( ADAM23 ), or roles in neuronal function ( PDCD4 ). Thus, we provide the first statistical evidence for ADAM23 as a candidate gene for epilepsy, based on the suggestive association signal combined with prior biological evidence from both animal (canine and murine) and one recent human epilepsy case study, potentially contributing to human epilepsy through its direct interaction with LGI1 . Phenome‐wide analyses highlighted the pleiotropic effects of epilepsy genes, with LGI1 and ADAM23 predominantly associated with epilepsy, whereas other genes such as KRIT1 , TSC1 , and TSC2 exhibited broader systemic involvement. Our study shows the potential of population‐scale genomic data and suggests that integrating these datasets with deep phenotyping will uncover more novel insights into epilepsy genetics in the future.

Introduction Parkinson's disease (PD) and Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by alpha-synuclein pathology. As current therapies largely target symptoms, there is a clear need for disease-modifying treatments. Emerging evidence links these disorders to glucose metabolism dysregulation, suggesting antidiabetic agents may hold therapeutic potential. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study involving 12 subjects with PD or DLB to evaluate the tolerability and preliminary effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor (sitagliptin 100 mg) vs. sodium glucose like transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor (dapagliflozin 10 mg) over a 4-week period, compared to a placebo. We assessed changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) scores, cognitive function, and autonomic biomarkers. Both sitagliptin and dapagliflozin were well-tolerated, with no adverse events. While no significant changes were observed in cognitive scores, a significant difference was found in the change from baseline for MDS-UPDRS part 1 ( P = 0.008), part 2 ( P = 0.020), and total scores ( P = 0.047) when comparing the three groups. Discussion The dapagliflozin group showed more favorable trends in MDS-UPDRS scores. Limitations include small study size and duration as well as all participants had PD except one subject in the DPP4 inhibitor group with DLB. This pilot study suggests that these inhibitors are safe in PD and DLB patients. The preliminary findings, particularly the trends in the dapagliflozin group, provide a basis for larger-scale, long-term studies to confirm these potential symptomatic benefits and explore disease-modifying effects. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06263673 , identifier: NCT06263673.

ABSTRACT Purpose To explore the opioid decision‐making process of prescribers in primary care, surgery, and subspecialty pain management. Methods This was a multistage qualitative‐qualitative study with clinicians involved in opioid prescribing and management from a single healthcare organization with locations in Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and Wisconsin. Clinicians in this study included physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) practicing in primary care, surgery, or pain medicine. The interview guide was organized in three domains of a conceptual model for opioid use: (1) prescriber characteristics, (2) patient characteristics, and (3) practice environment characteristics. Individual interviews ( N = 20) were performed first, and data were summarized using a rapid template‐based approach. Subsequently, focus groups (FGs) ( N = 4) were conducted with an additional 21 clinicians to confirm and explore interview results. Data from interviews and FGs were analyzed using a common codebook. Results Findings were organized as decision factors into the three domains. Factors in the prescriber domain included characteristics such as formal pain management training, as well as factors that influenced knowledge and beliefs (e.g., advice from or observation of supervising clinicians and expert colleagues). Decision factors in the patient domain included patient pain etiology, comorbid medical or mental health conditions, and demographic characteristics. Clinicians' perceptions of these factors, such as viewing older age as having lesser risk for opioid misuse, influenced prescribing decisions. Clinicians also described challenges associated with “legacy patients” whose therapy was previously managed by a different clinician. Primary care clinicians, in particular, expressed difficulties managing post‐surgical or trauma‐related pain after care transition. Relevant decision factors reported by prescribers in the practice environment domain included guidelines and practice oversight. Most participants reported practicing in an environment that promoted conservative opioid use and having access to standardized institutional guidelines that reduced perceived decision‐making burden. Clinicians described how they used prescribing guidelines to help them communicate with patients about opioid use and prescribing decisions. Conclusions Intersecting prescriber, patient, and practice environment factors shape opioid analgesic prescribing decisions. Available resources in the practice environment, including peer input and institutional guidelines, may support clinician decision‐making and conversations with patients at the point of care, including in cases where patients have complex histories or personal characteristics that influence decision making.