Citations

Clear

114 citation(s) found for "Weller, M".

A Phase II Trial of 200% ProMACE-CytaBOM in Patients With Previously Untreated Aggressive Lymphomas: Analysis of Response, Toxicity, and Dose Intensity
Young, Mary Lynn, Weller, Edie, Glick, John H., Ghosh, Chirantan, Flynn, Patrick J. , Cassileth, Peter A., Gordon, Leo I. , Young, Mary, Habermann, Thomas M. , Winter, Jane N.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 11, 2019 | Volume: 94 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 3307-3314

10.1182/blood.v94.10.3307.422k11_3307_3314 Get It

We showed in a phase I trial that the maximum tolerated dose of the ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen in patients with aggressive lymphoma was 200% (Gordon et al, J Clin Oncol 14:1275, 1996). Based on these observations, we initiated a phase II trial designed to determine response, toxicity, and dose intensity using this regimen. We analyzed 74 patients with advanced-stage (III or IV) or bulky stage II aggressive lymphoma. The overall complete response rate was 69% (72% in evaluable patients). With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the median survival has not yet been reached. The 4-year survival rate is 73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62, 83%) and no difference was observed among International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups. The 4-year disease-free survival was 71% (95% CI 58, 84%) with no statistical difference between patients with IPI 0 to 1 versus 2 to 4. The toxicity was acceptable, though the grade 4 hematologic toxicity rate for this regimen was 100%. Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was 36%. Three cases of either myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia occurred at 7 months, 3.4 years, and 4.2 years after registration. Cytogenic analysis was available in two cases, showing inv(16) without French American British classification (FAB) M4 EO histology in one patient and a 5q-syndrome in the other. These data suggest that 200% ProMACE-CytaBOM with either granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF results in a high complete remission rate and a disease-free survival comparable to any prior risk-based analysis in aggressive lymphoma. Before using this regimen in general practice, phase III clinical trials should be conducted.
Differences in Outcomes in Males and Females with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Induction Rituximab and Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Maintenance Rituximab
Morrison, Vicki A., Dakhil, Shaker R. , Weick, James K., Frankel, Stanley R., Gascoyne, Randy D. , Fisher, Richard I., Cheson, Bruce D. , Weller, Edie, Höchster, Howard S. , Horning, Sandra J., Habermann, Thomas M. , Hong, Fangxin , Kahl, Brad S. , Peterson, Bruce A.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 9, 2019 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3705-3705

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3705.3705 Get It

Abstract Abstract 3705 Improved outcomes were reported in USA studies in DLBCL (Habermann et al. J Clin Oncol 2006) in a two-staged randomized study of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone) versus CHOP with a second randomization assignment to maintenance rituximab (MR) or observation (OBS) (E4494) and in follicular lymphoma (FL) in patients in a trial with CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by randomization to MR versus OBS in advanced-stage indolent lymphoma (E1496) (Hochster et al. J Clin Oncol 2009). The details of the treatment regimens have been previously described. The German High Grade Lymphoma Study Group has reported differences between men and women in outcomes in DLBCL with improved outcomes in women treated with rituximab (Müller et al. Blood 2012). Methods: Survival outcomes by sex were analyzed using a stratified weighted cox regression, removing the effect of maintenance rituximab in DLBCL (E4494), and a log-rank test in patients with follicular histology (E1496). A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the differences between males and females together with weight (below or above the median). Wilcoxon test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare medians and proportions, respectively. Results: In DLBCL, there were 273 eligible males and 273 females. The median age was 69 in males and 70 in females. There were no differences in baseline patient characteristics among the male and female populations. 138 males and 129 females were treated with R-CHOP. There was no difference in treatment received, with 83% females and 75.3% males receiving 6 cycles or more of R-CHOP treatment (p=0.14). The complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) rates after RCHOP were higher in females (82.6%) versus males (71.5%) (P = 0.04). With a median follow-up of 9.45 years, the failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were improved in females (P = 0.02, 0.002; HR=0.63, 0.54) compared with males in the R-CHOP group. The outcomes were not different in the CHOP group for FFS (P = 0.81) or OS (P= 0.57) between males and females. Within the R-CHOP group, the failure free survival (FFS) was significantly different between women and men (P = 0.002) and body weight (P = 0.03), but only female sex (P = 0.001) was significant and not weight (P = 0.26) for OS. Of 282 evaluable patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma who received initial treatment with CVP, 115 patients were randomly assigned to MR and 113 to OBS. 120 patients were male, and 108 were female. The median age was 58 years in the MR arm and 54 years in the OBS arm. At a median follow-up of 8.04 years, MR markedly improved the PFS (P=0.003) compared with OBS. There were no differences in PFS (P= 0.17) between males and females treated with MR or OS (P = 0.27). In conclusion, in induction therapy with rituximab in DLBCL there is a sex dependent effect with rituximab with males benefiting less than females. In contrast, in patients with follicular lymphoma treated with chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab, there were no differences. The differences in outcomes in patients of different sex with DLBCL treated with immunochemotherapy and FL treated with maintenance rituximab will require further analysis of multiple clinical and biologic variables. Disclosures: Fisher: Roche: Advisory Board Other. Cheson:Genentech: Consultancy. Kahl:Genentech, Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Horning:Genetech, Roche: Employment, stock (Roche) Other.
OS7.4 Calculating the net clinical benefit in brain tumor clinical trials by combining survival and health-related quality of life data using two methods: quality adjusted survival effect sizes (QASES) and joint modelling (JM)
Coomans, Marijke B , Bottomley, Andrew , Bent, Martin J. van den , Sloan, Jeff A. , Reijneveld, Jaap C. , Taphoorn, Martin , Baumert, Brigitta G. , Coens, Corneel , Gorlia, T., Herrlinger, Ulrich , Keime-Guibert, Florence, Martinelli, Francesca , Talacchi, Andrea , van den Bent, Martin J , Dirven, Linda , Stupp, Roger , Weller, Michael , Aaronson, Neil K. , Brandes, Alba Ariela , Chinot, Olivier , Gorlia, Thierry, Malmström, Annika , Wick, Wolfgang

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | September 6, 2019 | Volume: 21 | Issue: Supplement_3 | Pages: iii14-iii15

10.1093/neuonc/noz126.047 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND The impact of treatment on both the quality and the quantity of life, i.e. the ‘net clinical benefit’, should be considered to inform glioma patients and facilitate shared decision making. We applied two methods (i.e. Quality Adjusted Effect Sizes (QASES) and Joint Modelling (JM)) that combine survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data into one outcome, to gain insight in the net clinical benefit of a treatment strategy. In addition, we assessed if both methods result in similar interpretations. MATERIAL AND METHODS We calculated the net clinical benefit in one randomized controlled trial, EORTC 26951 comparing radiotherapy (RT) + PCV chemotherapy versus RT alone, as a proof of concept for other trials. With the QASES method, effect sizes for differences in survival and HRQoL between treatment arms were calculated. Next, the combined effect size can be determined by weighing the emphasis put on survival or HRQoL (e.g. survival more important). JM allows simultaneous modeling of a longitudinal outcome (HRQoL), and a time-to event outcome (survival). HRQoL scales/items that were selected for primary analysis in the main study were also selected for this analysis: fatigue, global health, social functioning, communication deficit, seizures, physical functioning, and nausea/vomiting. RESULTS 288/386 patients completed baseline HRQoL forms and were included in the analysis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with combined treatment (difference of 10.8 months). In contrast, the percentage of patients who experienced a clinically relevant deterioration (≥10 points) in nausea/vomiting, fatigue, social functioning and global health up to one year after treatment compared to baseline was larger in the RT+PCV arm. The QASES corresponded to a reduction in the median OS difference from 10.8 months to 6.8 months when adjusted for the HRQoL scales/items, when given equal weights to OS and HRQoL. JM analyses resulted in a theoretical loss of treatment effect in OS of 2–6% when adjusting for HRQoL. CONCLUSION Both methods showed that adjusting for the impact of treatment on a relevant HRQoL parameter reduced the survival benefit in the experimental treatment arm compared to standard treatment arm. Applying these methods may facilitate communicating the impact of treatment to patients in clinical practice.
Lipid droplet size directs lipolysis and lipophagy catabolism in hepatocytes
Schott, Micah B. , Weller, Shaun G. , Schulze, Ryan J. , Krueger, Eugene W. , Drizyte‐Miller, Kristina , Casey, Carol A. , McNiven, Mark A. , Casey, Carol A , Schott, Micah B , Drizyte-Miller, Kristina

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cell Biology | August 7, 2019 | Volume: 218 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 3320-3335

10.1083/jcb.201803153 | PMID 31391210 Get It

Lipid droplet (LD) catabolism in hepatocytes is mediated by a combination of lipolysis and a selective autophagic mechanism called lipophagy, but the relative contributions of these seemingly distinct pathways remain unclear. We find that inhibition of lipolysis, lipophagy, or both resulted in similar overall LD content but dramatic differences in LD morphology. Inhibition of the lipolysis enzyme adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) resulted in large cytoplasmic LDs, whereas lysosomal inhibition caused the accumulation of numerous small LDs within the cytoplasm and degradative acidic vesicles. Combined inhibition of ATGL and LAL resulted in large LDs, suggesting that lipolysis targets these LDs upstream of lipophagy. Consistent with this, ATGL was enriched in larger-sized LDs, whereas lipophagic vesicles were restricted to small LDs as revealed by immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and Western blot of size-separated LDs. These findings provide new evidence indicating a synergistic relationship whereby lipolysis targets larger-sized LDs to produce both size-reduced and nascently synthesized small LDs that are amenable for lipophagic internalization.
Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials
Lee, Eudocia Q. , Chukwueke, Ugonma , Hervey‐Jumper, Shawn L. , Leone, José Pablo , Chang, Susan M. , Arons, David, Oliver, Kathy , Verble, Kay, Musella, Al , Willmarth, Nicole E. , Doherty, Lisa, Gaffey, Sarah, Halkin, Thomas, Friday, Bret Edward Buckley, Fouladi, Maryam , Macdonald, David R., Peñas-Prado, Marta , Vogelbaum, Michael A. , Sahebjam, Solmaz , Sandak, David, Bent, Martin J. van den , Weller, Michael , Reardon, David A. , Wen, Patrick Y. , Galanis, Evanthia , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Groot, John de , Armstrong, Terri S. , Chang, Susan Marina , Alexander, Brian M. , Bates, Amanda, Lin, Nancy U. , Mehta, Minesh P. , Wen, Patrick Yung

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | June 7, 2019 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/neuonc/noz104 | PMID 31175826 Get It

Abstract Many factors contribute to the poor survival of malignant brain tumor patients, some of which are not easily remedied. However, one contributor to the lack of progress that may be modifiable is poor clinical trial accrual. Surveys of brain tumor patients and neuro-oncology providers suggest that clinicians do a poor job of discussing clinical trials with patients and referring patients for clinical trials. Yet, data from the Cancer Action Network of the American Cancer Society suggest that most eligible oncology patients asked to enroll on a clinical trial will agree to do so. To this end, the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) in collaboration with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, including the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC), and other partners are working together with the intent to double clinical trial accrual over the next 5 years. Here we describe the factors contributing to poor clinical trial accrual in neuro-oncology and offer possible solutions.
Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials.
Lee, Eudocia Q. , Chukwueke, Ugonma , Hervey‐Jumper, Shawn L. , Groot, John Frederick De, Leone, José Pablo , Chang, Susan M. , Arons, David, Oliver, Kathy , Friday, Bret Edward Buckley, Penas‐Prado, Marta, Vogelbaum, Michael A. , Sahebjam, Solmaz , Bent, Martin J. van den , Reardon, David A. , Wen, Patrick Y. , van den Bent, Martin J , Armstrong, Terri S. , Chang, Susan Marina , Galanis, Evanthia , Lin, Nancy U. , Mehta, Minesh P. , Peñas-Prado, Marta , Weller, Michael , Wen, Patrick Yung

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2024-2024

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.2024 Get It

2024 Background: A major impediment to improving neuro-oncology outcomes is poor clinical trial accrual. Methods: We convened a multi-stakeholder group including Society for Neuro-Oncology, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners to determine how we can improve trial accrual. Results: We describe selected factors contributing to poor trial accrual and possible solutions. Conclusions: We will implement strategies with the intent to double trial accrual over the next 5 years. [Table: see text]
Association of rs613872 and Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion in the TCF4 Gene of German Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Okumura, Naoki , Hayashi, Ryousuke, Nakano, Masakazu , Tashiro, Kei, Yoshii, Kengo, Aleff, Ross A., Butz, Malinda L., Highsmith, Edward W., Wieben, Eric D. , Fautsch, Michael P. , Baratz, Keith H. , Komori, Yuya, Ueda, Emi , Nakahara, Makiko , Weller, Julia M. , Tourtas, Theofilos , Schlötzer‐Schrehardt, Ursula , Kruse, Friedrich E., Koizumi, Noriko , Aleff, Ross, Butz, Malinda

Mayo Clinic

Cornea | April 9, 2019 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 799-805

10.1097/ico.0000000000001952 | PMID 30973406 Get It

Purpose: To investigate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and trinucleotide repeat (TNR) expansion in the transcription factor 4 (TCF4) gene in a large cohort of German patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods: Genomic DNA was obtained from 398 patients with FECD and from 58 non-FECD controls. Thirty-seven previously reported SNPs were evaluated by genotyping. The 398 FECD samples were analyzed for TNR expansions by short tandem repeat assays and Southern blotting. The possible associations between the TNR length and clinical parameters (age, sex, visual acuity, and central corneal thickness) were analyzed in 132 patients. Results: The SNPs in COL8A2, TCF8, LOXHD1, and AGBL1 showed no heterogeneity in 36 cases, although SLCA411 showed 3 nonsense mutations. SNPs were detected for TCF4 (rs613872, rs2123392, rs17089887, rs1452787, and rs1348047), but only rs613872 showed a significant association with FECD (P = 9.93 × 10−12). Overall, 315/398 (79%) patients harbored TNR lengths >50, whereas no non-FECD controls harbored TNR lengths >50. The TCF4 SNP rs613872 genotype was TT: 39 (67%), TG: 18 (31%), and GG: 1 (2%) in non-FECD controls; TT: 39 (47%), TG: 38 (46%), and GG: 6 (7%) in FECD cases harboring TNR <50; and TT: 23 (8%), TG: 224 (79%), and GG: 38 (13%) in FECD cases harboring TNR >50 (P = 2.93 × 10−25). No significant association was detected between the TNR length and clinical parameters. Conclusions: Our large German cohort demonstrated a significant association between the risk allele G in rs613872 and FECD, irrespective of TNR expansion, although this risk allele was more frequent in FECD cases with TNR expansion than without.
Pancreatic tumor cell metastasis is restricted by MT1-MMP binding protein MTCBP-1
Li, Qiang , Cao, Hong , Chen, Jing , Weller, Shaun G. , Krueger, Eugene W. , Zhang, Lizhi , Razidlo, Gina L. , McNiven, Mark A. , Qiang, Li , Razidlo, Gina L , Chen, Jing

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cell Biology | November 28, 2018 | Volume: 218 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 317-332

10.1083/jcb.201802032 | PMID 30487181 Get It

The process by which tumor cells mechanically invade through surrounding stroma into peripheral tissues is an essential component of metastatic dissemination. The directed recruitment of the metalloproteinase MT1-MMP to invadopodia plays a critical role in this invasive process. Here, we provide mechanistic insight into MT1-MMP cytoplasmic tail binding protein 1 (MTCBP-1) with respect to invadopodia formation, matrix remodeling, and invasion by pancreatic tumor cells. MTCBP-1 localizes to invadopodia and interacts with MT1-MMP. We find that this interaction displaces MT1-MMP from invadopodia, thereby attenuating their number and function and reducing the capacity of tumor cells to degrade matrix. Further, we observe an inverse correlation between MTCBP-1 and MT1-MMP expression both in cultured cell lines and human pancreatic tumors. Consistently, MTCBP-1–expressing cells show decreased ability to invade in vitro and metastasize in vivo. These findings implicate MTCBP-1 as an inhibitor of the metastatic process.
Quantifying the benefit of chemotherapy and radiation in low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of numbers needed to treat.
Bota, Daniela A. , Maher, Elizabeth A. , Aregawi, Dawit , Brown, Paul D. , Buckner, Jan C. , Bent, Martin J. van den , Glantz, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Brown, Timothy J. , Liau, Linda M. , Weller, Michael , Berger, Mitchel S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2057-2057

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.2057 Get It

2057 Background: The optimal role of chemotherapy and radiation (RT) in adult low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade 1 & 2) is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of the literature on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with LGG. Methods: Pubmed was queried with MeSH terms. All comparative studies of adults with newly diagnosed, supratentorial LGG were included. Comparisons of interest were OS and PFS at 2, 5, and 10 years in chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and early RT versus delayed or no RT. Data were extracted from studies and synthesized with a random effects model. Quality of evidence was determined by American Academy of Neurology criteria and further analysis was performed, separating high quality (class I and II) from low quality (class III and IV) evidence. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) were determined from the risk difference. Results: 1531 articles were screened; 18 studies were included. Chemotherapy was not associated with a significant survival advantage compared to control. However, an analysis of high quality data revealed a survival advantage at 10 years associated with chemotherapy compared to control with NNT 5 (relative risk death chemo vs control 0.69 [0.56-0.86] p = 0.0006). Furthermore, NNT to prevent one progression with chemotherapy at 5 and 10 years was 6 and 3, respectively. Early RT was not associated with an OS advantage compared to control. However, early RT had progression benefit at all time points, with NNT of 10, 6, and 5 at 2, 5, and 10 years. Conclusions: Further study will be needed to confirm the optimal role of chemotherapy and RT. Caution must be used in interpretation as much of the literature consists of low-quality studies. [Table: see text]
Association of aggressive resection with survival and progression-free survival in adult low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with numbers needed to treat.
Bota, Daniela A. , Maher, Elizabeth A. , Aregawi, Dawit , Brown, Paul D. , Buckner, Jan C. , Bent, Martin J. van den , Glantz, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Brown, Timothy J. , Liau, Linda M. , Weller, Michael , Berger, Mitchel S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2025-2025

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.2025 Get It

2025 Background: Low-grade gliomas (LGG) account for 17-22% of all primary brain tumors. Optimal surgical management consists of optimum safe resection with the goal of complete resection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the association of extent of resection with likelihood of survival, expressing our results in numbers needed to treat (NNT). Methods: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to determine the association of resection with overall survival and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed, supratentorial LGG in adults was performed by querying PubMed. Data were extracted to compare gross total resection (GTR) to subtotal resection (STR) and STR to biopsy (Bx) to determine relative risks (RR) of death and progression at 2, 5, and 10 years. Data were analyzed using a random effects model. NNT were calculated from significant comparisons and rounded up to the nearest whole number. Quality of evidence was determined by American Academy of Neurology criteria. Results: The systematic review resulted in 283 potential studies. Ultimately 29 studies were included in at least one comparison. There were no high quality (class I and II) or prospective studies discovered in the review. Comparing GTR to STR, RR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of death at 2, 5, and 10 years, and NNT to avoid one death at 2, 5, and 10 years (GTR vs. STR) were 0.29 [0.17-0.52, p < 0.0001, NNT 17], 0.39 [0.29-0.51, p < 0.00001, NNT 6], and 0.50 [0.35-0.70, p < 0.0001 NNT 4]. RR and NNT for progression (GTR vs. STR) at 2, 5, and 10 years were 0.37 [0.24-0.57, p < 0.0001 NNT 7], 0.50 [0.39-0.64, p < 0.0001 NNT 4], and 0.67 [0.53-0.84, p = 0.0005 NNT 4]. Comparing STR to Bx, RR of death at 2, 5, and 10 years were 0.55 [0.34-0.88, p = 0.01 NNT 10], 0.9 [0.61-1.34], and 0.95 [0.73-1.23]. Conclusions: Increasing resection thresholds appear to be associated with improved overall and progression free survival, but the body of literature consists of low quality studies. Prospective studies are required to explore whether extent of resection matters or whether resectable tumors share a favorable biology associated with better outcome.