Citations

Clear

82 citation(s) found for "Weingarten, Toby N".

Performance Improvement System and Postoperative Corneal Injuries
Martin, David P. , Weingarten, Toby N. , Gunn, Paul W., Kunmoo, Lee, Mahr, Michael A. , Schroeder, Darrell R. , Šprung, Juraj , Weingarten, Toby N , Schroeder, Darrell

Mayo Clinic

Anesthesiology | July 16, 2009 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 320-326

10.1097/aln.0b013e3181ae63f0 | PMID 19602956 Get It

Background The authors' department conducted a performance improvement initiative aimed to reduce the rate of perioperative corneal injuries. This study reports the effects of the initiative and examines the risk factors for corneal injury. Method The rate of corneal injuries during nonophthalmologic procedures under anesthesia was compared between the two time periods: preinitiative baseline (August 1, 2005-December 31, 2005) and initiative period (January 1, 2006-April 30, 2007). To examine the risk factors for corneal injury, a nested case-control study with a 2:1 matched-set design was separately performed and included cases between January 1, 2006 and July 31, 2008. Results During the baseline period, the corneal injury rate was 1.51 per 1,000, and it decreased to 0.79 per 1,000 during the performance initiative (P = 0.008). Independent risk factors were longer anesthetics (odds ratio = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.3 per 30 min), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (odds ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8 for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3-4 vs. 1-2), and student nurse anesthetist as a primary anesthesia provider (odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.0). Conclusion Corneal injury rate in our institution was significantly reduced and remains at low levels long after initiation of perioperative eye care improvement initiative. The higher rate of corneal injuries among student nurse anesthetists highlights the importance of standardizing education and supervision among all anesthesia providers. We believe that our model of performance improvement initiative can be used to improve other perioperative outcomes.
Anesthesia and Patients with Congenital Hyposensitivity to Pain
Weingarten, Toby N. , Ackerman, Joel D., Bojanić, Katarina , Watson, James C. , Dyck, P. James B. , Šprung, Juraj , Weingarten, Toby N

Mayo Clinic

Anesthesiology | July 25, 2006 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 338-345

10.1097/00000542-200608000-00017 | PMID 16871068 Get It

Background Congenital hyposensitivity to pain or hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy represents a variety of disorders characterized by decreased perception of nociception, loss of other modalities of sensation, and variable expression of autonomic dysfunction. Sensory loss, especially that of pain, is associated with self-mutilations that may require frequent operations. Little is known about the safety of anesthesia for these patients. Methods The authors performed a computerized search of the Mayo Clinic medical records database between January 1996 and November 2005 for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain and related disorders who underwent general anesthesia. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, anesthetic techniques and agents, use of opioids, and perioperative complications. In addition, the authors conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to summarize the current knowledge regarding anesthesia for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain, and compared it with the patients with hyposensitivity to pain identified at the Mayo Clinic. Results The authors identified seven patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy II, IV, or V and undefined variants of congenital pain hyposensitivity who generated 17 anesthesia records: 12 for orthopedic operations, 3 for sural nerve biopsies, and 2 for ophthalmologic procedures. In all patients, standard doses of volatile agents were used during anesthesia. Small amounts of opioids were used during the course of eight operations. Most patients experienced mild hypothermia (lowest temperature 34.7 degrees C), and none experienced hyperthermia. All patients were hemodynamically stable during otherwise uneventful anesthesia. During recovery from anesthesia, opioids were given to only one patient, a single dose of 1 mg morphine. Even after major orthopedic operations, the patient did not require additional analgesia. Conclusions The patients with profound congenital hyposensitivity to pain underwent anesthesia without any adverse events. The authors found that despite reduced pain perception, the requirements for volatile anesthetics were within the expected range for population with normal pain perception, but they did not require opioids postoperatively. Intraoperative mild hypothermia was easily managed by adjustment of environmental temperature.