Citations

4130 Background: Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic profiling is an emerging tool for pancreatic cancer. The impact of detected genomic alterations in tumor response to systemic treatments and outcomes is under investigation. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and ctDNA collected at time of initial diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with patients’ demographics, systemic treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 104 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 70.5 years (SD: 8.3), 50% were male, 37% with locally advanced disease and 63% with metastatic disease. Somatic alterations were detected in 84.6 % of the patients, no genetic alterations were detected in 15.4%, and were associated more with locally advanced pancreatic cancer as opposed to metastatic, p = 0.025. 60.6 % of the cohort had ≥ 2 genomic alterations detected. 28% were treated with FOLFIRINOX and 63% with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line systemic treatment. Patients with any detectable genomic alterations when compared to patients with no detectable variant had worse median PFS (6.2 versus 15.3 months, p = 0.005) and patients with ≥ 2 detectable genomic alterations had worse median PFS (5.6 versus 11.0 months, p < 0.001) and worse median OS (11.5 versus 24.2 months, p = 0.001). KRAS was detected in 62.5% of the patients and was associated with PD to systemic treatments (80.4% vs 19.6%, p = 0.006), worse median PFS (5.8 versus 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and worse median OS (11.5 versus 26.3 months, p = 0.002). TP53 was detected in 60% of patients and was associated with worse median PFS (5.9 versus 10.9 months, p = 0.02) and worse median OS (13.5 versus 24.2 months, p = 0.001). CCND2 was detected in 14% of the patients and was associated with worse median PFS (3.6 versus 8.2 months, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our study showed that initial detection of ctDNA may identify different genomic alterations that help predict disease outcomes, confirmation of these findings in larger studies are warranted.

4079 Background: Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds significant promise and is being used for clinical decision making in multiple tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-treatment ctDNA in metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) treated with platinum based first-line chemotherapy treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 67 patients who underwent ctDNA testing before platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment for metastatic BTC. For analysis we considered the detected gene with highest variant allele frequency (VAF). Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with patients’ demographics, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of patients was 67 y/o (27-90). 54 (80.6%) of 67 patients evaluated had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; seven had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and six gallbladder cancer. 46 (68.6%) of the patients were treated with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, 14 (21%) patients received gemcitabine and other platinum (carboplatin or oxaliplatin) combinations while 7 (10.4%) patients were treated on a clinical trial with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus additional targeted agents (CX4945 or PEGPH20). TP53, KRAS, APC, FGFR2 and IDH1 were the genes with highest frequency as dominant clone. The median dominant clone allele frequency (DCAF) was 3% (0-97%). DCAF >3% was associated with statistically significant worse PFS (median PFS: 4.05 vs. 7.70 months, p=0.046) and OS (median OS: 10.8 vs. 18.8 months, p=0.056). Each 1% increase in DCAF is associated with a hazard ratio of 26.21 in OS when adjusting for subtypes, age, treatment type, and CA19-9 [Table]. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic BTC with DCAF > 3% at diagnosis have worse PFS and OS compared to patients with low ctDNA when treated with upfront platinum-based chemotherapy.[Table: see text]

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

Objectives Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been associated with limited efficacy; recent studies suggest CPIs may represent promising treatment for high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods We examined 57 patients with NENs who were treated with CPIs to determine if NETs and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) respond to immunotherapy. Results Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI monotherapy had an objective response rate (ORR) of 0% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–4.6). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on dual CPI therapy had an ORR of 13% and PFS of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.4–not reached [NR]). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI and cytotoxic therapy had an ORR of 36% with PFS of 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.6–NR). Well-differentiated grade 1 and 2 NETs on CPI monotherapy had an ORR of 25% with PFS NR. Well-differentiated grade 3 NETs had 0% ORR with a PFS of 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4–4.2) on CPI monotherapy. Conclusions Checkpoint inhibitor therapy shows limited activity in patients with NENs. Future studies should identify biomarkers that can help identify patients who are likely responders to immunotherapy.

AbstractThrough our involvement in KEYNOTE‐059, we unexpectedly observed durable responses in two patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA) who received ramucirumab (anti‐VEGFR‐2)/paclitaxel after immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). To assess the reproducibility of this observation, we piloted an approach to administer ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI in more patients, and explored changes in the immune microenvironment. Nineteen consecutive patients with mGEA received ICI followed by ramucirumab/paclitaxel. Most (95%) did not respond to ICI, yet after irRECIST‐defined progression on ICI, all patients experienced tumor size reduction on ramucirumab/paclitaxel. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression‐free survival (PFS) on ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI were higher than on the last chemotherapy before ICI in the same group of patients (ORR, 58.8% vs 11.8%; PFS 12.2 vs 3.0 months; respectively). Paired tumor biopsies examined by imaging mass cytometry showed a median 5.5‐fold (range 4‐121) lower frequency of immunosuppressive forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells with relatively preserved CD8+ T cells, post‐treatment versus pre‐treatment (n = 5 pairs). We then compared the outcomes of these 19 patients with a separate group who received ramucirumab/paclitaxel without preceding ICI (n = 68). Median overall survival on ramucirumab/paclitaxel was longer with (vs without) immediately preceding ICI (14.8 vs 7.4 months) including after multivariate analysis, as was PFS. In our small clinical series, outcomes appeared improved on anti‐VEGFR‐2/paclitaxel treatment when preceded by ICI, in association with alterations in the immune microenvironment. However, further investigation is needed to determine the generalizability of these data. Prospective clinical trials to evaluate sequential treatment with ICI followed by anti‐VEGF(R)/taxane are underway.

Background: Advance directives are legal documents that include living wills and durable health care power of attorney documents. They are critical components of care for seriously ill patients which are designed to be implemented when a patient is terminally ill and incapacitated. We sought to evaluate potential reasons for why advance directives were not appropriately implemented, by reviewing the electronic health record (EHR) in patients with terminal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the EHR of 500 cancer patients from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2016 was performed. Data points were manually collected and entered in a central database. Results: Of the 500 patients, 160 (32%) had an advance directive (AD). The most common clinical terminology used by physicians indicating a terminal diagnosis was progressive (36.6%) and palliative (31%). The most common clinical terminology indicating incapacity was altered mental status (25.6%), and not oriented (14%). 34 (6.8%) patients met all criteria of having a terminal diagnosis, a documented AD, and were deemed incapacitated. Of these patients who met all of these data points, their ADs were implemented on average 1.7 days (SD: 4.4 days) after which they should have been. This resulted in a total of 58 days of additional care provided. Discussion: This study provided insight on to how ADs are managed in day to day practice in the hospital. From our analysis it appears that physicians are able to identify when a patient is terminal, however, it is typically later than it should have been recognized. Further studies should be performed focusing on harnessing the power of the EHR and providing physicians formative and evaluative feedback of practice patterns to ensure that ADs are honored when appropriate.

Abstract Purpose Recent advances in molecular diagnostic technologies allow for the evaluation of solid tumor malignancies through noninvasive blood sampling, including circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, often because of late presentation of disease. Diagnosis is often made using endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which often does not yield enough tissue for next-generation sequencing. With this study, we sought to characterize the ctDNA genomic alteration landscape in patients with advanced PDAC with a focus on actionable findings. Materials and Methods From December 2014 through October 2019, 357 samples collected from 282 patients with PDAC at Mayo Clinic underwent ctDNA testing using a clinically available assay. The majority of samples were tested using the 73-gene panel which includes somatic genomic targets, including complete or critical exon coverage in 30 and 40 genes, respectively, and in some, amplifications, fusions, and indels. Clinical data and outcome variables were available for 165 patients; with 104 patients at initial presentation. Results All patients included in this study had locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Samples having at least one alteration, when variants of unknown significance (VUS) were excluded, numbered 266 (75%). After excluding VUS, therapeutically relevant alterations were observed in 170 (48%) of the total 357 cohort, including KRAS (G12C), EGFR, ATM, MYC, BRCA, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations. KRAS, SMAD, CCND2, or TP53 alterations were seen in higher frequency in patients with advanced disease. Conclusion Our study is the largest cohort to date that demonstrates the feasibility of ctDNA testing in PDAC. We provide a benchmark landscape upon which the field can continue to grow. Future applications may include use of ctDNA to guide treatment and serial monitoring of ctDNA during disease course to identify novel therapeutic targets for improved prognosis. Implications for Practice Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis often due to late presentation of disease. Biopsy tissue sampling is invasive and samples are often inadequate, requiring repeated invasive procedures and delays in treatment. Noninvasive methods to identify PDAC early in its course may improve prognosis in PDAC. Using ctDNA, targetable genes can be identified and used for treatment.

Abstract Introduction Recent classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms has defined well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) as a distinct entity from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aimed to evaluate metastatic NET G3 response to different treatment regimens. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with NET G3 within the Mayo Clinic database. Patients’ demographics along with treatment characteristics, responses, and survival were assessed. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results Treatment data was available in 30 patients with median age of 59.5 years at diagnosis. The primary tumor was mostly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki-67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. Treatments included capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), lutetium 177 DOTATATE (PRRT; n = 10), Platinum-etoposide (EP; n = 8), FOLFOX (n = 7), and everolimus (n = 2). CAPTEM exhibited ORR 35%, DCR 65%, and median PFS 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.96–16.07). Both EP and FOLFOX showed similar radiographic response rates with ORR 25.0% and 28.6%; however, median PFS durations were quite distinct at 2.94 and 13.04 months, respectively. PRRT had ORR of 20%, DCR of 70%, and median PFS of 9.13 months. Conclusion Among patients with NET G3, CAPTEM was the most commonly used treatment with clinically meaningful efficacy and disease control. FOLFOX or PRRT are other potentially active treatment options. EP has some activity in NET G3, but responses appear to be short-lived. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in patients with NET G3 are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy. Implications for Practice High-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) are considered a different entity from low-grade NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma in terms of prognosis and management. The oral combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is considered a good option in the management of metastatic NET G3 and may be preferred. FOLFOX is another systemic option with reasonable efficacy. Similar to other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to have some efficacy in these tumors.

TPS258 Background: Engineered toxin bodies (ETBs) are comprised of a proprietarily engineered form of Shiga-like Toxin A subunit genetically fused to antibody-like binding domains. ETBs work through novel mechanisms of action & are capable of forcing internalization, self-routing through intracellular compartments to the cytosol & inducing potent cell-kill via the enzymatic & permanent inactivation of ribosomes. MT-5111 is a de-immunized ETB targeting HER2+ solid tumors. Its novel mechanism of action, via enzymatic ribosome inactivation, may not be subject to resistance mechanisms that exist for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, or antibody modalities. MT-5111 binds an epitope on HER2, distinct from trastuzumab or pertuzumab, that may provide for combination potential with other HER2-targeting agents. MT-5111 is a 55 kilodalton protein & may have improved tumor penetration capability. The objective of this trial will be to determine the safety, tolerability, & maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MT-5111 in patients (pts) with advanced HER2+ solid tumors. Methods: This Phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation & expansion study will evaluate MT-5111 monotherapy in pts with HER2-positive solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD; secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, tumor response & immunogenicity. Part 1 consists of MT-5111 dose escalation (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, 6.75, 10µg/kg/dose) based on a modified 3+3 design (n≤42 pts); Part 2 (dose expansion) will evaluate MT-5111 at the MTD in ≤98 pts. All pts will be administered MT-5111 over 30 min via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, & 15 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal of consent, or another reason for withdrawal. Part 1 will include pts with any HER2+ solid cancers. Part 2 will enroll 3 expansion cohorts: HER2+ breast (BC), HER2+ gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (collectively referred as gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas [GEA]) & other HER2+ solid cancers. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) status must be 2+ or 3+, regardless of in situ hybridization (ISH) results; if no IHC is available for pts with BC or GEA, ISH criteria per the American Society of Clinical Oncology College of American Pathologists guidelines will be used. In metastatic cases, HER2 positivity must be demonstrated on metastatic lesions. Pts with HER2+ BC should have had ≥2 lines of HER2-directed therapy; pts with HER2+ GEA should have received or been intolerant to trastuzumab. Pts with evaluable disease may be included in Part 1; in Part 2, all pts must have ≥1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Further details can be found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04029922). Enrollment, which began in September 2019, is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04029922.

423 Background: Advanced PDAC remains a deadly disease with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. cfDNA - based next generation sequencing (NGS) may identify actionable alterations in patients with PDAC. In this study, we aim to determine the feasibility of utilizing serial cfDNA NGS testing and its potential relevance in predicting therapeutics outcomes. Methods: A total of 23 PDAC patients with PDAC cfDNA isolated from plasma collected at diagnosis and upon disease progression to first line SOC therapy and were analyzed on a 73-74 gene NGS panel (Guardant Health). Changes in molecular profiles from baseline to progression were analyzed for overall survival, progression free survival (PFS), and treatment response. PFS and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival of different groups of patients. All p-values were two-sided. Analyses were performed using R (version 3.5.1, R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Results: In this retrospective study, the 1-year probability of survival was 71% (median 473 days) and the 1-year PFS was 14% (median 212 days). TP53 and KRAS were the most frequently mutated genes identified in baseline samples, with 78% prevalence for each. Patients with clearance of TP53 17% (3/18) patients and/or KRAS 33% (6/18) patients clones after first line therapy significantly increases PFS (p=0.0056 and p=0.037, with HR of 0.087 and 0.32, respectively). However, appearance of TP53 or KRAS alterations upon progression does not significantly affect overall survival or PFS. Conclusions: The preliminary results from this study suggest that cfDNA clearance of TP53 and/or KRAS alterations may predict for improved PFS in PDAC. Confirmation of these findings in larger studies is warranted.