Abstract Background: Despite the well-established survival benefit associated with adjuvant hormonal treatment, younger women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) are less adherent to endocrine therapy (ET) as prescribed, compared to their older counterparts, and may have unique issues that contribute to ET non-adherence. In an effort to identify factors that can be targeted to improve ET uptake and adherence, we sought to evaluate ET initiation in young women with BC. Methods: As part of a multi-center, prospective cohort enrolling women with newly diagnosed BC at age ≤40 years between 2006-2016, we identified 657 women with HR+, Stage 0-III BC. Participants complete serial surveys that included questions about socio-demographics, fertility concerns, and treatment. Women who did not report taking tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) at least once in the 18 months after diagnosis (dx) were classified as non-initiators. Variables significant at p<0.20 in univariable models were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to identify independent (p<0.05) predictors of non-initiation. Results: By 18 months post-dx, 15% (99/657) had not initiated ET; among women with Stage 0 BC, 77% (51/66) had not initiated vs 8% (48/591) with invasive BC (p<0.0001). Among initiators (N=558), 93% were on tamoxifen, with 7% reporting AI alone or in addition to tamoxifen; 97% started ET within 12 months of dx. Among women with invasive BC (Table), non-initiation was associated with having less than a college degree (OR: 2.49 95% CI: 1.25-4.94), non-Caucasian race (OR: 2.58 95% CI: 1.18-5.64) and non-receipt of radiation (OR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.21-0.75).Age at dx, marital status, having children, employment, perceived financial comfort, fertility concern, stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were not significantly associated with non-initiation. Conclusion: Most young women with HR+ DCIS do not take adjuvant ET despite the potential benefits (substantially reduced risk of local recurrence and contralateral BC) and very low risk of serious toxicity. Among young women with invasive HR+ BC, a significant minority fails to start ET within 18 months of dx. Adjuvant ET non-initiation may contribute in part to the racial and SES outcomes disparities that have been observed. Further study is needed to elucidate barriers to initiation with the goal of developing targeted interventions that will enhance ET initiation and adherence in general. Table. Predictors of ET non-initiation in women with invasive BC (N=577*) Univariable Multivariable Median (range)OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)ppAge at dx (years)36 (17-40)1.08 (0.99-1.18)0.07 N (%) Financial comfort300 (51)0.88 (0.49-1.60)0.68 Non-white59 (10)2.68 (1.25-5.71)0.012.58 (1.18-5.64)0.02Full employment282 (48)0.76 (0.42-1.39)0.38 Less than college graduate95 (16)2.61 (1.36-5.02)0.0042.49 (1.25-4.94)0.009Married/living as married452 (77)0.79 (0.41-1.55)0.50 Children pre-diagnosis369 (62)1.11 (0.60-2.05)0.75 Fertility concern234 (40)0.92 (0.50-1.70)0.80 Stage (ref=3) 1244 (41)1.22 (0.47-3.15)0.68 2259 (44)1.27 (0.50-3.24)0.62 Mastectomy vs lumpectomy335 (57)1.16 (0.64-2.12)0.63 Radiation therapy331 (56)0.40 (0.21-0.73)0.0030.40 (0.21-0.75)0.004Chemotherapy411 (70)0.66 (0.36-1.22)0.18 *multivariable analytic cohort Citation Format: Rosenberg SM, Gelber S, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come S, Meyer ME, Partridge AH. Drugs don't work if people don't take them: Non-initiation of endocrine therapy in young women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-07.
Post-traumatic stress disorder in young breast cancer survivors.
202 Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with morbidity and mortality in affected populations. Cancer survivors experience PTSD at a rate higher than the general population, with young age and female gender identified as risk factors. While young women with breast cancer experience greater psychosocial distress in general following diagnosis (dx), little is known about PTSD in this population. Methods: Women dx’d with Stage I-III breast cancer at age ≤ 40 were surveyed as a part of a multi-site cohort study. Demographic, treatment, psychosocial characteristics (including self-reported psychiatric conditions and use of psychiatric medications prior to dx), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fear of recurrence (Lasry Scale), and social support (Medical Outcomes Study) were assessed within 1 year after dx. PTSD was measured at 30 months post-dx using the PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version; a score ≥ 50 was considered positive for PTSD. Univariable and stepwise multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate factors associated with PTSD. Results: 572 women were eligible for this analysis; median age at dx was 37 (range: 17-40); 87% had Stage I or II cancer. 37/572 women (6.5%) met criteria for PTSD at 30 months. Lower educational attainment, less financial comfort, less social support, stage 2 (vs. 1) disease, receipt of chemotherapy, fear of recurrence, anxiety and depression, and psychiatric comorbidities were associated (p ≤ 0.05) with PTSD in univariable analyses. Chemotherapy (OR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.09-11.06), anxiety by HADS (OR = 20.29, 95% CI = 7.83-52.53), and psychiatric comorbidities (OR = 4.22, 95% CI = 1.40-12.74) were associated with increased likelihood of PTSD, whereas college education (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10-0.59) and greater social support (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-0.99) appeared to be protective in multivariable analyses. Conclusions: PTSD affects a minority of young breast cancer survivors, with the prevalence in our cohort similar to that seen in other breast cancer populations. Early identification of those at risk for developing PTSD is essential for the adequate treatment of affected women and for the improvement of health outcomes and quality of life in cancer survivors.
Abstract Background. The increase in breast cancer risk during pregnancy and postpartum is well known; however, the molecular phenotype of breast cancers occurring shortly after pregnancy has not been well studied. Given this, we investigated whether nulliparity and the time interval since pregnancy among parous women affects the breast cancer phenotype in young women. Materials and Methods. We examined molecular phenotype in relation to time since pregnancy in a prospective cohort of 707 young women (aged ≤40 years) with breast cancer. Parity was ascertained from study questionnaires. Using tumor histologic grade on central review and biomarker expression, cancers were categorized as luminal A- or B-like, HER2 enriched, and triple negative. Results. Overall, 32% were luminal A-like, 41% were luminal B-like, 9% were HER2 enriched, and 18% were triple negative. Although, numerically, patients diagnosed >5 years after pregnancy had more luminal A-like subtypes than women with shorter intervals since pregnancy, there was no evidence of a relationship between these intervals and molecular subtypes once family history of breast cancer and age at diagnosis were considered. Conclusion. Distribution of breast cancer molecular phenotype did not differ significantly among young women by parity or time interval since parturition when important predictors of tumor phenotype such as age and family history were considered. Implications for Practice: Distribution of breast cancer molecular phenotype did not differ among parous young women by time interval since pregnancy. The implication of these findings for clinical practice suggests that pregnancy-associated breast cancers may be seen up to 5 years beyond parturition.
Abstract P2-10-03: Decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with early stage breast cancer
Abstract Background: There is an increasing recognition that many young women with breast cancer will have favorable outcomes without chemotherapy. We sought to characterize decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (CT) in this population for whom chemotherapy has historically been a standard of care. Methods: As part of an ongoing, multi-center, prospective cohort of young women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 and younger, we identified 657 women with Stage I-III breast cancer. Participants were asked to complete surveys by mail that included questions about socio-demographics, decision-making, and treatment history within the first year following diagnosis. Tumor characteristics were ascertained via pathology and medical record review. We used Chi-square tests to compare: decisional involvement (patient-driven vs. shared vs. physician-driven), degree of confidence, and feeling informed about the CT decision (the latter two measured on a 0-10 scale, categorized as follows: 0-5=low; moderate=6-8; 9-10=high) between women who did and did not receive CT. To explore clinical appropriateness of the CT decision, we used logistic regression to assess the relationship between tumor characteristics and non-receipt of CT among women with Stage I/II disease. Results: Among women with Stage I (n=250), II (n=312), and III (n=95), disease, 66%, 95%, and 100%, received CT, respectively. A greater proportion of women who had CT were highly confident with their decision compared with women who did not have CT (80% vs. 60%, p<0.0001); women who did not have CT were more likely to report a low level of feeling informed about the CT decision compared to women who received CT (20% vs. 5%, p<0.0001). Women who did not have CT were also more likely to report the final CT decision as made by their doctor (49% vs. 28%) and less likely to report a shared decision (33% vs. 59%, p<0.0001). Non-receipt of CT in women with Stage I/II disease (n=546) was associated within having node negative disease, T1 (vs. T2 or larger), Her2- negative, and hormone receptor positive tumors. Conclusion: Although non-receipt of CT would be expected to be viewed favorably by patients and doctors, we found that women who received CT felt more confident and better informed than those who received no CT. Given that women who did not have CT were also less likely to perceive the CT decision as shared, improved communication together with better decisional support may be beneficial, especially for women who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Shoshana M Rosenberg, Karen Sepucha, Kathryn J Ruddy, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Virginia Borges, Evan Morgan, Nancy U Lin, Shari Gelber, Rulla M Tamimi, Ann H Partridge. Decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-03.
Partner support and anxiety in young women with breast cancer