Citations

577 Background: BAY 43–9006 targets the ras/raf signaling pathway and inhibits VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and or PDGFR-β growth factors. A study was conducted to assess anti-tumor activity and the toxicity profile in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: A two-stage phase II study was conducted with pts with MBC who had measurable disease and were candidates for 1 st or 2 nd line chemotherapy and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. Pts started with a dose of 400 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 4 week cycle. Based on interval adverse events (AEs), a dose reduction was considered as 400 mg given one time daily. Primary endpoint was tumor response defined as a complete or partial response (PR) according to RESIST. The study required 40 pts, but was to be terminated if 0 or 1 responses occurred among 1 st 20 eligible pts. Results: 23 pts enrolled with a median age of 54 (range 37–70) but 3 were declared ineligible. All 23 pts were included in all analyses except efficacy analysis as stated per protocol. Fifteen (65%) had visceral metastasis; 22 (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment (tx); 16 (70%) had prior taxane tx.; 10 (44%) had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and 14 (61%) had a prior relapse free interval of 12 months (mos) or more. Pts received tx for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8) with a median follow-up of 7.2 mos. Dose reductions were due to dermatitis/skin rash (3), hand/foot skin reaction (2), hypertension (1) and cramping hands/feet (1). No grade 4 AEs occurred and grade 3 AEs included acne (2), hand/foot skin reaction (1), neutropenia (1), cough (1), wound infection (1), and prolonged PTT (1). Among the 20 pts eligible for efficacy analysis one pt (5%; 95% CI 0.5–20.5%) achieved a PR with duration of 3.6 mos and one pt achieved stable disease for at least 6 mos. The 6-month overall survival rate was 81% and the progression-free survival rates were 53% at 2 mos, 24% at 4 mos and 6% at 6 mos. Median time to progression was 2 mos. Based on the lack of sufficient response, we did not proceed with the 2nd stage of this study. Conclusion: Treatment with oral BAY 43–9006, while well tolerated, does not have sufficient activity to warrant further testing as a single agent in this disease setting. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Genentech Genentech

3585 Background: CX-3543 inhibits over-expressed ribosomal RNA synthesis in cancer cells by disrupting an essential protein-rDNA quadruplex complex, thereby inducing selective apoptosis. A phase I clinical trial for CX-3543 was undertaken to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of this agent. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received CX-3543 in successive dose cohorts at: 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 240, 360 and 480 mg/m2. Drug is administered by daily intravenous infusion on the first five consecutive days of a three week cycle, and the infusion duration has varied from one hour to six hours. Response by RECIST is determined after every 2 cycles. Results: Thirty-three patients (M/F:19/14; median age 69, range 44–83) with advanced solid tumors were treated with intravenous CX-3543. No drug related serious adverse events (SAEs) were encountered. DLTs of infusion-related cough and headache were identified at 480 mg/m2 (The MTD was 360 mg/m2). These adverse events were fully and rapidly reversible upon slowing or interrupting the infusion. Other drug-related adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity. Four patients had stable disease for longer than 4 months and one patient, with stable disease for over one year, currently continues on study. CX-3543 demonstrated an increasing plasma terminal half life at the higher dose levels due to a ‘reservoir‘ effect from CX-3543 reversibly binding to blood cells. Conclusions: CX-3543 administered as a 6 hour infusion for five consecutive days of a three week cycle is well tolerated and has stabilized disease in a number of patients enrolled in this phase I study. This trial is now in an expanded enrollment phase at 360 mg/m2 and pharmacodynamic measures, specifically FDG-PET scans and circulating tumor cells, have been included to detect biological activity at this dose level. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3501 Background: PXD101 is a hydroxamate HDAC inhibitor that has broad anti-neoplastic activity in vivo and in vitro. Preclinical data showing PXD101 down-regulation of thymidylate synthase (TS), an in vivo target of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) provide a rationale for combination of PXD101 with 5-FU. Methods: This is a phase Ib/II trial of PXD101 plus 5-FU in patients with advanced solid tumors, with dose escalation to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and an expansion at the MTD in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Patients (pts) must be = 18 yrs, have measurable disease, and had disease progression after standard chemotherapy. PXD101 was administered as a 30-min IV infusion on Days 1–5 of a 3-wk cycle. 5-FU was administered from cycle 2 on, as a continuous 96-hr IV infusion starting on Day 2 of the same 3-wk cycle. The primary endpoints were safety, and effect of belinostat on TS expression in patients’ tumors. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were PXD101-related = Gr 3 non-hematologic or Gr 4 hematologic toxicities. Expression of TS mRNA was measured by RTQ-PCR. Results: Twenty pts have been treated for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8). Cohorts of 3–6 pts were tested at 5 dose levels of PXD101/5-FU (mg/m2/d): 300/250, 600/250, 1,000/250, 1,000/500, and 1,000/1,000. Two pts did not complete cycle 2, and one pt at the 600/250 dose level received 1,000 mg/m2/d 5-FU. There were no DLTs in the first 4 dose cohorts; the 5th cohort is ongoing. In the first 4 dose cohorts (17 pts), the most frequent AEs were fatigue, nausea/vomiting, dysgeusia, dehydration, constipation, edema, anorexia and anemia. There were 2 Gr 4 AEs (pulmonary embolism, bacteremia); Gr 3 AEs in = 2 pts were fatigue and dehydration. All Gr 3/4 events were assessed as not related to PXD101. One pt with stage IV CRC treated at 600/1,000 mg/m2/d PXD101/5-FU had stable disease (SD) for 8 cycles, and one pt with stage IV esophageal cancer treated at the 1,000/250 mg/m2/d dose had SD for 4 cycles. Conclusions: PXD101 in combination with 5-FU has been well tolerated up to 1,000/500 mg/m2/d PXD101/5-FU. The study is ongoing and data from the MTD expansion part, including effect of PXD101 on tumor TS expression, will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Purpose: To determine if the degree of estrogen suppression with aromatase inhibitors (AI: anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole) is associated with efficacy in early-stage breast cancer, and to examine for differences in the mechanism of action between the three AIs. Experimental Design: Matched case–control studies [247 matched sets from MA.27 (anastrozole vs. exemestane) and PreFace (letrozole) trials] were undertaken to assess whether estrone (E1) or estradiol (E2) concentrations after 6 months of adjuvant therapy were associated with risk of an early breast cancer event (EBCE). Preclinical laboratory studies included luciferase activity, cell proliferation, radio-labeled ligand estrogen receptor binding, surface plasmon resonance ligand receptor binding, and nuclear magnetic resonance assays. Results: Women with E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL after 6 months of AI treatment had a 2.2-fold increase in risk (P = 0.0005) of an EBCE, and in the anastrozole subgroup, the increase in risk of an EBCE was 3.0-fold (P = 0.001). Preclinical laboratory studies examined mechanisms of action in addition to aromatase inhibition and showed that only anastrozole could directly bind to estrogen receptor α (ERα), activate estrogen response element-dependent transcription, and stimulate growth of an aromatase-deficient CYP19A1−/− T47D breast cancer cell line. Conclusions: This matched case–control clinical study revealed that levels of estrone and estradiol above identified thresholds after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole treatment were associated with increased risk of an EBCE. Preclinical laboratory studies revealed that anastrozole, but not exemestane or letrozole, is a ligand for ERα. These findings represent potential steps towards individualized anastrozole therapy.

PURPOSEThe phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin is a key pathway of survival and therapeutic resistance in breast cancer. We evaluated the pan-Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in combination with standard therapy in patients with high-risk early-stage breast cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODSI-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase II, open-label, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant platform trial that screens experimental therapies and efficiently identifies potential predictive biomarker signatures. Patients are categorized by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), hormone receptor (HR), and MammaPrint statuses in a 2 × 2 × 2 layout. Patients within each of these 8 biomarker subtypes are adaptively randomly assigned to one of several experimental therapies, including MK-2206, or control. Therapies are evaluated for 10 biomarker signatures, each of which is a combination of these subtypes. The primary end point is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy graduates with one or more of these signatures if and when it has an 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a hypothetical phase III trial, adjusting for biomarker covariates. Patients in the current report received standard taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy without (control) or with oral MK-2206 135 mg/week.RESULTSMK-2206 graduated with 94 patients and 57 concurrently randomly assigned controls in 3 graduation signatures: HR-negative/HER2-positive, HR-negative, and HER2-positive. Respective Bayesian mean covariate-adjusted pCR rates and percentage probability that MK-2206 is superior to control were 0.48:0.29 (97%), 0.62:0.36 (99%), and 0.46:0.26 (94%). In exploratory analyses, MK-2206 evinced a numerical improvement in event-free survival in its graduating signatures. The most significant grade 3-4 toxicity was rash (14% maculopapular, 8.6% acneiform).CONCLUSIONThe Akt inhibitor MK-2206 combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy resulted in higher estimated pCR rates in HR-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. Although MK-2206 is not being further developed at this time, this class of agents remains of clinical interest.

BackgroundThe focus on noncancer causes of death in patients with breast cancer (BC) remains superficial. The objective of the current study was to assess and quantify causes of death after BC diagnosis.MethodsIn total, 754,270 women with BC in the United States who were diagnosed during 2000 through 2015 and retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were studied. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for causes of death were calculated.ResultsOf the included patients, 183,002 (24.3%) died during the follow‐up period. The greatest proportion of deaths (46.2%) occurred within 1 to 5 years after diagnosis. Most deaths occurred from BC itself or from other cancers, and the number of BC deaths decreased as more years passed after diagnosis. The most common noncancer causes of death within <10 years after diagnosis were heart diseases followed by cerebrovascular diseases. However, >10 years after diagnosis, the most common noncancer causes of death were heart diseases followed by Alzheimer disease. Patients had a statistically significant higher risk of death from chronic liver diseases within 5 to 10 years after diagnosis compared with the general population (SMR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.38) and had statistically significant higher risks of death from Alzheimer disease (SMR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14‐1.29) and from diseases of the heart (SMR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.09) >10 years after diagnosis.ConclusionsAlthough BC remains the most common cause of death after BC diagnosis, other non‐BC causes of death (mainly heart and cerebrovascular diseases) represent a significant number of deaths among patients with BC. These findings provide important insight into how BC survivors should be counselled regarding future health risks.

Abstract Background Patients with cancer may face a significant knowledge deficit as they battle their illness. We developed a first of its kind comprehensive patient symposia (Living with Cancer (LWC): A Mayo Clinic Symposia for Patients and Loved Ones) with 8 hours of general sessions (covering nutrition, exercise, cancer inheritance, financial and legal challenges, communication, survivorship, and cancer therapy) and a 4-hour disease specific breakout (myeloid diseases, myeloma, lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer, lung cancer, cutaneous malignancy, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer). Through voluntary questionnaires, we studied the impact of this cancer symposium on quality of life, cancer specific knowledge, and symptom management among cancer patients. Methods LWC meeting attendees were provided surveys prior to and 3 months following the convention. Surveys included 1) EORTC-QLQ-C30; 2) new disease understanding tool developed specifically for this conference; 3) distress thermometer and problems checklist; 4) validated disease-specific questionnaires. Changes over time were assessed using McNemar’s tests and paired t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results Patients:158 attendees completed the pre-convention survey. The median age was 67.5 (range 30-86), 49% males, 76% over 1 year from diagnosis. Cancer type included 37% hematologic malignancies, 23% breast cancer, 23% prostate cancer, and 17% other. The hematologic malignancies were comprised of 34% leukemia, 31% CLL/lymphoma, 25% amyloid/multiple myeloma, and 9.3% myeloproliferative neoplasms. Baseline Disease Understanding, Symptoms, QOL: Most attendees endorsed understanding their disease quite a bit (54%) or very much (29%). Most respondents reported at least “quite a bit” of understanding regarding treatment options (84%), screening modalities (83%), symptomatology (74%), and cancer-related side effects (71%). Attendees endorsed the least understanding of disease-related stress (49%), risk factors (49%), management of disease related fatigue (41%), and legal issues related to disease/treatment (27%) Mean QLQ-C30 scores were 84.4 for physical functioning, 83 for role functioning, 80.7 for social functioning, and 72.7 for global health status. The symptoms with highest mean scores were insomnia, fatigue, and pain. Knowledge Improvement Durable at 3 Months: 115 (73%) patients completed the post-symposium survey. There was improvement in 12 of 14 areas of self-reported knowledge (Table 1) especially in areas of nutrition, and management of disease related stress and fatigue (all p<0.001). Symptomatic Changes at 3 Months: There was no significant change in QLQ-C30 physical/role/emotional functioning, fatigue, pain, or insomnia. Conclusions This first evaluation of a patient centered cancer symposium as an education intervention suggests patients selecting to participate in such an event seek to improve an already solid knowledge base regarding their malignant disease. Participating in the event improved disease specific knowledge in numerous areas. However, as a single intervention, function and symptoms tended not to improve with participation. Future efforts on 1) improving participation with disease knowledge “naïve” patients and 2) targeted efforts aimed at specific symptom management (i.e. insomnia, stress) are planned. This study serves as an avenue to empower patients and inform physicians to improve the experience of living with cancer. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 586 Background: Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD40, mediates antitumor activity through multiple mechanisms of action, including effector cell functions (ADCC/ADCP) and direct apoptotic signal transduction. Ongoing evaluation of the molecule has led to 2 additional key findings: a gene signature that predicts sensitivity to single-agent dacetuzumab, and upregulation of the pro-apoptotic and chemosensitizing transcription factor TAp63αa when dacetuzumab is combined with rituximab (R) and gemcitabine (GEM). In prior single-agent dacetuzumab trials, several patients who were immediately treated with GEM after progressing achieved unexpected responses. These observations provided rationale for further analysis of the combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM. Methods: A phase 1b dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and adverse event profile of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was conducted in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients received dacetuzumab at cohort-specific doses of 8 or 12 mg/kg IV weekly in combination with R (375 mg/m2 IV for 1 cycle, then once/28-day cycle) and GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV weekly or biweekly) in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. A maximum number of 8 cycles was permitted. Eligible patients included those with de novo DLBCL, including transformed lymphoma and follicular grade 3, who failed potentially curative therapy. Results: Thirty-one patients with a median age of 68 years (range 29–80) were enrolled and treated in the study (3 patients in each of 3 cohorts + 22 in an expansion cohort). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1–18); 10 patients (32%) had transformed histology and 4 (13%) had prior ASCT. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1–8), although 11 patients are still on treatment. Three patients in the first cohort required dose reduction of GEM due to transient, non-dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. The protocol was thus amended to administer GEM on a biweekly schedule. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and MTD was not defined. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling suggesting no significant difference in exposure between dose levels, 8 mg/kg of dacetuzumab was chosen as the dose for the expansion cohort. The combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was generally well tolerated. Across all cohorts, the most common adverse events (> 15%) were nausea (42%), thrombocytopenia (35%), fatigue (32%), headache (29%), anorexia (19%), dyspnea (19%), pyrexia (19%), diarrhea (16%), and neutropenia (16%), the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 adverse events related to dacetuzumab occurred infrequently. One patient experienced Grade 3 stress cardiomyopathy that resolved; this patient had a history of congestive heart failure. One patient developed pneumonitis in the left lung and acute respiratory distress syndrome, and subsequently died due to pulmonary toxicity; this patient had received prior radiation therapy to the left chest. There was preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Of the 28 patients with response assessments, 7 patients achieved CR, 8 PR, 7 SD, and 6 PD per investigator assessment of response, yielding an objective response rate of 54%. Of interest, 1 patient who previously failed ASCT achieved a CR and was able to undergo allogeneic transplant. To date, this patient remains in CR. Conclusion: The combination of dacetuzumab, R and biweekly GEM was generally well tolerated. Evidence of antitumor activity with this combination is encouraging as multiple responses were observed in a population with heavily pre-treated patients. Further investigation with a randomized trial is warranted to more fully characterize safety and efficacy and to determine if sensitivity to this combination correlates with the previously identified single-agent predictive gene signature. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Gemcitabine has not been FDA approved for treatment of lymphoma. Dacetuzumab is an investigational agent.. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Nasta:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Northfelt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Beaven:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Myint:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Whiting:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drachman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.