Citations

The recently published SPACE-2 trial (Stent-Supported Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery Versus Endarterectomy-2) compared 3 treatments to prevent stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis ≥70%: (1) carotid endarterectomy plus best medical treatment (BMT), (2) transfemoral carotid artery stenting plus BMT, or (3) BMT alone. Because of low enrollment, the findings of similar safety and efficacy for carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting, or BMT alone were inconclusive. Publication of the CREST (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial)-2 results should provide level A evidence that has been lacking for 2 to 3 decades, to guide treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis. For symptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis, no trials are underway to update the degree of benefit reported for carotid endarterectomy by NASCET (North American Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) and ECST (European Carotid Surgery Trial), published in 1991. Subsequently, the use of cigarettes has plummeted, and major improvements in medical treatments and in carotid revascularization have emerged. These advances have coincided with abrupt decline in the clinical end points necessary for treatment comparisons in procedural trials. One of the advances in the invasive management of carotid disease has been transcarotid artery revascularization, already with limited approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. Establishing safety and efficacy of transcarotid artery revascularization compared with carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting, or BMT alone may be challenging because of enrollment, regulatory, and funding barriers to design and complete an adequately powered randomized trial.

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) has emerged as a common factor driving age-dependent diseases, including stroke and dementia. CSVD-related dementia will affect a growing fraction of the aging population, requiring improved recognition, understanding, and treatments. This review describes evolving criteria and imaging biomarkers for the diagnosis of CSVD-related dementia. We describe diagnostic challenges, particularly in the context of mixed pathologies and the absence of highly effective biomarkers for CSVD-related dementia. We review evidence regarding CSVD as a risk factor for developing neurodegenerative disease and potential mechanisms by which CSVD leads to progressive brain injury. Finally, we summarize recent studies on the effects of major classes of cardiovascular medicines relevant to CSVD-related cognitive impairment. Although many key questions remain, the increased attention to CSVD has resulted in a sharper vision for what will be needed to meet the upcoming challenges imposed by this disease.

Abstract We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with a history of orthotopic heart transplant who was hospitalized with new-onset headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed T2 hyperintense signal involving the left occipital lobe with leptomeningeal enhancement and mild vasogenic edema. Initial neurologic examination was normal; however, after 7 days she developed imbalance, visual disturbances, night sweats, bradyphrenia, alexia without agraphia, and right hemianopsia. Brain MRI showed enlargement of the left occipital mass and worsening edema. Stereotactic needle biopsy showed nondiagnostic necrosis. The patient continued to deteriorate despite dexamethasone. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suggested infection, and cytomegalovirus CSF polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive. The patient received vancomycin, imipenem, and ganciclovir. After obtaining a positive serum beta-D-glucan (Fungitell), amphotericin was added. Despite best medical efforts, the patient died. Postmortem broad-range PCR sequencing of the brain tissue was positive for rare amoeba Balamuthia mandrillaris.

Background: Migraine is associated with neuroimaging differences in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). However, it is unknown if migraine-related disability (MRD) or if calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a vasoactive peptide important in migraine pathology, have radiographic implications. The aims of this study were to identify whether MRD or interictal serum CGRP levels impacted neuroimaging findings for those with CADASIL. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed. The primary outcomes were neuroimaging differences associated with MRD among those with migraine or interictal serum CGRP levels of those with and without migraine. MRD was defined by 2 migraine disability scales (Migraine Disability Assessment, Headache Impact Test-6). Retrospective brain magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed (average 1.7 ± 2.0 y before enrollment). Rank-sum and χ2 tests were used. Results: Those with migraine (n=25, vs. n=14 without) were younger [median 49 (25 to 82) y vs. 60 (31 to 82) y, P<0.007], had fewer cerebral microbleeds (0 to 31 vs. 0 to 50, P=0.02) and less frequently had anterior temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [68% (17/25) vs 100% (14/14), P=0.02]. MRD scale outcomes had no significant radiographic associations. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ (migraine: n=18, 27.0±9.6 pg/mL vs. no migraine: n=10, 26.8±15.7 pg/mL, P=0.965). Conclusions: Migraine may forestall microangiopathy in CADASIL, though possibly independent of severity as measured by MRD. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ in our cohort suggesting CGRP may not be vital to migraine pathophysiology in CADASIL. Larger studies are needed to account for age differences.

Introduction: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a well-recognized cause of acute ischemic stroke, especially in young adults, accounting for up to 20-25% of all cases. Several studies reported an incidence between 2.5-5 per 100,000 in the general population. However, the actual incidence may be higher as many patients remain asymptomatic. Even though CAD is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, there is a lack of consensus in management. Our study surveyed practicing clinicians involved in the management of CAD to characterize current practice trends and provide a foundation for future research. Methods: An online case-based questionnaire with 11 questions regarding the management of cervical artery dissection was developed and piloted internally with 12 Mayo Clinic cerebrovascular neurologist/neurosurgeons. The survey was finalized, and initially sent to the STOP-CAD study group. We then sent the survey to practicing vascular neurologists across different academic institutions. Surveys were sent to 126 unique individuals. Results: A total of 42 clinicians completed the questionnaires. The response rate was 33% (42/126). Aspirin antiplatelet monotherapy was seen as the most appropriate therapy for asymptomatic CAD (81% [34/42]). Anticoagulation was the treatment of choice for cases with CAD and concomitant intraluminal thrombus (74% [31/42]). Most (74% [31/42]) of the participants recommended repeat imaging at three months. However, no consistent response regarding the type of antithrombotic agent for symptomatic CAD without intramural thrombus or cases with pseudoaneurysm. There was marked variability regarding the duration of antithrombotic therapy, ranging from three months to life-long treatment. Conclusion: Marked variability was seen in the management of CAD, especially regarding the choice of antithrombotic agent in symptomatic and complicated (stenosis or pseudoaneurysm) cases and the duration of such therapy, which reflects the lack of definitive clinical trial data. Ongoing research is needed to better guide the optimal management of these patients.