Citations

OBJECTIVE Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an FDA-approved antifibrinolytic that is seeing increased popularity in spine surgery owing to its ability to reduce intraoperative blood loss (IOBL) and allogeneic transfusion requirements. The present study aimed to summarize the current literature on these formulations in the context of short-segment instrumented lumbar fusion including ≥ 1-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS The PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for all full-text English studies evaluating the use of topical TXA (tTXA), systemic TXA (sTXA), or combined tTXA+sTXA in patients undergoing PLIF. The primary endpoints of interest were operative time, IOBL, and total blood loss (TBL); secondary endpoints included venous thromboembolic complication occurrence, and allogeneic and autologous transfusion requirements. Outcomes were compared using random effects. Comparisons were made between the following treatment groups: sTXA, tTXA, and sTXA+tTXA. Given that sTXA is arguably the standard of care in the literature (i.e., the most common route of administration that to this point has been studied the most), the authors compared sTXA versus tTXA and sTXA versus sTXA+tTXA. Study heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test, and grouped analysis using the Hedge’s g test was performed for measurement of effect size. RESULTS Forty-five articles were identified, of which 17 met the criteria for inclusion with an aggregate of 1008 patients. TXA regimens included sTXA only, tTXA only, and various combinations of sTXA and tTXA. There were no significant differences in operative time, TBL, or postoperative drainage between the sTXA and tTXA groups or between the sTXA and sTXA+tTXA groups. CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis suggested clinical equipoise between isolated sTXA, isolated tTXA, and combinatorial tTXA+sTXA formulations as hemostatic adjuvants/neoadjuvants in short-segment fusion including ≥ 1-level PLIF. Given the theoretically lower venous thromboembolism risk associated with tTXA, additional investigations using large cohorts comparing these two formulations within the posterior fusion population are merited. Although TXA has been shown to be effective, there are insufficient data to support topical or systemic administration as superior within the open PLIF population.

Background: Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015 to December 2020. Methods: Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL versus scleral sutured IOL versus scleral fixated IOL versus. sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery. Results: The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0%–2.7%). Rates of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were not significantly different between techniques (anterior chamber IOL 9/198 [4.5%], SFIOL 1/54 [1.9%], scleral sutured IOL 14/274 [5.1%], sulcus 2/35 [5.7%], total 26/561 [4.6%], P = 0.79). Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses (anterior chamber IOL 5/198 [2.5%], SFIOL 4/54 [7.4%], scleral sutured IOL 16/274 [5.8%], sulcus 5/35 [14.3%], total 30/561 [5.3%], P = 0.12). Conclusion: Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear are not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.

Purpose: To evaluate anatomic outcomes and surgeon response following the use of microserrated (Sharkskin, Alcon, Forth Worth, TX) internal limiting membrane (ILM) forceps compared with conventional (Grieshaber; Alcon) ILM forceps for peeling of the ILM. Methods: Patients were prospectively assigned in a 1:1 randomized fashion to undergo ILM peeling using microserrated forceps or conventional forceps. Rates of retinal hemorrhages, deep retinal grasps, ILM regrasping, time to ILM removal, and surgeon questionnaire comparing the use of microserrated and conventional ILM forceps were analyzed. Results: A total of 90 eyes of 90 patients were included in this study. The mean number of deep retinal grasps was higher in the conventional forceps group (1.51 ± 1.70 vs. 0.33 ± 0.56, respectively [P < 0.0001]). The mean number of failed ILM grasps was higher with conventional forceps (6.62 ± 3.51 vs. 5.18 ± 2.06 [P = 0.019]). Microserrated forceps provided more comfortability (lower number) in initiating the ILM flap (2.16 ± 0.85 vs. 1.56 ± 0.76, P < 0.001), comfortability in regrasping the ILM flap (2.51 ± 1.01 vs. 1.98 ± 0.89, P = 0.01), and comfortability in completing the ILM flap (2.42 ± 1.03 vs. 1.84 ± 1.02, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Surgeons utilizing the microserrated forceps experienced fewer deep retina grasps and fewer failed ILM grasps compared with conventional ILM forceps. The microserrated forceps was also a more favorable experience subjectively among the surgeons.

Abstract Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells play a key role in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. However, the exact effector molecules that are regulated by PD-1 signals in cytotoxic CD8+ T cells have not been completely defined. Lack of this knowledge is a crucial problem in addressing how to overcome the low clinical response rate to ICI therapy. When exploring why certain patients not responding to ICI therapy, we found non-responders did not have an elevated NKG7 expression in CD8+ T cells as responders to ICI therapy. The difference in NKG7 expression in CD8+ T cells between non-responders and responders to anti-PD-1 therapy prompted us to investigate the potential role of PD-1 signaling in regulating NKG7 expression. To that end, we generated a CD8+ T cell-specific Pdcd1 conditional knockout mice (CD8 E8ICre-Pdcd1fl/fl, also known as CD8-PD-1 cKO) where Pdcd1 is deleted after thymic selection of single positive CD8+ T cells. We observed a delayed tumor growth and prolonged survival in CD8-PD-1 cKO mice compared to control mice after B16-OVA melanoma tumor challenge. On Day 12, when the CD8-PD-1 cKO mice demonstrated their ability to control tumor growth, we conducted single cell RNA sequencing on isolated tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells, revealing a significant increase of Nkg7 expression in effector CD8+ T cells in the Pdcd1 deficient CD8+ T cells compared to the control wild type T cells. Pdcd1-deficient effector CD8+ T cells also had increased expression of genes linked to NFAT/Calcineurin signaling pathway including Nfatc1, S100a4, Tbet and Tox, suggesting Nkg7 could be regulated by Pdcd1 via the NFAT pathway. To determine the impact of increased NKG7 expression in CD8+ T cells, we used OVA protein as a surrogate tumor antigen in vaccination. We found a complete B16-OVA tumor rejection in CD8-PD-1 cKO mice compared to control mice when tumor cells were injected on day 7 after vaccination with OVA protein and poly (I:C) (as an adjuvant), but only a partial rejection on day 21. The CD8-PD-1 cKO mice that were tumor-free for 30-40 days rejected 2nd tumor challenge with B16-OVA tumors. This long-term protection is tumor antigen (OVA) specific because these mice did not reject B16F10 tumor cells that do not express OVA antigen. We also found effector memory CD8+ T cells with high cytotoxicity increased in the spleen of CD8-PD-1 cKO mice after OVA antigen immunization compared to control. In conclusion, we found NKG7 is one of the effector molecules in cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which can be regulated by PD-1 signals through NFAT signaling. Targeting the PD-1-NFAT pathway may be a new option to overcome low responses of T cells to ICI therapy in treatment of refractory cancer. Citation Format: Zhiming Mao, Joanina Gicobi, Jacob Hirdler, Xin Liu, Michelle Hsu, Emilia Dellacecca, Wenjing Zhang, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Hai dong. PD-1 signals regulate NKG7 that is required for CD8+ T cells to sustain cytotoxicity and durable antitumor memory responses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3979.

Abstract Background: Although targeting myeloid cells has become one of the next generation targets for cancer immunotherapy, there is a lack of therapeutic tools to specifically target these cells. Our group has developed a novel humanized PD-L1-targeting antibody, H1A, that induces PD-L1 degradation via blockade of PD-L1 and CMTM6, therefore limiting PD-L1 intrinsic signaling while also preventing interactions with PD-1. In the immune cell compartment, CMTM6 expression is restricted to myeloid cells, making these cells the primary target of H1A. Recently, we unexpectedly found that targeting intrinsic PD-L1 in myeloid cells via H1A resulted in increased release of CCL2 from myeloid cells. In this study, we examined the role of CCL2/CCR2 signaling in CD8 T cell function using human peripheral blood-derived immune cells and evaluated the therapeutic potential of H1A antibody using our humanized PD-L1/PD-1 mouse model. Methods: Human PBMCs derived from healthy donors were treated with H1A or Atezolizumab, a blocking PD-L1 antibody, followed by mass cytometry and flow cytometry to evaluate immune cell phenotype and functional states. PD-L1 expressing myeloid cells isolated from human PBMCs were treated with H1A or Atezolizumab and assessed for CCL2 secretion using multiplex immunoassays. CCL2 production and transcription were confirmed by flow cytometry and single-cell RNA-sequencing. CCR2 blockade was used on human PBMCs to evaluate the effects of CCL2/CCR2 signaling on T cell function alongside H1A treatment. Finally, in vivo antitumor activity of H1A and Atezolizumab were compared in two humanized PD-L1 tumor models. Results: H1A reduced the frequency of regulatory T cells and increased effector T cells, in whole PBMCs upon global T cell activation with anti-CD3/CD28. H1A enhanced the secretion and production of CCL2 from myeloid cells, which was confirmed at a transcript level. CCR2 blockade diminished CD8 T cells’ ability to differentiate into effector cells in H1A treated PBMCs. H1A demonstrated comparable therapeutic effects with Atezolizumab in treatment of immunogenic and ICI-responsive mouse tumor MC38, which is CD8 T cell-dependent, but showed superior therapeutic effects in treatment of ICI-insensitive mouse tumor E0771 compared to Atezolizumab. Both treatments elicited durable memory specific immune responses upon E0771 tumor rechallenge. Conclusion: H1A demonstrated a superior antitumor activity compared to Atezolizumab in our preclinical models via a new mechanism by which H1A caused degradation of intrinsic PD-L1 in myeloid cells. This causes more release of CCL2 to improve T cell function via CCR2 upon T cell activation. Thus, H1A is emerging as a new immunotherapy tool to target PD-L1/CMTM6 in myeloid cells for treatment of cancers that are refractory to current immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Citation Format: Michelle Alexandria Hsu, Xin Liu, Ying Li, Whitney Barham, Kevin Pavelko, Jake Hirdler, Fabrice Lucien, Haidong Dong. Targeting PD-L1/CMTM6 in myeloid cells results in elevated release of CCL2 to improve CD8 T cell-mediated antitumor response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2664.

AimsPrior cost-effectiveness analyses on osseointegrated prosthesis for transfemoral unilateral amputees have analyzed outcomes in non-USA countries using generic quality of life instruments, which may not be appropriate when evaluating disease-specific quality of life. These prior analyses have also focused only on patients who had failed a socket-based prosthesis. The aim of the current study is to use a disease-specific quality of life instrument, which can more accurately reflect a patient’s quality of life with this condition in order to evaluate cost-effectiveness, examining both treatment-naïve and socket refractory patients.MethodsLifetime Markov models were developed evaluating active healthy middle-aged male amputees. Costs of the prostheses, associated complications, use/non-use, and annual costs of arthroplasty parts and service for both a socket and osseointegrated (OPRA) prosthesis were included. Effectiveness was evaluated using the questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA) until death. All costs and Q-TFA were discounted at 3% annually. Sensitivity analyses on those cost variables which affected a change in treatment (OPRA to socket, or socket to OPRA) were evaluated to determine threshold values. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated.ResultsFor treatment-naïve patients, the lifetime ICER for OPRA was $279/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). For treatment-refractory patients the ICER was $273/QALY. In sensitivity analysis, the variable thresholds that would affect a change in the course of treatment based on cost (from socket to OPRA), included the following for the treatment-naïve group: yearly replacement components for socket > $8,511; cost yearly replacement parts OPRA < $1,758; and for treatment-refractory group: yearly replacement component for socket of > $12,467.ConclusionThe use of the OPRA prosthesis in physically active transfemoral amputees should be considered as a cost-effective alternative in both treatment-naïve and treatment-refractory socket prosthesis patients. Disease-specific quality of life assessments such as Q-TFA are more sensitive when evaluating cost-effectiveness.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):218–226.

PURPOSE Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves outcomes for patients with AML harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3 ( FLT3-ITD) AML. These patients are routinely treated with a FLT3 inhibitor after HCT, but there is limited evidence to support this. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized trial of post-HCT maintenance with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02997202 ) to determine if all such patients benefit or if detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) could identify those who might benefit. METHODS Adults with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and were randomly assigned to placebo or 120 mg once daily gilteritinib for 24 months after HCT. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and the effect of MRD pre- and post-HCT on RFS and OS. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-six participants were randomly assigned post-HCT to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Although RFS was higher in the gilteritinib arm, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.679 [95% CI, 0.459 to 1.005]; two-sided P = .0518). However, 50.5% of participants had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT, and, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, gilteritinib was beneficial in this population (HR, 0.515 [95% CI, 0.316 to 0.838]; P = .0065). Those without detectable MRD showed no benefit (HR, 1.213 [95% CI, 0.616 to 2.387]; P = .575). CONCLUSION Although the overall improvement in RFS was not statistically significant, RFS was higher for participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD pre- or post-HCT who received gilteritinib treatment. To our knowledge, these data are among the first to support the effectiveness of MRD-based post-HCT therapy.

BACKGROUND: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry (LAAO) includes the vast majority of transcatheter LAAO procedures performed in the United States. The objective of this study was to develop a model predicting adverse events among patients undergoing LAAO with Watchman FLX. METHODS: Data from 41 001 LAAO procedures with Watchman FLX from July 2020 to September 2021 were used to develop and validate a model predicting in-hospital major adverse events. Randomly selected development (70%, n=28 530) and validation (30%, n=12 471) cohorts were analyzed with 1000 bootstrapped samples, using forward stepwise logistic regression to create the final model. A simplified bedside risk score was also developed using this model. RESULTS: Increased age, female sex, low preprocedure hemoglobin, no prior attempt at atrial fibrillation termination, and increased fall risk most strongly predicted in-hospital major adverse events and were included in the final model along with other clinically relevant variables. The median in-hospital risk-standardized adverse event rate was 1.50% (range, 1.03%–2.84%; interquartile range, 1.42%–1.64%). The model demonstrated moderate discrimination (development C-index, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65–0.70] and validation C-index, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62–0.70]) with good calibration. The simplified risk score was well calibrated with risk of in-hospital major adverse events ranging from 0.26% to 3.90% for a score of 0 to 8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A transcatheter LAAO risk model using National Cardiovascular Data Registry and LAAO Registry data can predict in-hospital major adverse events, demonstrated consistency across hospitals and can be used for quality improvement efforts. A simple bedside risk score was similarly predictive and may inform shared decision-making.

458 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of patients with advanced and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, complete response rates remain low and there is a need for novel therapeutic options for ICI-resistant and refractory RCC. Our group has generated a novel humanized anti-PD-L1 antibody, called H1A, that induces PD-L1 degradation preventing not only its interaction with PD-1 but also inhibiting pro-tumorigenic intracellular signaling. In this study, we compared the antitumor activity of H1A with FDA-approved ICI using patient-derived immune cells and humanized mouse tumor models. Methods: In vivo antitumor activity of H1A and atezolizumab (ATZ) was compared in three humanized PD-1/PD-L1 mouse tumor models with different immunogenicity (E0771:high, MC38:moderate, B16-F10:poor). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 14 RCC patients undergoing with nephrectomy. PBMC were treated with H1A, nivolumab (NIV), atezolizumab (ATZ) and pembrolizumab (PEM) to evaluate their efficacy in inducing tumor cell death in an ex-vivo cytotoxicity assay. Mass cytometry was employed to determine the impact of H1A and atezolizumab on the PBMC profile. Results: MC38 tumors showed moderate response to both H1A and ATZ which was abrogated by CD8 T cell depletion. In E0771 tumors, higher percentage of complete responders was observed with H1A compared to ATZ and E0771 rechallenge revealed memory antitumor immunity with complete rejection of tumors. Patient-derived PBMC treated with H1A showed superior tumor cell killing compared to NIV, PEM and ATZ (p<0.01). While H1A treatment of PBMC induced expansion of effector NK and CD8 T cells (GZMB+ T-bet+), ATZ treatment led to enrichment of Tregs (CD25+,Foxp3+) expressing inhibitory markers PD-1 and LAG-3. Conclusions: H1A demonstrated superior antitumor activity compared to FDA-approved ICI which lays the ground for clinical testing of H1A as a next-generation immune checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.