Citations

Clear

191 citation(s) found for "Hartmann, L".

High-Dose Samarium-153 Ethylene Diamine Tetramethylene Phosphonate: Low Toxicity of Skeletal Irradiation in Patients With Osteosarcoma and Bone Metastases
Anderson, Peter M. , Wiseman, Gregory A., Arndt, Carola A.S., Hartmann, Lynn C. , Smithson, William A., Mullan, Brian P., Dispenzieri, Angela , Bruland, Øyvind Sverre

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 189-196

10.1200/jco.2002.20.1.189 | PMID 11773169 Get It

PURPOSE: Samarium-153 ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate (153Sm-EDTMP), a bone-seeking radiopharmaceutical, provides therapeutic irradiation to osteoblastic bone metastases. Because the dose-limiting toxicity of 153Sm-EDTMP is thrombocytopenia, a dose-escalation trial using peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) or marrow support was conducted to treat metastatic bone cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic osteosarcoma or skeletal metastases avid on bone scan were treated with 1, 3, 4.5, 6, 12, 19, or 30 mCi/kg of 153Sm-EDTMP. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with 153Sm-EDTMP. Transient symptoms of hypocalcemia were seen at 30 mCi/kg. Estimates of radioisotope bound to bone surfaces and marrow radiation dose were linear with injected amount of 153Sm-EDTMP. Cytopenias also occurred in all subjects and were dose-related. At day +13 after 153Sm-EDTMP, residual whole-body radioactivity was 1% to 65% of whole-body radioactivity considered safe for PBPC infusion, 3.6 mCi. After PBPC or marrow infusion on day +14 after 153Sm-EDTMP, recovery of hematopoiesis was problematic in two patients at the 30 mCi/kg dose infused with less than 2 × 106 CD34+/kg on day +14, but not in other patients. Reduction or elimination of opiates for pain was seen in all patients. Patients had no adverse changes in appetite or performance status. CONCLUSION: 153Sm-EDTMP with PBPC support can provide bone-specific therapeutic irradiation (estimates of 39 to 241 Gy). Hematologic toxicity at 30 mCi 153Sm-EDTMP/kg requires PBPC grafts with more than 2 × 106 CD34+/kg to overcome myeloablative effects of skeletal irradiation. Nonhematologic side effects are minimal.
Impact of reconstruction on satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Boughey, JC , Hartmann, Lynn C. , Johnson, Joan L., Jacobson, Stephen R., Frost, Marlene H., Hoskin, Tanya L. , Jacobson, S. R., Degnim, Amy C.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2017 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 27_suppl | Pages: 240-240

10.1200/jco.2011.29.27_suppl.240 Get It

240 Background: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is increasingly chosen by patients with breast cancer. Satisfaction after CPM is high. However, decreased satisfaction has been associated with reoperation after reconstruction. This study’s aim was to examine the adverse aspects patients attribute to reconstruction and the subsequent effect on psychosocial consequences and satisfaction with CPM. Methods: 487 unilateral breast cancer patients with a family history of breast cancer who underwent CPM between 1960 and 1993 were mailed a questionnaire evaluating QOL and satisfaction with CPM. Results: Of 269 respondents, 210 (78%) underwent reconstruction and 59 (22%) did not. Mean age at CPM was 46 and 50 years respectively (p=0.01). Mean follow-up was 20.2 years. Reconstruction was immediate in 96%, 98% with implants and 2% with tissue flap. Reconstruction was associated with lower satisfaction with CPM (p=0.03), but still only 7% (vs 2% in those without reconstruction) said they were dissatisfied. Most (83%) of those with reconstruction said they would choose reconstruction again while 7% were unsure and 10% said they would not. In those who did not undergo reconstruction, 18% said they would choose reconstruction if able to make the choice again while 5% were unsure and 77% said they still would not. 95 patients (45%) of those that underwent reconstruction required one or more reoperations for complications. Those with reoperation reported poorer responses for satisfaction with CPM (p=0.04), choice to have CPM again (p=0.008), and choice to have reconstruction again (p=0.004) when compared to patients with reconstruction and no reoperation. Those with and without reconstruction did not differ significantly with respect to femininity, sexual relationships or emotional stability, but those without reconstruction reported significantly poorer effects related to self esteem (p=0.04) and body appearance (p=0.002). Conclusions: In patients who undergo CPM, many years after surgery satisfaction with CPM is higher in those choosing not to have reconstruction than those with reconstruction although it was high in both groups. Reoperation is common after reconstruction and is associated with lower satisfaction.
Breast Cancer Risk and Progressive Histology in Serial Benign Biopsies
Visscher, Daniel W., Frank, Ryan D. , Carter, Jodi M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Heinzen, Ethan P. , Broderick, Brendan T., Denison, Lori A., Allers, Teresa M., Johnson, Joanne L., Frost, Marlene H., Hartmann, Lynn C. , Winham, Stacey J. , Radisky, Derek C. , Degnim, Amy C. , Vierkant, Robert A , Carter, Jodi

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | February 16, 2017 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djx035 | PMID 28376198 Get It

Bevacizumab May Differentially Improve Ovarian Cancer Outcome in Patients with Proliferative and Mesenchymal Molecular Subtypes
Kommoss, Stefan , Winterhoff, Boris , Oberg, Ann L. , Konecny, Gottfried E. , Riska, Shaun M., Fan, Jian-Bing, April, Craig, Shridhar, Viji , Kommoss, Friedrich, Hilpert, Felix , Mahner, Sven� , Baumann, Klaus , Schroeder, W., Burges, Alexander , Canzler, Ulrich , Chien, Jeremy , Embleton-Thirsk, Andrew , Parmar, Mahesh , Kaplan, Richard , Perren, Timothy , Hartmann, Lynn C. , Goode, Ellen L. , Dowdy, Sean C. , Pfisterer, Jacobus , Wang, Chen , Maurer, Matthew J. , Bois, Andreas du , Chien, Jeremey , Kaplan, Richard

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | February 3, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 3794-3801

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2196 | PMID 28159814 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Recent progress in understanding the molecular biology of epithelial ovarian cancer has not yet translated into individualized treatment for these women or improvements in their disease outcome. Gene expression has been utilized to identify distinct molecular subtypes, but there have been no reports investigating whether or not molecular subtyping is predictive of response to bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: DASL gene expression arrays were performed on FFPE tissue from patients enrolled on the ICON7 trial. Patients were stratified into four TCGA molecular subtypes. Associations between molecular subtype and the efficacy of randomly assigned therapy with bevacizumab were assessed. Results: Molecular subtypes were assigned as follows: 122 immunoreactive (34%), 96 proliferative (27%), 73 differentiated (20%), and 68 mesenchymal (19%). In univariate analysis patients with tumors of proliferative subtype obtained the greatest benefit from bevacizumab with a median PFS improvement of 10.1 months [HR, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.34–0.90), P = 0.016]. For the mesenchymal subtype, bevacizumab conferred a nonsignificant improvement in PFS of 8.2 months [HR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.44–1.40), P = 0.41]. Bevacizumab conferred modest improvements in PFS for patients with immunoreactive subtype (3.8 months; P = 0.08) or differentiated subtype (3.7 months; P = 0.61). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant PFS improvement in proliferative subtype patients only [HR, 0.45 (95% CI, 0.27–0.74), P = 0.0015]. Conclusions: Ovarian carcinoma molecular subtypes with the poorest survival (proliferative and mesenchymal) derive a comparably greater benefit from treatment that includes bevacizumab. Validation of our findings in an independent cohort could enable the use of bevacizumab for those patients most likely to benefit, thereby reducing side effects and healthcare cost. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3794–801. ©2017 AACR.
Factors Associated With Clostridium difficile Infection Relapse in Patients After Fecal Microbiota Transplant
Hartmann, Carlos, Allen, Sorcha , Griesbach, Cheryl L., Orenstein, Robert , Patron, Roberto L. , Kosiorek, Heidi

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | February 1, 2017 | Volume: 3 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1665 Get It

PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS
Southey, Melissa C. , Goldgar, David E, Winqvist, Robert , Pylkäs, Katri , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Heikkinen, Tuomas , Hopper, John L. , Dörk, Thilo , Claes, Kathleen , Teo, Zhi L. , Radice, Paolo , Catucci, Irene, Peterlongo, Paolo , Odefrey, Fabrice, Dowty, James G., Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Verhoef, Senno, Carpenter, Jane, Clarke, Christine L. , Scott, Rodney J. , Fasching, Peter A. , Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Peto, Julian , Fletcher, Olivia , Johnson, Nichola , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Tomlinson, Ian , Kerin, Michael J. , Miller, Nicola, Marmé, F., Burwinkel, Barbara , Guénel, Pascal , Truong, Thérèse , Sanchez, Marie, Bojesen, Stig E. , Nielsen, Sune F. , Flyger, Henrik, Benı́tez, Javier , Zamora, M. Pilar , Menéndez, Primitiva, Brenner, Hermann , Stegmaier, Christa, Brauch, Hiltrud , Brüning, Thomas , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Muranen, Taru , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl , Bogdanova, Natalia , Antonenkova, Natalia, Lindblom, Annika , Margolin, Sara , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Wauters, Els , Smeets, Dominiek, Beuselinck, Benoit , Floris, Giuseppe , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Vachon, Celine M. , McLean, Catriona , Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Kristensen, Vessela, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, Zheng, Wei , Hunter, David J. , Lindström, Sara, Hankinson, Susan E. , Kraft, Peter , Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Glendon, Gord, Mulligan, Anna Marie , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Grip, Mervi, Kauppila, Saila , Devilee, Peter , Tollenaar, Robert A.E.M., Seynaeve, Caroline, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael , Eccles, Diana M, Tapper, William , Gerty, Sue, Hooning, Maartje J. , Collée, J. Margriet, Tilanus‐Linthorst, Madeleine M.A., Li, Jingmei , Brand, Judith S. , Humphreys, Keith , Reed, Malcolm , Luccarini, Craig , Baynes, Caroline, Dunning, Alison M. , Hamann, Ute, Torres, Diana , Ulmer, Hans Ulrich, Rüdiger, Thomas , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Jaworska, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Slager, Susan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Ashworth, Alan , Orr, Nick , Jones, Michael E. , González‐Neira, Anna , Pita, Guillermo , Alonso, M. Rosario, Álvarez, Núria, Herrero, Daniel, Tessier, Daniel C., Vincent, Daniel , Bacot, François, Simard, Jacques , Dumont, Martine , Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind A. , Muir, Kenneth , Grönberg, Henrik , Schleutker, Johanna , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Weischer, Maren , Travis, Ruth C. , Neal, David E. , Donovan, Jenny , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Stanford, Janet L. , Blot, William J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Kelley, Joseph L., Maier, Christiane, Kibel, Adam S. , Butterbach, Katja, Kaneva, Radka , Batra, Jyotsna , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Hartmann, Arndt , Hein, Alexander , Ruebner, Matthias , Lambrechts, Diether , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Lambretchs, Sandrina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Nickels, Stefan , Eilber, Ursula, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Odunsi, Kunle , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Friel, Grace , Lurie, Galina, Killeen, Jeffrey , Goodman, Marc T. , Runnebaum, Ingo B., Hillemanns, Peter , Pelttari, Liisa M. , Edwards, Robert P., Ness, Roberta B., Moysich, Kirsten B., Heitz, Florian , Harter, Philipp , Kommoss, Stefan , Walsh, Christine , Lester, Jenny, Jensen, Allan , Høgdall, Estrid , Peissel, Bernard , Bernard, Loris, Goode, Ellen L. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Cunningham, Julie M. , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Kalli, Kimberly R., Liang, Dong , Lu, Karen H., Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Wu, Xifeng , Levine, Douglas A. , Bisogna, Maria, Iversen, Edwin S., Marks, Jeffrey R. , Akushevich, Lucy , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Stampfer, Meir J. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Olson, Sara H. , Salvesen, Helga B., Altena, Anne M. van , Aben, Katja K.H. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Bean, Yukie T., Kelemen, Linda E., Le, Nhu D. , Górski, Bohdan , Menkiszak, Janusz , Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte , Engelholm, Svend Aage, Dicks, Ed , Campbell, Ian , McNeish, Iain A. , Whittemore, Alice S. , Rothstein, Joseph H. , McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva , Cai, Hui , Teten, Rachel Threet, Sutphen, Rebecca , McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A., Phelan, Catherine M., Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Fenstermacher, David, Lin, Hui‐Yi , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Chen, Zhihua , Gayther, Simon A. , Ramus, Susan J. , Menon, Usha , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C., Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Plisiecka-Hałasa, Joanna, Moes-Sosnowska, Joanna , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Song, Honglin , Winship, Ingrid , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Tavtigian, Sean V. , Easton, Doug , Lu, Karen H. , Durocher, Francine , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Vachon, Celine, Pankratz, Vernon S, Thibodeau, Stephen, Goldgar, David E, Couch, Fergus J. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Foulkes, William D. , Dennis, Joe , Nevanlinna, Heli , Reis‐Filho, Jorge S. , Tsimiklis, Helen , Broeks, Annegien , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Yang, Rongxi , Ménégaux, F. , Sanchez, Marie, Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Ziogas, Argyrios , Clarke, Christina A. , Arndt, Volker , Mannermaa, Arto, Spurdle, Amanda B. , Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Rudolph, Anja , Seibold, Petra , Olson, Janet E. , Vachon, Celine M. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Hankinson, Susan E. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Czene, Kamila , Eriksson, Mikael , Eccles, Diana M, Rafiq, Sajjad , Hooning, Maartje J. , Martens, John W.M. , Hall, Per N , Cox, Angela , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Cybulski, Cezary , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Park, Jong, Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Renner, Stefan P. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Moysich, Kirsten B., Bois, Andreas du , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Bonanni, Bernardo , Fridley, Brooke L. , Larson, Melissa C. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Dao, Fanny , Berchuck, Andrew , Cramer, Daniel W. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Orlow, Irene , Bjørge, Line , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Cook, Linda S. , Gronwald, Jacek , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Paul, James , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Glasspool, Rosalind , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , McLaughlin, John R, Permuth, Jennifer B. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Berg, David Van Den , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Giles, Graham G. , Milne, Roger L. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Peterlongo, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J , Teixeira, Manuel R , Tworoger, Shelley S , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Radice, Paolo , Lissowska, Jolanta , Claes, Kathleen B M , Campbell, Ian G , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Menkiszak, Janusz , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Travis, Ruth C , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Dunning, Alison M , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Jones, Michael E , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Brenner, Hermann , Guénel, Pascal , Li, Jingmei , Muranen, Taru A , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Winship, Ingrid M , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hartikainen, Jaana M , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Kraft, Peter , Benitez, Javier , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Batra, Jyotsna , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Devilee, Peter , Lubinski, Jan , Fletcher, Olivia , Bojesen, Stig E , Goodman, Marc T , Truong, Therese , Mclean, Catriona , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Medical Genetics | September 5, 2016 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 800-811

10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103839 | PMID 27595995 Get It

Background The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. Methods We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. Results For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10−5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10−8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. Conclusions This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
Abstract LB-364: Natural history of age-related lobular involution and impact on breast cancer risk
Visscher, Daniel W., Frank, Ryan D. , Vachon, Celine M. , Denison, Lori A., Hartmann, Lynn C. , Frost, Marlene H., Radisky, Derek C. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Winham, Stacey J. , Stallings‐Mann, Melody , Hoskin, Tanya L. , Nassar, Aziza , Vachon, Celine M. , Degnim, Amy C.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 26, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 14_Supplement | Pages: LB-364-LB-364

10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-lb-364 Get It

Abstract Background: Age-related lobular involution (LI) is a physiological process in which the terminal duct lobular units of the breast regress as a woman ages. Analyses of breast biopsies from women with benign breast disease (BBD) have found that extent of LI is negatively associated with subsequent breast cancer development. Here we assess the natural course of LI within individual women, and the impact of progressive LI on breast cancer risk. Methods: The Mayo Clinic BBD cohort consists of 13,455 women with BBD from 1967-2001. The BBD cohort includes 1115 women who had multiple benign biopsies, 106 of whom had developed breast cancer. Within this multiple biopsy cohort, the progression of the LI process was examined by age at initial biopsy and time between biopsies. The relationship between LI progression and breast cancer risk was assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: Women who had multiple biopsies were younger age and had a slightly higher family history of breast cancer as compared with the overall BBD cohort. Extent of LI at subsequent biopsy was greater with increasing time between biopsies and for women age 55+ at initial biopsy. Among women with multiple biopsies, there was a significant association of higher breast cancer risk among those with involution stasis (lack of progression, HR 1.63) as compared with those with involution progression, p = 0.036. Conclusions: The multiple biopsy BBD cohort allows for a longitudinal study of the natural progression of LI. The majority of women in the multiple biopsy cohort showed progression of LI status between benign biopsies, and extent of progression was highest for women who were in the perimenopausal age range at initial biopsy. Progression of LI status between initial and subsequent biopsy was associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Citation Format: Derek Radisky, Daniel W. Visscher, Ryan Frank, Robert A. Vierkant, Stacey J. Winham, Melody L. Stallings-Mann, Tanya L. Hoskin, Aziza Nassar, Celine M. Vachon, Lori A. Denison, Lynn C. Hartmann, Marlene H. Frost, Amy C. Degnim. Natural history of age-related lobular involution and impact on breast cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-364.
Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography
Häberle, Lothar , Fasching, Peter A. , Brehm, Barbara, Heusinger, Katharina, Jud, Sebastian M. , Loehberg, Christian R. , Hack, Carolin C. , Preuß, Caroline, Lux, Michael P. , Hartmann, Arndt , Vachon, Celine M. , Meier-Meitinger, M., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Schulz‐Wendtland, Rüdiger, Vachon, Celine M. , Uder, Michael , Lux, Michael P

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Cancer | July 8, 2016 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1967-1974

10.1002/ijc.30261 | PMID 27389655 Get It

Although mammography screening programs do not include ultrasound examinations, some diagnostic units do provide women with both mammography and ultrasonography. This article is concerned with estimating the risk of a breast cancer patient diagnosed in a hospital‐based mammography unit having a tumor that is visible on ultrasound but not on mammography. A total of 1,399 women with invasive breast cancer from a hospital‐based diagnostic mammography unit were included in this retrospective study. For inclusion, mammograms from the time of the primary diagnosis had to be available for computer‐assisted assessment of percentage mammographic density (PMD), as well as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) assessment of mammography. In addition, ultrasound findings were available for the complete cohort as part of routine diagnostic procedures, regardless of any patient or imaging characteristics. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of mammography failure, defined as BIRADS assessment 1 or 2. The probability that the visibility of a tumor might be masked at diagnosis was estimated using a regression model with the identified predictors. Tumors were only visible on ultrasound in 107 cases (7.6%). PMD was the strongest predictor for mammography failure, but age, body mass index and previous breast surgery also influenced the risk, independently of the PMD. Risk probabilities ranged from 1% for a defined low‐risk group up to 40% for a high‐risk group. These findings might help identify women who should be offered ultrasound examinations in addition to mammography.
Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women
Dupont, William D. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Frank, Ryan D. , Frost, Marlene H., Winham, Stacey J. , Smith, Jeffrey R. , Page, David L., Vachon, Celine M. , Ghosh, Karthik, Denison, Lori A., Carter, Jodi M. , Hartmann, Lynn C. , Visscher, Daniel W., Radisky, Derek C. , Hoskin, Tanya L. , Degnim, Amy C. , Sanders, Melinda E. , Vachon, Celine M. , Hieken, Tina J. , Winham, Stacey J , Vierkant, Robert A , Carter, Jodi

Mayo Clinic

Cancer | June 29, 2016 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 2971-2978

10.1002/cncr.30153 | PMID 27352219 Get It

BACKGROUNDWomen with atypical hyperplasia (AH) on breast biopsy have a substantially increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Here the BC risk for the extent and subtype of AH is reported for 2 separate cohorts.METHODSAll samples containing AH were included from 2 cohorts of women with benign breast disease (Mayo Clinic and Nashville). Histology review quantified the number of foci of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). The BC risk was stratified for the number of AH foci within AH subtypes.RESULTSThe study included 708 Mayo AH subjects and 466 Nashville AH subjects. In the Mayo cohort, an increasing number of foci of AH was associated with a significant increase in the risk of BC both for ADH (relative risks of 2.61, 5.21, and 6.36 for 1, 2, and ≥3 foci, respectively; P for linear trend = .006) and for ALH (relative risks of 2.56, 3.50, and 6.79 for 1, 2, and ≥3 foci, respectively; P for linear trend = .001). In the Nashville cohort, the relative risks of BC for ADH were 2.70, 5.17, and 15.06 for 1, 2, and ≥3 foci, respectively (P for linear trend < .001); for ALH, the relative risks also increased but not significantly (2.61, 3.48, and 4.02, respectively; P = .148). When the Mayo and Nashville samples were combined, the risk increased significantly for 1, 2, and ≥3 foci: the relative risks were 2.65, 5.19, and 8.94, respectively, for ADH (P < .001) and 2.58, 3.49, and 4.97, respectively, for ALH (P = .001).CONCLUSIONSIn 2 independent cohort studies of benign breast disease, the extent of atypia stratified the long‐term BC risk for ADH and ALH. Cancer 2016;122:2971‐2978. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Breast cancer risk by the extent and type of atypical hyperplasia
Visscher, Daniel W., Frost, Marlene H., Vierkant, Robert A. , Frank, Ryan D. , Winham, Stacey J. , Vachon, Celine M. , Dupont, William D. , Hartmann, Lynn C. , Radisky, Derek C. , Degnim, Amy C. , Vachon, Celine M. , Winham, Stacey J , Vierkant, Robert A

Mayo Clinic

Cancer | June 28, 2016 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 3087-3088

10.1002/cncr.30151 | PMID 27352099 Get It