Citations

Abstract Ramucirumab (RAM) is a high affinity, humanized, monoclonal antibody that binds to the extra-cellular domain of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). RAM prevents the binding of VEGF ligands with VEGFR-2, the most potent receptor of the VEGF tumor angiogenesis pathway. RAM is FDA approved for adults with NSCLC, as well as for gastric and colorectal adenocarcinoma where higher exposure was associated with better outcomes. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the adult data, a minimum steady state concentration (Cmin ss) of ≥ 50 µg/ml of RAM was considered the target concentration for pediatrics. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) conducted a phase 1 study using a rolling six design to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and /or a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), evaluate toxicities and explore circulating angiogenic cells as a biomarker for RAM monotherapy in children with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. The starting dose of 8 mg/kg IV q2 weeks (DL1) was chosen based on the adult safety profile and effective Cmin ss. Since adult data suggested that lower body weight was associated with lower Cmin ss, dose escalation to 12 mg/kg IV q2 weeks (DL2) was planned provided the MTD was not exceeded in DL1 and up to 16 mg/kg IV q2 weeks (DL3) if Cmin ss was < 50 µg/ml in 1 of 6 subjects on DL2 without exceeding the MTD. An expansion cohort was planned at the lowest dose where at least 5 of 6 subjects exceeded the target in order to generate PK data in at least 6 additional subjects < 12 years of age. In the absence of an MTD, the RP2D was defined as the dose achieving Cmin ss ≥ 50 µg/ml on day 42 ± 2, after 3 doses of RAM administered IV every 2 weeks, in at least 10 of 12 subjects. Sixteen subjects (15 eligible; 7 females), median age of 14 years (3-21 yrs.) have been enrolled. Of the 7 subjects on DL1, two had insufficient PK sampling to establish Cmin ss, including 1 who experienced grade 2 proteinuria (DLT). In the remaining 5, the median (range) Cmin ss was 66 (40-136) µg/ml; 2/5 did not achieve the target of ≥ 50 µg/ml. Of the 8 subjects on DL2, two had insufficient PK sampling, including 1 with grade 2 proteinuria (DLT). In the remaining 6, the median (range) Cmin ss was 64 (51-101) µg/ml, all ≥ 50 µg/ml; thus 12mg/kg IV q2 weeks was identified for the expansion cohort. The most common RAM related non-DLT toxicities were grade 1/2 headache in 6 subjects, grade 1/2 elevation in aspartate aminotransferase in 7 subjects and grade 2/3 hypertension in 2 subjects. Due to low participation, circulating angiogenic cells could not be analyzed. This is the first COG study in which dose escalation and RP2D for a targeted agent incorporated a primary PK endpoint (Cmin ss) based upon efficacy data from adult studies and paves the way for similar study design for future phase-1 studies. Citation Format: Kamnesh Pradhan, Stacey L. Berg, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G. Minard, James Croop, Joel M. Reid, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J. Weigel. A dose escalation and toxicity study using pre-determined target concentration of Ramucirumab, a novel anti-angiogenic agent in children with recurrent / refractory solid tumors: A report from the children's oncology group phase I/ pilot consortium (ADVL1416) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT054.

Abstract Purpose: In phase I testing, alisertib tablets with irinotecan and temozolomide showed significant antitumor activity in patients with neuroblastoma. This study sought to confirm activity of this regimen; evaluate an alisertib oral solution; and evaluate biomarkers of clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-stage phase II trial of alisertib tablets (60 mg/m2/dose × 7 days), irinotecan (50 mg/m2/dose i.v. × 5 days), and temozolomide (100 mg/m2/dose orally × 5 days) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The primary endpoint was best objective response. A separate cohort was treated with alisertib at 45 mg/m2 using oral solution instead of tablets. Exploratory analyses sought to identify predictors of toxicity, response, and progression-free survival (PFS) using pooled data from phase I, phase II, and oral solution cohorts. Results: Twenty and 12 eligible patients were treated in the phase II and oral solution cohorts, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. In phase II, partial responses were observed in 19 evaluable patients (21%). The estimated PFS at 1 year was 34%. In the oral solution cohort, 3 patients (25%) had first cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Alisertib oral solution at 45 mg/m2 had significantly higher median Cmax and exposure compared with tablets at 60 mg/m2. Higher alisertib trough concentration was associated with first cycle DLT, whereas MYCN amplification was associated with inferior PFS. Conclusions: This combination shows antitumor activity, particularly in patients with MYCN nonamplified tumors. Data on an alisertib oral solution expand the population able to be treated with this agent.

Abstract Background Eribulin mesylate is a novel anticancer agent that inhibits microtubule growth, without effects on shortening, and promotes nonproductive tubulin aggregate formation. We performed a phase 1 trial to determine the dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated or recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of eribulin in children with refractory or recurrent solid (excluding central nervous system) tumors. Methods Eribulin was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 in 21‐day cycles. Three dose levels (1.1, 1.4, and 1.8 mg/m 2 /dose) were evaluated using the rolling six design with additional patients enrolled into a PK expansion cohort at the MTD. PK samples were obtained following the day 1, cycle 1 dose. Results Twenty‐three patients, ages 3–17 (median 14) years were enrolled; 20 were evaluable for toxicity. DLTs occurred in 0/6 and 1/6 subjects at the 1.1 and 1.4 mg/m 2 /dose, respectively. One subject at the 1.4 mg/m 2 /dose had grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 fatigue. At the 1.8 mg/m 2 /dose, 2/5 subjects experienced dose‐limiting (grade 4) neutropenia. Grade 3/4 non‐DLTs included lymphopenia and hypokalemia, while low‐grade toxicities included anorexia and nausea. No episodes of grade > 2 corrected QT interval prolongation or peripheral neuropathy were reported. Eribulin pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable; the median elimination half‐life was 39.6 (range 24.2–96.4) hr. A partial response was observed in one patient (Ewing sarcoma). Conclusions Eribulin was well tolerated in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors with neutropenia identified as the primary DLT. The RP2D of eribulin is 1.4 mg/m 2 /dose on days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle.

Abstract Background We conducted a phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary activity of cabozantinib in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. Methods Patients received cabozantinib tablets on a continuous dosing schedule in a rolling‐six escalating phase 1 trial design. PK and PD studies were performed. Results Forty‐one patients, median (range) age 13 (4–18) years, received cabozantinib to achieve a weekly cumulative dose equivalent to 30 (n = 6), 40 (n = 23). or 55 (n = 12) mg/m 2 /day. At 40 mg/m 2 /d, dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, mucositis, and elevated alanine aminotransferase, lipase, and bilirubin. At 55 mg/m 2 /d, hypertension, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were DLTs. Frequent non‐DLTs included diarrhea, hypothyroidism, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, elevated hepatic transaminases, and proteinuria. In subsequent cycles, DLTs occurred at all dose levels. Across all dose levels, the steady‐state exposure and peak cabozantinib concentrations were similar. Four patients experienced a confirmed partial response: medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; n = 2), Wilms tumor, and clear cell sarcoma. Stable disease (>6 cycles) was seen in seven patients (MTC [n = 2], Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, paraganglioma, and ependymoma). Conclusions A protocol‐defined MTD was not reached; DLTs and dose reductions for toxicity occurred in the first and subsequent cycles at all dose levels. Based on the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and responses, the recommended dose of cabozantinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors is 40 mg/m 2 /day. A phase 2 study of cabozantinib is being conducted.

AbstractBackgroundOntuxizumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the cell‐surface glycoprotein endosialin (tumor endothelial marker‐1[TEM‐1]/CD248) found on activated mesenchymal cells and certain tumors. Ontuxizumab binding to endosialin may interfere with platelet‐derived growth factor signaling, prevent tumor stroma organization, and prevent new vessel formation.MethodsOntuxizumab was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28‐day cycle at three dose levels (4, 8, and 12 mg/kg). Further dose escalation to 16 mg/kg was planned if the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached and the ontuxizumab systemic clearance was ≥30% higher in children compared to adults. Following determination of the MTD/recommended phase 2 dose, an additional cohort of six patients (<12 years) was enrolled for further pharmacokinetics (PK) evaluation.ResultsTwenty‐seven eligible patients (17 male, median age 15 years, range 3–21 years) were enrolled. Twenty‐two patients (neuroblastoma [5], Ewing sarcoma [4], rhabdomyosarcoma [4], and other tumors [9]) were fully evaluable for toxicity. Five patients did not complete cycle 1 due to tumor progression. Two of 10 patients experienced dose‐limiting toxicity of bacteremia (n = 1) and hyponatremia (n = 1) at 12 mg/kg. Grade ≤2 fever or infusion‐related reactions occurred in 10 patients. Clearance was dose dependent and within 30% of adult value at 12 mg/kg.ConclusionOntuxizumab administered weekly at 12 mg/kg appears to be well tolerated in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. The PK of ontuxizumab does not appear to be significantly different in children compared to adults.

Abstract Background: Inhibition of the WEE1 kinase by AZD1775 potentiates replicative stress induced by oncogenes or chemotherapy, and demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of pediatric cancer. A pediatric phase I dose escalation study of AZD1775 in combination with irinotecan was completed within the COG DVL consortium. Methods: Patients age 1-21 years with relapsed/refractory solid or CNS tumors were eligible. Both agents were administered orally once daily on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle with a step-wise inter-patient dose escalation of both agents. AZD1775 dose levels (DL) were 50 mg/m2 (DL1), 65 mg/m2 (DL 2 and 3), 85 mg/m2 (DL4) and 110 mg/m2 (DL5). Irinotecan, 70 mg/m2 day (DL 1-2), or 90 mg/m2/day (DL3-5), was administered with cefixime for diarrheal prophylaxis. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Results: Thirty-one eligible patients, median age 14 years (range 5-20) were enrolled; 29 (93%) received prior chemotherapy (median 3 regimens) and 25 (81%) received prior radiation therapy. Sixteen patients had a primary CNS malignancy: malignant glioma (9), ependymoma (4), medulloblastoma (2) and CNS Ewings sarcoma (1). Fifteen patients had extracranial solid tumors: soft tissue sarcoma (6), neuroblastoma (2), carcinoma (4), osteosarcoma (2) and Wilms’ Tumor (1). The most common toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). Two patients experienced dose limiting toxicity, grade 3 diarrhea and dehydration at DL5 (AZD1775 110 mg/m2 and irinotecan 90 mg/m2). Conclusion: This is the first pediatric clinical trial of AZD1775 in combination with chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose in children and adolescents with solid tumors was AZD1775 85 mg/m2/day in combination with irinotecan 90 mg/m2/day for five days every 21 days. Accrual is ongoing for a pediatric PK expansion, PD analysis and Phase 2 expansion in patients with neuroblastoma or medulloblastoma / CNS PNET. Clinical trial information: NCT02095132 Citation Format: Kristina A. Cole, Joel M. Reid, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G. Minard, John M. Maris, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J. Weigel. Pediatric phase I trial of the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 and irinotecan in patients with refractory solid and CNS malignancies; A Children’s Oncology Group Study (ADVL1312) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT144. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT144

Abstract Purpose: Trebananib is a first-in-class antiangiogenic peptibody (peptide–Fc fusion protein) that inhibits Angiopoietin 1 and 2. A pediatric phase 1 trial was performed to define trebananib dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics (PK). Experimental Design: Trebananib was administered by weekly infusion. Three dose levels (10, 15, or 30 mg/kg/dose) were evaluated using a rolling-six design. Part 2 evaluated a cohort of subjects with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers was performed during the first 4 weeks. Response was evaluated after 8 weeks. Correlative studies included angiogenic protein expression and DCE-MRI. Results: Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled (31 evaluable for toxicity) with median age 12 years (range, 2 to 21). Two of 19 evaluable non-CNS subjects developed DLT at the 30 mg/kg dose level, including venous thrombosis and pleural effusion. In the CNS cohort, 3/12 subjects developed DLT, including decreased platelet count, transient ischemic attack, and cerebral edema with headache and hydrocephalus. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included lymphopenia (n = 4), anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, vomiting, and hypertension (n = 1 each). Response included stable disease in 7 subjects, no partial or complete responses. Two subjects continued study treatment with prolonged stable disease for 18 cycles (neuroblastoma) and 26 cycles (anaplastic astrocytoma). Pharmacokinetics appeared linear over 3 dose levels. Correlative studies demonstrated increased PlGF and sVCAM-1, but no change in endoglin or perfusion by DCE-MRI. Conclusions: Trebananib was well tolerated in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid or CNS tumors. RP2D is 30 mg/kg. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6062–9. ©2017 AACR.

AbstractBackgroundThe c‐Met receptor tyrosine kinase is dysregulated in many pediatric cancers. Tivantinib is an oral small molecule that inhibits the c‐Met receptor tyrosine kinase. A phase 1 and pharmacokinetic (PK) trial evaluating tivantinib was conducted in children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors.MethodsOral tivantinib capsules were administered twice daily with food, continuously in 28‐day cycles. Dose levels 170, 200, and 240 mg/m2/dose were evaluated using a rolling‐six design (Part A). In Part B, subjects received tivantinib powder sprinkled on food at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from Part A. PK, CYP2C19 genotyping, and baseline tumor tissue c‐Met expression were analyzed.ResultsThirty‐six patients were enrolled: 20 in Part A, 6 in a PK expansion cohort, and 10 in Part B. Fifteen patients had primary central nervous system tumors and 21 had solid tumors. In Part A, there were no dose‐limiting toxicities. One grade 4 intracranial hemorrhage occurred in a patient with a progressive brain tumor in the expanded PK cohort (240 mg/m2). PK analysis showed marked interpatient variability (20‐fold) in the Cmax and AUC0‐8h across all dose levels. Sprinkling tivantinib powder over food did not alter exposure. Membranous and total c‐Met expression was moderate (2), low (4), or not detected (26). Two patients had stable disease as the best response.ConclusionsThe RP2D of tivantinib given with food in children with refractory solid tumors is 240 mg/m2/dose. PK of tivantinib in children demonstrated high variability. Objective responses were not observed in this phase 1 trial.

503 Background: We evaluated temporal patterns in the utilization of systemic therapy among patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) from a large national cancer registry and assessed patient characteristics associated with receipt of systemic treatment. Methods: We reviewed the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV RCC who underwent CN between 1998-2010. Systemic therapy was defined as any treatment with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy (including targeted agents). We evaluated the association between clinicopathologic features and receipt of systemic therapy using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, and assessed the interaction of treatment with time, stratified as immunotherapy (1998-2004) versus targeted-therapy (2005-2010) eras. Results: Of 22,409 patients with mRCC undergoing CN, 8,830 (39%) received systemic therapy. Receipt of systemic therapy increased from 32% in 1998 to 49% in 2010 (p<0.001), largely due to increased utilization of chemotherapy (13.9% vs. 46.7%; p<0.001). Following adjustment, increasing patient age (51-60 years: OR 0.82 [CI 0.73-0.92]; 61-70 years: OR 0.67 [CI 0.59-0.76]; ≥71 years: OR 0.36 [CI 0.31-0.43]), as well as coverage with Medicaid (OR 0.61 [CI 0.5-0.74]), Medicare (OR 0.70 [CI 0.62-0.79]), or no insurance (OR 0.75 [CI 0.63-0.91]) were associated with decreased utilization of systemic therapy. Although use of systemic therapy in the elderly (≥71 years) and in patients with Medicare/Medicaid remained lower throughout the study period, each of these cohorts was significantly more likely to receive systemic treatment in the targeted versus immunotherapy era (all p values <0.05). Conclusions: Utilization of systemic therapy among patients undergoing CN has increased over time, coinciding with the introduction of targeted therapies. Nevertheless, still less than half of such patients receive systemic treatment. While the etiology for lack of treatment is likely multifactorial, the potential health policy implications of continued disparities in care warrant further investigation.