Citations

Clear

90 citation(s) found for "Bansal, Vikas".

117: Obesity Is a Risk Factor for Increased COVID-19 Severity: A Systemic Review and Meta-Regression
Bansal, Vikas , Singh, Romil , Bhurwal, Abhishek , Rathore, Sawai Singh , Kashyap, Rahul

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 43-43

10.1097/01.ccm.0000726356.00193.e7 Get It

61: Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 Illness in Children: Analysis of the VIRUS: COVID-19 Registry
Kumar, Vishakha K. , Boman, Karen , Retford, Lynn, Bhalala, Utpal , Tripathi, Sandeep , Gist, Katja M. , Chiotos, Kathleen , Dapul, Heda , Gharpure, Varsha , Bansal, Vikas , Kashyap, Rahul

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 32-32

10.1097/01.ccm.0000726272.88301.cd Get It

Risk Factors for and Outcomes Associated With Peri-Intubation Hypoxemia: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Smischney, Nathan J. , Brauer, Ernesto, Morrow, Lee E. , Ofoma, Uchenna R. , Kaufman, David A. , Sen, Ayan , Venkata, Chakradhar , Morris, Peter E. , Bansal, Vikas , Ofoma, Uchenna R , Bansal, Vikas , Smischney, Nathan J , Khanna, Ashish K.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | October 1, 2020 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1466-1474

10.1177/0885066620962445 | PMID 33000661 Get It

Background: Little is known about hypoxemia surrounding endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Thus, we sought to identify risk factors associated with peri-intubation hypoxemia and its effects’ on the critically ill. Methods: Data from a multicenter, prospective, cohort study enrolling 1,033 critically ill adults who underwent endotracheal intubation across 16 medical/surgical ICUs in the United States from July 2015-January 2017 were used to identify risk factors associated with peri-intubation hypoxemia and its effects on patient outcomes. We defined hypoxemia as any pulse oximetry ≤ 88% during and up to 30 minutes following endotracheal intubation. Results: In the full analysis (n = 1,033), 123 (11.9%) patients experienced the primary outcome. Five risk factors independently associated with our outcome were identified on multiple logistic regression: cardiac related reason for endotracheal intubation (OR 1.67, [95% CI 1.04, 2.69]); pre-intubation noninvasive ventilation (OR 1.66, [95% CI 1.09, 2.54]); emergency intubation (OR 1.65, [95% CI 1.06, 2.55]); moderate-severe difficult bag-mask ventilation (OR 2.68, [95% CI 1.72, 4.19]); and crystalloid administration within the preceding 24 hours (OR 1.24, [95% CI 1.07, 1.45]; per liter up to 4 liters). Higher baseline S p O 2 was found to be protective (OR 0.93, [95% CI 0.91, 0.96]; per percent up to 97%). Consistent results were seen in a separate analysis on only stable patients (n = 921, 93 [10.1%]) (those without baseline hypoxemia ≤ 88%). Peri-intubation hypoxemia was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 2.40, [95% CI 1.33, 4.31]; stable patients: OR 2.67, [95% CI 1.38, 5.17]) but not ICU length of stay (point estimate 0.9 days, [95% CI −1.0, 2.8 days]; stable patients: point estimate 1.5 days, [95% CI −0.4, 3.4 days]) after adjusting for age, body mass index, illness severity, airway related reason for intubation (i.e., acute respiratory failure), and baseline S P O 2 . Conclusions: Patients with pre-existing noninvasive ventilation and volume loading who were intubated emergently in the setting of hemodynamic compromise with bag-mask ventilation described as moderate-severe were at increased risk for peri-intubation hypoxemia. Higher baseline oxygenation was found to be protective against peri-intubation hypoxemia. Peri-intubation hypoxemia was associated with in-hospital mortality but not ICU length of stay. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02508948 and Registered Report Identifier: RR2-10.2196/11101.
Guiding Principles for the Conduct of Observational Critical Care Research for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemics and Beyond: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study Registry
Kashyap, Rahul , Kumar, Vishakha K. , Boman, Karen , Bolesta, Scott , Bansal, Vikas , Bansal, Vikas , Kashyap, Rahul , Walkey, Allan J. , Sheldrick, Radley Christopher , Zampieri, Fernando Godinho , Harhay, Michael Oscar , Gajic, Ognjen

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | September 15, 2020 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 11 | Pages: e1038-e1044

10.1097/ccm.0000000000004572 | PMID 32932348 Get It

Objectives: Use of observational data to inform the response and care of patients during a pandemic faces unique challenges. Design: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study COVID 2019 Registry Core data and research methodology team convened over virtual meetings throughout March to June 2020 to determine best practice goals for development of a pandemic disease registry to support rapid data collection and analysis. Setting: International, multi-center registry of hospitalized patients. Patients: None. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Large-scale observational data collection requires: 1) quality assurance and harmonization across many sites; 2) a transparent process for selecting from among many potential research questions; 3) the use of best practices in design of descriptive, predictive, and inferential studies; (4) innovative approaches to characterize random error in the setting of constantly updated data; (5) rapid peer-review and reporting; and (6) transitions from a focus on discovery to implementation. Herein, we describe the guiding principles to best practices and suggestions for innovations to study design and reporting within the coronavirus disease 2019 Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study pandemic registry. Conclusions: Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study coronavirus disease 2019 registry sought to develop and implement prespecified best practices combined with grassroots efforts from clinical sites worldwide in order to develop clinically useful knowledge in response to a pandemic.
The Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): An International Registry of Coronavirus 2019-Related Critical Illness
Kumar, Vishakha K. , Bolesta, Scott , Bansal, Vikas , Kashyap, Rahul , Bansal, Vikas , Kashyap, Rahul , Walkey, Allan J. , Harhay, Michael Oscar , Gajic, Ognjen

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Explorations | April 27, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e0113

10.1097/cce.0000000000000113 | PMID 32426754 Get It

Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has disproportionally strained intensive care services worldwide. Large areas of uncertainly regarding epidemiology, physiology, practice patterns, and resource demands for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 require rapid collection and dissemination of data. We describe the conception and implementation of an intensive care database rapidly developed and designed to meet data analytic needs in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic—the multicenter, international Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study. Design: Prospective cohort study and disease registry. Setting: Multinational cohort of ICUs. Patients: Critically ill patients with a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Within 2 weeks of conception of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study, study leadership was convened, registry case report forms were designed, electronic data entry set up, and more than 250 centers had submitted the protocol for institutional review board approval, with more than 100 cases entered. Conclusions: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study provides an example of a rapidly deployed, international, pandemic registry that seeks to provide near real-time analytics and information regarding intensive care treatments and outcomes for patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
Postoperative Pulmonary Edema Conundrum: A Case of Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema
Guru, Pramod , Agarwal, Anjali , Pimentel, Mario, Guru, Pramod K , McLaughlin, Diane C, McLaughlin, Diane , Bansal, Vikas

Mayo Clinic

Case Reports in Critical Care | September 23, 2018 | Volume: 2018 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-3

10.1155/2018/1584134 | PMID 30345119 Get It

Postobstructive pulmonary edema (POPE) also known as negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) is an underdiagnosed entity in clinical practice and can lead to life-threatening hypoxemia. A 64-year-old male patient’s perioperative course was complicated by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, after extubation following general anesthesia, following the excision of the right vocal cord papilloma. His chest X-ray showed features of pulmonary edema, EKG showed dynamic ST-T changes in the lateral leads, and echocardiography showed evidence of regional motion abnormalities. His coronaries were normal on the immediate angiogram. He was managed with lung protective mechanical ventilation strategy, diuretics, and fluid restriction. His respiratory status improved, and trachea was extubated after 10 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The case illustrates the various differentials of immediate postoperative flash pulmonary edema and ensuing appropriate management strategy.
Randomized Clinical Trial of a Combination of an Inhaled Corticosteroid and Beta Agonist in Patients at Risk of Developing the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome*
Festić, Emir , Carr, Gordon, Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Hinds, Richard , Banner‐Goodspeed, Valerie , Bansal, Vikas , Asuni, Adijat T., Talmor, Daniel , Rajagopalan, Govindarajan, Frank, Ryan D. , Matthay, Michael A. , Levitt, Joseph E. , Asuni, Adijat, Gajic, Ognjen , Bansal, Vikas

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | February 25, 2017 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 798-805

10.1097/ccm.0000000000002284 | PMID 28240689 Get It

Objectives: Effective pharmacologic treatments directly targeting lung injury in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome are lacking. Early treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and beta agonists may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing lung inflammation and enhancing alveolar fluid clearance. Design: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01783821). The primary outcome was longitudinal change in oxygen saturation divided by the F io 2 (S/F) through day 5. We also analyzed categorical change in S/F by greater than 20%. Other outcomes included need for mechanical ventilation and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Setting: Five academic centers in the United States. Patients: Adult patients admitted through the emergency department at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Interventions: Aerosolized budesonide/formoterol versus placebo bid for up to 5 days. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled from September 3, 2013, to June 9, 2015. Median time from presentation to first study drug was less than 9 hours. More patients in the control group had shock at enrollment (14 vs 3 patients). The longitudinal increase in S/F was greater in the treatment group ( p = 0.02) and independent of shock ( p = 0.04). Categorical change in S/F improved ( p = 0.01) but not after adjustment for shock ( p = 0.15). More patients in the placebo group developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (7 vs 0) and required mechanical ventilation (53% vs 21%). Conclusions: Early treatment with inhaled budesonide/formoterol in patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome is feasible and improved oxygenation as assessed by S/F. These results support further study to test the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids and beta agonists for prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Association of Inhaled Corticosteroids with Incident Pneumonia and Mortality in COPD Patients; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Festić, Emir , Bansal, Vikas , Gupta, Ena, Scanlon, Paul D., Bansal, Vikas

Mayo Clinic

COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | December 9, 2015 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 312-326

10.3109/15412555.2015.1081162 | PMID 26645797 Get It

SpO 2 /FiO 2 Ratio on Hospital Admission Is an Indicator of Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Development Among Patients at Risk
Festić, Emir , Bansal, Vikas , Kor, Daryl J. , (USCIITG–LIPS), US Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention Study Investigators, Bajwa, Ednan K. , Douglas, Ivor S. , Frendl, György , Gajic, Ognjen , (USCIITG–LIPS), US Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention Study Investigators, Bansal, Vikas

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | December 20, 2013 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 209-216

10.1177/0885066613516411 | PMID 24362445 Get It

Purpose: Oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SpO 2 /FiO 2 ) has been validated as a surrogate marker for partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio among mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The validity of SpO 2 /FiO 2 measurements in predicting ARDS has not been studied. Recently, a Lung Injury Prediction Score (LIPS) has been developed to help identify patients at risk of developing ARDS. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the LIPS-1 cohort. A multivariate logistic regression included all established variables for LIPS, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2, age, and comorbid conditions that could affect SpO 2 /FiO 2 . The primary outcome was development of ARDS in the hospital. The secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, hospital day of ARDS development, and hospital day of death. Results: Of the 5584 patients, we evaluated all 4646 with recorded SpO 2 /FiO 2 values. Median SpO 2 /FiO 2 in those who did and did not develop ARDS was 254 (100, 438) and 452 (329, 467), respectively. There was a significant association between SpO 2 /FiO 2 and ARDS ( P ≤ .001). The SpO 2 /FiO 2 was found to be an independent predictor of ARDS in a “dose-dependent” manner; for SpO 2 /FiO 2 < 100—odds ratios (OR) 2.49 (1.69-3.64, P < .001), for SpO 2 /FiO 2 100 < 200—OR 1.75 (1.16-2.58, P = .007), and for SpO 2 /FiO 2 200 < 300—OR 1.62 (1.06-2.42, P = .025). The discriminatory characteristics of the multivariable model and SpO 2 /FiO 2 as a single variable demonstrated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and AUC of 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: The SpO 2 /FiO 2 , measured within the first 6 hours after hospital admission, is an independent indicator of ARDS development among patients at risk.